Google is at it again!
Censoring pictures of Anti-Zionist activists.
Today's story about Google censorship is only one of thousands. The owner of Google got there first in the lucrative search engine business. But in a span of a few years this company has attained so much prominence that it has become so arrogant as to censor websites at will and without cause. But the Google owners are not stupid. When Jews signed half a million signatures on a petition to remove a neo-nazi site by the name of "Jewwatch' from the Google search engine, Google would not budge. They knew better, because the petition had already drawn much publicity which in effect skyrocketed the ranking of 'Jewwatch' than ever before. Why did Jews sign half a million petitions to silence the voice of a neo-nazi? When anyone searched Google for the word 'Jew', the first one that came up was 'Jewwatch'. When they did not accomplish their mission via petition, then the Jewish groups designed a different censorship tool. They managed to create a link on Wikipedia for the word 'Jew' (I now call Wikipedia, 'stupidia',); Wikipedia is now almost worthless, as Jewish groups have corrupted it.
Now when one searches for the word 'Jew'onn Google, the most beautifully dressed-up entry of "Jew' on Wikipedia is #1 and Judaism entry on Wikipedia #2. Jewwatch was pushed down to #3. You must understand that a lot of maneuvering is taking place by Jewish groups to have managed to push Jewwatch down to #3 and to achieve the stunning ranking results of #1 and #2 from Wikipedia to emerge on a Google searche for 'Jew'. But Google also reached an agreement with the ADL's that there would be a siren that would sound when one searchs for the word 'Jew' on Google. It is not really a siren, but a text a message that oddly enough states: 'Offensive search results'. That message appears on Google only and only when one searches for the word 'Jew' and for no other word on this planet and beyond. If I were a Jew, I would not like it. The word 'Jew' is not offensive nor is the word 'Muslim' or 'Christian'. But that is what the ADL's wanted and that is what they got as a compromise from Google. If that is a compromise, I wonder what a discord looks like
Why did Google refuse to censor Jewwatch? Because the news of the half million petition signed by Jews to remove Jewwatch had made it into news headlines, and they did not want to smear their already smeared name. But they had no problem reaching out and unplugging Uruknet from their search engines.
Here is the story today about Google reaching out and shoving under the rug items Jewish groups do not approve of. After the story - directly below, I provide you with many links about Google's underhandedness.
Reported on Saudi newspaper AL-Watan, [1] Israel pressured Google to remove all the images of Egyptian footballer Abu Trika showing his T-shirt with the text "Sympathize with Gaza" [also confirmed by Al-Arabiya [2] or you can do the search by yourself].
Egyptian "Islamic Group" [Al Jamaa Al Islamiya] issued a rare statement, applauded Abu Trika action in an article called "Abu Trika…playing football or playing with fire" [3] on their website, [4] saying:
I cried from joy because the young generation feels the scale of the tragedy experienced by their countries….
I cried and cried and cried because saying "Sympathize with Gaza" become a crime requires punishment…..
Abu Trika, I salute you, you are an example for the youth…
Algerian newspaper El Khabar [5] interviewed Abu Trika [English]
I think it's normal, I've expressed a feeling; a natural feeling of any Arab…and if you ask any Arab about what is happening to Palestinians and Gaza population he would tell you the same…