Here is a typical caption for the images of the devastated Palestinians:

Mourners react during the funeral of Palestinian militant Mohammed Dola in the town of Beit Lahiya, northern Gaza Strip, Thursday, June 12, 2008. Israeli troops killed Dola and another Palestinian militant in a clash in the northern Gaza Strip on Thursday, a new outbreak of violence that came as a key Israeli envoy headed to Egypt in a bid to wrap up a cease-fire with the Hamas militant group.

I have removed all the captions from the pictures that follow. Some of them are half-a-page long, in attempt to justify the murder of Arabs by Jews. Suffice it say that the Ashkenazi Jews in Palestine seem to have an insatiable thirst for Arab land. I think Germnan blood would even be better if only they could manage to vanquuish Germany and hold its people under seige. The problem that I have with the captions is that their logic seems to be very twisted to fit the demands of International Jewry.

  1. The Palestinian dead is always described as 'Militnat' while the Ashkenazi terrorist on someone else's land are just angels, who just happen to carry killing machines, and who just happen to enjoy pumping bullets into gentile heads.
  2. It says the Jews killed the Palestinian in a clash. you wouild always see the word, 'clash' , where the truth is that the Jews are using bulldozers and armoured vehicles during a killing spree when they go on a blood lust to the devastated Palestinian homes.
  3. 'a new outbreak of violence'. The European Ashkenazi Jews had been terrorizing, murdering, bulldozing the Arabs for over decades, there is nothing new.
  4. A Jew envoy is headed towards an Arab land -Egypt - to 'wrap up' cease-fire, but the Jews feel the need to hurry up and spill some more Arab land, just in case there is a cease-fire?
  5. The 'Hamas Militant Group': The word 'militant' is there to depict a violent and vicious group whereas the European Ashkenazi Jews who are the real terrorists are described by a biblical hocus-pocus of 'Israeli'. How do the European shkenazi Jews get the chutzpah to call themselves 'Israelis'? Isn't it like the Chinese calling themselves 'Eskimos'?

Aug 10, 1903 - Theodor Herzl

In the course of our talk when I explained to him the need for Russian intervention with the sultan, because Palestine was the only place that attracted us, I added some remarks on the difficulties of being admitted into other countries, even England and America. If emigration were to be subventioned with gov't funds-as bruited about in St. Petersburg these days, and indeed published in the "Novoye Vremya" - it would be tanamount to putting an export premium on Jews; and the reluctance to receive them, which I knew of first hand in England, would be strengthened. A people would certainly be considered 'undesirable' for whose departure their own government is willing to pay a bonus.

Here are the pictures from today: Thursday, June 12, 2008

Fair Use Notice: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in the ZioMania website is archived here under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in reviewing the included information for personal use, non-profit research and educational purposes only.
Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml