The following article was very annoying to me like the rest written by the International Jews. Their articles are riddled with so many deliberate and often silly lies, but the gullible goyim had been trained not to detect their lies. That is indeed the most unfortunate aspect when it comes to Judaic and Goyim relations. Jewry's power is in direct proportion with the level of ignorance of the goyim. The higher the ignorance of the natives where these International people dwell, the more the acquisition of wealth and political power by the International Jews. The American public holds the medal of ignorance when it comes to 'Judaic Affairs'. And please do not challenge my expression of 'International Jews' since they do refer to themselves as people in the 'Diaspora', even after having lived in a certain part of the globe for generations. They are supposed to be at home only on the soil of Arab Palestine. What a group of delusional people are the European Khazars to consider themselves to be in the 'Diaspora' unless they are on Arab soil! As long as they claim to be in the Diaspora, they can never be expected to be loyal citizens of the host countries where these people dwell; and the land where these people dwell can only be considered 'host countries' as long as the Khazars keep claiming to be in the 'Diaspora' unless they are dwelling on Arab Palestine.
This article is like so many written by Khazars and I attempt to shed light on their lies and deceptions. My statements are in borders.
Is anti-Zionism hate?
Opinion
Los Angeles Times
Yes. It is more dangerous than Anti-Semitism , threatening lives and peace in the Middle East.
By Judea Pearl
Oh, how precious! The Ashkenazi writer's name is both 'Judea' and 'pearl'!
March 15, 2009
In January, at a symposium at UCLA (choreographed by the Center for Near East Studies), four longtime Israel bashers were invited to analyze the human rights conditions in Gaza, and used the stage to attack the legitimacy of Zionism and its vision of a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians.
Who the hell are [Israel bashers]? Do we have other sorts of bashers, such as German bashers, Arab bashers, and Islam bashers? The fact of the matter remains that the Arab world is saddled with Europe's Jewry that Europe dispatched towards the Arabs to solve its age-old problem with its own European Jewry. Nobody wants to be the dumping ground for anyone's unwanted group of people and it is never lost on the Arabs that that was exactly what took place with the stampede of European Jewry to Palestine.
They criminalized Israel's existence, distorted its motives and maligned its character, its birth, even its conception. At one point, the excited audience reportedly chanted "Zionism is Nazism" and worse.
Jewish leaders condemned this hate-fest as a dangerous invitation to Anti-Semitic hysteria, and pointed to the chilling effect it had on UCLA students and faculty on a campus known for its open and civil atmosphere. The organizers, some of them Jewish, took refuge in "academic freedom" and the argument that anti-Zionism is not Anti-Semitism .
A survey done by none other than Ashkenazi Jewry confirmed that 94% of Jewry were elated to see Jewry's rain of hell fall on the people of Gaza. So let me guess: Those are meek innocent non-Zionist Jews, right? Wake up! 99.99999999999999% of world Jewry is Zionist, which simply means THIEVES WHO FEEL ENTITLED TO A PIECE OF ARAB LAND BECAUE THEY ARE JEWS!
I fully support this mantra, not because it exonerates anti-Zionists from charges of Anti-Semitism but because the distinction helps us focus attention on the discriminatory, immoral and more dangerous character of anti-Zionism.
Anti-Zionism rejects the very notion that Jews are a nation -- a collective bonded by a common history -- and, accordingly, denies Jews the right to self-determination in their historical birthplace. It seeks the dismantling of the Jewish nation-state: Israel.
I do have a major problem with the International Bandits' claims to Palestine to be their 'Historical birthplace'. I honestly do not know the meaning of 'historical birthplace'. What is that suppposed to mean? Nigeria certainly is not the 'historical birthplace' of the Swede and Sweden is not the 'historical birthplace' of Nigerians. But European Jewry has latched on to this non-sense because it is hoped to elevate them to the ranks of the 'Chosen'. But what about the mirror? These Jews have zero lineage to Palestine, none! Take a look!
Explain to me what purpose do these European Jews have on Arab soil?
Anti-Zionism earns its discriminatory character by denying the Jewish people what it grants to other historically bonded collectives (e.g. French, Spanish, Palestinians), namely, the right to nationhood, self-determination and legitimate coexistence with other indigenous claimants.
Anti-Semitism rejects Jews as equal members of the human race; anti-Zionism rejects Israel as an equal member in the family of nations.
The so-called 'holocaust' has to do with the Khazars of Europe and the European people, i.e. intra-European Affairs. It did not affect Iranian Jews nor Yemeni Jews nor Iraqi Jews. The European Ashkenazi do have an obligation to get to the bottom of what caused the conflict so that it could be prevented from happening again.
Who gave permission for European Ashkenazi Jewry to stampede to Palestine? Who opened the gates of Palestine to European foreigners to have free access to colonize a land of people of color? How is European Jewry entitled to Palestine more than an Eskimo or a Zulu? The answer had to do with the abundance of Ashkenazi (Khazars) Jewry's money and also the European people's earnest wish to see the European Jews removed from their vicinity. Don't give me this nonsense about the repugnant malignant tumor of the Jews being 'a member of family of nations'. If European Jewry wanted a state, that state belong in Europe. People of color owe European Jewry NOHTING! Ashkenazi Jewry had zero right to erect their vile repugnant tumor in the heart of people of color, i.e. in the heart of the Arab world! These European people belong on European soil and not on the soil of people of color.
Are Jews a nation? Some philosophers would argue Jews are a nation first and religion second. Indeed, the narrative of Exodus and the vision of the impending journey to the land of Canaan were etched in the minds of the Jewish people before they received the Torah at Mt. Sinai. But, philosophy aside, the unshaken conviction in their eventual repatriation to the birthplace of their history has been the engine behind Jewish endurance and hopes throughout their turbulent journey that started with the Roman expulsion in AD 70.
Explain to me the 'shared history' between these two Jews?
More important, shared history, not religion, is today the primary uniting force behind the secular, multiethnic society of Israel. The majority of its members do not practice religious laws and do not believe in divine supervision or the afterlife. The same applies to American Jewry, which is likewise largely secular. Identification with a common historical ethos, culminating in the reestablishment of the state of Israel, is the central bond of Jewish collectivity in America.
There are of course Jews who are non-Zionists and even anti-Zionists. The ultra-Orthodox cult of Neturei Karta and the leftist cult of Noam Chomsky are notable examples. The former rejects any earthly attempt to interfere with God's messianic plan, while the latter abhors all forms of nationalism, especially successful ones.
There are also Jews who find it difficult to defend their identity against the growing viciousness of anti-Israel propaganda, and eventually hide, disown or denounce their historical roots in favor of social acceptance and other expediencies.
But these are marginal minorities at best; the vital tissues of Jewish identity today feed on Jewish history and its natural derivatives -- the state of Israel, its struggle for survival, its cultural and scientific achievements and its relentless drive for peace.
Given this understanding of Jewish nationhood, anti-Zionism is in many ways more dangerous than Anti-Semitism .
First, anti-Zionism targets the most vulnerable part of the Jewish people, namely, the Jewish population of Israel, whose physical safety and personal dignity depend crucially on maintaining Israel's sovereignty. Put bluntly, the anti-Zionist plan to do away with Israel condemns 5 1/2 million human beings, mostly refugees or children of refugees, to eternal defenselessness in a region where genocidal designs are not uncommon.
Secondly, modern society has developed antibodies against Anti-Semitism but not against anti-Zionism. Today, Anti-Semitic stereotypes evoke revulsion in most people of conscience, while anti-Zionist rhetoric has become a mark of academic sophistication and social acceptance in certain extreme yet vocal circles of U.S. academia and media elite. Anti-Zionism disguises itself in the cloak of political debate, exempt from sensitivities and rules of civility that govern inter-religious discourse, to attack the most cherished symbol of Jewish identity.
Finally, anti-Zionist rhetoric is a stab in the back to the Israeli peace camp, which overwhelmingly stands for a two-state solution. It also gives credence to enemies of coexistence who claim that the eventual elimination of Israel is the hidden agenda of every Palestinian.
Palestiniansneed not have a hidden agenda on their very own soil. The one that came with the hidden agenda was the Khazaric European Jew who wanted to rid the land of its inhabitants. Why is Palestinian resistance to European colonization of their land perceived to be any different than the Kenyans against the British, the Algerians against the French. European Ashkenazi Jewry has no reason to be on stolen land except via the reason of brute force.
It is anti-Zionism, then, not Anti-Semitism that poses a more dangerous threat to lives, historical justice and the prospects of peace in the Middle East.
Judea Pearl is a professor at UCLA and the president of the Daniel Pearl Foundation.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/sunday/commentary/la-oe-pearl15-2009mar15,0,2362924.story
Ashkenazi Jews need to erect huge mirrors in their household and keep staring back at that Khazaric look staring back at them and begin to embrace, to love and to accept that Khazar. As long as Khazars continue to wanna be 'Chosen', it would always lead to discord because it is based on wishful thinking. Given the choices of being 'chosen' vs. 'non-chosen', most people of course would prefer that they are the chosen. But Khazars were thousands of miles away from the biblical holy lands and they are a different breed of people.