Goldberg writes:
Iran's Two Ticking Clocks

27 Dec 2009 01:33 pm

Is this the beginning of the end? I hope so: "The clock began to tick for Ayatollah Khameni's fall from today. Killing people on Ashura shows how far Mr. Khamenei is willing to go to suppress the protests. People are comparing him more with Yazid because they consider him responsible for the order to use violence against people." So said Fatemeh Haghighatjoo, a former member of Iran's Parliament, to the Times. I hope this is right, for any number of reasons; mainly because a regime that murders its own children has no right to exist. But I hope it's correct because of the other ticking clock -- the Iranian nuclear clock. It would be best for everyone if the people of Iran could triumph over their oppressors before the regime goes definitively nuclear. The peace of the world may depend on this.

I have often wondered if Goldberg really buys the notion that we the gentiles are all goyim, which in Jewish lingo means cattle. He writes: "a regime that murders its own children has no right to exist". How about a muderous state that kills other people's children like his own terror state that goes by 'israel'. Does it have the right to exist? According to Goldberg, the peace of the world depends only on Goldberg's state having exclusive right to nuclear powers. Funny, no? This man is like no other "chosen" in his relentless and endless fight on behalf of his "chosen" and he had been hammering away at Iran from time immemorial.

[Note: the picture is of a Palesnian mother and her children who were gunned down in cold blood by Goldberg's cousins in Palestine]