Lord: Protect me from Michael Neumann's wreckage
which is his twisted, convoluted logic.
Note: I have no clue whether a one or two state solution would help the Palestinians and the Arabs. What they have in their midst is a horrible European Ashkenazi enemy for life, an enemy like no other in its viciousness. The only solution, which would be wishful thinking would be for the European Jews to return to their home, back to Europe safe and secure.
"I would rather walk among rattlesnakes whose constant rattle warns me where they are". Malcolm-X
"Like the game of a shrewd peddler, who tries hard to gain his customers' trust by a display of false honesty." Benjamin Merhav
The above two quotes do apply to Michael Neumann, in my opinion, becasue he is a pretender, a peddler of false information under the guise of a 'guru' on the Palestinian and European Ashkenazi Jewry's conflict, his sole aim in life is the welfare of his own tribe, the Khazars who originated from Europe, now scattered arond the globe.
March 10, 2008
The One-State Illusion: More is Less
The Debate over Israel and Palestine
By Michael Neumann
What follow are excerts, the link to the entire article is at the bottom of the page
Neumann: These arguments establish the obvious. Of course the two-state solution is unjust. It cements Zionist usurpation of Palestinian land. It lets the perpetrators of this usurpation go scott-free, without so much as compensation for their victims.
My Response: Here is he -the shrewd peddler- getting his magic wares upfront to lure the unsuspecting. Interesting that he used the words 'the obvious', because that is what they do to lure in the innocent and the uninformed. They display as their wares what is obvious, thereby hoping to gain the trust if the ill-informed. I have observed a pattern in Neumann's writings whereby he attempts to clear the way right at the beginning of his article, thereby attempting to disguise himself as someone with genuine concern for the Palestinians, but for the astute observer his main goal in life is the welfare of his European Ashkenazi tribe.
Neumann: Worst of all, it perpetuates a state based on racial supremacy. Israel's notion of Jewishness, the determinant of who should hold sovereignty, is ultimately a biological. It is based on kinship. In practice, this kinship does not, as in other countries, depend on tracing family lines back to residence in the sovereign state, but simply on closeness to anyone considered 'Jewish' in the racial sense of the term.
My Response: What race would you say this Khazar on the left picture is? It is not hard to tell even with his darkened face, is it, Neumann? What race? Oh Lord! please rescue me in the future from Neumann's writings coming across my radar. what is he blabbering about? Biological? But Neumann would rather fall on the sword rather than disclose what that 'biological group' is that is colonizing Palestine. There is hardly an Ashkenazi Jew who would come forward and tell us what 'race' they belong to. It has a name: Khazar. Does Neumann want his readers to believe that the Ashkenazi Jews, Oriental Jews and black Jews all share the same biologic i.e. racial identities. What does 'anyone considered 'Jewish' in the racial sense of other term' mean? What term? Lest we forget, the Ashkenazi Jew brought the Yemeni Jews as cheap laborers and even stole their children to be given to childless Ashkenazi Jews who stampeded to Palestine.
Neumann: It is based on kinship. In practice, this kinship does not, as in other countries, depend on tracing family lines back to residence in the sovereign state, but simply on closeness to anyone considered 'Jewish' in the racial sense of the term.
My Response: What 'kinship', Neumann? Are the Ethiopian Jews your Kinship? Your explanation of 'kinship' would give one a headache, so convoluted, so illogical. and of course, you, the Ashkenazi Jew cannot trace 'family lines' on the land where you just arrived to colonize! can you imagine the English tracing their ancestry to India where they had colonized. Why is it so hard to disclose your own 'race' 'ethnicity', 'kinship', Neumann? It has a name: Khazar! There is no shame in being born to whatever race, but the shame is in hiding it.
Neumann: I'm not sure anyone in recent memory, including Hamas, has proposed it. A just solution would essentially repair the injustice done by Zionism. This would require far more than a democratic 'binational' state in Palestine. It would require that the Jews who came as Zionists to Palestine leave, and with them their descendants. (This is not ethnic cleansing; the original Jewish population and their descendants would remain.)
My Response: Neumann: you are desperately attempting to make the Arab Jews also known as 'Oriental Jews' the same people as the European Ashkenazi Jews also known as Khazars. Are the Chinese Muslims the same ethnic people as the Nigerian Muslims? What is in your heart is the belief that the European Ashkenazi Jew is the 'Israelite' of old testament. Look in the mirror, what do you see? You should see a European staring back at you! Yes, it woiuld be 'ethnic cleansing' since the Ashkenazi Jews are a separate ethnic group form the original Jews of the Middle East, who are indeed - ethnically speaking - Arabs. But the better word for the Arabs of cleansing themselves of the foreign entity would be called 'de-colonization' and not ethnic cleansing. Yes! that would indeed be splendid. But the European Khazars had been planning the colonization of Palestine for over a century, they did make sure to get the guarantees of the 'great powers' as Herzl referred to them. that was then, and this is now where International Jewry as acquired immense powers and fortunes, which was the result of their theft of Palestine. Neumann: The original Jews that you refer to are Arabs, they spoke Arabic, they referred to their god as 'Allah'. They are the same people as the rest of the Arabs except for religion. The Ashkenazi Jew is European, pure and simple. Note: Notice how Neumann refers to Europe's Ashkenazi Jewry as 'those who came as Zionists', so petrified to call them for who they are which is a tribal Ashkenazi group. In Neumann's convuluted and disorented thinking, I do believe that he believes his lineage to be from the Arab region, despite the obvious.
Neumann: There would have to be criminal proceedings against thousands of Israelis who have committed human rights violations, and convictions would have to involve further compensatory payments. Israeli firms that profited from and/or supported the occupation would be subject to yet further punitive and compensatory damages.
My Response: Neumann: It is not 'Israelis' but International Jewry in its totality that is calpable in the crimes upon humanity upon the Palestinians. You need to stop dreaming Neumann or better yet deceiving. Who is going to be sitting at the Judge's chair to grant 'punitive and compensatory damages', other than a member of the International Jewry. You know it and i know it, why waste your ink making no sense whatsoever?
Neumann: Does resolving an ethnic conflict somehow ensure economic and social justice for all?
My Response: What 'ethnic' groups are in the conflict Neumann? Can you name them? and would you name the European Ashkenazi Jew as being Khazaric in ethnicity?
Neumann: And a two-state solution will indeed leave Palestinians with a sovereign state, because that's what a two-state solution means. It doesn't mean one state and another non-state.
My Response: i guess the math here does not seem too complex, does it? two state = 2, one state =1, no?
Neumann: But that's just why the idea that Israel would concede a single state is laughable.
My Response: yes, because who is going to make it, right. There is no power on earth that could make them do anything unless it is forced upon them, such as Hizbullah's devastating blow on this predatory group.
Neumann: One-staters apparently believe that Israel will give up its reason for existence and at the same time expose itself not to the risk but to the certainty of being 'swamped by Arabs'.
My Response: the Ashkenazi Jew is 'swamped' by black Africans in South African where over a hundred thousand Ashkenazi Euroean Jews have made it their home. The Ashkenazi Jews in America don't seem to be stampeding away because they are 'swamped' by the non-jews. six millions jews live in American where they are 'swamped' by the gentile populations of all colors and ethnicities. we don't see these Jews wanting to stampede elsewhere to avoid being swamped. The Jewish state benefits from its whoredom for Empire, and no whoredom=no billions of dollars from the American tax payer.
Neumann: For example, most Palestinian property in Israel is now occupied by Jews, who firmly believe they have a right to their homes.
My Response:
There is a reason why they may want to believe that becasue their god tells them to be thieves and murderers. Moses said to Israel:
Deuteronomy 6:10 The Lord promised your ancestors Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob that he would give you this land. Now he will take you there and give you large towns, with good buildings that you didn't build, 11and houses full of good things that you didn't put there. The Lord will give you wells that you didn't have to dig, and vineyards and olive orchards that you didn't have to plant.
Neumann: That dispossessed Palestinians have a right of return is beyond obvious. It is equally obvious that we should all love one another and gather all the poor and oppressed into our bosom. What is less obvious is what should be done about it.
My Response: I don't know what to say to the above, except kind of smile in disbelief that a professor writes such convoluted statements.
Neumann: It is said that the two-state solution renounces the right of return. This confuses the solution itself with the words that may accompany it. Indeed any agreement establishing a Palestinian state might involve the Palestinian representatives asserting such a renunciation. Both morals and historical realities put any such assertions in proper perspective.
My Response: The Palestinians representatives would renounce such a right of return? Who would in their right mind give them the right to give away a right on behalf of the owners of the right to return to their homes? the Palestinian refugees? As far as your statement: "Both morals and historical realities put any such assertions in proper perspective"; i have no clue what that means.
Neumann: For now, Israel will not honor a Palestinian right of return; to 'demand' it is the emptiest of gestures. That right will be honored only if the Palestinians become powerful enough to enforce it.
My Response: such nonsense being mouthed by a professor! The Palestinians' wings have been clipped along with the majority of Arabs. The devastation of Iraq was towards that goal, or didn't the learnt Professor not realize it? Read The Zionist Plan for the Middle East by Oded Yinon.
Neumann: In the name of realism, one-state ideologues abandon the goal of Palestinian sovereignty to pursue an illusion: that the Israels will give all of Palestine to the Palestinians, yet inhabit all of Palestine as well.
My Response: it looks like an impossible feat for Europe's Jews to give up all of Palestine and concurrently inhabit all of Palestine ... my head is beginning to spin the way it does when it comes across your shattered logic, Professor Neumann. .