Why I think that Michael Neumann is
a fox in sheep's clothing
I have a huge problem with Jews who attempt to pass for the well-meaning Jews when their entire motivation is to confuse, to misinform and thereby attempt to diminish the damage to their Jewish state. They always begin by pretending to blame their Jewish state, that usually comes right at the beginning of their articles, and then they go right to business of disinformation. Neumann appears to me to be both deceptive and at the same time a confused man. Most of his statements are utterly ridiculous. He is however an emotional Zionist Jew. There are always tell-tell signs. In Neumann's case, for example from his December 30, 2003 article titled:"critism of Israel is not Anti-semitism', right from the title of the Article, the deception begins.
Neumann: that makes anti-Semites of Nelson Mandela, Bishop Tutu, not to mention thousands of Jews.
My Response: My response: There! You see, Mandela and Tutu are genuinely concerned individuals about the way the Ashkenazi Jews treat those whom they regards as insects, the Palestinians. But Neumann threw in a falsehood when he said 'thousands of Jews' are also concerned about the bestiality of their Jewish state. The number of Jews who truly care when it comes to the question of Palestine might be a hundred, push it up a thousand, but no way are they 'in the thousands'.
Neumann: '87% of Jews said that they have a responsibility to work on behalf of the poor. '
My Response: Are there not poor Palestinians in Palestine whom the Ashkenazi Jews avoid as the plague? But he is attempting to convince the West about the generous soul of the Jew.
Neumann: My childhood, in largely Jewish suburbs of New York and Boston, was full of Israel bond drives and calls to support Israel.
My Response: There! This is an emotional Jew with an attachment to that stolen piece of Arab land. He can't even help it if he tried considering how he was raised with the notion that Palestine belongs to the 'Israelites' and with the firm belief that the European Ashkenazi Jew is the 'Israelite'!
Neumann: The best way to reserve "anti-Semitism" as a term of condemnation is to define it as hatred of Jews, not for what they do but for what they are. It is to hate them just because they belong to a certain ethnic group. Foxman is right to suggest that you can be an anti-Semite without expressing any racist sentiments
My Response: But you see, Neumann will never mention the name of those who 'belong to a certain ethnic group'. He won't spell for us the name of the 'ethnic group'. What do we call hatreds for other people not for what they do but for what they are? What do we call Jewish hatred for others? You do notice how he brings Foxman to the witness table to help him out, don't you? By the way, he blames Foxman for not taking action against certain groups on behalf of Jews. Yes, he does, that is, Neumann does. So Neumann + Foxman = Zionist? No?
Neumann: But the touchiest question is not what anti-Semitism is, or whether it has increased. It is whether Jews are in significant danger. Isn't that what matters? To put it personally: Anti-Semitism may be important to me, but is it important, period? The answer cannot be dictated by "Jewish sensibilities." My background certainly predisposes me to regard anti-Semitic incidents with alarm.
My Response: There! There! This is a very emotional Jew with a huge amount of Jewish baggage. There have been wars, millions of gentiles who perished during wars. But only the Jew carries the banner of 'the holocaust' around wherever her travels.
Neumann: But we Jews live not in the past but in a brutal present that forces us to reassess our moral priorities.
My Response: I get nervous when Jews say, 'we Jews', it is such a dead giveaway of a very emotional Jew.
I am done with Neumann! The next time I come across his article, I won't walk, I will start running away!