Last update - 18:42 07/07/2009

American Jewish soldier killed in insurgent attack in Afghanistan

By Haaretz Service and The Associated Press

Tags: Jewish World, Israel News

An American Jewish soldier was killed during an attack on his base in eastern Afghanistan Saturday, the U.S. Army has confirmed.

Pfc. Aaron Fairbairn, 20, of Aberdeen, Washington, was killed when an insurgent drove an explosives-filled truck into Combat Outpost Zerok and detonated it.

Another soldier - Pfc. Justin Casillas - was also killed in the attack, and 12 other soldiers were injured.

Fairbairn and Casillas were both Alaska-based paratroopers.

Fairbairn's death comes just weeks after a British Jewish soldier was killed in Afghanistan in June. Lieutenant Paul Mervis, 27, was killed when a roadside bomb exploded near him while leading his platoon on foot patrol.

Two Jewish U.S. intelligence officers, Shawn Pine and Lieutenant Roslyn Schultte, were also killed recently in Kabul. Schulte, 25, was the first female graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy to be killed in action in Afghanistan or Iraq.

Australian Jewish soldier Gregory Sher, 30, was killed in January when his patrol base in southern Afghanistan came under rocket attack from Taliban insurgents.

Last update - 20:14 07/07/2009

Michael Jackson's fans descend on L.A. to say goodbye

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News, Michael Jackson

Michael Jackson fans came from near and far Tuesday to say last goodbyes to their pop music hero, some traveling from across the U.S. and Europe for his public memorial in Los Angeles.

Near the downtown Staples Center before where his service was to be held, vendors sold Jackson memorabilia such as T-shirts, collages, buttons and bouquets of snapdragons and dahlias.

Jackson's golden casket has arrived at the Staples Center mid-morning on Tuesday. A hearse carried the flower-draped casket in a motorcade from a private service earlier Tuesday at a cemetery hall in the Hollywood Hills.

"His music will live forever. That's why I'm here today. It's like closure. I'm a person who believes in miracles, and I'm witnessing one today," said Jenee Huitt of Los Angeles, referring to her gold wristband allowing her to be among the lucky fans to attend the memorial service.

Huitt, an etiquette teacher, said she met the Jackson 5 as a girl in the early 1970s.

"Diana Ross brought the Jacksons in to this event, introduced them and said, 'They're going to be stars,'" Huitt said.

Fans drove or flew in from around the United States and as far away as England - some just to be outside the event. Some wore trademark Jackson clothing, including sequined white socks and red leather jackets echoing those the singer wore in his music videos.

The scene was reminiscent of one of Hollywood's many awards shows, which draw vendors and celebrity gawkers. Police helicopters flew overhead, and officers patrolled on foot and bicycle. The crowds were orderly.

Fans carried signs such as "Michael Jackson Lives". One turned himself into a walking music video, strapping a flat-screen TV to his back that played Jackson numbers.

Claudia Hernandez, 29, said she loved Jackson's music as a girl growing up in Mexico. Now a day-care teaching assistant in Los Angeles, Hernandez said she has cried watching TV coverage of his death.

"I'm trying to hold in my emotions," said Hernandez, wearing a wristband to allow her admittance to the service and holding a framed photograph of Jackson. "I know right now he's teaching the angels to dance."

Half a dozen protesters stood among fans, condemning Jackson over his

child-molestation charges, holding signs that read, Jacko in Hell, You're

Going to Hell and Mourn for Your Sins.

But Jackson's devotees far outnumbered his critics. Mishelle Van, 37, drove with her cousin from Hesperia, California, arriving in Los Angeles at 1 A.M. They spent the early morning hours with other Jackson fans.

"They're touching us and saying, can you bring the love in for us?" said Van, who was among those with a wristband for the service.

Melvin Price, 43, flew in from England on Saturday, even before he knew he had won a ticket to the Jackson memorial.

"I wanted to pay my last respects to Michael Jackson," said Price, dressed in a red leather jacket. "I've been a fan of his for 35 years."

Beverly J. Ellis, 46, said she drove from Holly Springs, Arkansas, just to be there even though she could not get in. She planned to go to Jackson's Neverland ranch later in the day to take pictures and see if she could get a rock or other souvenir to take home.

"I'm just a groupie. I'm an old groupie now," said Ellis, who held an American flag and a sign with a photocopied image of Jackson. "I'm a die-hard, true fan."

Vernay Lewis, 32, flew in from Wilmington, Delaware, spent all Monday night on the streets outside Staples Center, wrapped in a blanket to stay warm overnight.

Lewis said she did not care that she traveled cross-country even though she did not have a wristband to attend the memorial. She just wanted to be near the singer and his fans.

"I think it was his kind heart, his gentleness, his childlike ways, said Lewis, who signed a wall for fans to offer farewell sentiments to Jackson. For me, he was the whole package as far as what an entertainer and what a person was supposed to be. I just think he was wonderful.

Last update - 17:59 07/07/2009

Kosher food at baseball games gets three strikes

By Jeff Weinstein, The Forward

Tags: jewish world

So A-Rod finally breaks his slump with a long drive into the seats, the fans leap to their feet - and wet tuna plops into your lap.

Even if there weren't the usual spat over who makes and packs the snacks for a game, a tuna sandwich or PB&J just doesn't cut it. At ballparks, salty, fatty, bad-for-you hot dogs and hamburgers aren't merely tolerated, they're required. So for observant baseball mavens, being kosher can be unfair.

The kosher baseball problem in New York was first addressed in 1998, when, under pressure from New York City Public Advocate Mark Green and Rabbi Marc Schneier, Shea and then Yankee Stadium opened small glatt kosher stands. Now that both Big Apple teams are playing in brand-new, tax-supported homes that include elaborate fast food and restaurant choices, kosher sports enthusiasts had new reason to hope that their needs wouldn't be ignored.

They weren't. New Jersey-based Kosher Sports set up four identical glatt kosher stands at the $800 million Citi Field - called "Debits Field" by older wags - and Ouri's Superior Kosher Caterers in Brooklyn did the same in the $1.5 billion Yankee palace. The season's on, and the 4 and 7 subway lines are jammed. So how's the food?

In general, Citi Field thrashes Yankee Stadium in the variety and success of its nonkosher food-stand offerings: authentic tacos, Blue Smoke barbecue, a branch of Danny Meyer's wildly successful Shake Shack. It's no different for kosher food, I've discovered, and the reason is simple: Kosher Sports at Citi Field cooks dogs and sausages on a small grill in front of you, while Ouri's somewhat wider selection is prepared off the premises, packaged, sealed and reheated. No matter how excellent the original recipes or ingredients, no fast food can survive such treatment with taste, texture or essential ballpark "snap" intact.

On a recent visit, the lines at both sets of carts are long right before the games begin, but they move steadily. Except for an occasional yarmulke, I couldn't tell from the customers' assorted ages and races that these stands are special - though once, near an Ouri's, a minyan formed during the seventh-inning stretch.

At times, the always-friendly staffers struggled to get orders straight and make change. This is especially true at Ouri's, because none of those carts have a cash register, just a lock-box. Also, all Yankee food stands except Ouri's list calories after each item. Confidence was not exactly inspired, and after a companion and I bought and sampled almost all of Ouri's food on offer = each stand was out of something, and even early on, none of the four had burgers - I am terribly sorry to say my confidence vanished.

The glatt frank ($5.50), mildly spiced and somewhat sweet, was lukewarm, watery and limp; the squishy bun didn't help. Too bad, because a hot dog is baseball's bottom line.

Barely heated chicken nuggets ($8) had long ago lost juiciness or savor and were hard to chew. Strips of rubbery beef layered on a flaccid hero with sweet pickle ($12) was almost impossible to negotiate, and the reddish mass of shredded shawarma ($12) on a similar roll had the feel of a perverse Pablum.

My Yankee advice? Try the toothsome knish, but make sure it?s hot, and then the respectable falafel plus tahini and greens ($8), if the pita?s edges haven't gone dry. There's also a fruit stand - yes, in Yankee Stadium - near Gate 4 for dessert.

Fewer kosher selections are offered at Citi Field, but they feel closer in merit and price to the temptations around them. I've always wished the fine Abeles & Heymann dog ($4.75) had a bit more garlic and spurt, but it went down well because the roll tastes like real bread; two pieces of quickly grilled pastrami placed on top to make a "pastrami dog" ($6.50) improve the bare frank enormously.

A plump A&H beef "Italian" sausage on an even better roll ($7.25) is topped with sautéed tricolor bell peppers. But bring your own mustard or ketchup; no packets are provided, and I was pointed to common condiment stations whose kosher qualifications are doubtful.

Many ticket buyers are grateful to have kosher options, yet I wish the "pleasure factor" were higher both in the food that's served and in patrons? expectations. Dietary restrictions need not be culinary limitations, even in a ballpark, and there's no reason for kosher cooking anywhere not to shine.

Writer and editor Jeff Weinstein, for more than 15 years the restaurant critic for New York?s Village Voice, covers cultural and gay issues at www.artsjournal.com/outthere.

Last update - 20:39 06/07/2009

German Jews urge boycott of Formula One over chief's Hitler remarks

By Reuters

Tags: Jewish World, Formula One

Germany's Central Council of Jews on Monday urged motor racing teams to boycott Formula One after its chief, Bernie Ecclestone, praised Adolf Hitler's ability to "get things done".

Ecclestone, 78, was quoted in the British newspaper the Times on Saturday as saying he preferred totalitarian regimes to democracies and as singling out Hitler for pushing things through effectively.

"No team should work with him any more - a boycott would be more than appropriate," said the Council's vice president, Dieter Graumann.

Graumann said Ecclestone was "either empty headed or unbelievably malicious - probably both" and said he risked driving the whole of Formula One into a wall.

Germany's Grand Prix takes place at the Nuerburgring this weekend.

"Just one week before the start of the Nuerburgring, the teams should make very clear that whoever praises Hitler, shows he is not serious," Graumann said in an interview with Handelsblatt newspaper. The Council confirmed the quotes.

Ecclestone was quoted in The Times as saying: "In a lot of ways, terrible to say this I suppose, but apart from the fact that Hitler got taken away and persuaded to do things that I have no idea whether he wanted to do or not, he was in the way that he could command a lot of people, able to get things done."

German media also reported that Guenther Oettinger, state premier of the southern state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, had cancelled a planned meeting with Ecclestone on the sidelines of the Nuerburgring race because of his comments about Hitler.

Ecclestone tried to clarify his comments in top-selling Bild newspaper on Monday.

"It is all a big misunderstanding. In the interview we talked about structures and that it's sometimes good if something can be handled stringently and decided without limits," he said.

Asked by Bild why he had praised Hitler, Ecclestone said: "I did not mention Hitler as a positive example but I just pointed out that before his terrible crimes, he succeeded in fighting unemployment and the economic crisis."

Asked if he wanted to apologize, he said: "I would never dream of hurting the feelings of a community. A lot of people among my closest friends are Jews. Everyone that knows me, knows that I would never attack minorities."

This is what is wrong with a Jewish state

By Bradley Burston

Tags: Israel News, Bradley Burston

Click here for more articles by Bradley Burston

JAFFA - Why was this Fourth of July different from all other independence days?

What the world has seen over the past 12 months is a re-definition of patriotism. It derives from a central lesson of the Obama campaign, the Obama victory, and, so far, of the Obama presidency: In true love of country, there is no room for hatred.

Perhaps this is what is so crushing, so profoundly depressing, about the people who have of late taken to redefining patriotism in Israel.

There is no little irony in the circumstance that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu chose Palestinian recognition of Israel as "the national state of the Jewish People" as a central tool in efforts to stave off peace talks and deflect demands for a settlement freeze.

Never, thanks to his government, has the concept of a Jewish state looked worse.

The undercurrent of racism in this year's election campaign was a clear warning. Overtly anti-Israeli Arab legislation and bills aimed at curbing Arab freedom of expression have soiled the concept of a Jewish state to a nadir that Israel's worst, most energetic enemies have never managed to approach.

The outpouring of hatred has since become an equal-opportunity sewer. Radical settlers and immigrants from the former Soviet Union have voiced unabashed, despicable racist attitudes toward a black president of the United States.

Inevitably, fellow Jews in Israel have become targets of the hatred as well. In Jerusalem, Jews who presume to be among the most devout of all adherents to Judaism, think nothing of attacking fellow Jews on the Sabbath with cinder blocks and glass bottles, all in protest over the opening of a parking lot.

Rabbis in the West Bank give Israel's enemies new ammunition week to week, by condoning killings of Palestinians.

And, in a reference to Israeli Arabs, ultra-Orthodox Housing Minister Ariel Atias this month chose the Bar Association, of all venues, to declare that he saw it as "a national duty to prevent the spread of a population that, to say the least, does not love the state of Israel." He went on to explicitly argue for segregation, not only between Jews and Arabs, but between ultra-Orthodox and secular Jews.

Whether all this is done in the service of patriotism or in the service of Jewish tradition, its effect is disservice to both.

Jewish tradition offers its adherents the widest range of choices, from an almost superhuman level of compassion and lovingkindness, to Old Testament admonishments to genocide.

It's up to the individual Jew to choose. And up to the Jewish state.

It's up to a Jewish state to find a way to oppose a Hamas government without resorting to blocking shipments of humanitarian supplies to more than a million innocent people, or arresting peace activists , among them a former U.S. congresswoman and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate trying to bring those supplies to Gaza.

It's up to a Jewish state to recognize when a policy of collective punishment is self-defeating as well as immoral, and to call a halt.

It's up to this Jewish state to redefine patriotism.

Love of country is, at heart, trust in a nation's people, faith in their better nature, esteem for their best hopes, understanding for the magnificence and the distinctiveness and the huge, infinitely shaded cultural palette of their simple humanity. Hatred has no place in this equation.

The choices here are never easy. The kinds of sacrifices which will be necessary to forge a peace with the Palestinians will come at the direct expense of many of the most fervent - if also most recent - ideologies of Orthodox Jewry, beginning with the imperative to settle the West Bank and oppose peacemaking.

The kinds of tolerance and policies which will be needed to deal fairly and humanely with refugees from Africa and with other non-Jews seeking a life in Israel will be difficult to enact and implement.

Yet we cannot call ourselves a moral Jewish state and countenance a situation in which, as in a Sunday edition of the newspaper, a picture of a refugee African boy protesting in Tel Aviv against threatened mass deportations, is placed directly atop an ad welcoming Jewish immigrants from southern Africa and wishing them "a smooth absorption in Israel, your new home."

The election of an African-American to the highest office of the nation which best embodied human equality - and for much too long, rebuffed it - is the kind of impossibility which takes minds and souls and forever alters them.

What sort of impossibility will it take for the Jewish state to place prophetically based compassion over rabbinically sanctioned boorishness and superiority to all those not exactly like us?

Hatred has no place in a Jewish state. And a Jewish state which sanctifies intolerance in the name of tradition or patriotism, will inevitably prove unwelcome not only to non-Jews, but to the Jewish People as well.

Last update - 05:30 06/07/2009

Israeli school system shafts children of olim, says ministry

By Cnaan Liphshiz, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: israel news

The Education Ministry does not properly address the needs of children

born in Israel to immigrant parents, the Immigrant Absorption Ministry said on Sunday ahead of its annual symposium on the subject.

In 2008, there were 210,381 immigrant children in Israeli educational

i

nstitutions, the Absorption Ministry said.

"Most (63 percent) of these children were born in Israel to immigrant parents, yet the education system views only children who were born abroad as immigrant students," the Absorption Ministry said in a statement. "Therefore, the needs of Israeli-born immigrant children are not properly met."

The Education Ministry did not respond by press time.

Also, in 2008 there were 235,567 immigrant children in Israel, or 10 percent of all residents under age 18. The Absorption Ministry says this figure is proportionally among the highest in the West.

The 2009 Immigrant Children in Israel symposium is set to open on Monday in Jerusalem.

Only 51.5 percent of immigrant students receive a high-school diploma - a

figure 10 points lower than for Israeli-born students. "This gap has not

shrunk in years," the report says.

In 2007, 23.3 percent of all children hospitalized in psychiatric hospitals were immigrant children born abroad, even though they account for only 3.7 percent of the general population.

School dropout rates for immigrant students have risen slightly this year, and are now double the 1.8 percent rate for Israeli-born students.

About 25 percent of all immigrant students are poor. Dr. Yitzhak Kadman,

chairman of the National Council for the Child . which coauthored the report . called on the government to cancel plans to slash childcare allowances for families with dropout children.

"This cut will hurt immigrant children more than anyone because they have a higher dropout rate," he said. "The original sin of having them drop out must not be coupled with the crime of slashing their allowances," he said

Last update - 03:51 05/07/2009

Former Beatles, Rolling Stones manager Allen Klein dies

By Reuters

Tags: Allen Klein, The Beatles

Infamous record label owner Allen Klein, who played a key role in the demise of the Beatles and also nabbed control of some of the Rolling Stones' best-known songs, died in New York on Saturday after a battle with Alzheimer's disease, a spokesman said. He was 77.

During a career spanning more than 50 years, the New Jersey-born accountant enjoyed a reputation as a savvy gangster-like figure. His ruthless business practices were reviled by many, but he also earned grudging respect for bullying labels into giving rich deals to his clients.

"Don't talk to me about ethics," he told Playboy magazine in 1971. "Every man makes his own. It's like a war. You choose your side early and from then on, you're being shot at. The man you beat is likely to call you unethical. So what?"

It did not hurt his reputation when he was sentenced to two months in prison in 1979 for tax evasion.

He once said John Lennon hired him to protect his interest in the Beatles because he and wife Yoko Ono wanted "a real shark - someone to keep the other sharks away."

His company, ABKCO Music Records, is one of the biggest independent labels in an industry controlled by multinational corporations. The spokesman said it would remain family-controlled. Two of Klein's three adult children work at the company, including son Jody who runs ABKCO. (The acronym stands for Allen and Betty Klein Co., Betty being his wife.)

Its assets include recordings by the Rolling Stones, the Animals, Herman's Hermits, Bobby Womack, the Kinks, Chubby Checker, Bobby Rydell and many others.

The publishing arm boasts more than 2,000 copyrights including compositions by Mick Jagger and Keith Richards of the Rolling Stones, Cooke, Womack, Ray Davies of the Kinks and Pete Townshend of the Who.

Klein broke into the music business by auditing record labels on behalf of clients including Bobby Darin and Connie Francis. When he found they were owed royalties, he took half of the difference as a fee.

His first big management client was Sam Cooke, for whom he negotiated a lucrative recording deal in 1963 that gave the soul star unprecedented control over his own catalog.

Klein, who was already representing "British Invasion" artists such as the Animals, Dave Clark Five and Herman's Hermits, set his sights on the Rolling Stones, who were laboring under an onerous deal.

He renegotiated their pact in 1965, and ended up managing the group for about five years - taking a 20 percent fee.

The Stones eventually tired of Klein. But the only way to break free of him was to give up the rights to their master recordings and rights to such timeless tunes as "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction" and "Jumpin' Jack Flash."

"In some ways Allen Klein was very much ahead of his time," Jagger said in the 1989 Stones documentary "25x5." "We lasted about three or four years with him, really, though the ramifications of that still continue to this day."

Richards was more philosophical, describing their experience with Klein as "the price of an education."

By then, Klein was focused on the ultimate prize, the Beatles. He offered his help to Lennon in early 1969, when the Fab Four's idealistic Apple Corps. label was fast draining the fractured group's coffers.

George Harrison and Ringo Starr also warmed to his pitch, but Paul McCartney was fiercely opposed. He preferred the expertise of his father-in-law, high-powered New York attorney Lee Eastman.

Amid a series of complex maneuverings that also have consequences to this day, Klein unsuccessfully tried to secure control of the Beatles' copyrights on behalf of the group. Michael Jackson ended up with the rights 16 years later.

Klein did score a rich recording deal for the Beatles, but relations within the group were past frayed, and it dissolved in 1970.

That year, Harrison "honored" Klein in a rough version of his song "Beware of Darkness" with the line "beware of ABKCO." "It might have ended up being prophetic. But at the time it was just a little joke," Harrison told Reuters in 2000.

Indeed, Harrison and Klein reunited in 1971 to put on the all-star Concert for Bangladesh shows at Madison Square Garden in New York. It took a decade for the funds to reach the refugees because of complex tax problems.

In addition to his children and wife, Klein is survived by his longtime girlfriend Iris Keitel, an ABKCO executive. His funeral will take place in New York on Tuesday.

Last update - 11:25 05/07/2009

Formula One Chief: Hitler got things done

By The Associated Press

Tags: Hitler, Israel news

Bernie Ecclestone, the Formula One chief, said on Friday that he preferred totalitarian regimes to democracies and praised Adolf Hitler for his ability to "get things done" in an outspoken interview with London's The Times.

The remark drew sharp criticism from politicians and Jewish groups on Saturday.

I

n the interview, Ecclestone expressed a preference for "strong leaders," citing former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Max Mosley, outgoing head of Formula One's governing body, as examples.

He was quoted as saying that democracy "hasn't done a lot of good for many countries - including this one."

"In a lot of ways, terrible to say this I suppose, but apart from the fact that Hitler got taken away and persuaded to do things that I have no idea whether he wanted to do or not, he was in the way that he could command a lot of people, able to get things done," Ecclestone was quoted as saying.

"In the end he got lost, so he wasn't a very good dictator."

"Politicians are too worried about elections," he said. "We did a terrible thing when we supported the idea of getting rid of Saddam Hussein. He was the only one who could control that country. It was the same [with the Taliban]. We move into countries and we have no idea of the culture. The Americans probably thought Bosnia was a town in Miami. There are people starving in Africa and we sit back and do nothing but we get involved in things we should leave alone."

The Board of Deputies of British Jews told The Times that Ecclestone's views were "quite bizarre," and Jewish Chronicle editor Stephen Pollard said he was "either an idiot or morally repulsive."

Labour Party lawmaker Denis MacShane told the newspaper that the remarks revealed ignorance of history and "a complete lack of judgment."

Calls to Ecclestone's London office were not immediately returned Saturday.

Ecclestone, who owns Formula One's commercial rights, is no stranger to controversial remarks. He once said women should dress in white "like all other domestic appliances."

In The Times interview, Ecclestone said that had been a joke, adding "I would love to have a good lady race driver and preferably black and Jewish too, but they might take maternity leave."

ast update - 00:00 17/10/2007

Jewish rightist: 'Finish Hitler's work, kill Ashkenazi Jews'

By Uri Blau, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Stiven Malik, incitement

A right-wing Jewish extremist has been disseminating calls for the assassination of leftists and Ashkenazim on Internet sites in Israel and abroad.

One film clip posted on YouTube, for instance, declares: "You are about to view a handful of leftist Ashkenazim that Hitler and Eichmann did not manage to incinerate. Before we begin, please remember: 90 percent of the moderate left are Ashkenazim!! 100 percent of the extreme left are Ashkenazim!!"

Next comes a picture of President Shimon Peres with the caption: "The murderer!" It is followed by pictures of Benjamin Netanyahu, Yossi Beilin and other politicians.

The clip concludes: "Now, after you have seen these unclean Ashkenazim, how degraded the Ashkenazi race is, and what a pity it is that Hitler and Eichmann did not finish off the Ashkenazim, I ask of you: Search for information on Google about Stiven Malik; there 'the document' awaits you."

The document in question is also full of incitement to violence: "If only we, too, could finish what Hitler began by destroying all the Ashkenazim, the descendants of the Jews who betrayed Germany."

Supportive comments have been posted on the Stiven Malik forum on the Israeli portal 2all; the forum has received thousands of visitors in recent month. Malik's anti-Ashkenazi incitement can also be found on the Israeli portals Tapuz and goop.co.il and on sites such as fresh.co.il.

A Haaretz investigation has concluded that "Malik" is a fictitious name used by a right-wing extremist who was once affiliated with Baruch Marzel's Jewish Front party, but was later expelled from it.

After Haaretz approached the relevant Israeli portals, some of Malik's writings were removed. Tapuz said it had given the material to the police, and Peres's office said it had given it to the Shin Bet security service. YouTube had not responded by press time.

Last update - 00:00 27/08/2007

YouTube criticized in Germany over anti-Semitic Nazi videos

By Reuters

Tags: Germany, YouTube, Nazi

Video-sharing Web site YouTube has met with harsh criticism in Germany for hosting clips that incite racial hatred, according to a news report due to be broadcast on German public TV late on Monday.

The videos hosted on YouTube include clips of a 1940 anti-Semitic propaganda film "Jud Suess" and two music videos of outlawed German far-right rock band Landser, which show footage from World War II depicting Nazi military operations.

Report Mainz, which is due to air the program, said in a statement that Social Democrat (SPD) parliamentarian Dieter Wiefelspuetz said airing the clips on YouTube in Germany was scandalous.

Report Mainz quoted him as saying: "Publishing these films amounts to aiding and abetting incitement of the people."

Report Mainz also said that Germany's Central Council of Jews Vice President Salomon Korn was considering pressing charges against Google Germany.

According to the statement from Report Mainz, German youth protection body Jugendschutz.net has complained to Google Germany more than 100 times and asked Google, which bought YouTube last year, to remove the clips.

Some of the material has been on the site for almost a year.

Google Germany was not immediately available for comment.

More than 60 years after the Holocaust, Germany is grappling with a rise in support for Nazi ideas. Neo-Nazi violence in Germany has reached its highest level since reunification in 1990

Last update - 15:46 02/07/2009

University of Vienna honors 2,200 Jews expelled by Nazis

By The Associated Press

Tags: jewish world, Nazis

Kurt Elias vividly remembers the day in 1938 when the Nazis barred him from entering the University of Vienna because he was Jewish.

"I had to send someone else in to get my dissection kit and coat," said the 90-year-old Elias, a medical student at the time.

Shortly thereafter, the Vienna native left Austria with just one suitcase and several dollars in his pocket. He ended up becoming a doctor in the United States and now lives in New York City.

Elias is one of more than 2,200 people listed in an online database launched this week containing the names of students and teachers - most of them Jewish - who were forced to leave the University of Vienna after Adolf Hitler annexed Austria in March 1938.

The database also contains the names of people who were stripped of their

academic titles - including famous writer Stefan Zweig, whom the Nazis in 1941 deemed unworthy of the philosophy degree he earned in 1904 because he was Jewish.

"This is a belated, symbolic initiative," reads the virtual memorial book.

While some entries consist of just a name, date of birth, basic biographical information and copies of inscription forms, others - such as the page dedicated to Elias - also include photos and life stories.

Some reflect the horrors of the time.

"She was deported and died in Auschwitz (Oswiecim/Poland) on January 1st, 1943," reads the final sentence of the entry dedicated to Antonie Frank, also a former medical student.

Project leader Herbert Posch said he and his team spent years identifying and trying to track down as many people as possible who were expelled from the University of Vienna 71 years ago.

In the end, he said, they reached about 150 and conducted some 100 interviews either in person, by telephone or via e-mail. Links to 14 videos of interviews are to be posted online in the near future.

But the search for victims is not over.

"It's a work in progress, Posch said, adding he hoped visitors to the Web site would help supplement entries with missing details - and help create new ones.

"We're presenting an incomplete list that, over the course of further research, will have to be complemented, expanded and possibly corrected," said his colleague, Friedrich Stadler, who heads a forum that investigates the history of the University of Vienna in the 20th century.

Still, Esther Fritsch, a Jewish community representative, described the

memorial book as a big step forward.

Organizers also compiled a handwritten memorial book that is on display in a light-filled former Jewish prayer house on campus. It has blank pages so that more names can be added as the project progresses.

To Elias, the database will help maintain the memory of what happened to him and many others.

"It's a very good idea to make sure the truth isn't forgotten," he said in a telephone interview from New York.

Last update - 12:57 02/07/2009

Austria's 'forgotten' concentration camp in danger of being demolished

By Anshel Pfeffer

Tags: austria, Israel news

If the excavations currently under way on a hill near the Austrian village of St. Georgen continue, within a few weeks little will remain of Gusen, one of the most horrifying of the Nazi concentration camps that was located nearby. Austrian officials say the work is necessary to prevent the collapse of underground tunnels on the site.

An estimated 36,000 to 50,000 inmates, including Jews, Soviet prisoners of war and political prisoners, met their deaths at Gusen, the site of an underground production facility for advanced Messerschmitt fighter jet aircraft and other weaponry. The planes were manufactured for the Nazi Luftwaffe with slave labor from the concentration camp. It has been 64 years since the closure of the aircraft factory, which was codenamed "Bergkristall."

One local resident who has been inside said the place resembles ten deserted soccer fields. Other than the gates to the factory and small memorial plaques, nothing on the outside bears witness to the tens of thousands of inmates who met their deaths as slave laborers there.

A small group of local residents and Holocaust survivors is trying to preserve the Bergkristall installation from demolition.

A few kilometers from the site stood the Mauthausen concentration camp, established in 1938 as a detention site for Jews and political prisoners, and ultimately as an administrative center for a network of affiliated camps established in the area under S.S. sponsorship. One of those camps was Gusen, established in 1940, initially as a quarry and slave labor center for the region's industry and agriculture. The inmates were actually made available for a fee as day laborers in the area. Gusen was expanded significantly in 1944, after Allied bombing of military industrial sites in Bavaria.

Thousands of slave laborers were used to dig underground facilities for the production of weapons and other military hardware. The most ambitious production facility was Bergkristall, built underground in an area estimated at 50,000 square meters, for the production among other weaponry of the Messerschmitt 262 jet fighter, on which Hitler pinned so many hopes.

Fewer than half the 70,000 inmates who went sent to Gusen made it out alive. The others were either executed or died of hunger, cold, disease or industrial accidents. The camp was among the most cruel in the Nazi Reich, and was actually ranked as such by the S.S. For a few weeks before the end of the war, the Bergkristall reached a record production level of 15 aircraft a day, but by that point the Nazis were running out of trains to transport them and fuel to fly them.

Production nonetheless continued at a murderous pace, ending only on May 3, 1945, days before the Nazis' surrender ended the war in Europe. About 20,000 Gusen inmates were liberated at the end of the war by the American army. Some died thereafter of disease, and the rest scattered around the world. Gusen has been called the "forgotten camp."

The Messerschmitt company was reestablished after the war and is now part of the giant EADS aviation firm which manufactures the Airbus airplane. Although the legacy of the Messerschmitt is carefully preserved by the firm, nowhere is the fact that slave labor went into the company's aircraft mentioned.

After the war, the Soviets tried to blow up the underground industrial facilities at Gusen, but the collapse of a residential area led them to simply seal the site. The Austrian government has chosen not to reopen it, although the Austrian interior ministry, which is responsible for historic preservation, did take control of the site in 2001.

When demolition work began at the site last month, the memorial committee mobilized, but the regional and national governments declined to stop the work. In response to an inquiry from Haaretz, the Austrian government said the work at Gusen constitutes "emergency measures" taken "in order to prevent the further decay of the tunnel system," and added that the activity at the site is being monitored by experts.

According to the Austrian government, after the work is complete in October, 1,900 meters of tunnel will be "preserved." The government said there was no alternative since the tunnels are in danger of collapse, adding that it was regrettable that the company carrying out the work did not notify the public or memorial organizations in advance.

"The responsible authorities in Austria," a government spokesman added, "will do their best to ensure that as a result of the above measures, the quality of the Gusen memorial site and accessibility for visitors will be decisively improved."

Despite the government's assurances, some local residents are convinced that the real reason for the work is to prepare the site for residential construction

Last update - 12:02 02/07/2009

Jew's Muse / The Iranian mullacracy will never go away

By Uzi Silber

Tags: Iran election, Israel news

As far as I'm concerned, the carefully calibrated observations spouted by professional Iran experts on news channels are about as valid as the opinions of the Shiraz-born proprietors of the Shalom Chai pizza parlor on Manhattan's Lower East Side. Unfortunately, David and Chaim were far too busy serving customers to field questions. Similarly, the Iranian-born ex-wives of two friends couldn't be reached for comment.

In attempt to elicit authentic if official Iranian views on the recent events in Tehran, I emailed queries to Iranian embassy VIPs in North America, Europe, India, Australia and New Zealand. These efforts have been fruitless as well.

That leaves me and my own ruminations -- as useful, I suppose, as anyone else's.

So here it goes: the Iranian mullacracy won't go away.

Government-backed motorcycle gangs have successfully smothered the desperate street protests; like those of '99 and '03, these too will soon be forgotten, Twitter, Facebook and Youtube notwithstanding. Rest assured: European officials and businessmen will be commuting to Tehran in a mere few months time, begging for business as usual.

And despite President Obama's firm, if lukewarm denunciations of the crackdown, the Americans won?t be far behind: at some future venue in Geneva, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will present Manouchehr Mottaki, her Iranian counterpart, with a toy 'reset' button just like the one she handed the Russian foreign minister last March. This gadget, recall, was meant as a metaphor for the Obama Administration's desire to diplomatically paper over Russian bullying of its neighbors.

International bleating to the contrary, when it comes right down to it, precious few worry about internal repression or oppression within dictatorially ruled countries. The Iranian government will get away with it, just as Chinese, Russians, Burmese, Venezuelan and Arab dictators have and do. And they all can, because it's not about human rights -- it's all just business.

The mullahs will never give up power. Like the dictators in Beijing, Havana, Yangon, Pyongyang, Riyadh, Moscow and Caracas, the Iranian military-mullah complex will endure because three decades in power has made the ruling elite fabulously wealthy and they?re not about to give all that up.

For the ascendant clique of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in particular, the money is a vital means to a far loftier mission - accelerating the arrival of the Muslim Shiite Messiah, known as the Twelfth Imam.

As it happens, this messianic End of Days worldview is held to a greater or lesser extent by all members of the Islamic political elite whatever their flavor, be it the hygienically challenged Ahmadinejad, his nemesis and corrupt billionaire power broker Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani, or former thug-turned Gandhi-like media darling, Mir Hossein Moussavi.

First the money; in wake of the 1979 Islamic revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini and his tough henchmen known as the Revolutionary Guards seized from the wealthy class thousands of lucrative properties and income producing businesses and placed them in so-called Islamic charitable foundations known as bonyads.

Over the decade that followed, the bonyads supposedly redistributed to the poor some of the wealth stolen by the Khomeini gang. But once the grand ayatollah died, the mullahs and Revolutionary Guards disregarded the bonyads? mandate of wealth redistribution, shifting their efforts instead to self-enrichment and intensified financing of jihadi terrorist organizations.

According to an influential 2003 article in Forbes Magazine, bonyads boast lucrative investments in disparate industries such as oil, real estate, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, shipping, construction and resorts. Freedom House estimates that the bonyads collectively control perhaps 20% of Iranian GDP, or over $100 billion. Bonyadic tentacles also reach into every small Iranian town where local operatives regularly extort local businesses. So much for justice.

As Vladimir Putin himself reportedly noted in 2007, the Iranian ruling clique is delusional. This is of course isn't unusual for autocrats: inhabiting bubbles and surrounded by trembling sycophants, dictators of all sorts are invariably prone to a megalomaniacal sense of destiny. Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser, Libya's Muammar Khaddafi and Iraq's Saddam Hussein each expected to unite the Arab world under their respective flags. Hugo Chavez is certain that he was born to lead the entirety of Latin America into a new socialist utopia.

Ahmadinejad has made it eminently clear in many public pronouncements that he sees himself as an agent put on earth to hasten the Twelfth Imam?s arrival; the archives of MEMRI.org provide ample record of these declarations.

It follows that any domestic or foreign opponent of the Iranian regime and its policies would be viewed by Ahmadinejad and his ilk as an obstacle to the Imam's eventual return, and as such, an intolerable foe. This holds true even when the foe happens to be a loyal son of the Islamic Revolution such as Moussavi.

Make no mistake -- Ahmadinejad and his ruthless clique will do whatever is required to hasten the arrival of their venerated Imam even if it takes the spilled blood of the very last unarmed Iranian.

The mullahs won't go: this isn't just about the power and the money -- it's about the coming of their Messiah.

Last update - 05:36 02/07/2009

Last remaining U.S. Jewish Republican Senator loses seat

By The Associated Press

Tags: Jewish World, Israel News

The defeat of incumbent Norm Coleman in the drawn-out Minnesota Senate race leaves U.S. Republicans without a Jewish senator for the first time in half a century.

Coleman's departure comes two months after the Republicans' other Jewish member, Arlen Specter, switched parties to become a Democrat. Coleman conceded his long-contested race with Democratic challenger Al Franken on Tuesday after the Minnesota Supreme Court rejected Coleman's legal challenge.

Republicans have had at least one Jewish senator since New York's Jacob Javits took office in 1957, reaching a peak of three during the mid-1980s.

In the House, Eric Cantor has risen quickly since he took office in 2001 to become the minority whip, the second-ranked House Republican. His other distinction is that, since 2003, he is the only Jewish Republican in the 435-member body. That is down from eight Jewish Republican members who served in the House during the 1990s.

There are currently 30 Democrats in the House who list their religion as

Jewish. The Senate will have 13 Jewish members as of next week when Franken, Coleman's rival in Minnesota, is sworn in. That's 11 Democrats and two independents who normally vote with the Democrats.

Ira Forman, CEO of the National Jewish Democratic Council, said the sharp drop in the number of Jewish Republicans in Congress paralleled the party's shift to the right. "It's a reflection of where the Republican Party has gone," he said. "It's left the Jewish community pretty cold."

Matt Broks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, said his group was not happy with the defeat of Coleman, who has worked with them as a consultant. But he disagreed with those who say the Republican Jewish movement is declining, saying you will see and are seeing Jewish Republicans winning elections all across the country at the state and local level

Last update - 14:44 03/04/2009

Jewish U.S. troops to get gefilte fish and matzot for an Iraq Pesach

By Shlomo Shamir, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: passover 2009, jewish world

Some 600 Passover kits will be shipped to Jewish soldiers serving in United States military units in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf next week.

Some of the kits will be delivered to Jewish sailors stationed on U.S. naval vessels in the Persian Gulf.

Each of the kits contains a package of regular Matzos, a package of chocolate-coated matzos, a large jar of gefilte fish, macaroons, a box of candy, a yarmulke, a Passover Haggadah and a booklet explaining the essence and traditions of Passover.

The kits were prepared, and will be delivered, by the JCC - the continental umbrella organization for the Jewish Community Center Movement - a U.S. government agency accredited to serve the religious and social needs of Jewish military personnel, their families, and patients in VA hospitals.

The kits are designed to enable Jewish servicemen and women deployed on U.S. ships and in remote areas of the world to have "a taste of Pesach" when the challenges of life in combat prevent attendance at family or communal services.

The Passover kits will be delivered along with special kosher for Passover combat rations that the U.S. military delivers to its Jewish soldiers.

Last update - 14:44 03/04/2009

Jewish U.S. troops to get gefilte fish and matzot for an Iraq Pesach

By Shlomo Shamir, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: passover 2009, jewish world

Some 600 Passover kits will be shipped to Jewish soldiers serving in United States military units in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf next week.

Some of the kits will be delivered to Jewish sailors stationed on U.S. naval vessels in the Persian Gulf.

Each of the kits contains a package of regular Matzos, a package of chocolate-coated matzos, a large jar of gefilte fish, macaroons, a box of candy, a yarmulke, a Passover Haggadah and a booklet explaining the essence and traditions of Passover.

The kits were prepared, and will be delivered, by the JCC - the continental umbrella organization for the Jewish Community Center Movement - a U.S. government agency accredited to serve the religious and social needs of Jewish military personnel, their families, and patients in VA hospitals.

The kits are designed to enable Jewish servicemen and women deployed on U.S. ships and in remote areas of the world to have "a taste of Pesach" when the challenges of life in combat prevent attendance at family or communal services.

The Passover kits will be delivered along with special kosher for Passover combat rations that the U.S. military delivers to its Jewish soldiers.

100 Jewish cantors to perform at Warsaw's National Opera

By Reuters

Tags: Poland, Warsaw, Israel News

For the first time since the Holocaust, 100 Jewish cantors from around the globe are gathering to perform in Warsaw, once one of the world's leading Jewish centers, Poland's chief rabbi said on Sunday.

The cantors, who sing liturgical chants during Jewish religious services, will perform at Warsaw's National Opera, U.S.-born Rabbi Michael Schudrich told Reuters.

"This will be a symbolic, historic event, because prior to the Holocaust, Warsaw was a world center of cantorial culture," the rabbi said.

The Grand Opera, where the concert is due to take place on Tuesday, is less than half a kilometre from Warsaw's Tlomackie Synagogue, blown up by the Germans during World War Two.

The building has since been rebuilt and now houses the Jewish Historical Institute.

The chief organizer of the performance is American cantor Nathan Lam of Los Angeles, who has family ties to Warsaw.

Up until World War Two, 3.5 million Jews lived in Poland, a major international center of Jewish religious and cultural life.

Poland lost some six million of its citizens during the war, including three million Jews who perished in the Holocaust.

Last update - 06:28 27/06/2009

Disgraced financier Madoff ordered to forfeit over $170b

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News, Madoff

Disgraced financier Bernard Madoff has been ordered to forfeit over $170 billion for orchestrating perhaps the largest financial swindle in history, prosecutors said Friday.

U.S. District Judge Denny Chin entered a preliminary order of forfeiture Friday, according to Acting U.S. Attorney Lev Dassin. The order forces Madoff to give up his interests in all property, including real estate, investments, cars and boats.

According to earlier court documents, prosecutors reserved the right to pursue more than $170 billion in criminal forfeiture. That represents the total amount of money that could be connected to the fraud, not the amount stolen or lost.

The government also settled claims against Madoff's wife, according to Friday's order. Under the arrangement, the government obtained Ruth Madoff's interest in all property, including more than $80 million of property to which she had claimed was hers, prosecutors said.

The order makes it clear, though, that nothing precludes other departments or entities from seeking to recover additional funds

The agreements strip the Madoffs of all their interest in properties belonging to them, including a homes in Manhattan, Montauk, and Palm Beach, Fla., worth a total of nearly $22 million.

New York prosecutors seek 150-year sentence for Madoff

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors said in court papers Friday that Madoff should receive a 150-year sentence.

"The sheer scale of the fraud calls for severe punishment," the prosecutors wrote in response to a defense motion seeking lighter punishment.

Madoff, 71, is due to be sentenced Monday after pleading guilty in March to charges that his exclusive investment advisory business was actually a massive pyramid scheme.

Federal sentencing guidelines allow for the 150-year term, prosecutors said. Any lesser sentence, they added, should still be long enough to send a forceful message and assure that Madoff will remain in prison for life.

The government's papers quoted from letters to U.S. District Judge Denny Chin written by victims of the scheme who are suffering severe hardships.

"Madoff ruined lives," one letter said. "He deserves no mercy."

At the time of Madoff's arrest, fictitious account statements showed thousands of clients had $65 billion. But investigators say he never traded securities, and instead used money from new investors to pay returns to existing clients.

Prosecutors said Friday that the total losses, which span decades, haven't been calculated. But 1,341 accounts opened since December 1995 alone suffered loses of $13.2 billion, they said.

Madoff attorney Ira Sorkin argued in court papers last week for a 12-year

term. He said his client deserved credit for his voluntary surrender, full

acceptance of responsibility and meaningful cooperation efforts.

"We seek neither mercy nor sympathy," Sorkin wrote. But he urged the judge to set aside the emotion and hysteria attendant to this case as he determines the sentence.

Share |

Last update - 13:39 26/06/2009

Meet Aaron Katz, Poland's first openly gay rabbi

By The Associated Press

Tags: Jewish World, Poland

When Rabbi Aaron Katz walks the streets of Warsaw's former Jewish quarter, scenes of that lost world fill his imagination: Families headed to synagogue, women in their kitchens cooking Sabbath meals, his father as a boy with the sidecurls of an Orthodox Jew.

But Katz's life could hardly be more different from that prewar eastern European culture, at least in one key respect: He is Poland's first openly gay rabbi.

Born in Argentina 53 years ago to parents who fled Poland before the Holocaust, Katz is the latest rabbi to play his part in reviving a once vibrant Jewish community that was all but wiped out by Hitler.

He settled into Warsaw's historic Jewish district in March with Kevin Gleason, a former Hollywood producer on such reality TV shows as "The Bachelor" and "Nanny 911," with whom he entered into a registered domestic partnership in Los Angeles two years ago.

They live only three streets from the birth home of Katz's father in a modern and spacious apartment with their dogs, two gentle brown boxers. Katz says he is moved by the links to his past, but keeps his focus on the future.

"I don't think we will come back to this great Jewish life," he said, referring to prewar Poland, a country where one person in 10 was Jewish and where synagogues, yeshivas and shtetls defined the landscape. "But I hope we will have a normal Jewish life in Poland."

Katz is certainly an anomaly in conservative Poland, where to be either Jewish or gay is challenge enough ? at least outside the cities. Of a population of 38 million, about 5,000 are registered as Jews, while thousands more have part-Jewish ancestry, and some have returned to their roots since Poland shed its communist dictatorship.

Katz is the second rabbi to serve Beit Warszawa, a Reform community with 250 members that was founded in the capital 10 years ago by Polish and American Jews who felt little affinity with some Orthodox practices, such as separating men and women during Sabbath services. The Reform movement ordains gay rabbis.

Homosexuals have won acceptance at differing levels throughout post-communist Eastern Europe. The Czech Republic and Slovenia recognize same-sex partnerships, as will Hungary from July 1. Poland hasn't gone that far. It has an active gay rights movement and gay nightclubs in the cities, but the Catholic church and some conservative politicians still publicly describe homosexuality as abnormal and immoral.

Katz, a citizen of Argentina, Israel and Sweden, says so far he has not faced anti-Semitism or homophobia in Poland. But some community members, speaking in private, reveal a degree of discomfort.

One woman at a Sabbath service whispered that she found Katz's open sexuality too "aggressive." A longtime male member counseled against writing about the rabbi, lest anti-Semites use it against the community.

A third member, Piotr Lukasz, said he himself supports gay rights, and marched with an Israeli flag during a recent gay rights parade in Warsaw. But he said he had heard others complain that it would weaken an already small and fragile community.

"They say that Poland is not a ready for a gay rabbi because the outside society is very conservative," said Lukasz, a 23-year-old student of cultural anthropology. "An openly gay rabbi is something very controversial."

Others, though, seem comfortable, as evidenced by a recent string of dinners where Jews and non-Jews joined Katz and his partner at their home, digging into goulash or chicken-and-potato meals around the dining room table and socializing through the evening.

Katz is the chief cook ? it's because he likes to be in charge, says Gleason, who instead welcomes guests warmly at the door and keeps their wine glasses filled through the evenings.

"I think the rabbi's home should be open," Katz said. "The moment that you take a position, your family takes the position too. It's a role."

Katz's life as a rabbi has been an evolution from one world to another. In the 1980s and early 1990s he was Sweden's chief Orthodox rabbi, married to a woman with whom he had five children now aged 16 to 31. Later he lived and worked in Berlin and Los Angeles. He had a dark beard, but today is clean-shaven.

The only photograph in their living room shows Katz and Gleason on the day they sealed their partnership ? which they refer to as a marriage ? surrounded by both their families, including Katz's sons and daughters, who are close to the couple and who showed their acceptance of the union with a gift of a ketubah, a traditional Jewish wedding certificate.

Katz's journey away from Orthodox Judaism was part of his "coming out process," he explains, but also was influenced by the realization that some of his children were not attracted to Orthodox worship. He concluded that Reform Judaism was more attractive to the young.

Still, he insists that as modern as he is, he loves tradition.

He keeps a kosher home and has enthusiastically embraced the Jewish tradition of matchmaker, using his dinners to introduce singles ? usually heterosexuals but not exclusively.

Asked how many marriages have resulted, he said "a couple," but Gleason jumped in to correct him: "You're being modest," he said.

Gleason, 50, was born into a Catholic family but converted to Judaism for Katz. He left Hollywood and now does administrative and fundraising work for the synagogue. He attends services, sitting in the back and tapping on his watch when he feels the rabbi's lively sermons are getting to long.

Still, the openness of their relationship can catch people in Warsaw off guard.

"I introduce him as my partner they say, 'Oh he's also a rabbi?"' Katz said. "When I say 'my partner' they think I mean like in business. So I say 'no, no, no, we are living together."

Last update - 10:05 25/06/2009

U.S. professor cleared over comparison of Gaza war to Holocaust

By Cnaan Liphshiz, Haarez Correspondent, and The Associated Press

Tags: Gaza, Israel News, IDF

A committee at a California university has cleared a professor who sent an e-mail comparing Israel's policies in Gaza to the Holocaust.

Officials at the University of California, Santa Barbara, sent a letter Wednesday to sociology professor William I. Robinson saying the committee had closed the matter.

In January, Robinson offended some students and others with an e-mail to his "Sociology of Globalization" class that juxtaposed grisly photos from the Nazi era with a recent Gaza offensive.

Jewish groups called the e-mail "hate spam" and claimed Robinson violated university policies barring professors from intimidating students and using campus resources for political reasons.

A leading pro-Israel student group blasted the move on Wednesday. "[The university] has blurred the lines between education and peddling of propaganda," the L.A.-based Israel advocacy group StandWithUs told Haaretz.

The affair was exposed by Santa Barbara student Leah Yadegar ? a graduate of the StandWithUs Emerson Fellowship program, which trains students in campuses in "response techniques" to anti-Israel efforts on campus.

"We are surprised and disappointed that the university chose not to uphold their standards for professional conduct," said Roz Rothstein, director and founder of StandWithUs, which filed the original complaint against Robinson.

"It is unfortunate that students will continue to be victims of partisan indoctrination and misinformation."

Robinson, who is Jewish, has said his justified criticism of Israel's policies should not be confused as anti-Semitism. Before the ruling, he had circulated a petition rallying colleagues and supporters against the internal probe into his actions.

First Jewish speaker for Britain's House of Commons

By Assaf Uni, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: UK, Israel News, John Bercow

Britain's parliament got its first ever Jewish speaker of the house this week, with the election of Conservative MP John Bercow to replace disgraced Labourite Michael Martin.

Martin resigned last month over the expences scandal that has rocked the British political world.

Bercow beat nine other candidates in three rounds of voting, despite a lack of support from his own party, winning the final ballot with 322 votes to 271.

The new speaker has been MP for Buckingham since 1997.

Bercow, a 46-year-old father of three, was born to a Jewish middle-class family in the north London neighborhood of Finchley. In 2001, he visited Israel on the invite of a Jewish friend from the Conservative party.

Many of Bercow's supporters expect him to pursue reforms meant to restore public faith in government following the expences scandal.

Last update - 10:21 23/06/2009

Family of murdered Yemeni Jew among 16 covertly brought to Israel

By Reuters

Tags: Israel News, Jewish World

The relatives of a Jewish man murdered last year in Yemen were among the three families brought to Israel on a secret Jewish Agency mission earlier this week, a member of the Arabian peninsula state's Jewish community said on Tuesday.

The 16 Jews left Yemen on Sunday, the same day a state appeals court handed a death sentence to Abdul-Aziz al-Abdi for shooting dead Mashaa Yaeesh al-Nahari in December.

The three families come from Amran in the north but were living in the capital Sanaa because of deteriorating security amid a rebellion in neighboring Saada province by a Shi'ite tribal group.

"The Jewish Agency took charge of the operation to move the Jews after they previously helped a family of 11 to leave," said the source who declined to be named.

There are an estimated 200 to 300 Jews in Yemen, mainly in Sanaa, remnants of a centuries-old community that spoke Hebrew. About 50,000 moved to Israel in an airlift begun in 1949.

Israel defines itself as a Jewish state and offers citizenship to Jews from anywhere in the world.

Yemen, the Arab world's poorest country, is struggling with a Shi'ite revolt in the north, a secessionist movement in the south and growing militancy among Sunni al Qaeda sympathizers.

Last update - 08:36 23/06/2009

British teens get a taste of Orthodox Israeli life on reality TV

By Nathan Jeffay, The Forward

Tags: Israel News, Orthodox Jews

It was clear that something unusual was going on in the Orthodox-only village of Nof Ayalon, in central Israel, when residents spotted a bikini-clad teenager strutting her stuff.

Nof Ayalon, near Modi'in and not far from the Green Line, very much bears the imprint of its founders. It was set up in the mid-1990s by the nearby Yeshivat Sh'alvim, and ever since it has been a bastion of punctilious observance and modest dress.

Until, that is, the middle of May, when a British teenage girl with a penchant for provocative outfits arrived as part of a reality TV show. Also taking part in the program was a teenage boy who is a self-styled Goth and body-piercing enthusiast.

Both youngsters are non-Jewish high school dropouts from Hampshire, England, and the idea of the program they were taking part in was to see whether a week living with an Orthodox family could transform them from madcaps to menches.

The show is part of a BBC series, "The World's Strictest Parents," in which unruly British teenagers are sent to live with strict families in different countries. The episode filmed in Israel is due to air later this summer.

As the program will show, the battle lines between the Israeli family and the youngsters were clear from the start. You don't get keener devotees to authority than Tzipi and David Shaked (pronounced sha-kayd) and their five children, whose ages range from 5 to 18. The Shakeds live in accordance with every dictate of Jewish law, and moved to Nof Ayalon to be among others who do so. And few people have such an aversion to authority as their houseguests, Jack Travers and Gemma Lyons, aged 17 and 16, respectively.

"We saw it as a rare opportunity to extend a hand to troubled non-Jewish teens and in so doing, showcase Jewish values which should be seen by the outside world," said Tzipi Shaked, who, like her husband is American born.

In terms of Jewish doctrine, the Shakeds were determined "to push nothing down their throats," but when it came to their guests' conduct, discipline was in no short supply. Travers and Lyons were expected to overhaul their dress habits - skimpy in her case; medieval-style clothing, multiple piercings, thick black eyeliner in his - and observe various Jewish practices, including some Sabbath laws and rules of negia, which forbid members of the opposite sex from touching. The teenagers got a further dose of discipline from the army: they spent a day training on an Israel Defense Forces base.

The Israel episode produced a stormier clash than any that had occurred in the previous two seasons of the show - other host families have included Alabama Christians and Indian Hindus. Lyons was infuriated by the modesty expectations and flouted them by donning her bikini. The family threw her out of the house, and producers had to take her to a hotel - something that has never happened on the program in the past. "It was a massive deal," director Colin Rothbart told the Forward. After a day and a half, she apologized and was allowed back in.

The situation wasn?t helped by the fact that Lyons has an anger problem - an issue the show?s producers tried to address in a novel way. "The teenagers met a Holocaust survivor who has every reason in the world to be angry, but who had a smile on her face. The boy gets depressed, and this also helped him put things in perspective," Rothbart said.

Despite the fireworks, the family's values resonated with the teenagers in the end. "She's a pretty girl, and the mum said people may not judge her by who she is but what she's showing, and she began to accept this," Rothbart said. "In fact, now [that] she's back home, she's dressing more modestly.?

When it came time to observe the Sabbath, which occurred toward the end of the trip, Travers and Lyons were intrigued by Jewish observance. While the Shakeds expected their guests to observe the Sabbath laws only when in public, they chose to do as the family did. "They wanted to experience what it was like from our perspective," Shaked said.

For Travers, the Sabbath was a turning point. He stayed up until 4 A.M. chatting with the local youngsters who, Shaked reports, had resolved "not to judge a 'Goth' by his cover." She recalled: "It was a revelation to him that the teens of Nof Ayalon can hang out on a Friday night with no fistfights and without alcohol, but having fun."

The producers of "The World's Strictest Parents" are not allowing the teens to be interviewed, as they are still following their progress, but they said that Travers has admitted since the trip that he smuggled alcohol into the Shakeds' house, but said he did not drink it, as he found family life there enjoyable without stimulants.

It seems that some other religious concepts impressed Travers and Lyons, as well. They heard about the Jewish idea of teshuvah, or repentance, and both plan to make amends with family members and teachers and return to their studies back home. And in a surprising endorsement of Israel, they both want to go back this summer - Lyons to spend time studying in university, and Travers to work on a kibbutz

Last update - 15:06 21/06/2009

Top U.S. rabbi hails Iran protestors' 'vision of freedom'

By Jewishjournal.com

Tags: Iran Election, Israel News

The rabbi of Los Angeles' Sinai Temple, home to one of the largest Iranian Jewish congregations in the world, hailed on Saturday the wave of post-election protests in Iran as reflecting the biblical promise of freedom.

"The people marching on the streets of Iran have seen a vision of freedom," Rabbi David Wolpe, who is considered a leader of the Conservative movement, told some 1200 congregants from the pulpit.

Last update - 07:07 21/06/2009

Row grows over Norway honor for pro-Nazi Nobel laureate

By Cnaan Liphshiz, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Jewish World, Norway

By honoring novelist and Nazi-sympathizer Knut Hamsun, Norway has damaged the international Holocaust education drive that it has recently been appointed to head, campaigners against anti-Semitism told Haaretz. Yet, the leader of Norway's Jewish community disagrees.

In March, Norway assumed chairmanship of the 26-nation Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education in the midst of celebrating the 150th anniversary of the birth of Knut Hamsun, the country's once celebrated author who was shunned for supporting Norway's Nazi occupation regime during World War II.

The government has honored the novelist with celebrations, a commemorative coin and is allocating millions of dollars toward building a cultural center in the Nobel Prize laureate's hometown, which is to open in August.

Hamsun, who died impoverished at the age of 92 in 1952 (the government stripped him of his property) once gave his Nobel Prize medal in literature as a gift to Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels. He also met Adolf Hitler in Bavaria. The author of masterpieces like "Hunger," Hamsun is cherished by readers in Norway and around the world.

"No government should honor Nazis, their collaborators or their sympathizers," said Carole Nuriel, an analyst for the Anti-Defamation League. The ADL drafted a statement on Norway in consultation with the country's Jewish community, noting that in the framework of commemoration, the Norwegian government was "highlighting Hamsun's moral failure, not downplaying it."

A spokesperson for the Norwegian embassy in Tel Aviv declined to comment, but Bjorn Svenungsen of the foreign ministry in Oslo told Haaretz that honoring Hamsun is "a commemoration of one of Norway's most important authors." He said all parties involved have criticized Hamsun's Nazi past. The celebration is "a tribute to Hamsun's role in European literature, not an acceptance of his political views," Svenungsen added. "The event is also used to remember the massive criticism of Hamsun after the 1945 liberation."

Per Antonsen, a former veteran consultant on foreign policy to the Norwegian government, told Haaretz that Hamsun's commemoration was "a clear result of the government's deep-rooted ignorance and lack of political and moral consciousness."

The head of the Simon Wiesenthal Center's Israel office, Ephraim Zuroff, said Hamsun's commemoration "casts a shadow on the task force's work, turning it into something less effective" and "more symbolic than practical."

Anne Sender, chairwoman of Norway's Jewish community, said she would rather the government didn't honor Hamsun, but she nonetheless lauded it for "using the events to highlight the man's Nazi past alongside his genius." She said she did not see the commemoration as conflicting with Norway's task force chairmanship. "The commemoration can be used in a healthy manner, to teach people who are less knowledgeable about Hamsun's Nazi sympathies."

Michael Melchior, Norway's Danish-born former chief rabbi, said the legitimacy of commemorating Hamsun depended on the prominence given to his Nazi past. "If Hamsun's ignominy is displayed in all its acrimoniousness, it wouldn't conflict with Norway's chairmanship of the task force," he said. "If they turn him into a hero, it would merit condemnation regardless of the task force."

Erez Uriely, director of the Oslo-based Center Against Anti-Semitism, concurs. "We should remember the genius Knut Hamsun, both as one of the most important authors of his time and as a Nazi supporter," he said.

But Manfred Gerstenfeld, a scholar on anti-Semitism and chairman of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, said the problem goes deeper than just the Hamsun issue. "The outrageous state-sponsored honoring of Hamsun is only the tip of the iceberg of why Norway should never have been chosen to chair the task force," he said

Last update - 18:42 06/06/2009

UN investigator 'shocked' by scale of destruction in Gaza

By News Agencies

Tags: UN, Gaza, war crimes

The head of a United Nations team investigating possible war crimes by Israel and Hamas during the Gaza war said Thursday he had been shocked by the scale of the destruction in the Palestinian areas.

South African Judge Richard Goldstone spoke at the end of a four-day fact-finding trip to Gaza, during which his 15-member team interviewed dozens of witnesses and visited sites damaged in Israel's three-week offensive against Hamas that ended Jan. 18.

His team hoped to visit Israel and the West Bank as well, but Israel has refused to cooperate, citing alleged anti-Israel bias by the U.N. Human Rights Council, the probe's sponsor.

Goldstone said he hoped Israel's refusal would not weaken the final report, due in early September, adding that it would not keep the team from investigating allegations against both sides.

"If we haven't dealt with facts that Israel would like us to deal with, I think we can hardly be blamed for that," he said.

The team announced Thursday that it will hold public hearings with the war's victims later this month in Gaza and Geneva.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said he did not anticipate a

change in Israel's stand toward the investigation or the Human Right Council, which has a record of criticizing Israel for its treatment of the Palestinians.

"They should call us the day the Human Rights Council decides on a human rights inquiry on some other place around the globe," he said, mentioning Darfur and Sri Lanka. "After that, we may start to be convinced that they are not singling out Israel."

Israeli, Palestinian and international human rights groups began calling for war crimes investigations soon after the 22-day war ended in January.

Israeli launched the war to stop eight years of Hamas rocket fire on Israeli towns.

Palestinian human rights groups say more than 1,400 Palestinians were killed, most of them civilians. Israel says around 1,100 Gazans were killed and that most were militants. Thirteen Israelis were also killed, three of them civilians.

Goldstone refused to comment on the ongoing investigation's content. But human rights groups have said Israel used disproportionate force and failed to protect civilians. They say Hamas fought from civilian areas and is suspected of having used human shields - all of which can be violations of international law.

Goldstone, who previously investigated war crimes in Rwanda and the former

Yugoslavia, said the public hearings in Gaza and Geneva later this month would allow the voices and the faces of victims to be seen and heard by the whole international community.

He said both Palestinians and Israelis would be invited to speak in Geneva.

Last update - 20:50 07/07/2009

UN investigator: Can't yet say if Israel committed war crimes in Gaza

By News Agencies

Tags: Israel News

The United Nations team charged with examining whether Israel and Hamas committed war crimes in the Gaza Strip during their war earlier this year has nearly concluded its probe, but says it is too early to determine a final verdict.

Richard Goldstone, a former chief UN war crimes prosecutor heading the four-person inquiry team, said he expected to submit the team's report to the UN Human Rights Council next month.

He made the comments as investigators wound up four days of public hearings from both Israelis and Palestinians.

Goldstone said his team regrets Israeli authorities blocked it from visiting Israel and the West Bank, but that testimony from victims from those areas was heard in Geneva, Switzerland.

Israel refused to cooperate with the mission because it regarded it as having biased instructions from the UN Human Rights Council, which has a track record of repeatedly singling out Israel for criticism and turning a blind eye to any Palestinian wrongdoing.

Goldstone said he regards the mandate of the fact-finding mission as requiring an independent investigation into all alleged violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law during the IDF's 22-day offensive.

"The testimonies we have heard from victims and witnesses... have been very difficult to hear, but I believe it is important that we listen to these stories," said Goldstone.

He said it would be premature, however, to talk about any conclusions the team may have made or whether it has enough evidence to present a case of war crimes.

"The hearings gave a voice to the victims and keep them from being lost among the statistics," he said.

"Last week we were in Gaza and heard two days of hearings and listened to the stories of intense pain, loss and suffering from the people of Gaza," Goldstone said.

"Yesterday and today in Geneva we have heard from victims and witnesses from Israel and from the West Bank, and they too have shared with us moving stories."

He said it was much better to see and hear people where they were affected and the team would have much preferred to hold the Geneva hearings in southern Israel, where Israelis have been subjected to rocket attack from Gaza, and in the West Bank.

"Obviously on this mission visiting Gaza was very important, not only to speak to people and hear what they suffered, what they endured, but also to see the physical damage, which I think shocked all of us, the extent of it," Goldstone said.

"No party to the conflict was fully cooperative," he said.

"That's the nature of this beast," Goldstone said. "One's dealing with strategic issues, one's dealing in some respects with intelligence matters, and one's got to do the best one can."

Goldstone says the team still plans to pose questions to the Israeli government, the Palestinian Authority and the Hamas rulers in Gaza, but then will wrap up the investigation and move on to writing its report, which is to be given to the United Nations by August.

Last update - 18:42 07/07/2009

American Jewish soldier killed in insurgent attack in Afghanistan

By Haaretz Service and The Associated Press

Tags: Jewish World, Israel News

An American Jewish soldier was killed during an attack on his base in eastern Afghanistan Saturday, the U.S. Army has confirmed.

Pfc. Aaron Fairbairn, 20, of Aberdeen, Washington, was killed when an insurgent drove an explosives-filled truck into Combat Outpost Zerok and detonated it.

Another soldier - Pfc. Justin Casillas - was also killed in the attack, and 12 other soldiers were injured.

Fairbairn and Casillas were both Alaska-based paratroopers.

Fairbairn's death comes just weeks after a British Jewish soldier was killed in Afghanistan in June. Lieutenant Paul Mervis, 27, was killed when a roadside bomb exploded near him while leading his platoon on foot patrol.

Two Jewish U.S. intelligence officers, Shawn Pine and Lieutenant Roslyn Schultte, were also killed recently in Kabul. Schulte, 25, was the first female graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy to be killed in action in Afghanistan or Iraq.

Australian Jewish soldier Gregory Sher, 30, was killed in January when his patrol base in southern Afghanistan came under rocket attack from Taliban insurgents.

Last update - 18:06 07/07/2009

Israel turns to cyberware to foil Iran nukes

By Reuters

Tags: Cyberwar, Israel News, Iran

In the late 1990s, a computer specialist from the Shin Bet security service hacked into the mainframe of the Pi Glilot fuel depot north of Tel Aviv.

It was meant to be a routine test of safeguards at the strategic site. But it also tipped off Israel to the potential such hi-tech infiltrations offered for real sabotage.

"Once inside the Pi Glilot system, we suddenly realized that, aside from accessing secret data, we could also set off deliberate explosions, just by programming a re-route of the pipelines," said a veteran of the Shin Bet drill.

So began a cyberwarfare project which, a decade on, is seen by independent experts as the likely new vanguard of Israel's efforts to foil Iran's nuclear ambitions.

The appeal of cyber attacks was boosted, Israeli sources say, by the limited feasibility of conventional air strikes on the distant and fortified Iranian atomic facilities, and by U.S. reluctance to countenance another open war in the Middle East.

"We came to the conclusion that, for our purposes, a key Iranian vulnerability is in its on-line information," said one recently retired security cabinet member, using a generic term for digital networks. "We have acted accordingly."

Cyberwarfare teams nestle deep within Israel's spy agencies, which have rich experience in traditional sabotage techniques and are cloaked in official secrecy and censorship.

They can draw on the know-how of Israeli commercial firms that are among the world's hi-tech leaders and whose staff are often veterans of elite military intelligence computer units.

"To judge by my interaction with Israeli experts in various international forums, Israel can definitely be assumed to have advanced cyber-attack capabilities," said Scott Borg, director of the U.S. Cyber Consequences Unit, which advises various Washington agencies on cyber security.

Technolytics Institute, an American consultancy, last year rated Israel the sixth-biggest "cyber warfare threat", after China, Russia, Iran, France and extremist/terrorist groups".

The United States is in the process of setting up a "Cyber Command" to oversee Pentagon operations, though officials have described its mandate as protective, rather than offensive.

Asked to speculate about how Israel might target Iran, Borg said malware - a commonly used abbreviation for "malicious software" - could be inserted to corrupt, commandeer or crash the controls of sensitive sites like uranium enrichment plants.

Such attacks could be immediate, he said. Or they might be latent, with the malware loitering unseen and awaiting an external trigger, or pre-set to strike automatically when the infected facility reaches a more critical level of activity.

As Iran's nuclear assets would probably be isolated from outside computers, hackers would be unable to access them directly, Borg said. Israeli agents would have to conceal the malware in software used by the Iranians or discreetly plant it on portable hardware brought in, unknowingly, by technicians.

"A contaminated USB stick would be enough," Borg said.

Ali Ashtari, an Iranian businessman executed as an Israeli spy last year, was convicted of supplying tainted communications equipment for one of Iran's secret military projects.

Iranian media quoted a security official as saying that Ashtari's actions "led to the defeat of the project with irreversible damage." Israel declined all comment on the case.

"Cyberwar has the advantage of being clandestine and deniable," Borg said, noting Israel's considerations in the face of an Iranian nuclear program that Tehran insists is peaceful.

"But its effectiveness is hard to gauge, because the targeted network can often conceal the extent of damage or even fake the symptoms of damage. Military strikes, by contrast, have an instantly quantifiable physical effect."

Israel may be open to a more overt strain of cyberwarfare. Tony Skinner of Jane's Defence Weekly cited Israeli sources as saying that Israel's 2007 bombing of an alleged atomic reactor in Syria was preceded by a cyber attack which neutralized ground radars and anti-aircraft batteries.

"State of War," a 2006 book by New York Times reporter James Risen, recounted a short-lived plan by the CIA and the Mossad to fry the power lines of an Iranian nuclear facility using a smuggled electromagnetic-pulse (EMP) device.

A massive, nation-wide EMP attack on Iran could be affected by detonating a nuclear device at atmospheric height. But while Israel is assumed to have the region's only atomic arms, most experts believe they would be used only in a war of last resort.

Last update - 17:59 07/07/2009

Kosher food at baseball games gets three strikes

By Jeff Weinstein, The Forward

Tags: jewish world

So A-Rod finally breaks his slump with a long drive into the seats, the fans leap to their feet - and wet tuna plops into your lap.

Even if there weren't the usual spat over who makes and packs the snacks for a game, a tuna sandwich or PB&J just doesn't cut it. At ballparks, salty, fatty, bad-for-you hot dogs and hamburgers aren't merely tolerated, they're required. So for observant baseball mavens, being kosher can be unfair.

The kosher baseball problem in New York was first addressed in 1998, when, under pressure from New York City Public Advocate Mark Green and Rabbi Marc Schneier, Shea and then Yankee Stadium opened small glatt kosher stands. Now that both Big Apple teams are playing in brand-new, tax-supported homes that include elaborate fast food and restaurant choices, kosher sports enthusiasts had new reason to hope that their needs wouldn't be ignored.

They weren't. New Jersey-based Kosher Sports set up four identical glatt kosher stands at the $800 million Citi Field - called "Debits Field" by older wags - and Ouri's Superior Kosher Caterers in Brooklyn did the same in the $1.5 billion Yankee palace. The season's on, and the 4 and 7 subway lines are jammed. So how's the food?

In general, Citi Field thrashes Yankee Stadium in the variety and success of its nonkosher food-stand offerings: authentic tacos, Blue Smoke barbecue, a branch of Danny Meyer's wildly successful Shake Shack. It's no different for kosher food, I've discovered, and the reason is simple: Kosher Sports at Citi Field cooks dogs and sausages on a small grill in front of you, while Ouri's somewhat wider selection is prepared off the premises, packaged, sealed and reheated. No matter how excellent the original recipes or ingredients, no fast food can survive such treatment with taste, texture or essential ballpark "snap" intact.

On a recent visit, the lines at both sets of carts are long right before the games begin, but they move steadily. Except for an occasional yarmulke, I couldn't tell from the customers' assorted ages and races that these stands are special - though once, near an Ouri's, a minyan formed during the seventh-inning stretch.

At times, the always-friendly staffers struggled to get orders straight and make change. This is especially true at Ouri's, because none of those carts have a cash register, just a lock-box. Also, all Yankee food stands except Ouri's list calories after each item. Confidence was not exactly inspired, and after a companion and I bought and sampled almost all of Ouri's food on offer = each stand was out of something, and even early on, none of the four had burgers - I am terribly sorry to say my confidence vanished.

The glatt frank ($5.50), mildly spiced and somewhat sweet, was lukewarm, watery and limp; the squishy bun didn't help. Too bad, because a hot dog is baseball's bottom line.

Barely heated chicken nuggets ($8) had long ago lost juiciness or savor and were hard to chew. Strips of rubbery beef layered on a flaccid hero with sweet pickle ($12) was almost impossible to negotiate, and the reddish mass of shredded shawarma ($12) on a similar roll had the feel of a perverse Pablum.

My Yankee advice? Try the toothsome knish, but make sure it?s hot, and then the respectable falafel plus tahini and greens ($8), if the pita?s edges haven't gone dry. There's also a fruit stand - yes, in Yankee Stadium - near Gate 4 for dessert.

Fewer kosher selections are offered at Citi Field, but they feel closer in merit and price to the temptations around them. I've always wished the fine Abeles & Heymann dog ($4.75) had a bit more garlic and spurt, but it went down well because the roll tastes like real bread; two pieces of quickly grilled pastrami placed on top to make a "pastrami dog" ($6.50) improve the bare frank enormously.

A plump A&H beef "Italian" sausage on an even better roll ($7.25) is topped with sautéed tricolor bell peppers. But bring your own mustard or ketchup; no packets are provided, and I was pointed to common condiment stations whose kosher qualifications are doubtful.

Many ticket buyers are grateful to have kosher options, yet I wish the "pleasure factor" were higher both in the food that's served and in patrons? expectations. Dietary restrictions need not be culinary limitations, even in a ballpark, and there's no reason for kosher cooking anywhere not to shine.

Writer and editor Jeff Weinstein, for more than 15 years the restaurant critic for New York?s Village Voice, covers cultural and gay issues at www.artsjournal.com/outthere.

Last update - 17:24 07/07/2009

Formula One chief says praise of Hitler was 'misunderstood'

By Haaretz Service

Tags: Israel news, Hitler

The director of the Formula One racing organization has apologized for remarks he made last week praising Nazi dictator Adolph Hitler.

"Those who don't know me think I support Hitler's atrocities; those who do know me have told me how unwise I was to articulate my points so badly that it should have been so widely misunderstood," Bernie Ecclestone told British newspaper on Tuesday.

"I'm just sorry I was an idiot. I sincerely, genuinely apologize," he said.

The World Jewish Congress had called on Ecclestone to resign or announce his own suspension after the Formula One chief praised Adolf Hitler for his ability to "get things done" in an outspoken interview with London's The Times.

He was quoted as saying that democracy "hasn't done a lot of good for many countries - including this one [The United Kingdom]."

"In a lot of ways, terrible to say this I suppose, but apart from the fact that Hitler got taken away and persuaded to do things that I have no idea whether he wanted to do or not, he was in the way that he could command a lot of people, able to get things done," Ecclestone was quoted as saying.

"In the end he got lost, so he wasn't a very good dictator."

Ecclestone also told The Times that Saddam Hussein, the executed former dictator of Iraq, "was the only one who could control that country."

He was quoted as saying that democracy "hasn't done a lot of good for many countries - including this one."

"In a lot of ways, terrible to say this I suppose, but apart from the fact that Hitler got taken away and persuaded to do things that I have no idea whether he wanted to do or not, he was in the way that he could command a lot of people, able to get things done," Ecclestone was quoted as saying.

"In the end he got lost, so he wasn't a very good dictator."

Ecclestone, 78, first apologized in an interview with the German daily Bild Zeitung on Monday, saying his remarks had been taken out of context.

Last update - 19:17 07/07/2009

Palestinian fatwa bans weddings without proof couple is swine flu free

By DPA

Tags: Israel News, Palestinians

The Palestinian Authority's top Islamic cleric on Tuesday issued a fatwa, or Islamic ruling, banning the issuance of marriage contracts without a certificate proving that couples are free of the swine flu virus.

The religious ruling was issued after more swine flu cases were registered in the West Bank.

In his fatwa, Chief Justice Taysseer al-Tamimi ordered religious courts in the Palestinian Authority not to complete wedding procedures unless couples bring a document from the Health Ministry proving they are not infected with the flu virus.

Al-Tamimi said the fatwa aims at curbing the spread of the virus in the West Bank.

The Health Ministry said Tuesday that two new cases were discovered in the cities of Ramallah and Bethlehem, raising the number of H1N1 cases in the Palestinian Authority to 69. No deaths have been reported.

Last update - 19:34 07/07/2009

Syria: No peace talks until Israel halts settlement activity

By News Agencies

Tags: Germany, Hezbollah

Syrian President Bashar Assad said on Tuesday that Israel must halt activity in West Bank settlements before Damascus considers renewing peace negotiations.

Assad told visiting German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier there is no real partner in Israel to make peace, repeating remarks he made last week.

Syria has said it is willing to resume indirect peace talks mediated by Turkey as long as they focus on a complete Israeli withdrawal from the Golan Heights, a strategic plateau captured by Israel in the 1967 Six-Day War.

Steinmeier, meanwhile, declared during the meeting that regional entities must not waste in laying the groundwork for Middle East peace, adding that none of the sides involved could afford to push off the process of negotiations for another year.

After meeting Monday with Assad and Foreign Minister Walid Moallem, Steinmeir called on the leadership in Damascus to do everything in its power to ensure a quick peace process.

Efforts must be made to "keep the region's destructive might must be kept to a minimum," he told the Syrian leaders, referring by name to Hezbollah, a Lebanese-based organization that draws support from Syria, as well as the radical Islamist Palestinian Hamas movement.

During a bilateral meeting with Assad, the two leaders were unable to come to agreement about the possibility of the resumption of Israeli-Syrian contacts. Those were suspended after Israel's military assault on the Gaza Strip earlier this year.

Steinmeier said he has doubts whether a Turkish mediator could make any advances in this area.

Moallem said there was only a limited window of opportunity to achieve Middle East peace and said Israel was wasting time. At the same time, he said Syria would not give up its claim to the Golan Heights, captured by Israel in the 1967 Six-Day War.

President Simon Peres told Steinmeier on Sunday that Assad must understand that Israel would not hand the Heights over to Syria on a

"silver platter."

In response, Moallem told his German counterpart that Syria did not want the Golan on a silver platter, but on gold.

Steinmeier also visited Lebanon on Tuesday, where he is supposed to meet with prime minister-designate Saad Hariri.

Last update - 17:50 07/07/2009

What would Arab states have to give in exchange for a settlement freeze?

By Reuters

Tags: Israel News, Arabs

U.S. Middle East envoy George Mitchell is pressing for a halt to Israeli settlement activity, holding out the prospect of reciprocal steps by Arab states towards normalizing relations with Israel.

Talks in London on Monday between Mitchell and Defense Minister Ehud Barak on a package that could include a settlement freeze and normalization ended inconclusively.

Further discussions are planned between Mitchell and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as early as next week.

Egypt and Jordan are the only Arab states that have diplomatic relations with Israel. Below are the regional normalization steps U.S. and Western officials say Washington is seeking:

# Arab countries in the Gulf would allow Israeli passenger and civilian cargo aircraft to fly over their territory. The move would save long detours on flights to Asia, a popular destination for Israeli travelers.

# Israel would be able to open interest sections in other states' embassies in Arab capitals, such as Riyadh and Abu Dhabi. Israel had interest sections in several Arab countries but they were closed after the start in 2000 of a Palestinian uprising in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

# Arab countries would lift bans on the entry of tourists and other visitors whose passports carry Israeli visas or entry stamps. Such a step would facilitate regional travel for tourists and business executives.

# Arab states would allow Israeli-registered mobile phones to operate on Arab networks, a move that could foster economic contacts.

# Israel and Arab states would hold cultural exchanges. Arab countries would ease restrictions that prevent their officials from meeting with Israeli counterparts at international events.

A senior Israeli official familiar with Mitchell's talks said Israel was skeptical the envoy would be able to coax Arab states to make concrete normalization commitments if only a temporary settlement freeze was declared.

"Even if the Americans can bring a serious settlement freeze, the normalization steps will be implemented only gradually and based on performance by Israel," the official said

Last update - 13:28 07/07/2009

Mubarak: Gilad Shalit is in good condition

By The Associated Press

Tags: Hosni Mubarak, Egypt

Israel Defense Forces soldier Gilad Shalit, who is being held captive in Gaza by Hamas militants, is in good condition, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak said on Tuesday.

The Egyptian president added that he hopes the issue of the soldier's release will be resolved soon.

Mubarak's comments came during a news conference Tuesday with President Shimon Peres, who was visiting Cairo. Shalit has been held in Gaza for more than three years by militants who tunneled into Israel and launched a raid against an IDF position along the Israel-Gaza border.

The 22-year-old Israeli sergeant has not been seen since, and Hamas has prevented the Red Cross from visiting him. Egypt has been mediating attempts to arrange a swap of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners, including militants involved in attacks, for the soldier.

When Mubarak was asked about Shalit, he answered: "Communications are ongoing. Shalit is in good condition. I hope that in the coming period, not in a long time, the Shalit issue will be closed."

Peres's visit was designed to discuss efforts to free Shalit as well as ways to promote a regional peace agreement.

Egypt and Jordan are the only Arab nations to have signed a peace agreement with Israel.

Both Mubarak and Peres emphasized that there is a good opportunity for peace.

"We cannot miss this opportunity. The differences between us are not that great that they cannot be overcome," Peres said. He also emphasized Israel's commitment to the two-state solution and said that Israel did not intend to build new settlements.

"Israel has no intention to rule over the Palestinian people. We have no intention to confiscate land, and we have no intention to build new settlements," he said. He did not address the issue of building within existing settlements, which has been a key point of contention between Israel and the United States.

The United States has been pushing for a freeze on all settlement building while the Israeli government under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been arguing for the right to build within existing settlements to allow for growing families.

The presidency in Israel is largely a ceremonial role but Peres' high stature and the controversial reputation of the current Israeli foreign minister who has been shunned by Egypt after he cursed Mubarak for not visiting Israel means the Israeli president's visit takes on a greater diplomatic significance.

Last update - 17:53 07/07/2009

Obama: U.S. 'absolutely' did not give Israel green light to strike Iran

By News Agencies

Tags: Obama, Israel news, Russia

U.S. President Barack Obama rebuffed suggestions that Washington had given Israel a green light to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, in an interview with CNN on Tuesday.

Asked by CNN whether Washington had given Israel approval to strike Iran's nuclear facilities, Obama answered: "Absolutely not."

"We have said directly to the Israelis that it is important to try and resolve this in an international setting in a way that does not create major conflict in the Middle East," Obama said in reference to Iran's contentious nuclear program.

In the interview broadcast from Russia where he is on an official visit, Obama added, however: "We can't dictate to other countries what their security interests are.

"What is also true is, it is the policy of the United States to try to resolve the issue of Iran's nuclear capabilities," Obama said.

This would be achieved "through diplomatic channels," he added.

Sources close to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told The Washington Times that the premier is hesitant to request formal U.S. approval to launch military operations against Iran for fear that Washington would turn him down, according to a report which appeared in Tuesday editions.

The sources said the Israeli leader feels there is no point in seeking American acquiescence at this stage givenObama's stated intention to pursue a policy of diplomatic engagement with the Tehran regime, The Washington Times reported.

"There was a decision not to press [for U.S. approval of a strike] because it was probably inadequate for the engagement policy and what we know about Obama's approach to Iran," a senior Israeli official told The Washington Times.

Discussion over authorization for such a strike arose after Vice President Joe Biden told ABC news earlier this week that the U.S. would not stand in the way of an Israeli attack on Iran.

"Israel can determine for itself - it's a sovereign nation - what's in their interest and what they decide to do relative to Iran and anyone else," Biden said.

Obama: Russia must help end Iran threat

Obama, on a visit to Moscow on Tuesday called for the United States and Russia to overcome Cold War mistrust and forge a true global partnership, saying that the U.S. wouldn't need to deploy a missile defense system in Europe, a move Russia opposes, if Russia helped to bring the Iranian nuclear threat to an end.

"If the threat from Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program is eliminated, the driving force for missile defense in Europe will be eliminated," Obama said in remarks prepared for delivery to graduates from Moscow's New Economic School.

"America wants a strong, peaceful and prosperous Russia," Obama said. "On the fundamental issues that will shape this century, Americans and Russians share common interests that form a basis for cooperation," the U.S. President went on to say.

Obama also laid out a vision for the graduates of the sort of world he believed they should pursue.

"The future does not belong to those who gather armies on a field of battle or bury missiles in the ground," he told his audience. "The future belongs to young people with the education and imagination to create."

But he also told the Russian students that success in the 21st century depended on economies that functioned within the rule of law.

"People everywhere should have the right to do business or get an education without paying a bribe," he said, in an apparent reference to the corruption which even President Medvedev says blights Russian society.

Obama was careful in his remarks not to criticize the Kremlin leadership directly and he repeatedly said that the United States did not seek to impose any system of government on another country.

But his message that "governments which serve their own people survive and thrive; governments which serve only their own power do not" is likely to resonate with Russia's embattled pro-Western opposition, which criticizes the Kremlin for suppressing democracy.

Last update - 12:44 07/07/2009

Peres: My talks with Mubarak don't impinge on Lieberman's authority

By Jack Khoury, Haaretz Correspondent, Haaretz Service, and News Agencies

Tags: Shimon Peres

Prior to his meeting with Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak on Tuesday, President Shimon Peres told reporters that his trip to Cairo is not meant to impinge on Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman's position as foreign minister.

Peres said part of the president's job description was to represent the state abroad, and that his talks with Egyptian officials do not encroach on Liebermann's turf.

With Ehud Barak overseeing the Netanyahu government's contacts with U.S. officials over the disagreement on settlement construction, Lieberman is increasingly perceived in Israel as a marginal figure in shaping Jerusalem's foreign policy.

Prior to the meeting, Peres told Haaretz that among the issues to be discussed are the fate of captive Israel Defense Forces soldier Gilad Shalit, advancing the Arab peace initiative, and the Iranian nuclear program.

Peres said that he consulted with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prior to his departure for Egypt.

When asked if Netanyahu accepted the Arab peace initiative, Peres replied that the question needed to be asked of Netanyahu. He added that the issue was sure to be raised during his talks with Mubarak.

The president said that recent developments have created a convergence of interests in Israel-Egypt relations. Cairo and Jerusalem are seeing eye-to-eye on a number of security issues, including the need to stymie arms-smuggling from Sinai into the Gaza Strip, Peres said.

Mubarak said on Tuesday he believed Shalit was well and that he hoped

the issue would not take a long time to resolve.

"I believe there were contacts (with Gilad Shalit), and that Shalit is fine, and I hope that in the upcoming period, maybe, not in the long term, the issue of soldier Shalit will end," Mubarak said in a joint news conference with Peres in Cairo.

Last update - 12:12 07/07/2009

'Israel hesitant to seek U.S. okay to strike Iran'

By Haaretz Service

Tags: Barack Obama, Iran

Sources close to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told The Washington Times that the premier is hesitant to request formal U.S. approval to launch military operations against Iran for fear that Washington would turn him down, according to a report which appeared in Tuesday editions.

The sources said the Israeli leader feels there is no point in seeking American acquiescence at this stage given President Barack Obama's stated intention to pursue a policy of diplomatic engagement with the Tehran regime, The Washington Times reported.

"There was a decision not to press [for U.S. approval of a strike] because it was probably inadequate for the engagement policy and what we know about Obama's approach to Iran," a senior Israeli official told The Washington Times.

The report said that although Israel has concluded that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose an existential threat, it has refrained from attacking in deference to vital American interests in the region.

The Israeli government said it supported the new administration's efforts to pursue diplomacy in a bid to halt Iran's nuclear program, though it has warned that talks will fail unless the West sets a firm deadline for Iranian compliance.

In the latter stages of the previous U.S. administration, Netanyahu's predecessor, Ehud Olmert, requested that Washington provide Israel will bunker-busting bombs widely believed to be intended for use in an attack on Iran's nuclear installations, according to The New York Times. That request was rebuffed by George W. Bush.

Citing U.S. and foreign officials, the Times reported the White House was unable to determine whether Israel had decided to carry out the strike before Washington objected or whether Olmert was trying to get Bush to act more decisively before he leaves office this month.

The Washington Times report comes days after Vice President Joe Biden told ABC television that "Israel can determine for itself - it's a sovereign nation - what's in their interest and what they decide to do relative to Iran and anyone else."

The State Department sought to clarify the implications of Biden's statement, saying that the vice president's remarks should not be construed as an American "green light" for an Israeli strike on Iran.

"We are certainly not going to give a green light to any kind of military strike, but Israel is a sovereign country and we're not going to dictate its actions," State Department spokesperson Ian Kelly said on Monday.

"We share the Israelis' deep concerns about Iran's nuclear program," Kelly said. "But you have to ask Israel if they are going to make a strike."

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Monday welcomed Biden's statement, calling it "logical."

But other Israeli leaders avoided comment, a low-key reaction that suggested Israel did not see Biden's comments as a green light to strike Iran. Obama underlined that diplomacy with Iran remains an option

Last update - 09:16 07/07/2009

Report: Israel releases former U.S. congresswoman McKinney

By Reuters

Tags: Israel news, Gaza, Free Gaza

Israel has allowed a former U.S. congresswoman, Cynthia McKinney, to return home days after detaining her and other activists on board a ship carrying relief supplies for Gaza, a pro-Palestinian group said on Monday.

Israeli authorities intercepted the vessel, which had 21 activists on board, on June 30 and said it would not be permitted to enter Gaza's coastal waters because of security risks in the area and an existing naval blockade.

McKinney has been released, a statement by the American Muslims for Palestine said.

The statement said another American, John Judge, was still being detained. But later on Monday, a spokeswoman for the group, Kristin Szremski, corrected this to say that Judge was not being held.

"McKinney and the others were taking much needed food and medical supplies to the 1.5 million residents of Gaza, where Israel's two-year blockade has resulted in a complete economic breakdown that has forced more than 70 percent of the population into abject poverty," said the statement from the group based in Palos Hills, Illinois.

Last week a United Nations human rights investigator, Richard Falk, called Israel's seizure of the ship "unlawful."

Israel's ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, Aharon Leshno-Yaar, rejected that charge and said "clearly the purpose of that ship was to create a buzz and serve as a propaganda vehicle against Israel."

McKinney was defeated for re-election to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2006, not long after she scuffled with a Capitol Police officer at a security checkpoint. She was not charged in that incident but apologized for it.

Last update - 13:32 07/07/2009

Norway invites Israelis to debate Nazi sympathizer's legacy

By Cnaan Liphshiz, Haaretz Correspondnet

Tags: Knut Hamsun, norway, nazis

Following angry reactions in Israel to Norway's honoring of novelist and Nazi-sympathizer Knut Hamsun, the institute commemorating him this year has invited Israeli campaigners against anti-Semitism to a debate next year. But the Israelis are demanding that the debate take place sooner, lest it become "irrelevant."

Last month Haaretz quoted campaigners who claimed that by declaring 2009 "Hamsun Year," Norway has damaged the international Holocaust awareness drive that it was recently appointed to head as chair of the 26-nation Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education. The once celebrated author, shunned for supporting Norway's Nazi occupation regime during World War II, was born 150 years ago and grew up in Hamaroy in northern Norway, where the government is building a cultural center in his name due to open next month.

Efraim Zuroff, head of the Simon Wiesenthal Center's Israel office, told Haaretz the commemoration "casts a shadow on the task force's work."

Manfred Gerstenfeld, chairman of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, said the Hamsun controversy was "the tip of the iceberg" of other disturbing phenomena in Norway.

"Knut Hamsun wrote magnificent literature, and also an obituary for Adolf Hitler," Bodil Borset, the designated director of the Hamaroy Hamsun Center responded last month in Aftenposten, the country's second largest newspaper. "He was among our greatest authors and a Nazi sympathizer. Can we reconcile this?"

The center, Borset said, would be "more than happy" to invite Zuroff and Gerstenfeld to attend a conference next year on the Hamsun Center's activities.

"Borset appears to believe that Hamsun's literary brilliance warrants the celebration of his birth, regardless of his active support for a regime which annihilated innocent civilians," Zuroff wrote in reply. While expressing willingness to attend, Zuroff insisted the event is held as soon as possible, while Norway still chairs the Task Force, so that it may have "practical consequences."

The Norwegian foreign ministry said that Hamsun's commemoration also focuses on his Nazi past and will thus serve as an educational tool. However, the commemoration is generating protest in Norway as well. Two weeks ago, unknown parties hung a Nazi flag over a statue of the novelist which was recently unveiled in the city of Grimstad in south Norway.

Mayor Hans Antonsen told the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation that whoever hung the Nazi flag there - presumably to protest the commemoration - perpetrated a "despicable act." He added: "We have a strong debate in Grimstad over Hamsun, and this is the absolute worst example of it."

Last update - 03:10 07/07/2009

Hamas taunts Israel with Gilad Shalit cartoon

By The Associated Press

Hamas TV in Gaza has broadcast a short animated movie mocking Gilad Shalit - the Israeli soldier captured by the militant Islamic group three years ago.

The Israeli media played excerpts from the movie on Monday.

The film depicts the 22-year-old Israel Defense Forces Sgt. chained to a jail cell wall, pleading with a Palestinian boy to be set free. The boy refuses, saying he has relatives in Israeli prisons.

Gaza militants captured the soldier in June 2006 after tunneling into Israel. Two other soldiers were killed in the attack.Shalit has not been seen since, and Hamas has prevented the Red Cross from visiting him.

Egypt has been mediating attempts to arrange a prisoner exchange in which Israel would release hundreds of Palestinian prisoners in exchange for Shalit.

Last update - 07:10 07/07/2009

Israel summons EU envoy over settlements criticism

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News

The Foreign Ministry on Monday said the EU ambassador to Israel was called in for explanations after the European Commission said Israel's settlement policy helps strangle the Palestinian economy and makes the Palestinian government more dependent on foreign aid.

In an unusually harsh statement Monday, the commission said that "it is the European taxpayers who pay most of the price of this dependence."

The commission says expropriation of fertile land for Israeli settlements, roads that serve settlers only and West Bank checkpoints help constrain Palestinian economic growth and make the Palestinian government more dependent on aid.

The European Union is one of the largest donors to the Palestinian Authority.

The commission says this year alone it has paid more than 200 million euros ($280 million) to help cover the Palestinian budget deficit

Last update - 23:56 06/07/2009

U.S. denies giving Israel 'green light' to strike Iran

By Natasha Mozgovaya, Haaretz Correspondent, and The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News, Iran, Joe Biden

Vice President Joe Biden's statement that Israel can decide on its own whether to strike Iran's nuclear sites should not be construed as an American "green light" for such an action, the State Department said on Monday.

"We are certainly not going to give a green light to any kind of military strike, but Israel is a sovereign country and we're not going to dictate its actions," State Department spokesperson Ian Kelly said on Monday.

"We share the Israelis' deep concerns about Iran's nuclear program," Kelly said. "But you have to ask Israel if they are going to make a strike."

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Monday welcomed Biden's statement, calling it "logical."

But other Israeli leaders avoided comment, a low-key reaction that suggested Israel did not see Biden's comments as a green light to strike Iran. President Barack Obama underlined that diplomacy with Iran remains an option.

Israel considers Iran a strategic threat because of its nuclear program and long-range missile development, dismissing Iranian denials that it intends to build nuclear weapons. Israel has been nervous over the Obama administration's attempts to engage Iran, and Israel has pointedly sent clear signals of its military capabilities while urging world action to rein in Tehran.

Meanwhile, the U.S. goal of dialogue with Tehran has been rattled by Iran's heavy crackdown on protesters in the country's disputed presidential election, though Washington says it still hopes the policy will bear fruit.

Interviewed by ABC-TV on Sunday, Biden appeared to depart from his previous comment that an Israeli attack on Iran would be "ill-advised."

Asked about the possibility of an Israeli attack against Iran's nuclear facilities, Biden replied Sunday, "Israel can determine for itself - it's a sovereign nation - what's in their interest and what they decide to do relative to Iran and anyone else."

The White House said Biden's remarks did not signal a shift in U.S. policy. In an interview published by the New York Times on Monday, Obama indicated the diplomatic option was still viable. "We have offered a pathway for Iran to rejoining the international community," he was quoted as saying.

Lieberman's response to Biden's comments was relatively measured. "I think he said things that are very logical," he said. "Israel is a sovereign state and at the end of the day, the government of Israel has sole responsibility for its security and future, not anybody else."

"Sometimes there are disputes between friends, but at the end of the day the decision is ours," he said.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office has refused to comment, underlining Israel's sensitive position on Iran and on U.S. policy toward Tehran.

Israel, which is widely believed to have a nuclear arsenal of its own, says it would likely be targeted by Iran, based on repeated statements by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad referring to Israel's destruction.

But even Israeli hawks like Lieberman recognize the limitations of an Israeli strike. Israel destroyed Iraq's nuclear reactor in a 1981 air strike, but experts do not believe Israel can do the same with Iran's nuclear operations, which are spread around the country, some of them hidden and heavily fortified.

Israel would also have to take into account the desires of the U.S., Israel's most important political and military ally.

The top U.S. military officer, Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned Sunday of the danger of an Iranian nuclear weapon - and of the fallout from an attack against Iran.

"I worry about it being very destabilizing not just in and of itself but the unintended consequences of a strike like that," he told CBS TV.

Netanyahu has been warning about the dangers of the Iranian nuclear program for years, calling for intensive world action to stop it. Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, leader of the dovish Labor Party, speaks frequently of leaving all of Israel's options open.

Israel has sent several military signals to Iran.

This week an Israeli submarine said by foreign experts to have the capability of carrying nuclear-tipped missiles returned to the Mediterranean after crossing to the Red Sea in the direction of Iran, a mission seen as a warning. Also, Israel has held air force maneuvers that were described unofficially as practicing an attack on Iranian targets.

Lieberman, who has advocated radical military responses to a range of challenges over the years, could be expected to beat the drum for an Israeli attack on Iran.

Instead, he has voiced a contrasting concern - that Israel might be expected to do the world's dirty work by hitting Iran, leaving the world community free to criticize Israel afterward, as happened after the attack on Iraq in 1981.

During a visit to Russia, Lieberman said, "We do not intend to bomb Iran, and nobody will solve their problems with our hands.

Last update - 07:12 07/07/2009

German Jews condemn slaying of pregnant Muslim woman

By Agencies

Jews in Germany joined their Muslim compatriots Monday condemnong the horrifying murder of a pregnant Muslim woman in a Dresden courthouse last week.

The secretary of Germany's Central Council of Jews, Stephan Kramer, said he was appalled by the attack.

"All those people who have in the past belittled our concern about a phobia against Islam in Germany are seeing after this awful act how

w

rong they were," he said, adding that the German neo-Nazis had been rousing up a climate of xenophobia in Germany for years.

Aiman Mazyek, secretary of the Central Council of Muslims in Germany, said such violence was no wonder when Islam was constantly mentioned in the same breath as extremism and terrorism, but he warned against revenge.

"German Muslims must not be infected by the spark of hate that caused this crime," he said. "Let's prove now that the Germans have no cause to be afraid of us."

Marwa al-Shirbini, 31, who regularly wore a scarf, was stabbed 18 times by a German man of Russian descent as she was about to give evidence against him in a civil suit between them in Dresden.

On Monday, thousands of mourners marched behind the coffin of Marwa al-Sherbini, 32, in her Mediterranean hometown of Alexandria where her body was buried after being flown back from Germany.

"There is no god but God and the Germans are the enemies of God," chanted the mourners, while others carried banners condemning racism.

"We will avenge her killing," her brother Tarek el-Sherbini told The Associated Press by telephone from the mosque where prayers were being recited in front of his sister's coffin. "In the West, they don't recognize us. There is racism."

Al-Sherbini, who was about four months pregnant, was involved in a court case against her neighbor for calling her a terrorist and was set to testify against him when he stabbed her 18 times inside the courtroom in front of her 3-year-old son.

Her husband, who was in Germany on a research fellowship, came to her aid and was also stabbed by the neighbor and shot in the leg by a security guard who initially mistook him for the attacker, German prosecutors said. He is now in critical condition in a German hospital, according to al-Sherbini's brother.

"The guards thought that as long as he wasn't blond, he must be the attacker so they shot him," al-Sherbini told an Egyptian television station.

The man, who has only been identified as 28-year-old Alex W., remains in detention and prosecutors have opened an investigation on suspicion of murder.

Christian Avenarius, the prosecutor in Dresden where the incident took place, described the killer as driven by a deep hatred of Muslims. "It was very clearly a xenophobic attack of a fanatical lone wolf."

He added that the attacker was a Russian of German descent who had immigrated to Germany in 2003 and had expressed his contempt for Muslims at the start of the trial.

At its regular news conference on Monday, a German government spokesman Thomas Steg said if the attack was racist, the government naturally condemns this in the strongest terms.

The killing has dominated Egyptian media for days, while it has received comparatively little coverage in German and Western media.

A German Muslim group criticized government officials and the media for not paying enough attention to the crime.

The incident in Dresden had anti-Islamic motives. So far, the reactions from politicians and media have been incomprehensibly meager, Aiman Mazyek, the general secretary of the Central Council of Muslims, told Berlin's Tagesspiegel daily.

Egyptian commentators said the incident was an example of how hate crimes against Muslims are overlooked in comparison to hate crimes committed by Muslims against Westerners. Many commentators pointed to the uproar that followed the 2004 murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh by a Dutch-born Islamic fundamentalist angry over one of his films criticizing the treatment of Muslim women.

Abdel Azeem Hamad, chief editor of the independent Egyptian daily el-Shorouk, said that if the victim had been a Jew, there would be have been in an uproar.

"What we demand is just some attention to be given to the killing of a young innocent mother on the hands of fanatic extremist," he wrote in his column.

An Egyptian blogger Hicham Maged, "wrote let us play the 'What If' game."

"Just imagine if the situation was reversed and the victim was a Westerner who was stabbed anywhere in the world or - God forbid - in any Middle Eastern country by Muslim extremists," he said.

The Egyptian Pharmacists' Association called for a boycott of German drugs.

According to numerous interviews in Egyptian local papers with el-Sherbini family, the man who stabbed al-Sherbini used to accuse her of being a terrorist, and in one incident, he tried to take off her headscarf.

Laila Shams, al-Sherbini's mother, told the el-Wafd daily that her daughter said she'd difficulty finding a job in Germany because of her head scarf.

"One [employer] suggested she remove her head scarf to get a job. She said no," she said.

Officials from a German Muslim group and the country's main Jewish group made a joint visit Monday to the Dresden hospital where the victim's husband is being treated.

"You don't have to be a Muslim to act against anti-Muslim behavior, and you don't have to be a Jew to act against anti-Semitism," said Stephan Kramer, the general secretary of the Central Council of Jews.

Last update - 23:58 06/07/2009

Barak: Progress in talks with U.S. over settlements, but still a way to go

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent and Reuters

Tags: Israel News, George Mitchell

In an attempt to bridge the divide between Jerusalem and Washington over the issue of West Bank settlement construction, Defense Minister Ehud Barak met with U.S. Mideast envoy George Mitchell in London for over three hours on Monday.

Most of the meeting took place in private, though Mitchell and Barak were later joined by the defense minister's team of consultants as well as by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's aide, Yitzhak Molko.

"I think there is progress. There's still a way to go," Barak told reporters after the talks in London.

He said he expected no imminent announcement on Israeli settlement building, a key issue in the talks.

However, Barak, who last met Mitchell on Tuesday in New York, said he was optimistic about the chances of "preparing the ground for launching a major peace process."

A senior U.S. official has told Reuters that Washington is asking Arab governments whether they might ease sanctions on Israel if it freezes settlement on land Palestinians want for a state.

"I think the Americans are active on this issue," Barak said when asked to confirm this.

"While they are demanding from Israel steps and concessions in order to enable this regional peace effort to take off, they are approaching the Arabs as well and asking what they can contribute in terms of ... starting normalization with Israel."

"We are looking and trying to find a formula (which) needs to show our readiness to be sensitive to the needs of others."

Barak described the talks with Mitchell as "a very good, constructive discussion" and said they had addressed all aspects of the Middle East peace process including the Palestinian, Syrian and Lebanese tracks.

He said they had discussed steps which could be taken to ensure "our slight differences regarding how to deal with the issue of settlements will ... be clarified but within the context of the need to push ahead the wider peace agreement."

Barak and Mitchell also agreed that initiating peace talks with the Palestinian Authority, Syria and Lebanon is a priority for both Israel and the United States. Both men released a joint statement which said that the two countries were committed to continued progress toward regional peace.

The statement also stressed that the Palestinians must continue to improve the security situation in the West Bank. Barak and Mitchell called on Arab nations to work toward normalizing their relations with Israel. The statement added that Israel must act on settlement building as well as freeing restrictions on the Palestinian population in the West Bank.

Barak and Mitchell said they expected continued progress to be achieved during Mitchell's visit to Jerusalem next week.

Aides to the defense minister said that Monday's meeting "continued the progress with regards to the settlement issue and furthered the understanding between the two parties."

Mitchell is scheduled to meet Netanyahu next week when he arrives in Israel.

Last update - 10:51 07/07/2009

Lieberman: Sarkozy's remark was a 'regrettable' verbal slip

By Mazal Mualem, Haaretz Correspondent and Reuters

Tags: Avigdor Lieberman

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said on Monday that French President Nicolas Sarkozy had made a "slip of the tongue" by calling for his dismissal, but that he was not disturbed by the remark.

Lieberman also dismissed what Israeli commentators call a snub by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has given Defense Minister Ehud Barak a mandate to narrow a rift with Washington over settlement building in the West Bank.

Neither Sarkozy nor Netanyahu have confirmed Israeli media reports last week that the French leader had told the Israeli during talks in Paris on June 24 to "get rid of" Lieberman as foreign minister.

Israel's Channel Two television and several newspapers said that Sarkozy had compared Lieberman, whose party has introduced legislation to curb the rights of Arab citizens, with French far-rightist Jean Marie Le Pen.

"People tend to say unnecessary things, including myself," Lieberman told reporters in parliament who asked him about Sarkozy's remarks.

"I relate to it as a regrettable slip of the tongue," said Lieberman, head of the Yisrael Beitenu party, Israel's third largest faction, said. "I'm not very excited by it."

A spokesman for Lieberman had denounced the reports of Sarkozy's comments as amounting to "intolerable" meddling in Israeli affairs, but Lieberman himself had avoided any comment before Monday's meeting of his parliamentary faction.

Lieberman has been accused of racism by Israel's Arab citizens for introducing legislation that could curb their rights. He has also said their towns be ceded to Palestinian jurisdiction in exchange for Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank.

The reports about Sarkozy's purported remarks had put a spotlight on a rift between Israel and Western countries over Netanyahu's rejection of calls to stop settlement building in land captured in a 1967 war which Palestinians want for a state.

Conflict of interest

Lieberman also said Monday that he had deliberately chosen to avoid taking part in the debate over West Bank settlement, as his own residence in a settlement would pose a conflict of interest.

"As far as I am concerned, there is a conflict of interest when someone who lives in a settlement, in an isolate town that is not even counted among the settlements, takes part in the issue," he said.

"I would not want to be accused of this when I have made it a calculated choice not to engage in negotiations on the issue with the Americans," he said. U.S.-Israeli relations are "more important than the will of a foreign minister," Lieberman said.

"There is no alternative to our relationship with the U.S., but we will never give up our red lines," he added.

Lieberman has come under fire of late for demanding to be made responsible for ties with the U.S., while Defense Minister Ehud Barak has actually taken charge of negotiations over construction in West Bank settlements.

Last week, French President Nicolas Sarkozy also urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to "rid himself" of Lieberman, who is seen as hawkish and hardline. Netanyahu and Barak have both come to Lieberman's defense in the face of public criticism.

Last update - 16:50 06/07/2009

'Migron outpost will be emptied within year, by force or by consent'

By Tomer Zarchin, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Israel news, West Bank

High Court told building underway to for 50 new homes in existing Adam settlement to absorb outpost evacuees.

The unauthorized West Bank outpost of Migron will be evacuated exactly a year from now, whether or not the settlers there agree to the terms of the evacuation, the State Prosecution said Monday.

The High Court of Justice heard that plans are underway to construct 50 new permanent homes in the existing settlement of Adam, to absorb the outpost evacuees.

Anar Helman from the State Prosecutor's Office told the court that any outpost resident who refuses to leave once construction of the new housing units has been completed will be removed by force.

The plan to absorb the outpost evacuees calls for the construction of 1,450 homes in Adam. Only 50 of the housing units have been approved by the Defense Ministry so far.

Anti-settlement organization Peace Now urged the court not to accept this arrangement, which was agreed by settlers and the Defense Ministry.

"Construction of a neighborhood in Adam is supposed to take years. Should the High Court accept this arrangement, it will effectively prepare the ground for dozens of families to remain on Palestinian territory, which is unlawful," said Peace Now director Yariv Oppenheimer.

"The time has come for [Defense Minister Ehud] Barak to stop passing the hot potato to the High Court, and for him to make the decision to evacuate the outpost immediately," he said.

Last update - 10:47 06/07/2009

U.S. and Russia agree on deal for cuts to nuclear weapons

By Haaretz Service and News Agencies

Tags: nuclear arms, Israel news

Negotiators from the United States and Russia have agreed the text of an outline deal cutting nuclear arms for their presidents to review and announce later on Monday, a U.S. official said.

U.S. President Barack Obama and his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev, are likely to announce a so-called framework agreement on Monday evening at the Kremlin, giving detailed instructions to negotiators to produce a treaty ready for signing by December.

"There is text for them to review", the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. He emphasised that the agreement would only become final once the two leaders had reviewed it. "It is not done until it is done," he added.

In December an existing pact known as START-1 regulating the number of long-range nuclear weapons expires.

Medvedev told the Italian media on Sunday that Russia-U.S. ties have begun to revive of late, particularly with regard to a treaty on strategic offensive weapons.

"At the moment I think we are all moderately optimistic, both the Russian side and the American side," he said. "When I talked to [Obama] on the phone a few days ago, we discussed the agenda and the process of preparing a new treaty concerning strategic offensive weapons. And that is in a way the most important item on the agenda."

|But in addition to what we call disarmament issues, we naturally have an extensive agenda that reflects other concerns," he added. "These involve interregional conflicts, efforts to overcome the international financial crisis, local conflicts and finally bilateral relations."

Last update - 04:21 07/07/2009

Noam Shalit to UN: My son's abduction was a war crime

By Jack Khoury and Yanir Yagna, Haaretz Correspondents

Tags: Israel News, Gilad Shalit

Noam Shalit, the father of the soldier held by Hamas, testified Monday before the Goldstone Committee, which is investigating illegal conduct by combatants during Operation Cast Lead on behalf of the United Nations.

Shalit asked that the committee include in its final report that the Hamas operation that led to the abduction of his son, Gilad Shalit, was a war crime according to the definitions of the Geneva Convention, and that he must be released immediately. He told the UN Committee that the abduction of his son preceded all the other events in the Gaza Strip - the IDF siege on the territory, the launching of rockets by Palestinian groups, and finally the Israeli offensive - and argued that that action had resulted in the subsequent actions.

"The committee is meant to relate to human rights, and he [Gilad] has lived without human rights for three years. No one knows what happened to him, and not even the Red Cross has paid him a visit," Shalit told the committee.

Shalit also expressed his view that Hamas should be held responsible for the abduction and all its implications. In an unusual move he also noted the specific responsibility of Hamas politburo chief Khaled Meshal, and asked that "the committee determine that Hamas and Khaled Meshal are responsible for the war crime of taking hostages."

Ashkelon Mayor Benny Vaknin also testified before the committee, as did Ophir Shinar of the Sapir College in Sderot, Dr. Mirlo Sidrer, who was injured during a rocket attack on a medical facility at the Ashkelon mall, and a resident of Sderot, Noam Bedein, who heads a public relations group on behalf of the city.

Bedein showed the committee short films on the lives of the people of Sderot during the eight years under the threat of Qassam rockets. "We showed them films that highlight the reality for the residents of Sderot during the years under Qassams," Bedein said. "We documented the residents running for cover and the horror of their lives in recent years. We presented statistics and findings of research, so that they could understand what the residents of the Negev went through."

Last update - 16:58 06/07/2009

Peres: Syria won't get Golan on a 'silver platter'

By DPA

Tags: Palestinians, Israel News

President Shimon Peres said on Monday that Syrian President Bashar Assad must understand that Israel would not hand over the Golan Heights on a "silver platter" so long as Damascus continued its ties with Iran and Hezbollah.

Peres told visiting German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier that a true peace process between the long time enemies would have to take place at the negotiating table, without preconditions or mediation.

Syrian officials last month threatened to take back the Golan Heights by force if a peace agreement involving the return of the strategic plateau is not reached with Israel.

A group calling itself the Syrian Committee for the Freedom of the Golan said it would take steps to regain control of the territory, adding that Israel has not shown willingness to achieve peace or to return what they called "Syrian land."

Just prior to that, Assad rejected Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's offer to resume peace talks between the two countries from "point zero."

Assad said the negotiations should resume from the point at which they stopped under former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, when the two sides had planned to formulate mutual commitments that would enable the talks to move to a direct negotiations stage.

Germany to push Arabs to join Mideast peace process

Steinmeier began talks with Israeli leaders on Monday morning as part of a 40-hour trip to Jerusalem, Damascus and Beirut.

Steinmeier landed in Tel Aviv before dawn and opened his talks by meeting Peres at his Jerusalem residence. He was scheduled next to tour the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial, before meeting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and opposition leader Tzipi Livni later in the day.

A planned stopover in the West Bank city of Ramallah, which was to

include an inaugural ceremony for some new, German-funded classrooms,

was cancelled due to an unannounced, last-minute visit by Palestinian

President Mahmoud Abbas to Jordan, a spokeswoman at the German

representation in Ramallah confirmed.

A key aspect of the discussions with the Israeli government is expected to be U.S. and European Union calls for a halt to settlement construction in the West Bank.

German officials said Steinmeier also hopes to persuade neighboring Arab states to take a more active role in diplomatic efforts to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The visit is Steinmeier's 14th since taking office in 2005.

He is scheduled to meet Tuesday with President Bashar Assad in Syria and in Lebanon with prime minister-designate Saad Hariri, son of former premier Rafik Hariri, who was killed in a bomb blast in 2005.

Last update - 09:19 06/07/2009

Iran vows 'real and decisive' response if attacked by Israel

By The Associated Press

Tags: Barack Obama, Israel news

Iran is ready to take real and decisive action if Israel attacks its nuclear facilities, a senior Iranian parliamentary official said Monday.

The remarks by Alaeddin Broujerdi, the head of Iran's parliamentary committee on national security and foreign policy, came after U.S. Vice President Joe Biden signaled that Washington would not try to prevent any such Israeli assault.

Both the U.S. and Israel are aware of the consequence of an erroneous decision, Broujerdi told reporters at the Iranian Embassy in Tokyo.

"I believe our response will be real and decisive," Broujerdi said. He declined to elaborate.

Israel fears Iran is developing nuclear weapons to target it. Iran denies it is pursuing an atomic arsenal, saying it only wants to produce nuclear power.

Israel's government has said it would prefer to see Iran's nuclear program stopped through diplomacy, but that it cannot rule out a military strike.

In an interview on ABC's This Week on Sunday, Biden was asked whether the U.S. would stand in the way if Israel - viewing the prospect of an Iranian nuclear bomb as a threat to its existence state - decided to launch a military attack.

"Look, we cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and cannot do," he said.

Broujerdi also defended a recent crackdown on protesters following Iran's

presidential election.

Opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi has said the June 12 election, in which incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was declared winner, was illegitimate

and marred with fraud. Riots and protests have followed, although Iran's restrictions on media coverage have made it difficult to confirm some reports.

Broujerdi said Iranian police had merely acted to restore order, and accused Mousavi of instigating the protests.

"There is no confusion. It is (now) a totally peaceful situation in Iran," he said.

Broujerdi is visiting Japan as chairman of the Iran-Japan Parliamentary Friendship League.

The Guardian Council, Iran's top electoral oversight body, pronounced the election results valid last week. Ahmadinejad is set to be sworn in later this month for a second four-year term.

Last update - 21:46 05/07/2009

Fayyad: Jews can be equal citizens in Palestinian state

By Haaretz Service

Tags: palestinians, peace process

Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad on Saturday said that Jews would enjoy freedom and full civil rights in a future Palestinian state, according to a report in the Aspen Daily News.

"Jews, to the extent they choose to stay and live in the state of Palestine, will enjoy those rights and certainly will not enjoy any less rights than Israeli Arabs enjoy now in the state of Israel," Fayyad said in response to a question from former CIA director James Woolsey at the Aspen Institute's Ideas Festival.

According to the report, the crowd at the festival's Greenwald Pavilion applauded enthusiastically after Fayyad's remarks.

Fayyad told the audience that the Palestinians seek a "meaningful political process that is capable of ending the occupation," according to the newspaper.

The report said that Fayyad had also attended a panel discussion that included U.S. former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who said that Hamas is a problem.

"I don't pretend to know how the Palestinian Authority should deal with it," Feinstein said, according to the report.

Fayyad replied that the answer is to get Palestinians to support "that which is done to affect a meaningful change for the better in people's lives. I think we stand a much better chance of winning that debate than going about it in a war of words, which has typified much of the argument over the divide."

Last update - 21:26 05/07/2009

Israel envoy tells U.S. Jews: There is no Israel-U.S. crisis

By Shlomo Shamir, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: michel oren, israel news

Israel's ambassador to the United States told a group of American Jews on Saturday that the rift between the Obama and Netanyahu administrations over construction in West Bank settlements was not a crisis, but a difference of opinion.

Speaking at an Orthodox synagogue in the Hamptons, Long Island, Michael Oren said he was speaking as an expert on U.S.-Israel relations.

He told his audience that there were differences between the allies on certain topics now, just as there has been in the past.

The envoy referred to several examples to differentiate the current situation from past crises between Israel and the U.S. He mentioned the threat to impose sanctions on Israel in 1956 during the Sinai campaign and the crises stemming from U.S. military support for Jordan before the 1967 Six-Day War and the U.S. sale of intelligence aircraft to Saudi Arabia.

Oren on Friday warned against ignoring the Iranian nuclear threat, telling a Colorado audience that an Iranian atomic bomb could "wipe Israel off the map in a matter of seconds."

He said he would not "second-guess" the Obama administration's next move in dealing with Tehran's nuclear aspirations, and added that he was certain Obama had "the best interests of the U.S. and the interest of Israel at heart."

Last update - 21:15 05/07/2009

Jordan breaks up 'illegal' sit-in against Israeli imports

By DPA

Tags: Israeli agriculture

The Jordanian government said Sunday that a sit-in against the import of Israeli agricultural products was forceably dispersed because had not obtained a proper protest license.

"The sit-in was illegal because the participants did not obtain a prior license in compliance with the law," Minister of State for Information Affairs and Communication Nabil Sharif said in a statement.

He said the government was keen on the right of citizens to freedom of expression within the law.

According to eyewitnesses, a number of trade unionists and politicians were "beaten" as security men used force to end the sit-in in front of the Agriculture Ministry, which was called to protest the import of goods

from Israeli settlements set up in Palestinian territories in violation of international law.

Head of the Public Freedoms Committee at the Jordan Engineers Association, Maisara Malas, said that the protest was in conformity with the Universal Declaration on Human Rights.

Sharif said the Interior Minister Nayef Qadi met later with leaders of the trade unions and settled the issue with them.

Last update - 20:31 05/07/2009

Israel and U.S. have yet to reach compromise on settlement halt

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Israel news

Defense Minister Ehud Barak will meet on Monday with U.S. special Mideast envoy George Mitchell in an effort to reach a compromise on calls for an Israeli settlement freeze and to seek ways to promote regional peace.

Barak and Mitchell, who met in New York last week, have still not reached an understanding on the contentious issue which has caused an unusual rift between Israel and the U.S.

"Unfortunately, there are no understandings or agreements [on settlements]," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told ministers at a Likud meeting on Sunday, when asked to elaborate on the matter. "All the reports saying we have agreed to freeze construction in the settlements are the sole responsibility of those who publish them."

During his visit to London this week, Barak will also meet with British Foreign Secretary David Miliband. The aim of this round of talks aimed at narrowing a rift with U.S. President Barack Obama, whose administration has demanded a halt to settlement activity.

The defense minister told reporters on Sunday he was aiming for a "broader understanding with the United States on diplomatic moves, including a comprehensive regional agreement".

Barak said Israel was also seeking "a way to translate" the 2003 road map peace plan into "a path acceptable to us, the United States and others".

After last meeting Mitchell, Barak made a link between any Israeli agreement to limit settlement expansion and progress on Arab states "normalizing" relations with Israel.

Barak has publicly raised the possibility Israel might temporarily refrain from starting new building projects - while continuing many under way - in settlements in return for initial steps towards a regional peace agreement.

Last update - 20:10 05/07/2009

Palestinians to host Brazilian soccer teams for solidarity match

By The Associated Press

Tags: israel news, brazil, soccer

Palestinian officials said Sunday that two popular Brazilian football clubs will play each other in the West Bank later this year in a show of solidarity with the Palestinians.

Football official Sami Makawi said the exhibition match between Rio's Flamengo and Sao Paulo's Corinthians will take place between Sept. 15 and Sept. 17 in the West Bank's only regulation-size stadium.

He added that the Brazilians support the Palestinian cause and know how much Palestinians love Brazilian football.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Yariv Ovadia said Israel's ambassador to Brazil issued a personal invitation to the teams to play in Israel as well. He said Israel hopes the teams will accept the offer.

Last update - 23:12 05/07/2009

Jewish swimmer to skip world championship for Maccabiah

By The Associated Press

Tags: jewish world, jason lezak

Triple Olympic gold medalist Jason Lezak said Sunday that his Jewish heritage inspired him to compete in Israel's Maccabiah Games instead of the upcoming World Swimming Championships in Rome.

Despite skipping the sport's top competition of the year, Lezak said his goal remains the same: to bring home the gold for the United States.

"I came here to swim fast and hopefully bring home some gold medals for the USA," Lezak said.

The Maccabiah Games is an international competition for Jewish athletes held every four years in Israel. More than 900 American athletes will compete in this year's games, officials said, making it the second-largest delegation behind Israel. The 10-day competition begins July 13.

"This is a very serious athletic competition that shares another purpose and that's to bring together worldwide Jewry," Ron Carner, chairman of the U.S. teams, said at a news conference with Lezak.

Lezak gained worldwide recognition in the 2008 Beijing Olympics' 4x100 meter freestyle relay when he dramatically overtook world record-holding French swimmer Alain Bernard in the relay's final stroke.

It was the fastest 100-meter lap in history and helped his teammate Michael Phelps to a record eight gold medals, eclipsing the previous record of seven held by another Maccabiah athlete, Mark Spitz.

Lezak's two other Olympic gold medals are for the 4x100 meter medley relay in Beijing and for the same event in the 2004 Olympics in Athens. He will be competing in multiple events at the Maccabiah.

"I learned from him that anything is possible," Lezak said, speaking of Phelps. "People doubted him and people doubted me and being able to accomplish things people don't think you can do, that's how you become a champion."

Last update - 18:08 05/07/2009

100 U.S. activists arrive in Egypt in bid to deliver aid to Gaza

By Haaretz Service and The Associated Press

Tags: israel news, egypt, Gaza

About 100 U.S. activists arrived in Egypt Sunday with the intention of traveling to Gaza to try to deliver medical aid despite a blockade on the territory.

It would be the largest group of U.S. activists to travel to Gaza since Hamas took control of the coastal territory in 2007. Since then, Egypt and Israel have sealed their borders with Gaza, allowing in only a trickle of commercial goods and humanitarian aid.

Most of the aid is cleared by the Egyptian government, and it was unclear whether authorities would approve the private medical aid.

The activists are part of an initiative called Viva Palestina that aims to send a convoy of 200 people by July 13.

U.S. organizer Mansour al-Barbari said Sunday the intended aid is worth about $1 million.

The Defense Ministry has recommended a partial lifting of the embargo on the Gaza Strip as a goodwill gesture toward the Palestinians to spur talks to free abdicted Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, Israeli media reported Friday.

Israel has been linking the opening of Gaza's borders to the release of Shalit, who has been held by Hamas militants for more than three years. Hamas has been pushing for a deal to trade him for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners currently held in Israeli jails.

Bruno's top five Jewish moments

By TheJewishJournal.com

Tags: Jewish World

Sacha Baron Cohen is back, with his highly anticipated (and litigious) mock documentary about a flamboyant gay fashionista who aspires to become the "biggest Austrian superstar since Hitler."

Universal Pictures has issued an embargo on reviews until the day before "Bruno's" July 10 release, but The Jewish Journal has compiled some of the film's top Jewish moments.

For instance, when Bruno fails to achieve uber-fame by solving the problems in Darfur, he comforts himself with the knowledge that "luckily, there is still one shithole left to fix in the world: "The Middle East" (or "Middle Earth," as he calls it). But he doesn't make many friends while traipsing in a black hat, pais and a speedo through a religious area in Israel, where enraged residents chase him out of the 'hood.

(here is the rest of the article on The Los Angeles Jewish Journal.com)

June 22, 2009 | 11:45 pm

Bruno’s Top Five Jewish Moments

Posted by Naomi Pfefferman

Bruno

Universal Pictures has issued an embargo on reviews until the day before “Bruno’s” July 10 release, but here are some top Jewish moments from Sacha Baron Cohen’s highly anticipated (and litigious) mock documentary about a flamboyant gay fashionista who aspires to become the “biggest Austrian superstar since Hitler.”

1) When Bruno fails to achieve uber-fame by solving the problems in Darfur, he comforts himself with the knowledge that “luckily, there is still one sh—hole left to fix in the world: “The Middle East” (or “Middle Earth,” as he calls it). But he doesn’t make many friends while traipsing in a black hat, pais and a speedo through a religious area in Israel, where enraged residents chase him out of the ‘hood.

2) Bruno conducts dialogues between Israeli and Arab leaders, including an ex-Mossad chief and a Palestinian mayor of Jerusalem. Alas, he confuses the word “hummus” with “Hamas.”

3) Bruno decides the best way to become famous is to be kidnapped by Muslim extremists, and so visits a leader of Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade in a refugee camp in Lebanon. “I want the best guys in the business. Al Qaeda is so 2001,” he tells the man. “Your king Osama looks like a dirty wizard or a homeless Santa Claus,” he adds. Needless to say, Bruno gets kicked out rather than kidnapped.

4) Bruno and his manager, desperate to land celebrity interviews, consult a chart they have made of top actors. There is “Wilhelm Schmidt” (Will Smith), Adolf Pittler (Brad Pitt) and lastly, a man Bruno calls “Der Fuhrer.” The camera pans to reveal the photograph of said star: Mel Gibson.

5) After congressman Ron Paul pronounces Bruno a “queer,” the fashionista laments, “I couldn’t even shtup Rupaul (sic). How am I going to get famous?

Last update - 17:36 05/07/2009

German FM arrives for 2-day visit to push for Mideast peace

By DPA

Tags: israel news, germany

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier is to arrive in region for a two-day visit, in which he plans to press for a return to the Middle Easdt peace process and to persuade Arab states to take a more active role in diplomatic efforts to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Steinmeier is due to spend two days in Israel, the Palestinian Territories, Syria and Lebanon, meeting with political leaders.

On Monday, Steinmeier is due to meet President Shimon Peres, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman in Jerusalem.

A planned meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the West Bank town of Ramallah is not expected to take place because Abbas is visiting Jordan for talks on forming a Palestinian unity government with the Hamas movement.

A key aspect of the discussions with Israel's conservative leadership is expected to be U.S. and European Union calls for a halt to settlement construction in the West Bank.

Israel has offered a temporary freeze but has declined to put an outright stop to settlement expansion.

Steinmeier, who is paying his 14th visit to the region since taking office in 2005, is also expected to push for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

On Sunday, Netanyahu referred for the first time to a "two-state solution" in reference to efforts to bring peace to the Middle East.

"We have achieved a national agreement on the formula of two states for two peoples," the prime minister said during the weekly cabinet meeting.

Last month, Netanyahu allowed the possibility of a demilitarized Palestinian state without mentioning a "two-state solution."

In Damascus, Steinmeier is expected to urge Syrian President Bashar Assad to play a more constructive role in helping to resolve the region's problems.

Foreign Ministry sources said he intended to urge the Syrian leader to end support for the Hezbollah movement in Lebanon and loosen political ties with Iran.

In Lebanon, the final stage of Steinmeier's tour, the minister is due to meet Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri, son of former premier Rafik Hariri, who was killed in a bomb blast in 2005.

Last update - 09:19 06/07/2009

U.S.: Letting Israel act freely on Iran isn't policy change

By Haaretz Service

Tags: Barack Obama, Iran

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden said on Sunday that the Obama administration would not stand in Israel's way should the latter chooses to take military action to eliminate Iran's nuclear threat.

White House officials said that the vice president's remarks demonstrated only U.S. allowance of Israeli sovereignty, and not a change in policy on the part of the Obama administration.

Biden told ABC reporter George Stephanopoulos that Israel has the right to determine its own course of action with regard to the Iranian nuclear threat, regardless of what the Obama administration chooses to do, .

When asked whether the Obama administration would restrain Israeli military action against Iran, Biden responded:

"Israel can determine for itself - it's a sovereign nation - what's in their interest and what they decide to do relative to Iran and anyone else."

Stephanaopoulos posed the question three times, and each time Biden repeated that Israel was free to choose its actions. "If the Netanyahu government decides to take a course of action different than the one being pursued now, that is their sovereign right to do that. That is not our choice."

White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said Biden's remarks did not signaling any change of approach on Iran or Israel.

"The vice president refused to engage hypotheticals, and he made clear that our policy has not changed," Vietor said. "Our friends and allies, including Israel, know that the president believes that now is the time to explore direct diplomatic options."

During the interview, Biden hinted that President Barack Obama was looking to take a harder line toward Iran over the latter's contentious nuclear program.

He said that Obama's offer for dialogue with Tehran remained on the table, but rejected the notion that the U.S. would make concessions for such negotiation to take place.

"The ball's in their court," Biden said. "If they choose to meet with the P-5 under the conditions the P-5 has laid out, it means they begin to change course. And it means that the protestors probably had some impact on the behavior of an administration that they don't like at all."

Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Sunday, when asked about Biden's comments, that the U.S. position on Iran and a military strike involves a political decision.

"I have been, for some time, concerned about any strike on Iran. I worry about it being very destabilizing, not just in and of itself but unintended consequences of a strike like that," Mullen said on CBS' Face the Nation.

"At the same time, I'm one that thinks Iran should not have nuclear weapons. I think that is very destabilizing," he said.

Last update - 14:08 05/07/2009

9 Israelis suspected of scamming millions from U.S. pensioners

By Yuval Goren, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: fraud, U.S., Israel NEws

The Tel Aviv police fraud squad arrested on Sunday nine Israelis on suspicion of netting millions of dollars from U.S. pensioners in a so-called Nigerian scam.

Police raided an office in the city, which is suspected to have been the nerve center of the dodgy enterprise. The defendants, all in their 20s and 30s, allegedly phoned American pensioners, told them they had won the lottery and asked them for a fee of several thousand dollars for the transfer of the prize money, which in fact never existed.

The investigation has been conducted in conjunction with U.S. law enforcement agencies.

Last week, it was reported that the American agencies had urged Israel Police to step up the extradition procedure of another ten Israelis who were suspected of scamming $2 million in similar means.

Most of the ten defendants in the advance-fee scam, which was unveiled by police last September, are in their early twenties, without a criminal record.

The first hearing in their extradition plea took place last week, after a New York law enforcement official said many of the victims are old and frail, and urged the Israeli police to bring the alleged offenders to imminent justice.

Last update - 11:25 05/07/2009

Formula One Chief: Hitler got things done

By The Associated Press

Tags: Hitler, Israel news

Bernie Ecclestone, the Formula One chief, said on Friday that he preferred totalitarian regimes to democracies and praised Adolf Hitler for his ability to "get things done" in an outspoken interview with London's The Times.

The remark drew sharp criticism from politicians and Jewish groups on Saturday.

I

n the interview, Ecclestone expressed a preference for "strong leaders," citing former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Max Mosley, outgoing head of Formula One's governing body, as examples.

He was quoted as saying that democracy "hasn't done a lot of good for many countries - including this one."

"In a lot of ways, terrible to say this I suppose, but apart from the fact that Hitler got taken away and persuaded to do things that I have no idea whether he wanted to do or not, he was in the way that he could command a lot of people, able to get things done," Ecclestone was quoted as saying.

"In the end he got lost, so he wasn't a very good dictator."

"Politicians are too worried about elections," he said. "We did a terrible thing when we supported the idea of getting rid of Saddam Hussein. He was the only one who could control that country. It was the same [with the Taliban]. We move into countries and we have no idea of the culture. The Americans probably thought Bosnia was a town in Miami. There are people starving in Africa and we sit back and do nothing but we get involved in things we should leave alone."

The Board of Deputies of British Jews told The Times that Ecclestone's views were "quite bizarre," and Jewish Chronicle editor Stephen Pollard said he was "either an idiot or morally repulsive."

Labour Party lawmaker Denis MacShane told the newspaper that the remarks revealed ignorance of history and "a complete lack of judgment."

Calls to Ecclestone's London office were not immediately returned Saturday.

Ecclestone, who owns Formula One's commercial rights, is no stranger to controversial remarks. He once said women should dress in white "like all other domestic appliances."

In The Times interview, Ecclestone said that had been a joke, adding "I would love to have a good lady race driver and preferably black and Jewish too, but they might take maternity leave."

Last update - 22:20 04/07/2009

Biden: That SOB Saddam is rolling over in his grave

By News Agencies

Tags: Iraq, Joe Biden, Israel news

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden on Saturday celebrated America's Independence Day with U.S. troops, including his soldier son Beau, at their base near Baghdad, giving a speech that mocked Saddam Hussein.

Biden, who U.S. President Barack Obama has asked to take a leading role in coordinating U.S. Iraq policy, also presided over a naturalization ceremony for 237 soldiers from 59 countries taking an oath of U.S. citizenship.

"We did it in Saddam's palace and I can think of nothing better," Biden said of the naturalization ceremony, held at Al-Faw Palace near Baghdad airport.

"That SOB is rolling over in his grave right now," he said of executed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

Baghdad remained cloaked in a sandstorm that grounded flights and forced Biden to scrap a planned trip to Iraq's largely autonomous Kurdistan region to meet Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd, and Kurdistan President Massoud Barzani.

U.S. forces pulled out of Iraq's towns and cities this week under the terms of a bilateral security pact that paves the way for a full U.S. withdrawal by 2012, raising concerns Iraq has not made enough political progress to prevent more fighting.

Violence has dropped sharply but there remain deep and worrying divisions between Iraq's majority Shi'ite Arabs, Sunni Arabs, ethnic Kurds and other minorities, which some fear could threaten Iraq's future stability.

But as the United States turns its attention to Afghanistan and moves ahead with a plan to end the unpopular Iraq war, Obama has pledged to halt combat operations here in August 2010.

During his meetings with Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on Friday, Biden warned that resurgent sectarian or ethnic violence in Iraq was "not something that would make it likely that we'd stay engaged," a U.S. official told reporters on Friday.

He added that in Washington, there is no longer "any appetite to put Humpty Dumpty back together again", should Iraq fall apart.

After the citizenship ceremony, Biden went to the main mess hall at Camp Victory, where he met privately with the Delaware National Guard unit where his son, Beau, serves.

He walked through the main cafeteria, grasping soldiers' hands and giving them hugs as they surveyed a July 4th menu of barbecued ribs, hamburgers and elaborately decorated cakes.

Last update - 16:30 04/07/2009

Ben Eliezer: U.S. inaction in face of N. Korea, Iran, is troubling

By Haaretz Service

Tags: North Korea, Ben Eliezer

Trade Minister Benjamin Ben Eliezer voiced harsh criticism on Saturday over America's inaction in the face of what he called North Korea's "blatant provocation" the test-firing of seven missiles off its eastern coast earlier in the day.

Speaking at a cultural event in Ramat Gan Saturday morning, Ben Eliezer also criticized the U.S.'s "appeasement" toward Iran

"As far as I'm concerned, the projections regarding when the Iranian nuclear bomb will be complete don't matter," he said. "For me, the Iranian bomb is already a fact, and the world is still playing a two-faced game with Iran, when in the morning there are resolutions and sanctions against Iran, and at night over 1,000 European companies maintain commercial ties with Iran."

"[Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad recognizes the West's weakness and laughs, because he knows that everyone needs the Iranian oil money," the trade minister continued.

Linking Israel's plight in the face of the Iranian threat to that of the rest of the world, Ben Eliezer said that "Israel mustn't put itself on the front of this battle. We're talking about a threat to Israel, but it is also a threat to the moderate Arab nations and the interests of the U.S. and Europe."

The trade minister stressed, however, that though Israel should not be on the front lines, it will know how to defend itself should the need arise.

Regarding peace talks with the Palestinians, Ben Eliezer said that under no circumstances should Israel agree to a peace deal with the Palestinians of the West Bank alone, excluding Hamas and the Palestinians of the Gaza Strip. "Then we'll have a three-state solution," he explained.

"I say this with the utmost confidence: as soon as the moderate Arab nations, led by Egypt, understand that we are serious and determined, and plan to implement a political move, they will cooperate with us and fully support our moves," Ben Eliezer said.

"An opportunity of shared interest for us, the Americans and the moderate Arab world has arisen in the form of stopping the Iranian nuclear program. We must seize this opportunity to implement a separation from the Palestinians and immediately resume negotiations," the trade minister continued.

"We have been in the occupied territories for 42 years, and things are getting worse from day to day," he went on to say. "We must sit down and reach an agreement."

Reiterating his argument that Israel should release jailed Palestinian leader Marwan Barghouti so that Israel will have "a tough, strong leader with whom we can cut a deal," Ben Eliezer declared that "Israel is one of the strongest nations that I know. We must seek an agreement and not be afraid."

Ben Eliezer praised Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech at Bar Ilan University last month, in which he called for a two-state solution, saying that "we must always remember that it wasn't the left, nor the center, who elected Netanyahu to the premiership. I judge people based on their actions, and if he succeeds in leading a move toward peace, I will bless him for it. As long as the prime minister stays on the track of a grand Arab plan, excluding the right of return, and shows willingness to sit down with the Palestinians as early as tomorrow morning, I will continue to bless him."

On U.S. President Barack Obama, Ben Eliezer said "he's no Bush, and he's no Clinton, but he's certainly no Carter. He sees the world differently, and I say ? maybe this is our chance to overcome our psychological blocks and 'flow' with the moves he is leading. Israel has an understanding with the U.S. ? I can't fathom an Israel without it. A strong Israel is also in America's best interest, but it is not always in its best interest to strengthen the settlements. I look at the bright side ? let's use the U.S.'s pressure to our benefit."

Share |

Last update - 14:07 04/07/2009

Hamas man suspected of trying to assassinate PA officials

By DPA

Tags: israel news, hamas

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's security forces have arrested a man who allegedly received three million euros from the Islamic Hamas movement for an alleged assassination plot, a security source said Saturday.

The source, who spoke in condition of anonymity, said Hamas transferred the money to the man identified as Zaher Abu Jebba.

"The arrest of the man and the money found with him is linked to Hamas plans to assassinate senior Palestinian Authority officials in the West Bank," said the source.

"The man confessed that the money was intended to be transferred to Hamas movement in the West Bank under the pretext of purchasing goods and construction materials."

Since Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip in June 2007, Abbas' security forces has been cracking down on Hamas movement in the West Bank amid a perceived threat of Hamas also seizing control there.

Last week, secretary general of the Palestinian Authority, Tayeb Abdel Rahim revealed that the PA security arrested two weeks ago six Hamas members were planning to kill senior PA officials.

Abu Jebba was arrested in an apartment in Ramallah, with a Gaza woman, said the source, adding: "When she was asked about her presence with the man, she said they are friends and she is there for medical treatment."

The source said: "The detained man has direct contacts with Hamas and its armed wing al-Qassam Brigades. The three million euros were transferred from Gaza to Ramallah through a money exchange agent."

Hamas and Fatah failed last week to reach a reconciliation deal in Cairo to ending their rift, and Egyptian mediatiors have set another target date for an agreement to be reached by July 28.

Last update - 16:29 04/07/2009

'Iran nuke could wipe Israel off map in seconds'

By Haaretz Service

Tags: michael oren, iran

Michael Oren, Israel's ambassador to the United States, on Friday warned that an Iranian atomic bomb could "wipe Israel off the map in a matter of seconds," and that the Iranians could "accomplish in a matter of seconds what they denied Hitler did, and kill 6 million Jews, literally."

Oren made his comments in a conversation with journalist Jeffrey Goldberg at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado.

The newly appointed ambassador warned, "There are clocks ticking all around," with regard to the Iranian nuclear issue. "One of those clocks is the uranium enrichment clock, which will show that by a certain date the Iranians will have sufficient, highly enriched uranium materials to create a bomb that could literally wipe Israel off the map in a matter of seconds."

Oren said the world must remain vigilant about what happens in Iran during the country's tumultuous post-election period.

"It's very important that we watch carefully what happens in Iran - the events in Iran have unmasked to the world the true nature of this regime," said Oren. "This is a regime that's willing to kill its own citizens; it will certainly have no compunctions killing other people in the region, Jews and Sunni Arabs alike."

Oren added that he would not "second-guess" the Obama administration's next move in dealing with Tehran's nuclear aspirations, and added that he was certain Obama had "the best interests of the U.S. and the interest of Israel at heart." Israel, he said, was concerned mainly about the "timing and timeline" of dealing with Iran.

Oren also addressed the issue of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which have stoked tensions in recent weeks between Israel and its close ally.

"I never said settlements are not an issue?but they're not the issue," he said.

Last update - 10:27 04/07/2009

Iran charges U.K. embassy employee over election unrest

By The Associated Press

Tags: israel news

The lawyer of a detained Iranian employee of the British embassy in Tehran said on Saturday that his client has been charged with acting against national security.

Lawyer Abdolsamad Khorramshi says his client is being held in Evin prison and will in all likelihood stand trial soon.

The lawyer identified his client as Hossein Rassam, the embassy's chief political analyst, and said he had not yet been able to meet with him or

s

ee the text of the indictment.

In June, Iran arrested nine local members of the British embassy staff, saying they were involved in post-election unrest.

Iranian news agencies said all but one of the embassy's employees had since been released.

Meanwhile, on Saturday, a top aide of Iran's supreme leader called the country's main opposition figure a U.S. agent and accused him of committing crimes against the nation in an editorial.

The editorial represents the first time that Mir Hossein Mousavi, who ran for president in Iran's June 12 elections, has been publicly called a U.S. agent.

Weeks of demonstrations erupted in Iran after Mousavi lost to the incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and authorities maintain that the protests were instigated by foreign elements.

"It has to be asked whether the actions of [Mousavi and his supporters] are in response to instructions by American authorities," said Hossein Shariatmadari in an editorial appearing in the conservative daily Kayhan.

Shariatmadari, who holds no official position but is a close adviser to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, added that Mousavi was trying to escape punishment for murdering innocent people, holding riots, cooperating with foreigners and acting as America's fifth column inside the country.

He called for Mousavi and former reformist president Mohammad Khatami to be tried in court for horrible crimes and treason.

The editorial added that there were undeniable documents proving Mousavi's foreign links.

When Iran's incumbent president was re-elected by a landslide, Mousavi and other opposition candidates cried foul sparking weeks of giant protests across the country that were eventually crushed.

Police say 20 rioters were killed during the violence as well as seven or eight members of the paramilitary Basij militia tasked with putting down the protests.

There have been no street protests since Sunday, but Mousavi has maintained his opposition to the results, issuing a defiant statement on Wednesday that he considered the government illegitimate and demanded political prisoners be released.

He has been laying low, however, and made no public appearances for days amid calls by many hard-liners for him to be prosecuted.

Iran's ruling clerics have called the elections pure and healthy following the supreme leader's declaration that the results would stand.

Only one of top clerics in the religious center of Qom have congratulated

Ahmadinejad's relection, showing their displeasure with the disputed results.

Some of have even openly supported Mousavi and condemned the goverment's tactics against demonstrators and expressed their own doubts about the election results.

"A large portion of the people have not been convinced over the ambiguities in the election.... Due to lack of public support, the government may faces legal and civil problems and a lack of competency," Grand Ayatollah Youssef Saanei said in a statement on his Web site Saturday.

Saanei is one of the top nine most influential clerics in the country and has substantial following among Iranians, though he is on poor terms with the government.

"I remind all forces that are required to protect the ... people and that no order should be an excuse or permission to violate the rights of the people ... let alone killing or injuring them," his statement added.

Last update - 00:18 05/07/2009

Obama: Build on Arab plan for Mideast peace

By Haaretz Service

Tags: barack obama, israel news

U.S. President Barack Obama reiterated his call for Israel and the Palestinians to fulfill their obligations toward achieving peace in a letter sent to the king of Morocco.

According to an official source, Obama wrote recently to Morocco's King Mohammed VI that Israel must cease settlement construction and remove checkpoints in the West Bank.

Obama also urged the Palestinians to strengthen their security forces in order to fight terror more effectively. He also called on them to implement institutional reform in preparation for the creation of a Palestinian state.

"I hope Morocco will be a leader in bridging gaps between Israel and the Arab world," said Obama in his message.

Obama also stressed that negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians could only succeed "if we can convince the parties to engage constructively."

Obama also called for Arab states to provide financial and political support to the Palestinian Authority, and to use the framework of the Arab Peace Initiative to solve the conflict.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's refusal to accede to Obama's demand for a complete halt to West Bank settlement construction has sparked tensions between Israel and the United States.

Netanyahu earlier this week attended a Fourth of July celebration at the home of American ambassador to Israel James Cunningham, and said that the bond between Israel and the U.S. was still strong, despite their countries' opposing views on settlements.

Amid tension with Israel's long-time ally over West Bank settlement construction, the prime minister declared that the sentiments voiced by Obama, who said in Cairo last month that his country's bond with Israel was unbreakable, were true.

Since taking office, Obama has on multiple occasions said that he would work toward achieving a comprehensive peace in the Middle East, including a Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security with Israel.

Last update - 18:21 04/07/2009

U.S. warns North Korea: Don't aggravate tensions

By News Agencies

Tags: south korea, north korea

The United States called on North Korea on Saturday not to "aggravate tensions" as it called Pyongyang's recent missile test "not helpful."

North Korea launched seven missiles off its east coast earlier Saturday, in what was likely to be seen as a message of defiance to the United States on its Independence Day holiday.

"North Korea should refrain from actions that aggravate tensions and focus on denuclearization talks and the implementation of its commitments from the September 19, 2005 joint statement," State Department spokesman, Karl Duckworth, said.

"This type of North Korean behavior is not helpful," he told reporters.

The launches, which came two days after North Korea fired four short-range missiles, could further escalate tensions in the region as the U.S. tries to muster support for tough enforcement of the UN resolution imposed on the communist regime for its May nuclear test.

South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said the missiles were fired Saturday morning, but declined to elaborate on the type.

South Korea's Yonhap news agency quoted military officials as saying the missiles appeared to be a type of Scud missile. North Korea's Scuds are considered short-range, South Korea's military said.

A senior presidential official said the missiles fired are believed to have a range of less than 300 miles (500 kilometers).

"Our military is fully ready to counter any North Korean threats and provocations based on strong South Korea-U.S. combined defense posture," the Joint Chiefs of Staff statement said.

North Korea's state news agency carried no reports on the launches.

The chief of U.S. Naval operations, Adm. Gary Roughead, said the American military was ready for any North Korean missile tests.

"Our ships and forces here are prepared for the tracking of the missiles and observing the activities that are going on," Roughead said after meeting Japanese military officials in Tokyo on Saturday.

Speculation had been high that the communist country might launch more missiles. North Korea had warned shipping to stay away from its east coast effective through July 10.

The senior presidential official cautioned that North Korea could fire more missiles in coming days, but said there was little possibility it could fire the intercontinental ballistic missile it threatened in April.

He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to media.

Saturday's launches came on July 4, or U.S. Independence Day. The North has a record of timing missile tests for the U.S. national day.

The missiles were seen as part of military exercises, but North Korea also appeared to have sent a message to the U.S. through the missile launches, the presidential official said, without elaborating.

The Japanese government condemned the North's action.

"The launch is a serious act of provocation against the security of neighboring countries, including Japan, and is against the resolution of the UN Security Council," Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura said in a statement.

The statement also urged North Korea to suspend all missile development activities.

In Beijing, a Foreign Ministry spokesman said he had no immediate comment.

In 2006, Pyongyang fired a barrage of missiles, including a long-range Taepodong-2 that broke apart and fell into the ocean less than a minute after liftoff. Those launches while Americans were celebrating the Fourth of July holiday also came amid nuclear tensions with the U.S.

A long-range missile launch by North Korea toward the United States would directly flout a UN sanctions resolution punishing Pyongyang for its May 25 nuclear test.

Last update - 01:01 04/07/2009

Biden urges Iraqi leaders to do more for national reconciliation

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News, Joe Biden, Iraq

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden pressed Iraqi leaders Friday to do more to foster national reconciliation and offered American assistance in achieving that, as concerns grow that a lack of political progress is fueling violence in Iraq.

Protesters, meanwhile, burned an American flag and chanted anti-U.S. slogans in Baghdad's main Shiite district of Sadr City.

Followers of anti-U.S. Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr hold such demonstrations weekly after Friday prayers, but the rally underscored the challenges facing the United States as it begins drawing down its military forces and losing its dominance in Iraq.

Biden, who was making his first visit to Baghdad since being appointed to oversee the administration's Iraq policy, said he came with a message of continuing support for the country even as the U.S. military pulls back.

"There are still political steps that must be taken and Iraqis must use the political process to resolve their remaining differences and advance their national interest," he said at a joint news conference after meeting with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

He added that "we stand ready, if asked and if helpful, to help in that process."

The news conference was held in the same hall at al-Maliki's ceremonial residence in which an Iraqi journalist threw his shoes at former President George W. Bush during his last visit to Baghdad in December.

Biden arrived in Baghdad late Thursday for the unannounced visit, two days after all U.S. combat troops were pulled out of Iraq's cities and towns as part of a security agreement that will see all American soldiers out of the country by the end of 2011.

U.S. President Barack Obama also has said all combat troops will be gone by the end of August 2010, leaving 30,000 to 50,000 troops in advisory roles.

But Biden's visit and his new position as Obama's point man on Iraq reflect growing concern in the U.S. administration about a recent rise in violence after a series of bombings that killed scores of people.

Al-Maliki, a Shiite, has been criticized for failing to take advantage of security gains to make progress on the political front as divisions deepen before Jan. 30 general elections.

Wearing a tan suit and suede combat boots, Biden held a morning meeting with Gen. Ray Odierno and Ambassador Christopher Hill, America's top soldier and diplomat in Iraq.

The trio made no comments as they emerged from their talks at Odierno's palatial residence at a U.S. military base, but Biden's office said they discussed the withdrawal, the security situation in Iraq, the capabilities of Iraqi forces and political issues.

He then traveled in a 22-vehicle motorcade after a sandstorm prevented him from flying to the walled-off Green Zone, which houses the U.S. Embassy and the Iraqi government headquarters, where he held meetings with al-Maliki and other senior Iraqi officials.

It was his first trip to Iraq as vice president, although he has traveled to the country and met many of its leaders as a senator and said he wanted to re-establish contacts with Iraqi leaders. He plans several trips to the region in the future.

Violence remains at low levels in Iraq compared with previous years, but U.S. and Iraqi officials have warned of more attacks after the city withdrawal deadline.

At least 447 Iraqi civilians were killed in June, double the toll from the previous month, according to an Associated Press tally.

Al-Maliki has called the U.S. withdrawal from cities as a great victory and declared June 30 National Sovereignty Day.

On Friday, he expressed gratitude for the U.S. support.

"I have seen very clearly the keen determination from the vice president and his administration to support Iraq ... and a great readiness to give us a lending hand and support when we ask," he said.

Biden also had breakfast with his son, Beau, an Army captain serving in Iraq, in the private room where the vice president spent the night.

Biden planned Saturday to speak at a naturalization ceremony for U.S. troops to mark the Fourth of July, then to travel to the semiautonomous Kurdish region in northern Iraq for meetings with President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd, and Kurdish leader Massoud Barzani.

Last update - 00:25 04/07/2009

Bahrain officials visit Israel for first time

By Reuters

Tags: Israel News

Bahraini officials visited Israel in an official capacity for the first time on Friday to collect five of their nationals Israel was deporting, a Bahraini news report and an Israeli official said.

The Bahrain News Agency said the delegation was sent by the interior and foreign ministries to collect the five Bahrainis, who were detained on a boat bound for Gaza from Cyprus this week while trying to break the Israeli blockade on the territory.

An Israeli foreign ministry spokesman confirmed the delegation's arrival and said it was the first time officials from the Gulf state had visited Israel in an official capacity.

"This is the first time Bahrainis have visited Israel but their only purpose was to process their nationals and fly them out, there is no other significance to their visit," spokesman Yigal Palmor said.

The Bahrain News Agency said the officials had arrived by air at Ben-Gurion International Airport.

The Israel navy intercepted and seized their small ferry boat on Tuesday. The vessel, operated by the U.S.-based Free Gaza Movement, was carrying pro-Palestinian activists and aid to the Gaza Strip from Cyprus.

The Israel navy maintains a blockade of the Gaza Strip, which is ruled by the Islamist Palestinian movement Hamas.

Last update - 18:21 03/07/2009

EU summons Iran ambassadors in joint protest

By The Associated Press

The European Union on Friday summoned Iranian ambassadors across the 27-nation bloc in a joint protest against the detentions of staff at the British Embassy in Tehran.

A top Iranian cleric had said earlier Friday that some of the detained embassy staffers would be put on trial, and accused Britain of playing a role in instigating widespread protests that erupted over the country's disputed presidential election last month.

Britain proposed recalling all EU ambassadors from Tehran in a sign of unity, but the bloc opted for gradually increasing pressure on the Iranian regime, Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt said.

He said the EU's escalatory approach to Iran was working, and noted in a statement that seven of nine embassy employees had been released.

In London, Foreign Secretary David Miliband said Britain was deeply concerned about the two staff members who remain in Iranian detention.

"Britain is confident that our staff have not engaged in any improper or illegal behavior," Miliband said in a statement, adding that the ministry was seeking urgent clarification from Iranian authorities and that he would speak with Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki about the issue.

"The European Union plans to review the situation next week, unless the remaining staffers are released," said Bildt, whose country holds the rotating EU presidency. He said he was awaiting confirmation of reports that Iran would put some of the detained staffers on trial.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy indicated he supported the British request to turn up the heat on the Iranian regime.

"France has always wanted to strengthen the sanctions, so that Iranian leaders will really understand that the path that they have chosen will be a dead end," he said in a joint news conference with Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt. "Now it's up to the British to tell us what they need, what help they need."

Sarkozy said that "our solidarity with our English friends is total."

The issue poses a difficult challenge for the EU. Recalling diplomats from Tehran would be an extraordinary move and a powerful signal of unity in the wake of Tehran's post-election crackdown.

But punishing the regime too harshly also risks spoiling chances of making headway on the critical issue of Iran's disputed nuclear program.

Sweden is calling for a moderate response to the Iranian crackdown on protesters to avoid pushing Iran further into isolation.

"It's a cry for freedom, a type of reaction which mustn't transform into turning into a conflict between Iran and the rest of the world," Reinfeldt said.

Last update - 03:52 03/07/2009

Death of a brother

By Benny Ziffer

Tags: Mozart, Uri Geller

Mozart was not Jewish - that's been said before. But the fact that Michael Jackson wasn't Jewish either is too mortal a blow to our national prestige. Nu, all right, he was almost Jewish. His best friend - fortunately for us, the singer is no longer around to deny it - was Uri Geller, who was interviewed this week on all possible Israeli media outlets as constituting the "Jewish-Israeli connection" with the highly praised deceased. So let's convert Jackson to Judaism, too. How do you do that? You castrate. How is that done? First, you make a face, as if to say, "Why are they making such a big deal out of him? Really. He was only a dancer with a mediocre voice" (an approximate quote from the Shulhan Arukh of our own Rabbi Yaron London on Monday, on his nightly interview program).

For the cutting ceremony, in the studio of Rabbi London and his cynical sidekick, Mottel Kirschenbaum, we gather three "experts" on Michael Jackson. One is a psychiatrist, because as we know Jackson was first of all a nutcase. One is an impresario, an Israeli, who was in charge of producing Jackson's performances here. In other words, Jackson may have been a bit of a Zionist. Or at least he didn't boycott Israel, and nowadays even that is something. The impresario said Jackson was really decent and a consummate professional, too - in short, a mensch. And the third expert: Gilad Padva, owner of a wide and forgiving smile, a local expert in the construction of masculinity and deconstruction of feminity and camp, who actually said nothing that explained anything about the art of our brother Michael.

Mozart, had he fallen into our hands alive, would have endured the same humiliating treatment. Because there is nothing less acceptable to the spirit of old-fashioned Israeliness than innocence. There is no such thing as a naive person; there can be only a bad person who hides his intentions beneath a cloak of naivete. And what can you do: Music is the art of absolute naivete. Music cannot be cynical or ironic, nor can it have self-awareness or a critical nature. And there is nothing that insults a musician more than being called "intelligent."

Mozart was anything but intelligent. In effect, he was infantile and a semi-retard. Without musicians' innate infantility, could Michael Jackson have created his divine stage fantasies? And would Mozart have been capable of writing operas? Paradoxically, such geniuses cannot possibly have a Jewish "head," in the sense of being cunning.

I watched the news of Michael Jackson's death live on CNN late at night, while I was abroad. I saw genuine shock and sorrow there at the death of a man who played a significant role in the lives of many. I myself never have understood anything about pop music in general or about that of Michael Jackson in particular, but it was clear to me that he enlisted his talents, as well as his physical being, in the fight against petit bourgeois self-satisfaction, the stereotypes it nurtures and the definitions with which it defines everything for its convenience.

In any case, he was not a war criminal who deserves contempt after his death as in his lifetime. Therefore, when they began there, on the American and foreign channels, to delve into issues of inheritance and family gossip and theories as to the causes of death - they did not forget for a moment that this was a person whose memory is deserving of respect.

Upon my return to Israel I became aware of the differences in style. For example, that of Haim Etgar, Channel 10's energetic cultural commentator. Just give him an opportunity to drag someone through the mud, and he grabs that someone by the hair and plunges him in up to his ears. And everything with the same wise-guy sardonic attitude and sly smile that has become pro forma in local news reporting, as if to say: "You thought you knew all the dirt about Michael's life? I've got news for you. You know nothing compared to the truth that I'll reveal to you now." Or, as if to say: "Ha, ha! His stupid fans are placing wreaths and letters in front of the gate to his home. Just wait until you know the whole truth about him."

As we know, the 11th commandment received by the Jewish people on Mt. Sinai was: "Don't be a sucker." And, as opposed to the other commandments, which they sometimes obey and sometimes don't, Jews love this prohibition with all their heart, with all their soul and with all their might. To mourn for no reason a deceased non-Jewish artist is the epitome of sucker-hood. Trying to scrape from this death a crumb of national pride through an across-the-board demonstration of contempt for someone whom the whole world admires - now that is abiding by a biblical commandment.

Last update - 01:53 04/07/2009

Report: U.S. to block Iran sanctions at G8 summit

By Shlomo Shamir, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Iran, Nuclear Program

The United States is opposed to enacting a new set of financial sanctions against Iran that are due to be discussed in the G8 summit next week, diplomatic officials in New York reported Friday.

According to officials, sanctions against Iran are expected to top the G8's agenda. Sources are also predicting a pointed debate between the heads of the industrialized nations over an appropriate response to Iranian authorities' suppression of reformist demonstrations in Iran led by Mir Hossein Mousavi and other Iranian opposition leaders.

Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi hinted in a newspaper interview earlier in the week that the G8 is due to decide on new financial sanctions against the Islamic Republic. Berlusconi disclosed that he had spoken with the heads of the G8 nations and has discussed such steps with them.

According to the Italian prime minister, "the general leaning [among G8 leaders] is toward sanctions."

However, diplomatic sources in New York reported that American officials are working behind the scenes to prevent new sanctions from being imposed against Iran.

U.S. officials claimed that a tough stance toward Iran could backfire, bringing about an opposite outcome to that desired by those who support such measures.

The Obama administration, according to the diplomatic sources, has discarded the notion of direct talks with Iran. However, the United States is still interested in re-engaging Iran through the renewed discussion of its nuclear program through the five permanent United Nations Security Council members and Germany.

American officials expressed concern that a decision to enact harsh steps against Iran during the G8 meeting could badly hurt the prospect of Tehran agreeing to renew negotiations with the permanent Security Council members.

In addition to U.S. reluctance to enact fresh sanctions, G8 members Russia and China have been known to oppose any punitive steps against Tehran.

The Security Council has already imposed several rounds of sanctions against Iran, including a weapons embargo and a ban on supplying Iran any materials which could be used to advance its disputed nuclear program.

New sanctions could include forbidding western oil companies from maintaining commercial ties with Iran.

Last update - 15:40 03/07/2009

An imam, a priest, a rabbi, and a Buddhist monk meet 10 atheists

By Reuters

Tags: Religion, Atheism

What happens when you put a Muslim imam, a Christian priest, a rabbi and a Buddhist monk in a room with 10 atheists?

Turkish television station Kanal T hopes the answer is a ratings success as it prepares to launch a game show where spiritual guides from the four faiths will seek to convert a group of non-believers.

The prize for converts will be a pilgrimage to a holy site of their chosen religion -- Mecca for Muslims, the Vatican for Christians, Jerusalem for Jews and Tibet for Buddhists.

But religious authorities in Muslim but secular Turkey are not amused by the twist on the popular reality game show format and the Religious Affairs Directorate is refusing to provide an imam for the show.

"Doing something like this for the sake of ratings is disrespectful to all religions. Religion should not be a subject for entertainment programs," High Board of Religious Affairs Chairman Hamza Aktan told state news agency Anatolian after news of the planned program emerged.

The makers of "Penitents Compete" are unrepentant and reject claims that the show, scheduled to begin broadcasting in September, will cheapen religion.

"We are giving the biggest prize in the world, the gift of belief in God," Kanal T chief executive Seyhan Soylu told Reuters.

"We don't approve of anyone being an atheist. God is great and it doesn't matter which religion you believe in. The important thing is to believe," Soylu said.

The project focuses attention on the issue of religious identity in European Union-candidate Turkey, where rights groups have raised concerns over freedom of religion for non-Muslim minorities.

Detractors of the ruling AK Party government, which is rooted in political Islam but officially secular, accuse it of having a hidden Islamist agenda, a charge it denies.

Some 200 people have so far applied to take part in the show and the 10 contestants will be chosen next month.

A team of theologians will ensure that the atheists are truly non-believers and are not just seeking fame or a free holiday.

Last update - 15:40 03/07/2009

An imam, a priest, a rabbi, and a Buddhist monk meet 10 atheists

By Reuters

Tags: Religion, Atheism

What happens when you put a Muslim imam, a Christian priest, a rabbi and a Buddhist monk in a room with 10 atheists?

Turkish television station Kanal T hopes the answer is a ratings success as it prepares to launch a game show where spiritual guides from the four faiths will seek to convert a group of non-believers.

The prize for converts will be a pilgrimage to a holy site of their chosen religion -- Mecca for Muslims, the Vatican for Christians, Jerusalem for Jews and Tibet for Buddhists.

But religious authorities in Muslim but secular Turkey are not amused by the twist on the popular reality game show format and the Religious Affairs Directorate is refusing to provide an imam for the show.

"Doing something like this for the sake of ratings is disrespectful to all religions. Religion should not be a subject for entertainment programs," High Board of Religious Affairs Chairman Hamza Aktan told state news agency Anatolian after news of the planned program emerged.

The makers of "Penitents Compete" are unrepentant and reject claims that the show, scheduled to begin broadcasting in September, will cheapen religion.

"We are giving the biggest prize in the world, the gift of belief in God," Kanal T chief executive Seyhan Soylu told Reuters.

"We don't approve of anyone being an atheist. God is great and it doesn't matter which religion you believe in. The important thing is to believe," Soylu said.

The project focuses attention on the issue of religious identity in European Union-candidate Turkey, where rights groups have raised concerns over freedom of religion for non-Muslim minorities.

Detractors of the ruling AK Party government, which is rooted in political Islam but officially secular, accuse it of having a hidden Islamist agenda, a charge it denies.

Some 200 people have so far applied to take part in the show and the 10 contestants will be chosen next month.

A team of theologians will ensure that the atheists are truly non-believers and are not just seeking fame or a free holiday.

Last update - 08:03 04/07/2009

Report: Israel mulling easing Gaza siege

By The Associated Press

Tags: Gilad Shalit, Israel news

The Defense Ministry has recommended a partial lifting of the embargo on the Gaza Strip as a goodwill gesture toward the Palestinians to spur talks to free a long-held captive soldier, Israeli media reported Friday.

Israel has been linking the opening of Gaza's borders to the release of abducted Israel Defense Forces soldier Gilad Shalit, who has been held by Hamas militants for more than three years. Hamas has been pushing for a deal to trade him for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners currently held in Israeli jails.

Israel imposed a near-total embargo of the Gaza Strip in 2007 after Hamas militants violently took control of the territory.

According to the new plan, reported by the news Web site Ynet, Israel would increase supplies of coffee, tea, soup, meat, fish and canned goods into Gaza ahead of the holy Muslim month of Ramadan, which begins in August, to promote a deal for Shalit.

Israel would also renew shipments of fuel, clothing, kitchenware and egg-laying chickens as part of the package.

Ynet reported that the proposal had been drafted by defense officials and awaits the approval of Defense Minister Ehud Barak.

The Defense Ministry would not officially comment on the report.

Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh said Friday that if there was any truth to the report, it would represent a righting of a previous wrong.

"The Palestinian people have one single, clear demand - the siege must be lifted and all the crossings have to be open and life to get back to normal in the Gaza Strip," he told reporters outside a Gaza mosque after Friday prayers.

The idea behind the plan, according to Ynet, was to lift the embargo gradually and link it to progress on Egyptian-mediated talks aimed at releasing Shalit from captivity. The plan does not include transferring products such as steel and concrete, which are needed to rebuild the battered territory but could also help Hamas improve its military capabilities.

Hamas and other militants have fired thousands of missiles at Israeli border towns and communities in recent years.

Israel has come under heavy pressure from the international community - including the Obama administration - to lift its embargo, which has crippled the Gaza economy. Gaza has survived largely thanks to a booming underground smuggling trade between Gaza and Egypt.

Last update - 16:49 03/07/2009

Assad invites Obama to Syria, signaling thaw in ties

By Reuters

Tags: Barack Obama, Israel news

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has issued an informal invitation to President Barack Obama to visit Damascus for talks, in a sign that relations between the two countries may gradually be thawing.

"We would like to welcome him to Syria, definitely," Assad told Sky News in an interview broadcast on Friday. "I am very clear about this."

Asked whether a meeting could take place any time soon, Assad replied: "That depends on him." Smiling, he added: "I will ask you to convey the invitation to him."

His comments came in a relaxed, walk-and-talk style interview conducted alongside his British-born wife that appeared designed to show Assad in a warm, congenial light.

Speaking in slightly French-accented English, Assad said that if he and Obama were to meet, it did not necessarily mean they had to agree on the issues.

"Any summit between any two presidents is something positive," he said, adding: "That doesn't mean you have to agree about everything. But when you discuss, this is how we can close the gap.

"It's normal to have differences between different cultures, between different nations and states.

"But I think the United States has a special role as the greatest power. I think President Obama should visit as many countries as he can in order to make these dialogues... And of course, that includes Syria."

The United States took steps to start talking to Syria after Obama took office, departing from the isolationist policy of George W. Bush, who put Syria in the "Axis of Evil" along with its three original members Iran, Iraq and North Korea.

Bush accused Syria of offering support to insurgents fighting in Iraq, and also imposed sanctions on the country for its role in Lebanon and for backing groups such as Hezbollah, which also receives support from Iran.

But Obama's stated intention to seek common ground with countries willing to "unnclench their fist" appears to have opened the way at least for basic dialogue with Syria, and the possibility of a high-level meeting at some point.

"An invitation is about dialogue, dialogue is about having common ground, a common vision," Assad told Sky. "Then you have to make a plan then, later, you take action.

Last update - 11:10 03/07/2009

Even Jews can't photograph Australia's synagogues

By Nadav Shemer, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Jewish world

A photographer who documents Jewish communities around the world has been banned from photographing Australian synagogues because of security concerns from local Jewish authorities.

Jono David, an Osaka, Japan-based photographer who runs the HaChayim HaYehudim (Jewish Life) Photo Library, had planned to visit Australia in August and September to photograph synagogues, cemeteries and aspects of Jewish life.

But he says he was left with no choice but to cancel his visit after being informed that the Melbourne and Sydney Community Security Groups (CSG) had sent emails to Jewish institutions recommending that they deny him permission to photograph because publication of the photos would pose a security risk.

Made up almost entirely of volunteers, the Melbourne and Sydney CSGs work under the auspices of the Jewish community roof bodies in their respective states of Victoria and New South Wales to provide security to synagogues, schools and other community institutions.

David initially received around 30 approvals to photograph after approaching individual Jewish institutions in Australia, he told Haaretz. But most of those approvals turned to refusals following the CSG emails, thwarting his plans.

He had planned to visit both Melbourne and Sydney, where the vast majority of Australia's estimated 120,000 Jews live, as well as Canberra, Adelaide and Tasmania, all home to smaller communities.

The ban comes amid concerns of rising anti-Semitism in Australia. According to the latest version of an annual report conducted by former Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Jeremy Jones, there were 652 reports of anti-Jewish violence, vandalism, harassment and intimidation in the country between October 1 2007 and September 30 2008, the highest tally ever recorded.

In an open letter on his Web site addressed to the Australian Jewish community, David wrote that that he understands Jewish community concerns and that they do not need explaining, but added that a "blanket no-photo policy" will ultimately be detrimental because it will rob Australian Jewry of documentation of their own history.

"I am aware of a recent rise in anti-Semitic sentiment in Australia. But documenting Jewish life is important even in times of adversity - perhaps more so. By restricting documentation, the AJC [Australian Jewish Community] is going to wake up in a generation and realize there is no photographic, no film, and no video record available to them. That is a real shame," he wrote.

David added in the letter that he "could never have imagined being blacklisted on an entire continent."

"CSGs (sic) emails at once sabotaged my project and, for all intents and purposes, maligned me, a fellow Jew, as a threat to the AJC. Their words are, in effect, defamatory," David wrote. "I am open to photo conditions. In the extreme, I am happy to document an institution and keep the images safeguarded for at least a generation. But, alas, I was deemed unworthy of even a courtesy email. I fail to understand such treatment."

Although he has occasionally been restricted in the past, David told Haaretz that he has never actually been banned altogether from taking photographs, despite having documented Jewish communities in some 80 countries.

He gave an example from 2008 in which he underwent a thorough security check after requesting permission to visit the Shevet Ahim Sinagoga in Panama City, Panama, and was ultimately given permission to photograph the exterior only.

Asked by Haaretz to respond, New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies CEO Vic Alhadeff - speaking on behalf of the Sydney CSG - said that he could not comment on security-related matters.

But despite the CSG's security concerns, photographs of Australian synagogues can be found easily on the Internet via a Google search or at synagogue Websites, some of which include extensive exterior and interior photographs.

David's own photo library even includes photos he took at synagogues in Melbourne, Brisbane and Newcastle during a previous visit to Australia in 1999.

"I walked in, no appointment, asked if I could visit and take some photos," David told Haaretz of that previous visit. "Times have clearly changed."

After canceling his upcoming visit to Australia, David will now spend August and September documenting communities in the United States and Mexico instead

Last update - 21:21 03/07/2009

UN's Richard Falk: IDF seizure of Gaza-bound ship is 'criminal'

By Reuters

Tags: gaza, un, israel news

A United Nations human rights investigator on Thursday called Israel's seizure of a ship carrying relief aid for the Gaza Strip "unlawful" and said its blockade of the territory constituted a "continuing crime against humanity".

Israeli authorities on Tuesday intercepted the vessel, which was also carrying 21 pro-Palestinian activists, and said it would not be permitted to enter Gaza coastal waters because of security risks in the area and its existing naval blockade.

Richard Falk, an American Jew and the United Nations special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, said the move was part of Israel's "cruel blockade of the entire Palestinian population of Gaza" in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention prohibiting any form of collective punishment against "an occupied people".

Falk, who is an expert on international law, said Israel's two-year blockade of Hamas-ruled Gaza restricted vital supplies such as food, medicine and fuel to "bare subsistence levels".

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said in a report this week that Israel was also halting entry to Gaza of building materials and spare parts needed to repair damage from its 22-day invasion late last December.

"Such a pattern of continuing blockade under these conditions amounts to such a serious violation of the Geneva Conventions as to constitute a continuing crime against humanity," Falk said in a statement released in Geneva.

Prior to leaving Cyprus, the ship was inspected by Cypriot authorities in response to Israeli demands to determine whether it carried any weapons, according to the UN investigator. "None were found and Israeli authorities were so informed."

"Nonetheless, the 21 peace activists on the boat were arrested, held in captivity and have been charged with 'illegal entry' to Israel even though they had no intention of going to Israel," Falk added.

Israel envoy calls remarks'biased'

Israel's ambassador to the UN in Geneva, Aharon Leshno-Yaar, rejected the remarks by Falk whom he said was "known for his bias against Israel and anti-Israel statements".

Israel is allowing relief aid to reach Gaza in coordination with Egypt and the Palestinian Authority, Leshno-Yaar said.

"Clearly the purpose of that ship was to create a buzz and serve as a propaganda vehicle against Israel," he told Reuters.

Activists from the U.S.-based Free Gaza movement said that Irish Nobel peace prize laureate Mairead Maguire and former U.S. congresswoman Cynthia McKinney were among those aboard.

Falk has had his own difficulties with Israeli authorities in trying to fulfill his independent mandate for the UN Human Rights Council.

Last December, he was detained and turned back from Israel, forcing him to abort a planned mission to Gaza -- a deportation denounced by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

In a report last March, Falk said Israel's year-end military assault on the densely population coastal strip of 1.5 million appeared to constitute a grave war crime.

Last update - 08:32 03/07/2009

Are we still afraid the Jewish state won't last?

By Yehezkel Dror

Tags: Jewish identity, arabs

We can offer several arguments for and against the demand to recognize

Israel as a Jewish state. The reasons in favor seem clear: On the tactical and strategic level, the demand puts to the test the willingness of the Palestinians, the Syrians and the countries of the Middle East in general, to make a quantum leap when it comes to accepting our existence. They would do so by recognizing the unique character of Israel and accepting it as a fact that should no longer be questioned. This is psychologically significant, with diplomatic-security implications whose importance should not be downplayed.

There is also the hope that formal recognition of Israel's Jewish character will check the demand to implement the refugees' "right of return"; clarify to the minorities in Israel their status as citizens, while drawing a red line that will emphasize the pointlessness of aspirations to undermine the Jewish character of the state, and reinforce global legitimization of the existence of Israel as a Jewish state.

However, it is impossible to ignore the suspicion that Israel's demand for recognition also stems from an unconscious, collective factor that is very problematic. We may still be suffering from the exile-induced fear that a Jewish state will not last a fear accompanied by expressions of a lack of confidence in our strength or a surfeit of such confidence.

This is speculation, but it can explain patently irrational diplomatic-security viewpoints, on both the left and the right, which are hard

to understand otherwise. If this assessment is correct then we are talking about a dangerous phenomenon that distorts our judgment. In that case, demanding Arab recognition of Israel's Jewish character replaces purposeful action on our part to strengthen this character on our own.

And here I come to considerations for opposing the demand. It is not accepted in those parts of international law that deal with the recognition of states: A country is recognized de facto or fully without any determination regarding its essence as a secular, Catholic, or Muslim country et al. Moreover, the demand to recognize Israel as a Jewish state implies that our character depends on such recognition, which our opponents can also withdraw.

Nor is there necessarily a real connection between recognizing the Jewish

character of Israel and the refugee issue. One can recognize Israel as a

Jewish state and yet demand the return of a large number of refugees. On the other hand, even in the absence of such recognition Israel can and must refuse adamantly to absorb a significant number of refugees. Anyone who is willing to conduct negotiations with us in good faith will understand that, even if they do not admit it.

A particularly important consideration is one derived from the assumption that Israel wants, in good faith, to progress to as stable a peace as possible. To the extent that this assumption is correct, the demand for explicit recognition of Israel as a Jewish state adds a grave and even fatal difficulty. Because even Arab rulers who want to recognize Israel and to normalize relations with it will be unable to permit themselves to explicitly recognize Israel as a Jewish state . in order to avoid undermining the stability of their regimes.

Added to the considerations for and against is the fact that our character as a Jewish state depends on us and us alone. Tactics to reinforce and deepen this character include demographic policy, a new arrangement of the status of religious institutions in Israel, accelerated conversion, genuine changes in the education system, a strengthening of pluralistic Jewish symbols combined with additional steps to consolidate Jewish identity and identification among the youth.

There is no connection between the future of our Jewish character and

recognition of this character by Arab countries. While the hope that such

recognition will strengthen the stability of the peace agreements, it will be offset by nearly killing the chances of reaching an overall agreement that includes such explicit recognition.

The question therefore is whether it is possible to create a synthesis that combines the advantages of recognition without the drawbacks of the demand for recognition. I think it is. I would recommend legislating a "basic law on a constitution" that would be passed by a special majority of the Knesset, with a higher status than the other basic laws, including immunity from judicial appeal. This law will assert that Israel is a Jewish state and the state of the Jewish people as a whole, while at the same time being a democratic state of all its citizens.

Recognition of a State of Israel that has such a constitutional law means

recognition of its character as a Jewish state, without any need for an

explicit statement to that effect. Therefore by means of such legislation it would be possible to benefit from all the advantages involved in a demand to recognize Israel as a Jewish state and to avoid all its drawbacks. In addition, the proposed basic law on a constitution and the discussion of it, will make it clearer to us that the responsibility for our character is ours and ours alone.

Yehezkel Dror is a professor of political science at Hebrew University

in Jerusalem. His most recent publication, "Political-Security Statecraft for Israel: Memorandum for Policymakers" (in Hebrew), can be downloaded at http://www.biu.ac.il/SOC/besa/docs/BM3.pdf.

ast update - 22:18 05/07/2009

Netanyahu: We have consensus on two-state solution

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Palestinian

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told his cabinet Sunday that the government has won "broad national consensus" in Israel for the concept of a two-state solution, hailing it as a major achievement of his 100-day-old coalition.

But the prime minister also lashed out at his detractors, opening the weekly meeting by saying that not only did his government not get a customary 100 days of grace, he in fact had not received "a single day of grace."

Netanyahu outlined the achievements of his government so far, placing at the head of the list the "establishment of a unity government," because of which he has "achieved a wide national consensus on the idea of two states for two peoples."

For the past two decades, the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians has been based on the concept of two states peacefully existing side by side. In the run-up to his election earlier this year and in the weeks immediately after he took office, Netanyahu drew fire for his reluctance to pledge his support for Palestinian statehood. In a speech last month, however, the prime minister said that he backed a demilitarized Palestinian state.

Netanyahu said Sunday that the infusion of "real meaning" into the two-state solution was one of the most important achievements of his government so far.

"The Palestinians will have no choice but to recognize Israel as a Jewish state, the [Palestinian] refugees issue will be resolved outside of Israel, and Israel will be entitled to defensible borders with full demilitarization of the Palestinian state," he said.

He also listed to other achievements - "quiet in southern Israel and power of deterrence."

"I have ordered that Israel respond to every rocket, and that is what is happening," Netanyahu told his ministers, referring to the rocket fire from the Gaza Strip into Israel's southern towns.

But while Netanyahu has reversed his stance on the issue of a Palestinian state, another sticking point in Israel-U.S. relations - the construction of settlements in the West Bank - appears to remain unresolved.

Information Minister Yuli Edelstein said that Netanyahu had stressed during the morning meeting that Israel "has made no commitments to the Americans regarding the freezing of construction in Judea and Samaria."

Defense Minister Ehud Barak said he would Monday discuss with a U.S. envoy a compromise over calls for an Israeli settlement freeze and seek ways to promote regional peace.

Barak, who last met envoy George Mitchell on Tuesday in New York, travels to London later Sunday for another round of talks aimed at narrowing a rift with U.S. President Barack Obama, whose administration has demanded a halt to settlement activity.

The defense minister told reporters he was aiming for a "broader understanding with the United States on diplomatic moves, including a comprehensive regional agreement".

Barak said Israel was also seeking "a way to translate" the 2003 road map peace plan into "a path acceptable to us, the United States and others".

After last meeting Mitchell, Barak made a link between any Israeli agreement to limit settlement expansion and progress on Arab states "normalizing" relations with Israel.

Barak has publicly raised the possibility Israel might temporarily refrain from starting new building projects - while continuing many under way - in settlements in return for initial steps towards a regional peace agreement.

Last update - 03:21 03/07/2009

PA: Arrested Hamas activists planned to assassinate Abbas

By Avi Issacharoff

Tags: Palestinians, hamas

Hamas activists arrested by the Palestinian Authority have admitted to tracking the movements of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and to gathering intelligence on his security, PA sources told Haaretz.

Their motive clearly was to assassinate Abbas, the sources said.

"Hamas' intention was to scuttle the reconciliation talks [between Hamas and Fatah] in Cairo and to create chaos in the West Bank, in contrast to the sense of security that has characterized the territory for the past two years," Fatah spokesman Fahmi Zarir told Haaretz.

Palestinian Authority Secretary Taib Abd-Arahim had said Monday amid the Cairo talks that Palestinian security forces had arrested 10 Hamas members planning to attack PA institutions. The detainees admitted they were planning to assassinate several senior Palestinian Authority officials on July 1, in order to halt the conciliation talks, he said.

Now, new details have now emerged about the plot: The Hamas activists were caught with weapons, maps and photos of senior Palestinian officers. The photos and maps indicated the cell was conducting surveillance on Abbas himself.

Sources say Palestinian security forces have detailed confessions in which the suspects acknowledged planning to assassinate several PA officials and stated they were observing Abbas' movements. PA sources say their motive was clear: to assassinate Abbas. The cell had three to five members, between the ages of 25 and 30.

A spokesman for Hamas' military wing has denied the allegations. However, if they are true, this is evidence not only of Hamas' intention to scuttle reconciliation with Fatah, but also to stage a coup of sorts against the Palestinian Authority. Reports suggest Hamas' military wing has an extremist agenda, but Hamas' political leadership in the west bank is thought not to have been aware of the plot.

Last update - 21:08 02/07/2009

Jordan's King Abdullah names teenage son as heir

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News, Jordan

Jordan's King Abdullah II named his eldest son as heir to the throne Thursday, ending five years of speculation over his successor.

Abdullah's move is aimed at avoiding the uncertainty over succession that dogged his father, King Hussein. In 1999, Jordanians were baffled to see Hussein - on his death bed struggling with cancer - strip his brother, Prince Hassan, of the crown and give it to Abdullah.

Hassan had been groomed for the Hashemite throne for more than three decades.

By naming Prince Hussein Bin Abdullah crown prince, Abdullah can groom the 15-year-old for the throne from a young age.

Hussein's appointment came in a royal decree released by the palace. It said the crown prince will hold the title and enjoy the rights and privileges of his post effective immediately.

Under the constitution, the crown prince has a largely ceremonial role, representing the monarch in ribbon-cutting ceremonies and carrying out other symbolic functions. He has no official political post.

Thursday's move was widely expected once the position became vacant in November 2004, when Abdullah removed the title from his half brother, Prince Hamzah, in a sudden palace shake-up.

Hamzah, 29, had held the post when Abdullah first ascended to the throne in

February 1999 following the death of their father.

At the time, Abdullah said Hamzah's position as crown prince was in line with his father's wishes, but later stripped him of the title because it restrained his freedom to study, travel and live a normal life.

Under the constitution, the crown is automatically ordained to the king's eldest son, unless the monarch decrees otherwise.

Prince Hussein - a high school student in Jordan - is the eldest of King Abdullah and Queen Rania's four children.

Like his father and other members of Jordan's ruling Hashemite dynasty, Hussein claims ancestry to Islam's Prophet Muhammad.

Last update - 19:54 02/07/2009

Lieberman: Settlements issue blown out of proportion

By Jack Khoury, Haaretz Correspondent and Reuters

Tags: Israel news, Merkel

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Thursday responded to remarks made earlier by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who said that Israel's construction in West Bank settlements jeopardized the two-state solution, and said that the world has blown the settlements issue entirely out of proportion.

"The situation in the West Bank and the cessation of settlement construction shouldn't top the international community's agenda," Lieberman said during a meeting with Druze leaders at the home of fellow party member MK Hamad Amar in Shfaram.

"North Korea fired three missiles today, despite the warnings and the sanctions, and the world is still occupying itself with Yitzhar and Migron," he said, referring to an outpost north of Jerusalem and a West Bank settlement.

"We have to allow the residents of the West Bank to live normal lives," Lieberman went on to say. "We can't strangle them. We must explain our stance and refrain from strangling people."

Lieberman added that "we all saw the occurrences and the dramatic events in Iran. Does the attempt to lead a normal life in Judea and Samaria top that on the international community's priority list? We have to bring things back into proportion."

The foreign minister also criticized what he termed as the Israeli government's concession policy, saying "we are certainly a government that wants to advance toward a resolution of the [Israeli-Palestinian] conflict, to come up with solutions, that isn't afraid to take responsibility. But taking responsibility doesn't mean that we always have to concede. We are always loved and applauded when we concede and concede. I'm not sure that these concessions lead to any kind of result."

Earlier Thursday, Merkel demanded that Israel halt construction in the West Bank settlements, saying it endangered efforts to achieve a two-state solution with the Palestinians.

"I think it is now important to get commitments from all sides and that includes the issue of settlement building," Merkel said in a speech to the Bundestag lower house of parliament.

"I am convinced that there must be a stop to this. Otherwise we will not come to the two-state solution that is urgently needed."

Merkel's remarks are in line with the positions of the European Union and the United States, but were unusually clear-cut for the German leader, who regularly cites her country's special obligation to Israel because of the Holocaust, in which six million Jews were deliberately murdered.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has said U.S.-backed peace talks with Israel cannot resume until all settlement activity has ceased on captured land the Palestinians want for a state.

Washington has also called for a total halt to settlement building in the West Bank, a demand that has opened the most serious rift in U.S.-Israeli relations in a decade.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on Wednesday that Israel would consider a limited moratorium on new settlement construction, but said it should be part of a broader deal bringing Arab states into the peace process.

Last update - 19:51 02/07/2009

North Korea test fires four short-range missiles

By Reuters

Tags: United Nations, North Korea

North Korea test-fired four short-range missiles on Thursday, further stoking tension in the region that was already high due to Pyongyang's nuclear test and threats to boost its nuclear arsenal in response to United Nations sanctions.

The North, which often fires short-range missiles as part of military drills and usually times the launches for periods of diplomatic friction, was hit with UN sanctions following its May 25 nuclear test.

The salvo began with two surface-to-ship missiles fired off North Korea's east coast between 5:20 P.M and 6 P.M. (0820-0900 GMT) that flew about 100 km (60 miles) and splashed into the sea, a South Korean defense official said.

A third short-range missile was fired around two hours later, the defense ministry said, and South Korea's Yonhap news agency, citing officials in Seoul, later said a fourth had been fired.

North Korea last month warned shipping to keep away from a maritime zone extending 110 km off its east coast between June 25 and July 10, saying it was conducting a military drill.

"This activity is not unexpected," said U.S. Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman.

"North Korea continues to develop and pursue missile technologies and the United States continues to remain concerned about not only their missile activities but their proliferation activities and their nuclear program."

A South Korean daily said that the secretive North may also test fire mid-range missiles, viewed by the South, the United States and others as a more serious act, in a matter of days.

Japan, a party to currently suspended six-nation talks aimed at coaxing the isolated North to give up its nuclear program in return for aid and greater diplomatic recognition, was quick to condemn Pyongyang's latest action.

"We have often warned that such a provocative act is not beneficial for North Korea's national interest," Kyodo News Agency quoted Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso as telling reporters.

The short-range missile launches came after regional markets had closed for the day, but East Asian investors have grown used to North Korea's saber-rattling and tend not to be fazed.

Analysts say they would likely panic only if there was military conflict on a peninsula, where 2 million troops face each other across one of the world's most heavily armed borders.

Washington said this week it had tightened its crackdown on firms linked to the North's lucrative proliferation of missiles, a major source of cash for the destitute state, and has sent the U.S. point man for sanctions to Asia for discussions.

Enforcement of the sanctions, aimed at halting its trade in arms, would depend heavily on China, the North's biggest benefactor and trade partner, analysts said.

China said on Thursday it was sending its envoy to the six-party talks to South Korea, Japan, Russia and the United States. North Korea, the sixth party, was not on the itinerary.

"China has consistently advocated dialogue and consultation, and achieving denuclearization of the Korean peninsula through the six-party talks process," Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang told a news briefing.

Earlier the JoongAng Ilbo daily quoted an intelligence source as saying the North was likely to fire medium or short range missiles from its east coast in early July that could include Scuds with a range of about 340 km (210 miles) or Rodong missiles with a range of up to 1,000 km (620 miles).

North Korea fired a barrage of short-range missiles following its May nuclear test, which experts said put the state closer to having a working nuclear bomb.

It launched a rocket in April in what was widely seen as a disguised long-range missile test that violated UN resolutions banning it from ballistic missile launches.

Philip Goldberg, the U.S. envoy who coordinates sanctions against the North, has been in China to enlist Beijing's help in getting tough with North Korea and said he had had "good discussions" with his Chinese counterparts.

"We want all the various aspects of the resolution to work", he told reporters after a day of meetings, adding that this included financial sanctions.

He will be in Malaysia on Sunday before heading back to Washington on Monday.

It was not immediately clear why he was visiting Malaysia, although earlier this week Japanese media reported police in Japan had arrested three people on suspicion of attempting to export equipment that could be used in weapons production to Myanmar via Malaysia and suspected a link to North Korea.

South Korean Foreign Minister Yu Myung-hwan said he was seeking a meeting of the foreign ministers of the six countries, including the North, on the sidelines of a regional security forum on July 23 in Thailand.

Officials said the North's military grandstanding is likely related to moves by its leadership to begin readying leader Kim Jong-il's youngest son as a future heir by consolidating the 67-year-old leader's power base.

Last update - 15:46 02/07/2009

University of Vienna honors 2,200 Jews expelled by Nazis

By The Associated Press

Tags: jewish world, Nazis

Kurt Elias vividly remembers the day in 1938 when the Nazis barred him from entering the University of Vienna because he was Jewish.

"I had to send someone else in to get my dissection kit and coat," said the 90-year-old Elias, a medical student at the time.

Shortly thereafter, the Vienna native left Austria with just one suitcase and several dollars in his pocket. He ended up becoming a doctor in the United States and now lives in New York City.

Elias is one of more than 2,200 people listed in an online database launched this week containing the names of students and teachers - most of them Jewish - who were forced to leave the University of Vienna after Adolf Hitler annexed Austria in March 1938.

The database also contains the names of people who were stripped of their

academic titles - including famous writer Stefan Zweig, whom the Nazis in 1941 deemed unworthy of the philosophy degree he earned in 1904 because he was Jewish.

"This is a belated, symbolic initiative," reads the virtual memorial book.

While some entries consist of just a name, date of birth, basic biographical information and copies of inscription forms, others - such as the page dedicated to Elias - also include photos and life stories.

Some reflect the horrors of the time.

"She was deported and died in Auschwitz (Oswiecim/Poland) on January 1st, 1943," reads the final sentence of the entry dedicated to Antonie Frank, also a former medical student.

Project leader Herbert Posch said he and his team spent years identifying and trying to track down as many people as possible who were expelled from the University of Vienna 71 years ago.

In the end, he said, they reached about 150 and conducted some 100 interviews either in person, by telephone or via e-mail. Links to 14 videos of interviews are to be posted online in the near future.

But the search for victims is not over.

"It's a work in progress, Posch said, adding he hoped visitors to the Web site would help supplement entries with missing details - and help create new ones.

"We're presenting an incomplete list that, over the course of further research, will have to be complemented, expanded and possibly corrected," said his colleague, Friedrich Stadler, who heads a forum that investigates the history of the University of Vienna in the 20th century.

Still, Esther Fritsch, a Jewish community representative, described the

memorial book as a big step forward.

Organizers also compiled a handwritten memorial book that is on display in a light-filled former Jewish prayer house on campus. It has blank pages so that more names can be added as the project progresses.

To Elias, the database will help maintain the memory of what happened to him and many others.

"It's a very good idea to make sure the truth isn't forgotten," he said in a telephone interview from New York.

Last update - 15:32 02/07/2009

Hardline Iran MPs call for Mousavi to be prosecuted

By Reuters

Tags: Mirhossein Mousavi

A group of hardline Iranian members of parliament want the judiciary to prosecute defeated presidential candidate Mirhossein Mousavi over post-election unrest that rocked the Islamic Republic last month.

"Those who hold illegal rallies and gatherings should be legally pursued," MP Mohammad Taghi Rahbar was quoted as saying by the Javan newspaper on Thursday.

It said Rahbar was among several MPs preparing to write to the judiciary complaining about Mousavi's activities after the disputed June 12 election. It did not say how many lawmakers backed the petition.

In another sign of mounting pressure, state television said a student branch of the pro-government Basij militia, which helped police suppress pro-Mousavi street protests, had urged the attorney-general to take him to court.

Basij students accused him of "inciting his supporters to take to the streets to stage protests" and "undermining national security", English-language Press TV said on its Web site.

The authorities have blamed Mousavi, a moderate former prime minister who says the poll was rigged in favor of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, for violence in which at least 20 people were killed. Mousavi says the authorities were responsible for the bloodshed.

Hardline Iranian cleric Ahmad Khatami urged the judiciary on Friday to charge the leading "rioters" as "mohareb", or people who wage war against God.

Mousavi and another losing candidate, pro-reform cleric Mehdi Karoubi, again denounced the election result on Wednesday and said Ahmadinejad's next cabinet would be illegitimate.

Although hardliners have appeared to be in the driving seat since security forces overcame street protests that erupted in the days after the poll, Mousavi and Karoubi have not yielded.

Despite their defiance, analysts say they have few practical options after Iran's top legislative body on Monday certified results showing Ahmadinejad had won re-election by a landslide.

The clerical leadership is likely to ignore the reformers and keep backing Ahmadinejad, who enjoys the public support of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's top authority.

Iran has accused foreign powers, especially Britain and the United States, of inciting the anti-government protests and of plotting to undermine the Islamic state with help of people inside the country. London and Washington reject the charges.

The semi-official Fars news agency said seven people linked to "anti-revolutionary" groups had been arrested because they had been "actively involved in riots and unrest" in Tehran and the northwestern city of Qazvin.

Iran's police chief said on Wednesday 1,032 people had been detained during the protests in Tehran, but most had been freed.

The International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran said on Tuesday reports from within Iran indicated that as many as 2,000 people, including opposition leaders, professors, journalists, students and protesters may be in detention across the country.

Mousavi on Wednesday called on the authorities to release detained "children of the revolution", a reference to scores of leading reformist political figures arrested since the poll.

Officials reject charges of election fraud, saying it was Iran's "healthiest" vote since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

Last update - 16:26 02/07/2009

Merkel: Settlements ruin efforts for 2-state solution

By Reuters

Tags: West Bank settlements

German Chancellor Angela Merkel demanded on Thursday that Israel halt construction in the West Bank settlements, saying it endangered efforts to achieve a two-state solution with the Palestinians.

"I think it is now important to get commitments from all sides and that includes the issue of settlement building," Merkel said in a speech to the Bundestag lower house of parliament.

"I am convinced that there must be a stop to this. Otherwise we will not come to the two-state solution that is urgently needed."

Merkel's remarks are in line with the positions of the European Union and the United States, but were unusually clear-cut for the German leader, who regularly cites her country's special obligation to Israel because of the Holocaust, in which six million Jews were deliberately murdered.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has said U.S.-backed peace talks with Israel cannot resume until all settlement activity has ceased on captured land the Palestinians want for a state.

Washington has also called for a total halt to settlement building in the West Bank, a demand that has opened the most serious rift in U.S.-Israeli relations in a decade.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on Wednesday that Israel would consider a limited moratorium on new settlement construction, but said it should be part of a broader deal bringing Arab states into the peace process.

Last update - 12:57 02/07/2009

Austria's 'forgotten' concentration camp in danger of being demolished

By Anshel Pfeffer

Tags: austria, Israel news

If the excavations currently under way on a hill near the Austrian village of St. Georgen continue, within a few weeks little will remain of Gusen, one of the most horrifying of the Nazi concentration camps that was located nearby. Austrian officials say the work is necessary to prevent the collapse of underground tunnels on the site.

An estimated 36,000 to 50,000 inmates, including Jews, Soviet prisoners of war and political prisoners, met their deaths at Gusen, the site of an underground production facility for advanced Messerschmitt fighter jet aircraft and other weaponry. The planes were manufactured for the Nazi Luftwaffe with slave labor from the concentration camp. It has been 64 years since the closure of the aircraft factory, which was codenamed "Bergkristall."

One local resident who has been inside said the place resembles ten deserted soccer fields. Other than the gates to the factory and small memorial plaques, nothing on the outside bears witness to the tens of thousands of inmates who met their deaths as slave laborers there.

A small group of local residents and Holocaust survivors is trying to preserve the Bergkristall installation from demolition.

A few kilometers from the site stood the Mauthausen concentration camp, established in 1938 as a detention site for Jews and political prisoners, and ultimately as an administrative center for a network of affiliated camps established in the area under S.S. sponsorship. One of those camps was Gusen, established in 1940, initially as a quarry and slave labor center for the region's industry and agriculture. The inmates were actually made available for a fee as day laborers in the area. Gusen was expanded significantly in 1944, after Allied bombing of military industrial sites in Bavaria.

Thousands of slave laborers were used to dig underground facilities for the production of weapons and other military hardware. The most ambitious production facility was Bergkristall, built underground in an area estimated at 50,000 square meters, for the production among other weaponry of the Messerschmitt 262 jet fighter, on which Hitler pinned so many hopes.

Fewer than half the 70,000 inmates who went sent to Gusen made it out alive. The others were either executed or died of hunger, cold, disease or industrial accidents. The camp was among the most cruel in the Nazi Reich, and was actually ranked as such by the S.S. For a few weeks before the end of the war, the Bergkristall reached a record production level of 15 aircraft a day, but by that point the Nazis were running out of trains to transport them and fuel to fly them.

Production nonetheless continued at a murderous pace, ending only on May 3, 1945, days before the Nazis' surrender ended the war in Europe. About 20,000 Gusen inmates were liberated at the end of the war by the American army. Some died thereafter of disease, and the rest scattered around the world. Gusen has been called the "forgotten camp."

The Messerschmitt company was reestablished after the war and is now part of the giant EADS aviation firm which manufactures the Airbus airplane. Although the legacy of the Messerschmitt is carefully preserved by the firm, nowhere is the fact that slave labor went into the company's aircraft mentioned.

After the war, the Soviets tried to blow up the underground industrial facilities at Gusen, but the collapse of a residential area led them to simply seal the site. The Austrian government has chosen not to reopen it, although the Austrian interior ministry, which is responsible for historic preservation, did take control of the site in 2001.

When demolition work began at the site last month, the memorial committee mobilized, but the regional and national governments declined to stop the work. In response to an inquiry from Haaretz, the Austrian government said the work at Gusen constitutes "emergency measures" taken "in order to prevent the further decay of the tunnel system," and added that the activity at the site is being monitored by experts.

According to the Austrian government, after the work is complete in October, 1,900 meters of tunnel will be "preserved." The government said there was no alternative since the tunnels are in danger of collapse, adding that it was regrettable that the company carrying out the work did not notify the public or memorial organizations in advance.

"The responsible authorities in Austria," a government spokesman added, "will do their best to ensure that as a result of the above measures, the quality of the Gusen memorial site and accessibility for visitors will be decisively improved."

Despite the government's assurances, some local residents are convinced that the real reason for the work is to prepare the site for residential construction.

Last update - 12:02 02/07/2009

Jew's Muse / The Iranian mullacracy will never go away

By Uzi Silber

Tags: Iran election, Israel news

As far as I'm concerned, the carefully calibrated observations spouted by professional Iran experts on news channels are about as valid as the opinions of the Shiraz-born proprietors of the Shalom Chai pizza parlor on Manhattan's Lower East Side. Unfortunately, David and Chaim were far too busy serving customers to field questions. Similarly, the Iranian-born ex-wives of two friends couldn't be reached for comment.

In attempt to elicit authentic if official Iranian views on the recent events in Tehran, I emailed queries to Iranian embassy VIPs in North America, Europe, India, Australia and New Zealand. These efforts have been fruitless as well.

That leaves me and my own ruminations -- as useful, I suppose, as anyone else's.

So here it goes: the Iranian mullacracy won't go away.

Government-backed motorcycle gangs have successfully smothered the desperate street protests; like those of '99 and '03, these too will soon be forgotten, Twitter, Facebook and Youtube notwithstanding. Rest assured: European officials and businessmen will be commuting to Tehran in a mere few months time, begging for business as usual.

And despite President Obama's firm, if lukewarm denunciations of the crackdown, the Americans won?t be far behind: at some future venue in Geneva, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will present Manouchehr Mottaki, her Iranian counterpart, with a toy 'reset' button just like the one she handed the Russian foreign minister last March. This gadget, recall, was meant as a metaphor for the Obama Administration's desire to diplomatically paper over Russian bullying of its neighbors.

International bleating to the contrary, when it comes right down to it, precious few worry about internal repression or oppression within dictatorially ruled countries. The Iranian government will get away with it, just as Chinese, Russians, Burmese, Venezuelan and Arab dictators have and do. And they all can, because it's not about human rights -- it's all just business.

The mullahs will never give up power. Like the dictators in Beijing, Havana, Yangon, Pyongyang, Riyadh, Moscow and Caracas, the Iranian military-mullah complex will endure because three decades in power has made the ruling elite fabulously wealthy and they?re not about to give all that up.

For the ascendant clique of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in particular, the money is a vital means to a far loftier mission - accelerating the arrival of the Muslim Shiite Messiah, known as the Twelfth Imam.

As it happens, this messianic End of Days worldview is held to a greater or lesser extent by all members of the Islamic political elite whatever their flavor, be it the hygienically challenged Ahmadinejad, his nemesis and corrupt billionaire power broker Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani, or former thug-turned Gandhi-like media darling, Mir Hossein Moussavi.

First the money; in wake of the 1979 Islamic revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini and his tough henchmen known as the Revolutionary Guards seized from the wealthy class thousands of lucrative properties and income producing businesses and placed them in so-called Islamic charitable foundations known as bonyads.

Over the decade that followed, the bonyads supposedly redistributed to the poor some of the wealth stolen by the Khomeini gang. But once the grand ayatollah died, the mullahs and Revolutionary Guards disregarded the bonyads? mandate of wealth redistribution, shifting their efforts instead to self-enrichment and intensified financing of jihadi terrorist organizations.

According to an influential 2003 article in Forbes Magazine, bonyads boast lucrative investments in disparate industries such as oil, real estate, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, shipping, construction and resorts. Freedom House estimates that the bonyads collectively control perhaps 20% of Iranian GDP, or over $100 billion. Bonyadic tentacles also reach into every small Iranian town where local operatives regularly extort local businesses. So much for justice.

As Vladimir Putin himself reportedly noted in 2007, the Iranian ruling clique is delusional. This is of course isn't unusual for autocrats: inhabiting bubbles and surrounded by trembling sycophants, dictators of all sorts are invariably prone to a megalomaniacal sense of destiny. Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser, Libya's Muammar Khaddafi and Iraq's Saddam Hussein each expected to unite the Arab world under their respective flags. Hugo Chavez is certain that he was born to lead the entirety of Latin America into a new socialist utopia.

Ahmadinejad has made it eminently clear in many public pronouncements that he sees himself as an agent put on earth to hasten the Twelfth Imam?s arrival; the archives of MEMRI.org provide ample record of these declarations.

It follows that any domestic or foreign opponent of the Iranian regime and its policies would be viewed by Ahmadinejad and his ilk as an obstacle to the Imam's eventual return, and as such, an intolerable foe. This holds true even when the foe happens to be a loyal son of the Islamic Revolution such as Moussavi.

Make no mistake -- Ahmadinejad and his ruthless clique will do whatever is required to hasten the arrival of their venerated Imam even if it takes the spilled blood of the very last unarmed Iranian.

The mullahs won't go: this isn't just about the power and the money -- it's about the coming of their Messiah.

Last update - 11:54 02/07/2009

EU states may recall Iran envoys after U.K. embassy arrests

By The Associated Press

Tags: EU, Israel News

Iran's standoff with the West escalated with the European Union considering pulling out all 27 of its ambassadors in retaliation for the recent detentions of several local employees of the British Embassy in Tehran, despite Iranian claims that all but one had been released.

The detentions last week ratcheted up tensions over Iran's bloody crackdown on opposition protesters who disputed the results of last month's presidential election.

In a further sign of deteriorating ties, Iran said Wednesday the EU had disqualified itself from talks over Tehran?s nuclear program because of its "interference" in the post-election unrest. Iran accuses the EU of supporting the anti-government rallies.

The EU "has totally lost the competence and qualifications needed for holding any kind of talks with Iran," Iran's chief of staff, Gen. Hasan Firouzabadi, was quoted as saying by the semi-official Fars News Agency.

Senior European Union officials were to debate Britain?s pullout request on Thursday.

Meanwhile, in fresh displays of defiance, Iranian opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi told supporters that "it's not yet too late" to push for their rights, and joined a reformist ex-president in condemning the regime for a crackdown both said was tantamount to a coup.

Mousavi said Wednesday that he considered Iran's cleric-led government illegitimate, and he demanded it release all political prisoners and institute electoral reforms and press freedoms. Former President Mohammad Khatami also lashed out at what he termed "a poisonous security situation" in the wake of violent street protests.

In boldly worded statements posted on their Web sites, Khatami accused Iran's leadership of a "velvet coup against the people and democracy," and Mousavi said the government's crackdown on demonstrators was "tantamount to a coup."

Wednesday's confrontations with the regime came as Iran?s feared Basij militia accused Mousavi of undermining national security and asked a prosecutor to investigate his role in the protests.

Khatami, an ally of Mousavi - who contends the June 12 election was marred by widespread fraud and insists he was robbed of victory - scorned the government for declaring incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the winner in a landslide.

"Given what has been done and declared unilaterally, we must say that a velvet revolution has taken place against the people and democratic roots of the system," Khatami said. "People?s protests were suppressed, those who were required to protect people's rights humiliated the people ... yet it [the government] speaks of national reconciliation and peace."

Mousavi said he was troubled by "the bitter, widespread distrust of the people toward the declared election results and the government that caused it."

"It's not yet too late," said Mousavi, who has slipped from public view in recent days. "It's our historic responsibility to continue our complaint and make efforts not to give up the rights of the people."

Mousavi also condemned alleged attacks by security forces on college dormitories where "blood was spilled and the youth were beaten," and he called for a return to a more "honest" political environment in the Islamic Republic.

"A majority of the people - including me - do not accept its political legitimacy," he said, adding: "There's a danger ahead. A ruling system which relied on people's trust for 30 years cannot replace this trust with security forces overnight."

State television reported Wednesday that all but one of nine Iranian employees of the British Embassy in Tehran had been released, and the sole Iranian still in custody was being held on suspicion of playing a role in post-election protests. British Foreign Secretary David Miliband said he had information suggesting two local employees might still be in detention.

Both Britain and the EU had condemned the detentions as "harassment and intimidation," and Britain asked the 27-nation bloc to withdraw its ambassadors.

The semiofficial Fars news agency, meanwhile, said the Basij - known as supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's street enforcers - sent the chief prosecutor a letter accusing Mousavi of taking part in nine offenses against the state, including "disturbing the nation's security," which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment.

Iran's regime says 17 protesters and eight Basiji were killed in two weeks of unrest that followed the election.

The powerful Guardian Council, Iran's top electoral oversight body, pronounced the election results valid earlier this week ? paving the way for Ahmadinejad to be sworn in later this month for a second four-year term.

"Whether he wanted to or not, Mr. Mousavi in many areas supervised or assisted in punishable acts," read the Basij letter, which also accused Mousavi of bringing "pessimism" into the public sphere

Last update - 09:29 02/07/2009

'U.S. can't get Arabs to commit to normal Israel ties'

By Barak Ravid and Cnaan Liphshiz

Tags: Arab world, Israel news

The U.S. administration has not been successful in securing commitments from Arab countries to take steps toward normalizing relations with Israel, a senior source in Jerusalem said Wednesday.

The source said U.S. President Barack Obama's recent meeting with King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia did not produce a commitment to encourage the other Arab states to begin normalization.

"In such a situation, the Americans can't continue demanding gestures only from Israel, such as the demand that Israel freeze settlement construction," the source said.

In response, a senior White House source said talks with the Arab states are continuing with the aim of obtaining a commitment to make gestures toward Israel, and there is still hope for progress.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak returned to Israel on Wednesday from a meeting with U.S. Mideast envoy George Mitchell. A senior White House official confirmed reports that progress was made on the issue of settlements, though no agreement had been reached. He added that similar progress had been made in contacts with Arab countries.

Haaretz has learned that the talks with Mitchell included discussions of a package deal to include a curb on settlement construction. Barak reportedly argued that any steps taken by Israel would have to be accompanied by assurances that the Arab states would also move forward. This would lay the groundwork for resumed talks on a final regional peace agreement.

Within the next two weeks or so, Mitchell is expected to visit Israel to continue talks.

A senior diplomatic source said that even if a meeting between Mitchell and the prime minister doesn't resolve the settlement issue, it will narrow the gap, and the prime minister may request a meeting with Obama in Washington in the coming months to seal an agreement.

Barak noted that if a package deal is reached, Israel might agree to a temporary construction freeze in the settlements, but this would not apply to more than 2,000 housing units already being built.

Also yesterday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke at the traditional Independence Day reception at the residence of the American ambassador, James Cunningham. Netanyahu spoke of shared values with the United States but did not address the settlement issue. Although many senior Israeli politicians attended the event, turnout was lighter than usual.

By attending, Knesset members ignored the call by Likud MK Danny Danon, who wrote a letter to his parliamentary colleagues this week urging them to boycott the event. He said America "was trying to call into question the State of Israel's independence" by pressuring it to halt construction in the West Bank and agree to territorial concessions to the Palestinians.

A senior diplomat said he was puzzled by the logic behind Danon's proposal. He said that despite any disagreements, the event was meant to honor the American people, not any administration.

In his address, Netanyahu highlighted the democratic traditions of Israel and the United States, which he said united them in the face of tyranny. Referring to Obama's recent speech in Cairo, he noted the president's reference to the unbreakable bond between Israel and the United States.

Last update - 05:36 02/07/2009

Last remaining U.S. Jewish Republican Senator loses seat

By The Associated Press

Tags: Jewish World, Israel News

The defeat of incumbent Norm Coleman in the drawn-out Minnesota Senate race leaves U.S. Republicans without a Jewish senator for the first time in half a century.

Coleman's departure comes two months after the Republicans' other Jewish member, Arlen Specter, switched parties to become a Democrat. Coleman conceded his long-contested race with Democratic challenger Al Franken on Tuesday after the Minnesota Supreme Court rejected Coleman's legal challenge.

Republicans have had at least one Jewish senator since New York's Jacob Javits took office in 1957, reaching a peak of three during the mid-1980s.

In the House, Eric Cantor has risen quickly since he took office in 2001 to become the minority whip, the second-ranked House Republican. His other distinction is that, since 2003, he is the only Jewish Republican in the 435-member body. That is down from eight Jewish Republican members who served in the House during the 1990s.

There are currently 30 Democrats in the House who list their religion as

Jewish. The Senate will have 13 Jewish members as of next week when Franken, Coleman's rival in Minnesota, is sworn in. That's 11 Democrats and two independents who normally vote with the Democrats.

Ira Forman, CEO of the National Jewish Democratic Council, said the sharp drop in the number of Jewish Republicans in Congress paralleled the party's shift to the right. "It's a reflection of where the Republican Party has gone," he said. "It's left the Jewish community pretty cold."

Matt Broks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, said his group was not happy with the defeat of Coleman, who has worked with them as a consultant. But he disagreed with those who say the Republican Jewish movement is declining, saying you will see and are seeing Jewish Republicans winning elections all across the country at the state and local level

Noam Shalit to tell UN panel: Gilad's abduction a war crime

By Jack Khoury, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Gilad Shalit, UN

Noam Shalit will ask a United Nations committee on Monday to declare the abduction of his son, Israel Defense Forces soldier Gilad Shalit, by Hamas in 2006 a war crime.

Shalit will tell the committee, headed by Richard Goldstone in Geneva, that the abduction of his son violates the Geneva Convention and call for his immediate release by his captors.

In a departure from his policy up to now, the father of the abducted soldier will name Hamas political bureau leader Khaled Meshal as personally responsible for his son's abduction.

Although Shalit is not interested in legally prosecuting Meshal, he believes declaring the Damascus-based leader responsible for the violation of humanitarian laws might expedite his son's release.

The UN committee, headed by former South African judge Goldstone, was set up to investigate human rights violations during Operation Cast Lead.

Shalit's adviser, attorney Nick Kaufman, who specializes in international law, told Haaretz that he will testify because of the relationship between Gilad Shalit's abduction and the more recent violence between Israel and the Palestinians. Israel does not recognize the committee and so Shalit's testimony will be considered a private and personal matter, Kaufman said.

Residents of the Qassam-stricken town of Sderot, which has sustained repeated attacks by Gazan militants for years, will also testify before the committee on an unofficial basis.

On Wednesday Noam Shalit was the guest of honor at a special meeting held at Rome's municipal palace. Shalit also met with Rome's mayor, Gianni Alemanno, and Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini.

At the same time Hezi Meshita, who headed the Shalit family-run campaign for the release of Gilad Shalit, announced he would be stepping down. Meshita said he has to tend to his private business but he would still devote much of his time to the cause. "The previous government missed out on some opportunities to bring Gilad Shalit home," Meshita said.

Last update - 04:44 02/07/2009

Is a crushed Israel in America's best interest?

By Ari Shavit, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Benjamin Netanyahu, U.S.

Seven months after Barack Obama's victory in the presidential election, it is still not clear what the United States' new strategic goal is: halting Iran's nuclear program, or learning to live with a nuclear Iran? It is also not clear what the new U.S. vision for the Middle East is: a partial but realistic peace, or a full but fictitious peace? It is not clear whether Obama's United States plans to isolate Middle Eastern extremists or encourage them. It is not clear what its attitude toward Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria and Iran will be. Nor is it clear whether it will leave Iraq victorious or defeated. But, on one issue, there is no doubt. In everything related to Israel, Obama's United States has adopted a tough-love strategy.

"Tough love" is a loaded phrase. It has educational, emotional and sometimes even sexual connotations. It encompasses the paternalistic belief that the educator knows what's better for the pupil's welfare than the pupil does. Therefore, it has traditionally been associated with reform schools and patronizing conservatism.

Recently, however, "tough love" has become the rage in liberal circles in Washington and New York. Democratic opinion leaders - many of them Jewish - have begun to speak with shining eyes about the need to administer a dose of tough love to Israel: to train it, wean it, set boundaries for it. To force it against its will to do what is good for it.

Israel, for its part, has done quite a bit to bolster the tough-love advocates. The pampered Israeli-American princess abused its status as the apple of Uncle Sam's eye. For years, it made a mockery of the U.S. administration and embarked on a spree of settlements, checkpoints and illegal outposts. With reckless abandon, it threw off every yoke and waved a red flag at the good and the great in America's capital.

Therefore, when Barack Obama and Rahm Emanuel entered the White House, many people advised them to tame the rebel. And the president and his chief of staff received the advice enthusiastically. To the two tough guys from Chicago, the idea of loving Israel in a strong, painful manner sounded cool.

The results can be seen almost every day on television screens throughout the world: an American policy taken straight out of a British public school. A diplomacy comprised of public reprimands. The new United States is trying to wean Israel from its bad habits by means of the teacher's ruler. Even as it bows and scrapes to Saudi Arabia and is scrupulously careful of Iran's honor, it humiliates Israel. The president's feet on the table were a message. The goal is a well-trained, obedient Israel.

The United States is a superpower. If the United States wants a broken, battered Israel, it will get a broken, battered Israel. This is a collision between a tank and an ATV, between a stealth bomber and a glider. But the question the White House ought to be asking itself is whether riding roughshod over Israel serves its goals - whether a crushed Israel is an American interest.

The answer is unequivocal: no. Already, Israel's public humiliation is hurting America. It is making even moderate Arabs unwilling to contribute anything to advancing the diplomatic process. And without a significant Arab contribution, there will be no diplomatic process.

But a continued tough love policy toward Israel is liable to do damage that is far more serious - and irreversible. Without a strong Israel, a Middle East peace can neither be established nor survive. Without a strong Israel, the Middle East will go up in flames.

Therefore, instead of playing games taken out of a basic training manual, Americans and Israelis must work in harmony. They must think outside the box and come up with a creative solution, based on listening to each other and mutual respect. They must jointly advance a genuine regional peace.

The hour is late. Both Obama's government and Benjamin Netanyahu's government have made serious mistakes the last few months. But ultimately, both Obama and Netanyahu are worthy leaders who want to do the right thing. Therefore, the two must stop the dangerous game they are playing. The time has come to replace tough love with sensible, grown-up love.

Last update - 04:31 02/07/2009

Israel is bullied because it acts like a doormat

By Israel Harel, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: U.S., Israel News

Anyone who acts like a doormat when he visits one foreign ruler should not be surprised when other rulers come along and act as arrogantly as the first. From day one we have let the world understand that we are a country with no self-respect, that we can be insulted and punched and will respond, if at all, with restraint and meekness. French President Nicolas Sarkozy was able to say what he said about Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman because for years Israel has been getting across the message: You can treat us arrogantly.

It isn't the Americans who formulated the belittling and trivializing formula "natural growth" at which the Obama administration is now chipping away in an arrogant and bullying manner. An Israeli government, headed by Ariel Sharon, was responsible for the trivializing. And instead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declaring, here at home, that no independent nation can agree to have "natural growth" dictate its rate of construction, Defense Minister Ehud Barak has gone off to the United States to plead for this poor little lamb.

And to whom has he gone? To the president? To the vice president? To the secretary of state? No. To an envoy, who holds the mere rank of ambassador. The State of Israel's defense minister has tried to extract an agreement to build kindergartens in Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria. And since George Mitchell has apparently sent the defense minister away empty-handed, the prime minister himself is about to go to him hat in hand. Maybe he'll change his mind.

The British government is on the brink of collapse. And with what is the British foreign minister busy? He "completely deplores" an Israeli decision to build 50 housing units in the settlement Adam in Judea and Samaria. Foreign diplomats in Israel are speaking in a lordly way to Israeli statesmen, and foreign journalists are asking them questions that are often biased, intrusive and insolent. These correspondents would never allow themselves to behave so crudely in their own countries. And why shouldn't they? Here, after all, everyone including prime ministers feels obligated to justify himself to them and gratify them. Only rarely does someone put them in their place.

The scorn for Israeli sovereignty and dignity runs from the lowest to the highest. Israelis, in contact with foreigners, tend to be self-abasing and massively critical of their country and its leaders. Those who excel at this in particular are people from Israeli organizations who get their funding from foreign governments and foreign NGOs, and in return, wittingly or not, serve their interests.

Azerbaijan, a Muslim country, has a dangerous border with Iran. Many of its interests, especially economic interests, inevitably intersect with Iran's. About three weeks ago Iran's chief of staff, Maj. Gen. Hasan Firuzabadi, paid a surprise visit to Baku. The aim: to prevent a visit to the republic by Israeli President Shimon Peres. Although it was made clear to them that Iran would take a dim view should they refuse (and indeed while Peres was there, Iran recalled its ambassador), the Azerbaijanis rejected the demand outright. Azerbaijan is a country with self-respect. They made it clear to the bullying Iranians that no one was going to tell them which guests to receive, or to whom to export goods, or especially from whom to import. Only Israel fired the director general of its Defense Ministry, Amos Yaron, because that's what the Americans dictated.

When the norm is to submit to pressure, the pressures only increase. If right at the start of the pressure campaign Netanyahu has bowed down to the Americans and given up his most basic principle - opposition to a Palestinian state - what is left for him to give when the next wave of pressure comes along? This is weakness and this is its wage.

Last update - 09:42 02/07/2009

Rome gives honorary citizenship to Gilad Shalit

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News, Gilad Shalit

Rome has given honorary citizenship to Gilad Shalit, the Israeli soldier kidnapped by militants linked to Gaza's militant Islamic Hamas group three years ago

Shalit's father, Noam Shalit, received the honor at a city hall ceremony Wednesday.

A giant photo of the soldier hung in the piazza, with the words Rome wants its citizen Gilad Shalit free - words Rome Mayor Gianni Alemanno repeated at the evening ceremony.

The city council voted to give Shalit honorary citizenship to coincide with Thursday's third anniversary of his capture by militants in a cross-border raid from Gaza into Israel.

Talks to trade Shalit for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners in Israel have been unsuccessful.

Last update - 23:51 01/07/2009

Netanyahu: Obama was right, U.S.-Israel bond unbreakable

By The Associated Press and Haaretz Service

Tags: Obama, Israel news, Netanyahu

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attended a Fourth of July celebration at the home of American ambassador to Israel James Cunningham on Wednesday, and said that the bond between Israel and the U.S. was still strong.

Amid tension with the long-time ally over West Bank settlement construction, the prime minister declared that the sentiments voiced by U.S. President Barack Obama, who said in Cairo last month that his country's bond with Israel was unbreakable, were true.

The prime minister also warned that the world order could break down if tyrannical regimes were to obtain weapons of mass destruction.

However, freedom has usually triumphed over repressive regimes, the prime minister stressed.

"The greatest danger facing our world today is that this historical consistency of the triumph and spread of democracy could change if the world's worst regimes acquire the world's most dangerous weapons," he said.

Netanyahu did not mention Iran, but he has often warned against allowing Iran to acquire nuclear weapons.

The prime minister spoke less than 24 hours after Defense Minister Ehud Barak met with U.S. envoy to the Mideast George Mitchell in Washington. A senior diplomatic source said Tuesday that tangible progress was made during that meeting. "There is no crisis, and there is progress," the source said. "The setting is ripe for a meeting between Netanyahu and Mitchell and until then, Israel must make some decisions."

Senior U.S. officials said after the meeting that they did not expect a completed deal to come out of the Barak-Mitchell meeting, but that it was a positive and effective meeting.

Last update - 19:55 01/07/2009

Thousands support Israeli doctor accused of complicity in torture

By Cnaan Liphshiz

Tags: Palestinian, torture

Thousands of people this week signed a petition in support of the Israeli president of the World Medical Association, following a campaign to impeach him from the world ethical body for alleged complicity in torturing Palestinians.

The impeachment campaign began shortly after Blachar assumed the presidency in November, but has picked up following last month's publication of a report by Israeli human rights groups on alleged complicity by Israeli doctors in tortures.

In June, 725 physicians from 43 countries signed a petition for Blachar's removal, claiming that the Israel Medical Association which he heads has ignored evidence that doctors working in detention facilities are allowing torture. Blachar denies this.

"We are fighting to immunize science from politics," said Nancy Falchuk, who organized the petition to support Blachar as president of Hadassah ? A Zionist body heavily invested in medicine and the largest volunteer organization in the U.S.

Though it does occasionally lend its power to countering anti-Israel initiatives, Hadassah is not a major player in this field. "We remain above politics," Falchuk said, but added that after 97 years of involvement in Israeli medicine, "we know the accusation is not true."

She added: "Hadassah will mount an army to defend Israel and its medical institutions, just as we have done in 2003 when the World Medical Association wanted to ban the Israel branch."

The campaign to impeach Blachar ? a 68-year-old pediatrician from Rehovot with 40 years of medical experience ? is spearheaded by Derek Summerfield, a psychiatrist and member of the U.K. Medical Committee for Palestine. Blachar said he intended to sue Summerfield for libel.

Furthermore, Blachar says that 60 percent of the doctors who signed the petition for his removal as president are Arab or Muslim.

Hadas Ziv, director of Physicians for Human Rights ? an Israel-based group that coauthored the report which fueled the petition against Blachar ? says she finds the ethnicity of the cosignatories "irrelevant" and calls the argument "Very problematic."

Ziv says that while her organization believes the Israel Medical Association is not doing enough to prevent torture, her group nonetheless opposes the boycott motion. She noted the organization did not sign the petition against Blachar.

However, Blachar says that Physicians for Human Rights are "actively creating an atmosphere which generates boycott and anti-Israeli motions." He noted that the 725-doctor letter includes the signature of Ruchama Marton, the PHR founder and president.

Speaking from Liverpool where he is attending the annual conference of the British Medical Association, Blachar said: "PHR are perceived by non-Israeli doctors as the ultimate authority on Israel. They don't know it's a politically-motivated entity."

He added he will be mounting a concentrated effort to illustrate this in the coming weeks. PHR describes itself as human rights-oriented and apolitical.

According to Ziv, the fact that Blachar called on Hadassah and other Jewish organizations to defend him is in itself a form of introducing politics into medicine. "Why did he go to Jewish groups?" she said. "If he's being persecuted, why not go to everyone and anyone and ask them to oppose this?"

In countering this, Blachar said: "Israeli doctors are already the subject of a hostile and political campaign, so I will do what it takes to defend their name from reckless and unfounded accusations, and I will also seek the help of our friends."

Last update - 18:11 01/07/2009

Iran opposition: Election result 'unacceptable'

By News Agencies

Tags: Ahmadinejad, Mousavi, Iran

Iran's embattled opposition leader has branded last month's presidential election "illegitimate" and has demanded the regime release all political prisoners.

Mir Hossein Mousavi's defiance came Wednesday in a new message on his Web site that also called for election reforms and press freedoms.

Mousavi insisted that Iran's disputed June 12 election was riddled with fraud. He contended that he - not incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - was the rightful winner.

But Iran's powerful Guardian Council proclaimed the election results valid earlier this week, and the regime since has stepped up efforts to isolate and discredit Mousavi.

Mousavi said in a statement on his Web site that he was troubled by the bitter, widespread distrust of the people toward the declared election results and the government that caused it.

"It's not yet too late," said Mousavi, who has slipped from public view in recent days. "It's our historic responsibility to continue our complaint and make efforts not to give up the rights of the people."

Mousavi also condemned alleged attacks by security forces on college dormitories where blood was spilled and the youth were beaten, and he called for a return to a more honest political environment in the Islamic Republic.

The semiofficial Fars news agency said the Basij - known as supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's street enforcers - sent the chief prosecutor a letter accusing Mousavi of taking part in nine offenses against the state, including disturbing the nation's security, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment.

Meanwhile, Iran's leading moderate party echoed Mousavi's sentiment, saying in a statement on the group's Website that the election was a "coup d'etat" and the official result was "unacceptable."

"The election was the result of a year-long coup d'etat ... that harmed the establishment's legitimacy inside and outside Iran ... We openly announce that the result is unacceptable," said the statement of Islamic Iran's Participation Front.

It also urged people, political parties and groups to avoid any move that could be used as a pretext by "violence-seekers" to pave the ground for "dictatorship".

"We are asking the authorities ... that now after establishing what they wanted to, to release all those jailed, innocent people and avoid creating fake cases for them," the statement said.

The party was formed by reformers close to former president Mohammed Khatami, including his brother, after his landslide election win in 1997.

Some members of the party have been arrested following the dispute over the June 12 presidential election, which defeated moderate candidates say was rigged in favor of hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The authorities say it was the "healthiest" election since Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution.

Last update - 14:05 01/07/2009

EU urges Iran to avoid confrontation with West

By News Agencies

Tags: EU, nuclear, israel news

Sweden's Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt on Wednesday said he hopes Iran's leaders will make the right choice in avoiding confrontation with the international community.

Reinfeldt urged Iran to introduce reforms rather than create conflict with the 27-nation European Union, the United States and others.

Sweden took over the EU presidency Wednesday.

EU nations have increased criticism of Iran's crackdown on protesters who allege that last month's presidential vote was rigged in favor of hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Reinfeldt said the EU is also showing solidarity and presenting a united front with Britain. Iran has detained nine local British Embassy employees in Tehran, saying that at least one of them played a `remarkable` role in fomenting the recent unrest, according to one of the country's semi-official news agencies.

EU countries are considering what diplomatic measures they could take.

Meanwhile, Iran's armed forces chief of staff said on Wednesday the European Union was not qualified to hold talks over the country's disputed nuclear program after what he called its interference in the Islamic state's affairs.

"Because of the interference of this group in the post-election riots...they have lost their qualification to hold nuclear talks with Iran," Hassan Firouzabadi was quoted as saying by the semi-official Fars news agency.

"Before apologizing for their huge mistake ... they [the EU] have no right to talk about nuclear negotiations," he added.

The Iranian government on Wednesday ordered the closure of the opposition daily Etemad Melli, which belongs to defeated presidential candidate Mehdi Karroubi, the newspaper's Web site reported Wednesday.

The moderate cleric Karroubi, who also heads the Etemad Melli party, has refused to acknowledge the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad which was confirmed on Monday.

Karroubi had harshly criticized the June 12 presidential election and accused the government of massive fraud.

Last update - 10:18 01/07/2009

WATCH: Animated film tells of Gaza woman's cancer battle

By The Associated Press

The first commercial animated film made in the Palestinian territories, about one woman's struggle with cancer, is set to open Wednesday in the West Bank city of Ramallah.

Fatenah, a 30-minute film, is inspired by the story of a Gazan woman whose battle against breast cancer included fighting inept Palestinian doctors and indifferent Israeli soldiers, documented in a report by the Israeli branch of Physicians for Human Rights after she died in 2004.

In a climactic scene in Fatenah - the first serious Palestinian attempt at animation - a Gaza woman, her back to the camera, ashamedly unbuttons her dress before a female Israeli soldier, revealing that her breasts were removed in a failed attempt to halt cancer.

She flunks the security check and isn't allowed to enter Israel for treatment.

Filmmakers said they used animation to make their grim subject more appealing - weaving a Mideast tale whose characters crisscross the Arab-Jewish divide.

An Israeli human rights activist becomes Fatenah's close friend and a love story between Fatenah and a Gazan man threads the story together. The film turns the territory into harshly colored scenes: an Israeli checkpoint, crowded buildings and the sea.

The film's budget of $60,000 was supplied by the World Health Organization. Producers are sending it to film festivals abroad.

The film highlights the strides of Palestinian filmmakers, who have made six feature-length movies in the past two years - despite no local funding, few experienced professionals and Israel's closure system that prevents Palestinians from moving between the West Bank and Gaza, and which restricts entry to Israel.

Director Ahmad Habash, a West Bank resident, couldn't see most of the scenes he needed to create for the film. He paid a Gazan photographer to snap pictures of the coastal territory. For Israeli hospital scenes, Habash used photos from a Web site.

"I wished I could have gone there [to Gaza and Israel]," Habash said. "I think I would have sketched the characters better".

While Palestinian films range from intense realism to oddball surrealism, most highlight life under Israel's occupation, and Fatenah is no different.

Producer Saed Andoni said he hoped to humanize the struggle of Gazans seeking medical care.

The gravely ill must seek treatment abroad because doctors in Gaza's ramshackle, poorly equipped hospitals cannot treat serious diseases. But it can take weeks for Palestinian bureaucrats to organize referrals and for Israel and Egypt to approve or deny entry.

Gazans are isolated from the world by years of prolonged closure that was tightened to a blockade after Hamas militants seized power in June 2007.

Supplies are scarce and some critically ill residents are left to die in Gaza.

In early 2004, the 28-year-old woman who inspired Fatenah felt a lump in her breast but Palestinian doctors dismissed her concerns. One doctor told her having children would cure her lump, but the cancer quickly spread and she had to undergo a double mastectomy.

Israeli activists had to lobby courts to let the woman enter Israel, because she did not have a valid ID - Israeli officials had halted procedures for Palestinians to obtain them at the time. She often missed appointments because soldiers wouldn't let her cross into Israel.

The climactic scene in Fatenah, where a female Israeli soldier demands she disrobe for a security check occurred in September 2004, according to the Physicians for Human Rights report.

Weakened by cancer, the Gazan woman lay on the floor because there were no chairs in the border crossing at the time, the report said. She opened her long Muslim robe to reveal a T-shirt and stuffed bra to disguise her mastectomy, but was sent back to Gaza.

It wasn't clear why she failed the security check, the report's author said.

The Israeli military said it would look into the report's description.

The conservative Gazan father of Fatenah's real life inspiration said he only learned of the film after reporters contacted them.

He unsuccessfully asked filmmakers to cut a brief, dimly lit scene showing her breasts, fearing damage to his daughter's reputation, even years after her death. The father, who requested anonymity, also expressed concern about Fatenah's innocent romance portrayed in the film.

In real life, the Gazan woman hoped to marry her university sweetheart but told a reporter in 2004 that she didn't expect to live long enough to marry.

The family and filmmakers were not aware of the Gazan woman's real-life relationship.

Habash said he didn't feel he had to tell the family about the screenplay because the film - while inspired by the Gaza woman's ordeal - was a fictionalized account. "We made a love story. It's sensitive," Habash acknowledged. "But it also allows Fatenah to be a story about a lack of access to health."

Last update - 10:36 01/07/2009

UN: Israel does not deny running spy ring in Lebanon

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: united nations, israel news

Israel does not deny accusations that dozens of men arrested recently in Lebanon were spying on its behalf, according to a report published by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

Lebanese authorities in recent months claimed to have detained dozens of suspects in an espionage investigation, including several senior military officials.

According to the UN report, the first arrest took place in June 2006 and the most recent took place in May 2009.

Israel has not previously commented on the arrests.

The report said Israel's defense establishment does not deny the suspects were spying on its behalf, but evades offering a more elaborate explanation.

The report, which Ban sent to the UN Security Council on Monday night, addresses the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which outlined conditions for a cease-fire between Israel and Lebanon after the Second Lebanon War in 2006.

Ban's report expresses concern about Lebanon's claims regarding the suspected espionage ring. Ban said that, if the allegations are proven, it would endanger the fragile truce between Israel and Lebanon.

The report also describes the chain of diplomatic correspondence between the UN, Lebanon and Israel on the subject, including a May 20 letter in which Lebanon detailed to the UN its arrest of 35 Lebanese and Palestinian nationals that were allegedly part of the espionage ring.

Last update - 00:19 01/01/2009

Peres to Saudi King: Meet me in Jerusalem, or in Riyadh

By Hila Raz, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service

Tags: Peres, Israel News

President Shimon Peres on Wednesday invited Saudi King Abdullah to come to Jerusalem, or meet him in Riyadh, to initiate discussions that would enable the implementation of a comprehensive peace between Israel and all the Arab states.

Peres spoke at an interfaith conference in Kazakhstan, addressing some 150 religious leaders from around the world, including a large delegation of imams, calling on King Abdullah to meet with him in Jerusalem, in Riyadh or in any other place "in order to fulfill his prayer for peace between all people, without differences of religion."

He praised a 2002 Arab peace initiative, which offers Israel full normalization in return for a withdrawal from territory conquered in the 1967 Six Day War, a Palestinian state and an equitable solution to the Palestinian refugee problem.

Peres quoted Jordanian King Abdullah II as calling the plan "a readiness for peace between the State of Israel and 57 Arab and Muslim states."

The president also spoke about Islamist terrorism.

"Thousands, if not millions of Muslims, have lost their lives at the hands of extremists that call the name of Allah," Peres said. "In the Twin Towers of New-York, Christians, Muslims, Jews, Buddhists and atheists, all lost their lives as one."

Meanwhile, Iranian delegates stormed out of the opening session of the interfaith conference as Peres began to deliver his address to the forum.

The delegates returned to the conference hall after Peres finished speaking.

One said the president was a repulsive Zionist figure whose "place was not here in a religious meeting."

"[Peres] plunders land and occupies, and we are not willing to hear him," an Iranian delegate added.

The move recalled a similar scene at a United Nations-sponsored conference in Geneva in April, when dozens of Western representatives walked out in protest against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's address to the forum.

The diplomats rose from their chairs and quit the hall as Ahmadinejad launched a tirade against Israel, which he called a racist entity.

About 80 delegations participated in the summit, representing different faiths and sects from 35 countries.

Israel's Ashkenazi chief rabbi, Yona Metzger, also attended the conference, during which he urged Hamas to let a cleric visit abducted Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

"I'm holding in my hands a picture of my brother, a son of my country who was kidnapped. We don't know anything about him; his father and mother aren't receiving any information on him," Metzger said.

He urged the religious leaders present "to call for a representative of the abductee's faith to be able to visit him and give him sustenance."

Last update - 14:25 01/07/2009

Sarkozy is right - Lieberman must go

By Editorial

Tags: avigdor lieberman

French President Nicolas Sarkozy's request of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he replace Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman exposes a sad truth: At present Israel does not have a functioning foreign minister. The international community refuses to speak to a politician who is considered racist in the wake of the campaign conducted by his party, Yisrael Beiteinu, against Arab citizens during the recent Knesset election campaign. There is not and cannot be any other way to interpret Sarkozy's comparison between Lieberman and far-right French politician Jean-Marie Le Pen.

The angry reactions emerging from the Foreign Ministry after Sarkozy's comment was publicized on Israel's Channel 2 on Monday, to the effect that he had "interfered in Israel's internal affairs," are not relevant.

France did not impose an official boycott on Lieberman, nor did Sarkozy condemn him publicly - he only conveyed a message to Netanyahu in private. It is therefore difficult to maintain that Sarkozy behaved in an undiplomatic manner.

It is more important to focus on the main thing, which is the ongoing damage to Israel's diplomatic interests resulting from Lieberman's tenure in the Foreign Ministry. Sarkozy was not the first to express dissatisfaction with the fact that the leader of Yisrael Beiteinu was elevated to the top of Israel's diplomatic pyramid.

The Arab countries refuse to speak to Lieberman because of his threats and the rude things he said in the past about Egypt and its president.

When Lieberman was recently invited to Washington, the U.S. administration expressed its dissatisfaction with him by demonstrating a preferential attitude toward Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who was invited to meet with President Barack Obama. Lieberman's predecessors in the Foreign Ministry, Tzipi Livni (Kadima) and Silvan Shalom (Likud), were also invited to such meetings with the president during their visits to Washington. He was not.

Lieberman's bizarre attempt to offer an alternative diplomatic policy, whose main feature is a strengthening of strategic cooperation with Russia as a counterweight to the Obama administration, collapsed embarrassingly right from the start. Before inviting Lieberman to Moscow, the Russians sent their foreign minister to a meeting with Hamas politburo chief Khaled Meshal.

In light of Israel's complex international situation on the eve of the renewal of negotiations with the Palestinians and perhaps with Syria too, it needs all the support it can enlist from the international community. It is imperative to replace Lieberman with another foreign minister, who will benefit from an open door in the world's capitals.

Last update - 06:20 01/07/2009

Arab world bloggers more wary of their leaders than of Israel

By Oded Yaron

Tags: Arab bloggers, Israel news

Ordinarily, we in Israel examine the Arab world from the political and

security point of view. From that perspective it often looks monolithic and in many cases quite threatening. A study published this month by the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University tried to map the blogosphere in the Arab world and reveals once again the extent to which our perceptions are one-dimensional.

Support for terror, for example, is almost entirely absent from the texts published in blogs originating in the Arab world. Researchers John Kelly, Robert Faris and John Palfrey found that only 1 percent of the more than 4,000 blogs examined supported terror activity, whereas 19 percent openly opposed terror. It would seem that these findings, along with others throughout the study, could indicate that American policymakers' fear concerning the use of the Internet to spread hate and support for terror are a bit exaggerated.

As support, the authors also refer to the trend studies at the Pew Research Center that show a consistent decline in support for suicide attacks in places like Lebanon - from a support rate of 74 percent in 2002 down to 32 percent in 2008.

"This is not to say," write the authors, "that anti-Western ideas are absent, or that groups like Hamas and Hezbollah do not have significant support, but that these ideas are countered by others, and support of Al Qaeda and civilian attacks is very rare..."

The authors also say that they "do not argue that extremist Web sites do not exist; certainly they do and our research does not address their impact. However, academic studies and media reports that focus exclusively on terrorist use of the Web can leave the impression that this is a dominant form of discourse in the Arabic language Internet, and could lead to ill-informed policy responses, which could intentionally limit the diverse, open and often civically-minded political, cultural, and religious discussions that take place in blogs and other Internet spaces."

Mapping the Arabic blogoverse

The researchers had the help of Arabic-speakers to read and identify the characteristics of 4,000 blogs. Among other things, the researchers found that the vast majority of the bloggers are young men - about 75 percent of them under the age of 35, and of this group 45 percent are between 25 and 35 years old. According to the study, only 9 percent of the bloggers in the Arab world are older than 35. The researchers also found that more than 60 percent of the bloggers are men and only 34 percent are women (a number were unidentified). However, in Saudi Arabia, for example, it emerged that the proportion of women was especially high: about 46 percent.

The study also made use of a special technology to map the Arab blogosphere in a way similar to a previous study of the Iranian blogosphere. To this end, the researchers mapped 35,000 blogs in 18 countries and examined their links to each other and other blogs. Thus, by examining the internal connections among the sites, they created clusters.

One of the patterns that stood out in the study is the clustering into countries like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Lebanon. At the same time, the researchers also identified groups of blogs written in English and French - mostly in North Africa but also in Syria - which the researchers have called a bridge to the wider world.

Within the countries there was also a sorting into groups. In Egypt, for example, where they found the largest number of bloggers, there are clusters of bloggers identified with or close to the Muslim Brotherhood as well as a large cluster of secular reformists who have little love for Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak

A smaller Israeli blip

Researchers were interested to discover that most of the writers are more interested in domestic political issues than in regional wars. Criticism of local leaders is the most common political topic the researchers encountered, and the next most common is not hatred for the United States or Israel but rather posts critical of terror.

In Lebanon, the researchers found criticism of local political leaders in more than 50 percent of the blogs but also a broad measure of support. In Syria, by comparison, the chances that a blogger would express support for the regime are especially low.

The bottom line is that a vast majority of the bloggers write about themselves and their lives. But make no mistake: Criticism of Israel and the United States does exist and is reinforced by events in the news. The film on YouTube to which the most blogs linked was extremely critical of Operation Cast Lead in Gaza. The second most popular was a video of the shoe thrown by an Iraqi journalist at former U.S. president George W. Bush.

The researchers said they were surprised to find the extent to which Web 2.0 sites have been integrated into the Arab bloggers' everyday activity. Indeed, it emerged that links to sites like Wikipedia and YouTube are more common than links to the major news sources in their countries.

Despite their tone of optimism regarding the political variety and relative openness in the blogs, the researchers are in no hurry to declare that the Internet will bring about a democratic revolution in the Arab world. They noted two contradictory theories about the way the Internet can nurture public discourse in Arab countries.

On the one hand, they noted Israeli-American Harvard law school Prof. Yochai Benkler's "view of the networked public sphere as a boon for individual autonomy and freedom, breaking elite strangleholds on democratic discourse and drawing diverse interests and talents into a common arena."

On the other hand, they noted, University of Chicago law school Professor Cass Sunstein warns in his book "Republic.com 2.0" that the possibility the Internet offers for uniting into groups of the like-minded does not contribute to the creation of a global village. Instead, it contributes to increasing fragmentation of society and the loss of the common denominator that, along with other things, is essential for the existence of a democracy, he wrote.

The researchers also remarked that, as in Egypt, Iran and Syria, bloggers have been arrested or blocked and they add that technology is not serving only pro-Western forces.

"The Internet does not just promise (or threaten) to change the balance of power among players on the field," cyber researcher Clay Shirky has argued, "it changes the field and changes the players too." However, from the perspective of the Berkman Center researchers, the most important thing to remember is that the field is not only black and white and that the Islamic extremists are just one aspect of it. At least in the blogosphere, they still sit on the margins.

Was Michael Jackson a friend of the Jews?

By The Jewish Journal

Tags: Jewish World, Michael Jackson

Pop legend Michael Jackson's life was full of contradictions, and his relationship to Jews and the Jewish community was no exception.

From speculations that the singer had committed himself to Kabbalah, to rumors of anti-Semitic comments made over the years, his connection to Judaism has remained unclear.

Even after Jackson's death last week, the Jewish angle has been resurrected with many wondering whether custody of his two older children (and of the estate they will inherit) will go to the pop star's parents or the kids' Jewish mother.

"Any suggestions that Michael was not friendly to the Jewish community are inaccurate," maintains Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, who befriended Jackson in 1999, though the two were out of touch for the last few years.

Hollywood Jew

Email | Print | Text - Normal Text +

June 30, 2009

Michael Jackson and the Jews

By Tom Tugend

Michael Jackson’s life was full of contradictions, and his relationship to Jews and the Jewish community was no exception.

He asked to be allowed to visit the Museum of Tolerance and its Holocaust exhibit one week before its opening in February 1993.

Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the museum, took Jackson on a two-hour tour ending with the vivid exhibit on the Final Solution.

“When he left the exhibit, Michael was crying, and he wrote me afterwards that he cried for weeks,” Hier recalled Monday.

Two years later, Hier and Jackson corresponded again, but this time the tone was quite different.

Jackson had just released an album, featuring the song “They Don’t Care About Us,” including the lyrics “Jew me, sue me, everybody do me/Kick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me.”

Hier fired off an angry letter to Jackson, who replied with a profuse apology, declaring that “I am committed to tolerance, peace and love,” and promised that an explanatory note would accompany future album sales.

Jackson met another notable rabbi, Shmuley Boteach, in 1999, and the two became fast friends and toured together to promote the Heal the Kids campaign.

Boteach, now a media figure in his own right, spoke by phone during a family trip in Iceland on Monday, reminiscing about his “warm relationship” with the pop star.

“We used to have him over for Shabbat dinners,” Boteach recalled. “At one point, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was visiting, and I wanted Michael to meet him.”

Jackson’s entourage urged him not to meet with the controversial Sharon for fear of offending some of his fans, but the stage icon ignored the advice and met with Sharon, Boteach said.

“Any suggestions that Michael was not friendly to the Jewish community are inaccurate,” Boteach maintained, though he acknowledged that he had not talked to Jackson for the last few years.

In a more formal emailed statement, Boteach wrote that “There was great beauty and gentility in Michael’s soul…I pray that Michael’s death will not be in vain, and that we see a return, even among Hollywood celebrities, to the spiritual and family values that are life sustaining.”

Close followers of Jackson’s permutations had a busy year in 2005. On the one hand, a taped phone conversation revealed that Jackson referred to two former business associates, both Jewish, as “leeches.”

On the other hand, sharp-eyed observers spotted something new after Jackson emerged from a trial in Santa Maria, in which he had been acquitted of child molestation charges.

As Jackson waved to his fans, clearly showing on his left wrist was a bendel, or red string, worn by Kabbalah adherents, particularly supporters of the celebrity-attracting Kabbalah Centre in Los Angeles.

After the photo was published, some noted that there were two unusual white spots on the red string, and inquiries about this oddity to the Kabbalah Centre elicited no response.

However, Prof. Jody Myers, author of a recent book on the Kabbalah Centre, noted that some celebrities had been known to add some glitz to the red strings with personal decorations.

These Kabbalah speculations were replaced in the past year with reports that Jackson had secretly converted to Islam, following the lead of his brother Jermaine and had chosen the new name of Mikaeel.

There is now considerable guess work on whether Jackson’s funeral, date still unknown, will follow the rites of Jehovah’s Witnesses, the faith in which he was raised, or Islamic ritual, or a mixture of the two, or none of the above.

Even after Jackson’s death, the Jewish angle has been resurrected with speculation on whether custody of his two older children (and of the estate they will inherit) will go to the pop star’s parents or the kids’ Jewish mother.

She is Debbie Rowe, Jackson’s former nurse, his wife for three years and biological mother of 12-year old Prince Michael I and Paris Michael Katherine, 11, who under Jewish law are also considered Jewish.

A third child, Prince Michael II, was born of a surrogate mother, whose identity has not been revealed.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff on Monday granted temporary guardianship of the three children to Jackson’s mother, Katherine Jackson.

Whether Rowe will contest the elder Jackson’s guardianship is unclear.

Requests for information from Rowe and her former and current lawyers went unanswered, and media reports maintain, with equal assurance, that Rowe will fight for the custody of her children, or that she has no interest in raising them.

To add a bit more spice, a British newspaper has resurrected an old story on Rowe’s alleged claim that she was impregnated artificially by semen other than Jackson’s.

Stay tuned for developments.

Last update - 04:05 01/07/2009

Are Hamas and Islamic Jihad planning a merger?

By Zvi Bar'el

Tags: Islamic Jihad, Hamas

"Only the aid from Iran continues to come in, and that too is only for bereaved families and for charities," Islamic Jihad Deputy Secretary-General Ziad al-Nahla, who is based in Damascus, recently told the Saudi-based newspaper Asharq Al Awsat. The problem is that a large part of the donor funds intended for Jihad is deposited in banks in the West Bank, where the funds are confiscated. "We can still guarantee the minimum necessary and the money reaches the Strip via the tunnels, just like the weapons," explained Nahla.

The freeze on aid to Islamic Jihad is part of an overall effort by Hamas and senior Jihad officials to merge the two movements and create a joint leadership coalition in preparation for the possible reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah and the formation of a national unity government. The goal is to have Jihad fighters join Hamas' military establishment and to fold Islamic Jihad's administrative officials and civil infrastructure into the Hamas government and civil mechanisms. Islamic Jihad Secretary General Ramadan Abdallah Shalah, Nahla and some of the organization's leadership in Gaza, such as Mohammed al-Hindi, support the merger with Hamas and are working to promote it.

Hindi's opponents, however, such as Abdallah al-Shami and Nafez Azzam, object to the merger because they see it as eliminating the Jihad organization. This is the source of the big dispute within the organization and the economic pressure on its Gaza branch. One of the public expressions of this dispute occurred several weeks ago at a gathering in Gaza: Hindi talked about the Palestinian Authority's arrest of Jihad activists in the West Bank and "forgot" to criticize the arrest of organization members by Hamas. In response, Shami stood up and left in a demonstration of anger. Islamic Jihad activists also mention the pressure placed on them by Hamas during the tahadiya (cease-fire), when it arrested activists and confiscated the weapons of Jihad members who wanted to continue shooting at Israel.

As an organization, Islamic Jihad still adheres to its positions and criticizes those of Hamas, which recently made specific mention of the "1967 borders" in reference to the Palestinian state. So far, Islamic Jihad has refused to join the conciliation talks with Fatah and it rejects outright the Arab initiative and the Egyptian plan for reconciliation.

The disagreement between the organizations attests also to the new direction Hamas adopted following the Cairo speech of U.S. President Barack Obama and the deepening ties between Syria and Washington. Shalah and Khaled Meshal, the Hamas political leader in Damascus, are already preparing the organizational foundation for the next stage, and judging by Meshal's declarations it is moving closer to the positions of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas with regard to a negotiated solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. There is still no formal recognition of the State of Israel here, but even a long-term tahadiya agreement would obligate Hamas to demonstrate its complete control in the Gaza Strip to prove that it is a trustworthy security force. Such control cannot tolerate rebelliousness from Islamic Jihad. Thus the moderate economic pressure that Islamic Jihad in Damascus is exerting on its "daughter" in Gaza, and the quiet with which it is reacting to the confiscation of funds in the West Bank.

Brothers, and sisters too

Enthusiasm for the new Egyptian law mandating the reservation of 64 new parliamentary seats for women is beginning to wear off. It now seems that it was prompted not by a yearning for democracy, but rather by the political struggle over the character of the regime after President Hosni Mubarak. The addition of 64 women will increase the number of MPs to 518, diluting the power of the Muslim Brotherhood, which holds 88 seats.

As a representative body the parliament cannot simply arrange for the appointment of several dozen female MPs. An election must be held, probably in September. Steps are also being taken to rein in the Muslim Brotherhood: Last week, for example, three leaders of the movement were arrested, including Abd al-Munem Abu al-Fatuah, the secretary of the doctors union, one of the largest professional organizations in the country, which is controlled by the Brotherhood. Also arrested were Gamal Abd al-Salaam, the secretary of the Arab doctors union and Dr. Fathi Lashin, a Justice Ministry official. The head of the Muslim Brotherhood's parliamentary bloc, Mohammed Saad el-Katatni, who attended the reception for Obama in Cairo, is also likely to be arrested. Observers believe the arrests will escalate as the election date approaches.

The Brotherhood, for its part, is adopting a new tactic: It is launching a campaign to encourage women from among their ranks to contest the parliamentary election. If the president wants more women in the name of democracy, the Brotherhood can also contribute. This is a new policy. The organization had refrained from sponsoring women for political office, and the ruling party had assumed that it would continue to favor ideology over politics. The assumption was proved wrong.

Even in the Muslim Brotherhood, however, even among happiness does not prevail. The old generation is now being sharply criticized by the young generation, which opposes the conservative line and primarily, the closing of paths to advance within the movement. This is still not a revolution, but large cracks are already visible in the unity of the Brotherhood.

It is enough to read the Internet sites of the young critics to understand that President Mubarak is not the target of the attack, rather it is the leadership that is incapable of being flexible, offering ideological alternative that will correspond with the global changes and formulating new principles that will extricate Islam in Egypt from the restrictive approaches created by the founders.

Last update - 06:27 01/07/2009

UN official: Settlement freeze could lead to Arab ties

By Akiva Eldar

Tags: Arab world, United Nations

Normalization with Arab countries cannot take place without a complete settlement freeze in the West Bank, the United Nations special coordinator for the Middle East peace process told Haaretz on Tuesday in an exclusive interview.

Robert Serry said that in response to a complete settlement freeze important Arab countries that do not have diplomatic relations with Israel could be expected to allow Israel to open interest sections and let El Al aircraft use their air space.

With regard to kidnapped soldier Gilad Shalit, Serry said negotiations for reconciliation in Gaza should bring about Shalit's release as part of a prisoner exchange and the opening of the crossings between Israel and the Gaza Strip and the Rafah crossing, while renewing the work of European observers. Serry said it was "intolerable" that the Red Cross had not been allowed to visit Shalit.

Serry spoke at length about the agreement being formulated between Hamas and Fatah in Egypt, noting that it included the establishment of a joint Hamas-Fatah committee to deal with issues of security, rehabilitation of the Gaza Strip and preparations for elections.

"I hope to see the beginning of a reconciliation process in July. The UN is ready to engage with any positive and agreed outcome of the unity process in Cairo," Serry said.

With regard to settlements, Serry said, "From a legal point of view there is no difference between settlements and outposts - the 4th Geneva convention sets out the international legal framework. We cannot change our position."

He also said there was no difference between a settlement within the large settlement blocs and outside them. He said recognition of the settlement blocs was a matter for negotiation between Israel and the Palestinians on permanent borders.

"The U.S. and the international community want Israel to commit to its Road Map obligations and patience is not endless. There must be a credible freeze - this is what the Quartet is asking for. This could lead to an early resumption of negotiations," Serry said.

Serry also said that if Hamas wanted to achieve results it had to be involved in the creation of a new reality and that he expected to see steps on Hamas' part. Serry also said there was de facto calm in Gaza and that Hamas was preventing attempts by extremists to renew the firing of Qassam rockets on Israel.

"The Quartet sees the situation in Gaza as unsustainable. In my own conversations with the government of Israel I think there is the growing realization that the current policies are not working," he said. "At the same time, for Israel there seem to be no good options and all the issues are interrelated. At the current time there is a 'mini-tahadiya' [cease-fire]. Hamas feels it is in their interest to observe a calm. The calm needs solidification to address the causes of instability in Gaza."

Iran Jews gripped by fear in wake of post-election violence

By Karmel Melamed, The Jewish Journal

Tags: Iran election, Iran jews

During the recent uprisings in Iran following the June 12th elections in that country, I have been approached by dozens of individuals asking me what is going on in Iran's Jewish community today.

The simple answer is pure fear, an emotion which is nothing new to Jewish minorities who have lived and somehow survived massacres, pogroms, as well as forced conversions in Iran for the past 2,700 years.

Since the current crisis broke out in Iran, I have had scores of Iranian Jewish activists and leaders repeatedly remind me to "watch" what I write about with regard to the government in Iran.

They fear that what is said by our community in the U.S. may possible jeopardize the lives of the Jews living in Iran.

June 27, 2009 | 6:30 pm

The fate of the Jews in Iran after the election violence

Posted by Karmel Melamed

[im]Iranian Jewish school boys hold placards during a sham protest against the Israeli attack on Gaza, in front of the U.N. office in Tehran on December 30, 2008.

somehow survived massacres, pogroms, as well as forced conversions in Iran for the past 2,700 years. Iranian Jewish fear is not only present today among the Jews in Iran but has also gripped thousands of Iranian Jews living in Southern California and New York. My piece this week in the Jewish Journal explores the fear that the Iranian American Jewish community is experiencing.

Since the current crisis broke out in Iran, I have had scores of Iranian Jewish activists and leaders repeatedly remind me to “watch” what I write about with regards to the government in Iran. They fear that what is said by our community in the U.S. may possible jeopardize the lives of the Jews living in Iran. This fear is so powerful in the Iranian American Jewish community that some individuals and community leaders will not even publicly comment on why they have decided to remain silent about their true feelings concerning the conflict on the streets of Iran! They not only believe that the regime of radical Islamic clerics may seek retributions in the form of violence against their Jewish brethren in Iran, but they also feel as if the regime’s thugs will manipulate any statements the Iranian American Jews make to news media outlets to divert the attention from the regime’s human rights violations after the election. Now while you may see many Iranian American Jews joining the hundreds of protesters in L.A.’s Westwood Village holding up banners against the regime in Iran, not many of them will openly criticize the regime on the record for a news media outlet.

This journalist’s sources here in Southern California and in Iran reveal the reality that the Jews of Iran are trying to stay out of the conflict on the streets of Tehran. They are essentially staying neutral with regards to the political battle between the “hardliners” and “reformists” in the Iranian regime. Nevertheless, my sources have informed me that young Jews have been among the Iranian student protesters injured and even arrested by the Iranian government following the election. What many American Jews and those unfamiliar with Iranian Jewish history do not realize is that Iran’s Jews have always found a way not to take sides when political or social crises occur in Iran. Perhaps the best example of this occured during the 1906 Constitutional Revolution when many in Iran wanted a form of a representive type democratic government with a constitution. Iran’s Muslim majority approached the Jews threatening them to either accept or refuse the new constiutional government or face death. To these demands Iran’s Jews in 1906 responded with a popular saying that community members in L.A. recall; “as has been dictated to us by the country’s Muslims, we also do not want a constitutional government“. While Iran’s Jews had not this year nor have they ever endorsed any candidates during the last 30 years in Iran, the community shares positive relations with many of the supposed “reformist” politicians including Mehdi Karroubi. During his campaign, Karroubi, who himself a follower of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, did briefly speak about improving rights for Iran’s minorities. Yet Iran’s Jews have not openly sided with the “reformists” nor with the regime’s “hardliners” for fear that may either side of the political power struggle clamp down on the Jews for saying anything advantageous. The upheaval in Iran today only reinforces the long hard reality that the Jews still living in Iran are essentially hostages of the regime! The not only place their own lives at risk but they also serve as the perfect scapegoats and propaganda tools for Iran’s radical Islamic regime to abuse at any time. Those interested in reading about how Iran’s Jews have been used as propaganda puppets for the regime in Iran can read my previous pieces here and here.

Lastly, I leave apologists for the Iranian government and those who still want to negotiate with Iran’s brutal dictators with one observation; if the killing of innocent demonstrators in Iran is how the regime in Tehran treats its own Shiite Muslim population, then I do not want to know how the Iranian government will treat non-Muslims in the West should the regime attain nuclear weapons!

14 Comments — Leave your comment

Share this post: del.icio.us Favicondel.icio.us Digg FaviconDigg Facebook FaviconFacebook Google FaviconGoogle Reddit FaviconReddit StumbleUpon FaviconStumbleUpon Technorati FaviconTechnorati YahooMyWeb FaviconYahooMyWeb

COMMENTS

We welcome your feedback.

Privacy Policy

Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.

Good article: main points that I like about the article is its focus on how Persian Jewish community is made to comply with the present government directly by force or indirectly in order to avoid social and economical problems. And how they are being used as part of the propaganda machine of the present Islamic regime in Iran. The part that I was uncomfortable with is the statement that “Persian Jews lived and somehow survived massacres, pogroms, as well as forced conversions in Iran for the past 2,700 years” and the reason is that this statement embodies a vast generalization without any insight and bundles every good thing about Iranians and Iranian/Persian culture together with the barbaric acts of the present Islamic regime and some primitive and propaganda-driven evangelical Islamic views that exist in Iran. At such time that yet again Iranians are fighting for their freedom and democracy, it makes it essential to shed some light on the fair and civilized aspects of Iranian culture and add more insight to the reasons behind some of the negative aspects of the Iranian history and culture. That’s why I felt needed to shed some light on civilized aspects of the experiences of Jewish community in Iran (everything is taken from references; refer to the bottom of the comments):

Comment by m. on 6/30/09 at 2:09 am

After the overthrow of Babylonia by the Persian (Iranian) Achaemenid Empire, Cyrus the Great permitted and enabled the Jews who were held captive in Babylon to return to their native land and to rebuild their temple; this goes back to ~2500 years ago which is the first documented history of Persian Jews and there are definite biblical proofs for it. Cyrus ordered rebuilding the Second Temple in the same place as the first; however, he died before it was completed. Darius the Great came to power in the Persian empire and ordered the completion of the temple (according to the Bible and documented history). The first plot against Persian Jews is done by Haman who was a minister in the king’s court who had personal issues with this community not because they were Jews but because they weren’t agreeing to accept orders from him. This plot was foiled by queen Esther, who was a Jewish Persian queen and wife of Persian King Ahasuerus. As the Biblical evidence shows upon being informed of the plot the king was enraged and ordered Haman to be hanged. The king then appointed Mordecai who was Jewish as his prime minister, and gave the Jews the right to arm themselves and defend themselves against any enemy. The tolerance of the Arsacid dynasty during and after Parthian period in Persia (~2100 years ago) was as legendary as that of the first Persian dynasty, the Achaemenids. So protective were the Parthians of the minority over whom they ruled, that an old Jewish saying tells, “When you see a Parthian charger tied up to a tomb-stone in the Land of Israel, the hour of the Messiah will be near”. The Sassanids intensified the Persian side of life, favored the Pahlavi language, and restored the old monotheistic religion of Zoroastrianism which became the official state religion. This resulted in the suppression of other religions but mainly to the state that the country and government had chosen an official religion and no massacres, pogroms, as well as forced conversions are reported of that era either. It is reported that Sassanids’ king Shapur I was very friendly to the Jews. His friendship with Shmuel gained many advantages for the Jewish community. King Shapur II’s mother was Jewish, and this confirmed the Iranian Jewish community’s freedom of religion and many advantages; this got us back to ~1400 years ago.

Comment by m. on 6/30/09 at 2:12 am

During early Islamic period in Persia and throughout 300 years of Persians political and military struggles with invading Arabs and Persians’ own experience of forced conversions to Islam, in different regions, various now Muslim Persian rulers got to power. The treatments of Persian Jews were different from ruler to ruler. They were treated different from Muslims with respect to political and executive authority positions and they had to pay pay taxes (jizya) in place of the zakat, which the Muslim population was required to pay. Jews were allowed to practice their religion and it is documented that they were granted significant economic and religious freedom when compared to their co-religionists in European nations during these centuries. Many served as doctors, scholars, and craftsman, and gained positions of influence in Persian society. Then ~800 years ago Mongols invaded Persia which led to many Persians (Jewish and non-Jewish) to be killed. During that time Persian Jews suffered a period of violent persecutions from the Muslim populace (mainly Mongols which now had converted to Islam) instigated by the clergy because one Mongol king favored Persian Jews to Mongols who had converted to Islam.

Comment by m. on 6/30/09 at 2:14 am

Then we come to Safavid and Qajar dynasties which based on some historical analysis are partly a disgrace to Persian and Iranian history. Mainly because by the start of Safavid dynasty British and Russian imperialism had started to become stronger in the region. There is much to analyze about those two eras but as a summation kings who were power mongers or lazy and corrupt preferred to keep signing concessions to foreign powers on an expanding list of trade items ranging from weapons to tobacco to oil to pay for extravagant lifestyle or power-thirsty expansions over Persian land—any attempt to reform the central treasury at the time was undermined by British and Russian. During these two eras Shiite clergies were getting more and more power from the central government in order to use religious manipulation of the un-happy and un-united masses in order to make them more prejudiced and discriminatory and simply busy with evangelical/fanatic Islamic ideologies to not bug the central government and whenever needed act as strong believer-soldiers who would do anything that is asked of them by the central government. During these eras the treatment of Persian Jews is different from city to city in some cities they were enjoying a fair position and were prosperous and free from persecution such as in cities like Teheran (old for Tehran), Kashan and Bushire. But in others there were numerous forced conversions and massacres, usually generated by Shiite clergy (where in many cases propaganda machine of Britain and more of Russia is running behind the scene) such as in cities like Tabriz, Shiraz and Mashhad. During the era of the kings that gained power between Safavid and Qajar eras, such as Nadir Shah and Karim Khan-eh-zand as well as the Safavid king Shah Abbas who were strong and patriotic and didn’t give much support and favor for imperialism and Shiite clergies, Persian Jews received a benign treatment and relative tolerance from the society and the culture that has already been damaged in parts by ugly discriminatory marks of Safavid dynasty. It is documented that the treatment of Persian Jews during these darker eras of Iranian history was significantly better and improved when compared to their co-religionists in European nations during these centuries.

Comment by m. on 6/30/09 at 2:15 am

During Qajar era the 1906 constitutional revolution in Iran happened where the goal was to establish a democratic parliament and Muslim Iranians as well as Iranians of many minorities fought side by side against the central government. During this time Persian Jews were forced to say they don’t want constitutional government by the central government not the Iranian Muslims who were fighting to establish a constitutional government.

Comment by m. on 6/30/09 at 2:16 am

During Pahlavi dynasty, life of Persian Jews was greatly improved, the influence of Shiite Clergies was weakened and restrictions of Jews and other religious minorities were abolished. Any mass conversion of Jews were prohibited and modern Hebrew was incorporated into curriculum of Jewish schools and publication of Jewish newspapers. In the 1930s the pro-Nazi sympathies of Reza Shah (he had firmly declared neutrality during WWII and had stayed neutral throughout) was to stop British exploitation of Iranian trade market and labors and to stop Angelo-Soviet invasion of Iran, before knowing the scope of events in Europe. There were no persecutions of the Jews during that time, but the situation threatened Iranian Jewry for a short period of time due to ethnonational character of some published articles that were a direct import from Germany. However when all hell broke loose in Europe there were many Persian Jewish family living in France. The Iranian government which had kept close contacts with the German authorities at the outset made it clear to them that Iranian Jews were Iranians since the time of Cyrus the Great and therefore fell under the protection of Iranian laws like any other Iranians. As a result, the Iranian Jews in France were not subjected to the special Nazi measures against the Jews. Then when in 1942 round up of Jewish people in Europe started and the news began to spread, Iranians in charge of consular affairs in France took upon themselves to issue Persian passports to non-Iranian Jews who were facing deportation in order to save them.

Comment by m. on 6/30/09 at 2:17 am

The reign of shah Mahammad Reza Pahlavi was a very prosperous era for the Jews of Iran. But the violence and disruption in Arab life associated with the founding of Israel drove increased anti-Jewish sentiment in Iran but this is mainly analyzed to be ignited by Shiite clergies who were supported and given more power indirectly by British to avoid nationalization of oil by Iranian prime minister Mossadegh. It is documented that Shiite clerical views were fomented by CIA propaganda. Mossadegh were later removed by a 1953 coup d’état that was supported and funded by the British and U.S. governments through the American/CIA operation called Operation Ajax to avoid Mossadegh’s reformations mainly for Iran’s oil industry. And now we come to the primitive and barbaric Islamic regime in Iran which demands complete compliance from everybody non-Jewish or Jewish.

Comment by m. on 6/30/09 at 2:19 am

There is much debate about how and why the Islamic regime came to power in Iran after the revolution and how they stole the revolution from educated and elite of Iran who had completely different political and social views. There is not any argument about the atrocities of this government over the past 30 years. As this article explains Jewish Iranians are forced directly or indirectly to comply with this government for their social and economic well-being similar to other Iranian who has had different views from this Islamic regime (refer to “1988 executions of Iranian political prisoners” and “chain murders of Iran”). As of now (forgetting about the government and just considering the people) in Iran I believe there are ~15-20% evangelical Islamists from usually the poorer areas and the rest are educated middle class (in America the percentage of evangelical Christians with fundamentalist views is placed somewhere between 22-42 %). You see anti-Jewish sentiments from some in these 15-20% portion of the population which their source can go back to all the Shiite clerical views that were fomented and ignited during different eras in Iranian history mainly as a direct consequence of imperialism and corrupt Qajar dynasty as well as the brain-washings and propaganda of present-day Islamic regime. But many from the educated middle class in Iran do not have any prejudice toward Iranian Jews and they find any anti-Jewish sentiments or sentiments against any other minority extremely barbaric and un-civilized.

Comment by m. on 6/30/09 at 2:20 am

I felt it is needed to write these as comment especially at such time that yet again Iranians are fighting for their freedom which makes it essential to shed some light on the fair and civilized aspects of Iranian culture and add more insight to the reasons behind some of the negative aspects of the Iranian history and culture. I would appreciate any feedback; thanx…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_Jews

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esther

http://en.wikipedia.org

/wiki/Iranian_Constitutional_Revolution

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reza_Shah_Pahlavi

http://users.sedona.net/~sepa/sardarij.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mossadegh

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1096071.html

Comment by m. on 6/30/09 at 2:22 am

Yes we know all about Cyrus the Great letting the Jews of Babylon return to Judea / Israel. But it is a fact that Iranian Jews after Persia became Muslim were forced to live in Ghettoes. Many were forced to convert to Islam. The same happened in Egypt in the 12th century and in Mesopotamia.

Comment by Semsem on 6/30/09 at 7:18 pm

Yes of course and certainly there is no disagreement about that, but I just wanted to explain that these shameful events happened through certain darker eras in Iranian/Persian history (of course not justifying anything but what was going on in [civilized] west at the same eras is documented to be much more darker and barbaric) and there have been many eras of very civilized treatment of minorities in the land of Iran before and after Islam because of the nature of the Iranian culture; and it is a fact that one of the main analyzed factors leading to such wrong events was the growing European imperialism at the time which ignited and in many cases generated Shiite religious views.

Comment by m. on 7/01/09 at 5:17 am

Those darker eras that I referred to are mainly related to Safavid and Qajar eras during late 18th and early to mid 19th centuries where corrupt kings and European imperialism were exploiting Iranians, Iran’s resources and Iranian culture to advance their selfish demands. Religion was used during those times as a tool of propaganda and palpitation to further prevent masses to unite and what I call ignorant evangelical Islamic views were ignited and developed by the Shiite clergies who where given more power by central government (directly) and nourished and supported by European imperialism (indirectly).

Comment by m. on 7/01/09 at 8:28 am

And as I had mentioned one of my main focuses in this discussion was that ~15-20% of the Iranian population as of now (to different degrees) still hold parts of such ignorant views which I call evangelical Islamic views(compare to reported 22-42% of evangelical Christians with practically similar fundamentalist views in US)and the other ~80-85% of Iranians cannot fundamentally be considered strict people of religion (if any, having some traditional views from religion is a better portrayal of them). Not only they absolutely dispel the fundamentalist Islamic views but more firmly they find any prejudice against religious minorities absolutely wrong and unforgivable in belief and in action…

Comment by m. on 7/01/09 at 8:43 am

The commentator sheds some light on the historical events and course of anti semitism in Iran, however, many of the terminologies are misused. The commentator states 18th and 19th century european imperialism and the absolute moncharchs as the instigator of shite fundamentalism. First, the word imperialism which was coined and described by Lenin as the last stage of capitalism, has specific preconditions which were not present in europe in 18th or mid 19th centuries. If the intented word is colonialism, it needs to be stated that iran was never a colony of european powers. The advent of shiism in Iran started with the Savafid dynasty, and was mainly due to regional struggle with the ottoman empire. Shiism became a state religion through mass conversion and executions of those who did not follow. The philosophy of shiism as practiced to day by the clerics in iran was developed during this dynasty. THe entire ritual of self flagelation in Ashura and Tassoua in the month of mohram was implemented by the shite clerics during this period, and continues to be used by the shiites as an apocalyptic event. Since shiite was the state religion, the King was not only the ruler, but an enforcer of this religion. So, it is a bit simplistic to point the finger to the outside powers. After the 1906 constitutional Shiite clergy did loose some of its power, specifically in the judicial process, but, still had large influence among the poor, and the people in rural areas. To maintain their power the ruling clerics in Iran have provided some basic government subsidies to the urban poor. This has resulted in gaining some support among the poor, and low income families in Iran. However, the educated and professional working men and women in Iran resent the horrible mismanagement of the Iranian economy and repressive laws governing their daily lives. The mullah’s can not continue to govern Iran as before. The blame game no longer works ,and they are at a cross road. The Khamenei and his ilk are planning a bloody purge,but they can only be stopped if we raise our voice and use every opportunity to demand deocracy for iran, freedom for all plotical prisoners, and prosecution of the all people engaged in shooting of innocent people. Our cry for democracy in Iran, will the the best protection for religious, ethnic minorities and the freedom fighters in Iran

Comment by saeed ahdout on 7/05/09 at 1:53 am

Last update - 03:17 01/07/2009

Jewish satirist Al Franken wins Minnesota Senate seat

By Reuters

Tags: Israel news, Jewish democrat

Democrat Al Franken, a Jewish satirist turned politician, was declared the winner of a Senate seat in Minnesota on Tuesday, clearing the way for President Barack Obama's party to secure a critical 60-seat majority in the U.S. Senate.

Ending one of the longest Senate races ever, the Minnesota Supreme Court unanimously rejected each of Coleman's five legal arguments that an earlier recount of the November 4 vote had been unfair. Coleman quickly conceded.

Franken will become the 58th Senate Democrat, the most the party has had since 1981. Two independents routinely vote with the Democrats, giving the party the 60 votes needed to clear Republican procedural hurdles known as filibusters.

However, the party has traditionally had trouble ensuring all its members vote the same way. They will also need to rely on Arlen Specter, a former Republican from Pennsylvania who switched parties in April who has said he will vote his own way and not necessarily along party lines.

The Minnesota court, in its 32-page ruling, said Coleman had failed to show there was anything wrong with the standards used to reject absentee ballots that he wanted counted.

"I thought we had a better case, but the court has spoken," Coleman told reporters at his St. Paul, Minnesota, home. "I'll abide by the results. There will be no further litigation."

Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty said in a statement he would sign the election certificate immediately, allowing Franken, a former writer and actor for the popular Saturday Night Live television show, to join the Senate.

After creating such characters as sad-sack self-help guru Stuart Smalley on Saturday Night Live, Franken agitated against conservatives on his nationally syndicated radio show and in a series of books that included "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right."

Both Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid extended a hand to the 58-year-old Franken, who had never run for public office and grew up in Minnesota.

"The Senate looks forward to welcoming Senator-elect Franken as soon as possible," Reid said.

Minnesota's vote count was the subject of recounts and legal battles.

Coleman, seeking a second term, held a razor-thin 206-vote lead in initial results after the Nov. 4 election.

But the close vote triggered an automatic recount of the 2.4 million ballots cast for the two men, and Franken edged to a 225-vote lead. That was challenged by Coleman and a judicial panel agreed to add only a few hundred previously rejected absentee ballots. That tally expanded Franken's lead to 312.

Pawlenty, considered a possible presidential contender in 2012, previously announced he would not run for governor again next year, which clears an avenue for Coleman to run for the post.

"That's a decision for another day," Coleman said.

The last time either party had a filibuster-proof 60 senators was 1979 when Democrats held 61 and Democratic Jimmy Carter was president. Democrats also control the House of Representatives, 256 to 178 with one vacancy.

There is no guarantee Senate Democrats would all fall in line to pass Obama's top initiatives, and the Democratic president knows it.

"I am under no illusions that suddenly I'm going to have a rubber-stamp Senate," Obama said in April after Specter switched parties.

The Franken-Coleman duel was the longest contested Senate election since a 1974 New Hampshire race, which was voided 10 months later due to voting irregularities, according to the Senate historian's office.

Defying Hezbollah, Lebanon welcomes French Jewish comedian

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel news

A French comedian of Jewish descent is welcome to perform in Lebanon, a cabinet minister in Beirut said Tuesday. Tourism Minister Elie Marouni even offered to receive Gad Elmaleh at the airport, defying a Hezbollah campaign claiming he served in the Israel Defense Forces.

Outgoing Minister Marouni's remarks came three days after Elmaleh canceled his participation in a festival in Lebanon next month because he apparently feared for his safety after Hezbollah's claims, which were denied by his agent.

Two other Lebanese ministers also criticized Hezbollah's campaign in a rare challenge to the Iranian-backed militant group, which suffered a major setback against the country's pro-Western coalition in June 7 parliamentary elections.

"In my name as the tourism minister, or as a Lebanese state, we tell Gad

Elmaleh he is welcome in Lebanon," Marouni said at a news conference.

Marouni said Lebanese authorities had granted Elmaleh permission to enter the country, saying "we are ready to receive him at the airport in order to affirm that Lebanon is a land of freedom and creativity."

Elmaleh, known for his one-man comic acts, had been scheduled to give three performances July 13-15 at a festival in the mountains outside Beirut.

Noura Jumblatt, head of the festival's organizing committee, said the group had received threats against allowing Elmaleh to perform.

Marouni stressed that cultural and arts festivals are essential to attract Arab and foreign tourists to Lebanon in summer.

"We have to keep arts, culture and tourism away from politics," he said.

Lebanon and Israel technically remain in a state of war. It is illegal for Lebanese citizens to have contacts with Israel.

Hezbollah's Al-Manar TV said Elmaleh, who is of Moroccan-Jewish descent, was an avid supporter of Israel and showed a purported picture of him wearing an IDF uniform. The performer's agent denied the report's claims and said the photo was a fake.

Lebanon's information and culture ministers, speaking at the news conference with Marouni, also criticized the media campaign against Elmaleh.

"The way the campaign was launched has probably harmed Lebanon's image,"

outgoing Information Minister Tarek Mitri said.

Last update - 23:21 30/06/2009

U.K. deplores Israel decision to build 50 new West Bank homes

By Reuters

Tags: Israel News, U.K., West Bank

British Foreign Secretary David Miliband said on Tuesday he deplored Israel's decision to approve construction of 50 new homes at a West Bank settlement in defiance of a U.S. call for a settlement freeze.

"Settlements are illegal under international law and they are a major blockage to peace in the Middle East on the basis of a two-state solution," Miliband told parliament.

"There are reports coming through of the Israeli Ministry of Defence yesterday granting permission for 50 new housing units at the Adam settlement which is something that we completely deplore," he said.

"This is the worst possible time for new settlements to be initiated or for construction to be started," he said.

"We are at an absolutely vital moment as the new American administration comes to a decision about how it will prosecute its commitment to a two-state solution."

The Defence Ministry said on Monday it had approved construction of the homes at Adam, north of Jerusalem, as part of a plan for 1,450 housing units.

News of the planned building work emerged hours before Defense Minister Ehud Barak left for the United States for talks aimed at bridging differences with Washington over settlements.

U.S. President Barack Obama has pressed Israel to halt settlement activity as part of a bid to revive peace talks under which the Palestinians would gain statehood.

Last update - 13:16 29/06/2009

Israel to build 50 West Bank homes for outpost evacuees

By Tomer Zarchin, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service

Tags: Israel News, Migron

Israel will build 50 new homes in an existing West Bank settlement as part of a wider plan to absorb residents slated to be evicted from the illegal outpost of Migron.

The complete plan calls for the construction of 1,450 homes in the settlement of Adam.

The State Prosecutor's Office informed the High Court on Friday that 190 housing units will be built in the settlement of Adam in the first stage, in accordance with the plan, which was approved by the Defense Ministry in May.

However, only 50 of the units can be erected without further approval from the ministry. This number does not include public buildings and roads.

"The understandings to advance the construction were examined by the political echelon, Yesha Council of settlements representatives and settler leaders in Judea and Sameria," the state wrote, referring to the West Bank.

News of the plan emerged shortly before Defense Minister Ehud Barak set off for the United States Monday in a bid to end a quarrel with U.S. President Barack Obama's administration over Israel's refusal to completely halt West Bank settlement construction.

A media advisor to Barak denied the report of a plan to build 1,450 new homes.

"The Defense Ministry approved the construction of 50 housing units only in the community of Adam, which will serve the evacuees from the settlement of Migron," Army Radio quoted the advisor as writing.

"All other reports speaking of the construction of 1,450 housing units are erroneous, tendentious and incorrect."

Why is Israel blatantly breaking U.S. rule on settlements?

By Akiva Eldar

Tags: Benjamin Netanyahu

Defense Minister Ehud Barak most certainly knows better than anyone else that there is no chance of the U.S. accepting the Migron-Adam deal, put forth by the Defense Ministry on Monday before the Supreme Court. Even those who claim that the Bush administration allowed them to continue building to meet the needs of "natural growth" in settlement blocs know fully well that the exchange deal, offering Adam for Migron, would be inacceptable to even the most ardent Netanyahu supporters in Washington.

The deal is not about additional construction inside the built-up area of an existing settlement, nor is it about adding additional floors to buildings; according to the plan brought before the court, 50 families from Migron are supposed to move to a new neighborhood, located on a relatively large parcel of land outside the built-up area of the Adam settlement. This proposal blatantly contradicts the iron-clad American rule - an integral part of the road map - that the area of settlements should in no way be expanded.

Moreover, according to the documents presented to the court, aside from requesting building permits for 50 new housing units, the defense minister last month also approved the detailed planning for constructing an initial total of 200 housing units; all part of the general construction blueprint for an additional 1450 units in Adam.

Eitan Broshi, the defense minister's aide for settlement affairs, argued Monday that this was part of a plan that had been approved by a previous government during the late 1990s. However, if the decisions of previous governments to expand settlements or to build new ones pave the way for the infusion of ever more settlers into the territories, there is no point to the commitment to freeze construction and to haggle over "natural growth." Such earlier decisions allow Israel to place a settlement under any tree located in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Barak was quick to present the plan to evacuate Migron and build at Adam as an effort meant to deter a petition by Peace Now, scheduled to be brought before the court Monday. The defense minister's aim is to gain more time. In any case, the Defense Ministry argues, the construction of the new neighborhood in Adam will take at least two years - a decent amount of quiet time. Barak based his gamble on the images of the violent evacuation of the Amona outpost and is hoping that the justices will be deterred from another clash with the settler-invaders, and will jump at the opportunity to put the whole matter to rest for a long time.

But it can also fairly be assumed that the justices have heard the announcement of the Migron settlers, who have said that the deal struck between Barak and the Yesha Council of settlements does not apply to them and that they have no intention whatsoever of leaving their homes for any "kosher" settlement.

Life sentence sought for alleged ringleader in murder of French Jew

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News, Ilan Halimi

The prosecuting counsel in the trial of a gang of French youths accused of murdering Parisian Jew Ilan Halimi has requested a sentence of life imprisonment for the group's ringleader.

Halimi was entrapped, sequestered, tortured and finally died before he could reach hospital in 2006, as a result of a three-week ordeal at the hands of a gang allegedly led by Youssef Fofana, in a crime that shocked France and raised fears of surging anti-Semitism among French Muslims.

Halimi was reburied at the Givat Shaul cemetery in Jerusalem in February 2007.

If convicted, Fofana's two prime accomplices each face 20 years in prison, a court spokesperson said on condition of anonymity because the case was held behind closed doors.

The victim's family says Halimi was killed because he was Jewish, which the prosecuting counsel claimed in the summing up Tuesday, according to one of their lawyers, Francis Szpiner.

Last update - 04:22 01/07/2009

Israel, U.S. inch toward deal on settlements

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Israel News, Barak

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. special Mideast envoy George Mitchell will meet in two weeks to reach a final agreement on settlement construction in the West Bank.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak and George Mitchell agreed during their talks in New York this week that Israel must take action toward easing access for Palestinians in the territory and halting settlement activity.

Their four-hour discussion brought Israel and the United States closer to ending its dispute over settlement construction, a source close to Barak said.

Mitchell did not explicitly tell Barak that Israel must impose a complete freeze on settlements - as the U.S. has been demanding - but rather emphasized that Jerusalem must take "action" on the matter, according to a Defense Ministry statement following the talks.

Asked whether Israel would declare a temporary settlement

building freeze, Barak told reporters following the meeting: "I think that it's a little bit too early to predict.

"We are considering every positive contribution Israel can make towards the taking off of a significant important peace effort," he said.

While significant progress was made in the talks, said the source close to Barak, differences remain over a number of subjects.

"There is still disagreement, but the direction is positive and there is a good dialogue," a source close to the defense minister said.

Barak and Mitchell discussed a spectrum of peace and security-related issues, according to the Defense Ministry. Part of their talks were dedicated to the contributions Israel, Palestinians, Arab states and the international community must make in order to advance the peace progress.

The two agreed that measures must be taken to "create a climate conducive to peace," said the Defense Ministry, including steps by Arab states to normalize relations with Israel and actions by Israel itself to lighten the tensions in the West Bank.

"The discussions were constructive and will continue soon," said the Defense Ministry statement.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's refusal to accede to Obama's demand for a complete halt to West Bank settlement construction has sparked tensions between Israel and the United States.

Barak traveled to the U.S. in an effort to reach a compromise formula on the matter. His advisers participated in the first two hours of the meeting, as did Netanyahu's emissary, Attorney Yitzhak Molcho; Barak and Mitchell held a tete-a-tete for the remainder of the time.

The meeting took place in light of a recent disagreement among the "forum of six" ministers over this issue.

A political source in Jerusalem said Monday that a "temporary freeze" of construction in the settlements was met with objections by three of the six senior ministers in the forum.

The meeting takes place in light of a recent disagreement among the "forum of six" ministers over this issue.

A political source in Jerusalem said Monday that a "temporary freeze" of construction in the settlements was met with objections by three of the six senior ministers in the forum.

Last update - 21:07 30/06/2009

Bomb kills 30 in Kirkuk as U.S. troops withdraw from Iraq cities

By Reuters

Tags: Iraq, Israel News, Kurds

A car bomb in the northern Iraqi city of Kirkuk killed at least 30 people on Tuesday, just hours after U.S. troops handed over full control of Iraq's cities to the domestic security forces six years after the invasion.

The bomb, which wounded at least 40 people, struck a busy market in a largely Kurdish part of Kirkuk, a city viewed as a potential flashpoint between the Shi'ite Arab-led central government and Kurds. Police said the death toll could rise.

Many Iraqis fear the U.S. pullback from towns and cities and into rural bases, the first step toward a full U.S. withdrawal by the end of 2011, leaves them open to attack.

But the government declared Tuesday a holiday, "National Sovereignty Day", and held a parade to show off the military muscle it will use against a stubborn insurgency.

"This day, which we consider a national celebration, is an achievement made by all Iraqis," Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said in a televised address.

"Our incomplete sovereignty and the presence of foreign troops is the most serious legacy we have inherited (from Saddam Hussein). Those who think that Iraqis are unable to defend their country are committing a fatal mistake."

Citizens and Iraqi soldiers drove around the streets of Baghdad in vehicles draped in flowers and Iraqi flags to celebrate.

Meanwhile, the U.S. military said four U.S. soldiers based in Baghdad had died of combat-related injuries on Monday. It gave no further details.

By midnight on Tuesday, all U.S. combat units must have left Iraq's urban centers and redeployed to rural bases, according to a bilateral security pact that requires all U.S. troops to leave Iraq by the end of 2011.

Last update - 19:42 30/06/2009

Romania students suspected of buying bones from Holocaust-era mass grave

By Cnaan Liphshiz, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Israel News, Jewish World

A prominent European Jewish organization has found evidence to suggest that Romanian medical students have been buying bones from a mass grave of Holocaust victims.

Each bone is believed to have been sold for $40.

The Rabbinical Center of Europe is investigating whether students from the University of Iasi had been purchasing parts of skeletons from a Jewish mass grave near the north-eastern Romanian university town.

The probe began this month following a complaint to the Center by an American Jew living in Iasi. According to his testimony, local medical students had been purchasing human bones and skulls for research purposes from a mass grave of Holocaust victims located in Podu Iloaiei, a nearby village.

The man said that Romanian medical students explained that the $40 fee was paid to the custodian of a commemorative cemetery built around the mass grave. For that price the bones came "cleaned up," the student reportedly said.

During the Holocaust two death trains left Isai. One of them stopped in Podu Iloaiei, where Nazi collaborators buried 1,194 Jews who had died along the way from thirst and heat exhaustion.

"From the evidence we have gathered so far, it is clear that something unbecoming and vile has been going on at Podu Iloaiei," Asher Gold, the Center's spokesperson told Haaretz on Tuesday. "These Jews were murdered by Nazis and their Romanian collaborators. I would have expected that at least their bones would be allowed to find some peace."

An Israeli medical student from Iasi who helped with the investigation told Haaretz that he had seen a skull being used as a learning aide by other students, but said he could not confirm that it came from the mass grave. "I believe bones are important for anatomy students and it seems they're willing to pay for them," he said.

To investigate whether Jewish bones were being sold, the Center used the services of Israeli medical students attending the University of Iasi. The institution's student body includes some 50 Jews, most of them from Israel.

On June 2, the Center sent two students to Podu Iloaiei to investigate. Upon reaching the cemetery, the foreign students posed as Romanians and asked the female caretaker of the cemetery whether they could purchase a number of bones.

In the ensuing discussion - which was recorded and later filed in the Center's offices - the woman reportedly referred the visitors to her husband to arrange the final details of the transaction.

A number of Jewish medical students at the Popa medical school in Iasi confirmed to the Center that notices concerning the sale of human bones and skulls have been circulating on campus. Most universities use plastic bone replicas.

The Rabbinical Center of Europe, a Brussels-based organization which functions as an umbrella group for European Jewry, said that it had no proof the alleged sale of bones was connected to the university's institutions.

Gold, the Center's spokesperson, said no criminal complaint has been filed yet on the matter, as the legal aspect is still being reviewed. The organization's EU representative plans to bring the subject up during a planned meeting on Thursday with Romania's ambassador to the Union.

"We were stunned to learn of these allegations," said Rabbi Arye Goldberg, the Center's deputy director. "We immediately set out to investigate before taking matters further. The results have left us deeply concerned and we will be aggressively pursuing this matter further. No human remains deserve to be used in such experimental manner. The memory of those who perished deserve to be preserved in a proper and dignified manner."

Last update - 18:20 30/06/2009

Ahmadinejad calls election a defeat for Iran's foes

By Reuters

Tags: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Mousavi

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Tuesday hailed his disputed re-election as a victory for the Iranian people and a defeat for the Islamic Republic's enemies.

The June 12 poll sparked Iran's most vigorous internal unrest since the 1979 Islamic revolution, but hardliners have regained the upper hand in the world's fifth biggest oil-exporting country, whose nuclear program has alarmed the West.

"This election was actually a referendum. The Iranian nation were the victors and the enemies, despite their... plots of a soft toppling of the system, failed and couldn't reach their aims," the state IRNA news agency quoted Ahmadinejad as saying.

Iran often accuses the West of seeking to promote a "velvet revolution" to overthrow its 30-year-old Islamic system.

The body that supervised the vote ruled out any further legal appeal and said those alleging fraud should be prosecuted.

"Based on Iran's constitution, the Guardian Council is the top legislative body to review complaints over the election. The council members have unanimously approved the election result," its spokesman Abbasali Kadkhodai told a news conference.

"The case of the 10th presidential election is closed," he said, a day after the council dismissed complaints raised by two defeated candidates, Mirhossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karoubi.

Kadkhodai urged the judiciary to take legal action against those who "spread rumors about election-rigging".

A statement on Mousavi's Web site did not comment directly on the 12-man body's ruling, but referred to the former prime minister's letter to the Guardian Council on Saturday in which he repeated his demand for the election to be annulled.

The next formal step is for Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to confirm Ahmadinejad as president. Parliament will swear him in a few weeks later.

It is not clear whether Mousavi will pursue his demand for the vote to be cancelled - and risk arrest - or accept defeat at the hands of Ahmadinejad, who is backed by Khamenei, the elite Revolutionary Guard and his own well-placed loyalists.

Hundreds of thousands of Iranians joined street protests after Ahmadinejad's victory was first declared, but riot police and religious militia have crushed protests since June 20.

State media say 20 people died in the violence, which the government and opposition blamed on each other. Many hundreds of people were detained during the unrest, but it is not clear how many are still held. Dozens of senior reformist politicians and activists hauled in shortly after the vote remain in custody.

The turbulent aftermath of the poll exposed splits in Iran's political and religious elite, but for now few options seem open for Ahmadinejad's reformist and conservative foes, who include powerful men such as former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani.

Tehran, locked in a row with the West over its nuclear program, has blamed the post-vote trouble on foreign powers.

Four Iranian staff of the British embassy remain in custody, accused of stirring the unrest. Britain rejects the charge.

British Foreign Minister David Miliband said on Tuesday that Britain and Iran agreed that a quick resolution of the dispute was in both countries' interests.

"We are extremely concerned at the continued detention of some of our locally engaged staff in Tehran. This is unacceptable harassment and intimidation, as European foreign ministers made clear in their joint statement on Sunday," Miliband told parliament.

"I have discussed this issue with Iranian Foreign Minister (Manouchehr) Mottaki and we both agreed in our second telephone conversation yesterday that a swift resolution was in both of our interests," Miliband said, calling for the release of the employees.

Nine Iranian staff of the British embassy were initally detained, accused of stirring protests which followed a disputed presidential election. Five were later released.

Britain rejects the charge.

Last update - 16:36 30/06/2009

U.S. re-approves Israel loan guarantees program

By Reuters

Tags: U.S., loan guarantees, israel

The United States has re-approved its Israel loan guarantees program, subject to meeting fiscal targets, the Finance Ministry in Jerusalem said Tuesday.

The move comes amid tensions between Israel and the Obama administration over Jerusalem's settlement policy in the West Bank.

"Re-approval of the loan guarantees shows significant faith in Israel's economy by the U.S. government," Yarom Ariav, the Finance Ministry's director-general, said in a statement after signing the agreement.

Earlier in the decade, to help Israel deal with a recession caused by a global downturn and a wave of Palestinian suicide bombings, the U.S. in 2002 provided a package of $9 billion in loan guarantees, where Israel could sell bonds internationally with the backing of the United States.

The guarantees have been instrumental in sovereign ratings upgrades by credit ratings agencies.

Israel still has $3.8 billion left to use by 2011 after already issuing $4.1 billion in bonds backed by the U.S. and a $1.1 billion deduction for Israeli settlement building and concerns over the West Bank separation fence.

Israel would only be able to use up to $3.2 billion in 2009 but another $333.3 million will be released in 2010 and another $333.3 million in 2011if Israel sticks to its fiscal targets.

Under the deal with the United States, Israel must meet a 2009 budget deficit target of 6 percent of gross domestic product and keep fiscal spending to 3.05 percent above 2008 spending, and, in 2010, Israel's budget deficit cannot exceed 5.5 percent of GDP while state spending cannot be 1.7 percent above 2009 levels.

Those targets are the basis of Israel's 2009 and 2010 budgets, which lawmakers are expected to approve in the next few weeks.

Israel also has to present a roadmap for a new medium-term fiscal rule that would guide spending growth and deficits through 2015 while progress on privatization of state-owned seaports and the electricity sector must continue.

The U.S. and Israel agreed to expand a partnership in energy and technology research and development activities and in 2010, Israel will be required to improve intellectual property rights protection.

According to the deal, the guarantees amount may be reduced for activities "the president of the United States determines are inconsistent with the objectives and understandings reached between the United States and State of Israel regarding implementation of the loan guarantee program.

Last update - 18:17 30/06/2009

Spain court drops 'war crimes' probe of 2002 IDF strike in Gaza

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent, Haaretz Service and News Agencies

Tags: war crimes, Israel News, Gaza

Spain's National Court on Tuesday decided to shelve an investigation launched by one of its judges into a July 2002 air strike by the Israel Defense Forces on a Hamas target in the Gaza Strip, judicial sources said.

Leading Hamas militant Saleh Shehadeh was killed when the Israel Air Force dropped a one-ton bomb on his apartment building in Gaza. The explosion destroyed the building and killed 14 other people, most of them women and children. Spanish Judge Fernando Andreu had argued that it could constitute a crime against humanity.

The suspects named by Andreu included former defense minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer and six current or former IDF officers or security officials.

The case had created some diplomatic tension between Spain and Israel.

The court decision followed a preliminary approval by parliament of legislation limiting the right of Spanish judges to investigate alleged human rights violations abroad.

Later Tuesday, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman welcomed the decision.

"We view positively every development that deals successfully with such an attempt, and hope that this will be the end of the matter," he said.

The foreign minister added that Israel has argued from the beginning that the probe was a political bid to exploit Spain's judicial establishment.

Lieberman's predecessor, Tzipi Livni, also praised the move.

"The message that Spain sent out today was the right message," said Livni, chairwoman of the Kadima party. "The decision of the Spanish judicial establishment to prevent its exploitation constitutes an example of a joint interest between Spain and Israel."

Last month, Spanish lawmakers almost unanimously passed a resolution which could end the right of Spanish judges to investigate serious crimes like genocide anywhere in the world in cases where courts in the affected country do not act.

Spain's Socialist government said earlier this year it would change the law after protests from Israel over the High Court's decision in January to launch a war crimes probe into the seven Israeli officials.

If translated into a law, the resolution would restrict Spain, which had been praised by international campaigners, to only investigating cases in which the accused is in Spain or Spaniards are victims.

Last update - 13:43 30/06/2009

Jewish cemetery in eastern Czech Republic desecrated

By The Associated Press

Tags: Jewish cemetery desecrated

A Jewish cemetery has been desecrated in theeastern part of the Czech Republic, members of the community there said Tuesday.

Jaroslav Klenovsky of the Jewish community in nearby Brno said 63 tombstones were overturned at the cemetery in Uhersky Ostroh, some 280 kilometers (175 miles) southeast of Prague.

He said the cemetery, which dates from 1862 and is no longer used for burials, contains a total of 300 tombstones.

Police said several tombstones were broken and said they were investigating.

Sunday's incident took place when Holocaust survivors, Jewish groups and

government officials from almost 50 countries gathered in Prague to assess efforts to return property and possessions stolen by the Nazis during World War II to their rightful owners or heirs.

Last update - 13:36 30/06/2009

Fatah deputy reports progress in unity talks with Hamas

By Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service

Tags: Fatah, Israel News, Hamas

The head of the Fatah faction in the Palestinian parliament, Azzam al-Ahmed, said on Tuesday that significant progress has been made in Egyptian-mediated reconciliation talks with Hamas.

The Fatah deputy said that both sides have found common ground on key issues, including Hamas prisoners being held in Palestinian Authority prisons, Palestinian elections, as well as the make-up of the armed force that is likely to be deployed in the Gaza Strip.

Both sides are currently discussing a deal whereby 75 percent of parliament members would be elected via party lists while the remaining 25 percent would be subject to regional polls.

Hamas and Fatah are also believed to be in agreement that the Gaza force would number 3,000 armed personnel. In addition, both the Fatah-run governments in the West Bank and the Hamas regime in Gaza would continue to rule while a joint committee is formed to administer the rehabilitation of the Strip and preparations for elections.

Israel opposes Egypt's proposal of a Palestinian unity government because it allows Hamas to be part of the Palestinian leadership.

Israel is holding talks with Egypt on a new cease-fire agreement in Gaza - the negotiations revolve around an Egyptian proposal within a broader effort to reconcile the two main Palestinian factions, Fatah and Hamas.

Another plank in the broader agreement being discussed is the reopening of the crossings to the Gaza Strip, on the border with Sinai and Israel.

Last update - 12:29 30/06/2009

Kazakhstan denies selling Iran nuclear material

By Haaretz Service

Tags: Israel News, Iran, Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan's president denied on Tuesday that his country is supplying Iran with nuclear material, according to Israel Radio.

Nursultan Nazarbayev made the statements following a meeting with his Israeli counterpart, Shimon Peres, who is on a historic visit to the region.

The Kazakh leader said he empathized with Israel's concern over the specter of a nuclear-armed Iran, Israel Radio reported.

Peres requested that Nazarbayev move to halt Kazakh sale of uranium ores to Iran, according to the report.

Nazarbayev said his country supported a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and that he was willing to assist in advancing this goal.

Peres also requested that Kazakhstan improve the prison conditions of an Israeli who has been incarcerated for the last three months.

Boris Shinkman, 62, was arrested by Kazakhstan's secret service on suspicion of bribing senior defense officials in order to promote deals with Israeli defense firms. Several Kazakhstani defense officials were also arrested, on suspicion of taking bribes from Israeli firms.

Iran recalled its ambassador to Azerbaijan for consultations on Monday, a day after Peres visited the country.

According to the Iranian news agency INSA, the envoy was recalled due to both Peres' visit and unspecified "threats" it said Israel's ambassador in Baku had voiced against Iran. The semi-official Fars News Agency carried a similar report.

Two weeks ago, the Iranian chief of staff visited Azerbaijan in an effort to forestall the visit, informing Baku in no uncertain terms that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wanted it called off. Iran also pressured Azerbaijan to cancel the visit via other diplomatic channels.

Last update - 11:36 30/06/2009

Netanyahu courts Kadima, with or without Livni

By Mazal Mualem

Tags: Israel News, Shaul Mofaz

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held a regularly scheduled update with opposition head MK Tzipi Livni (Kadima) on Monday. Procedure dictates the meeting take place once a month. The 45-minute meet, also attended by the prime minister's military secretary Maj. Gen. Meir Klifi, did not include political discussion, although Netanyahu has not given up on his plan to have Kadima join the government "as one piece or in parts."

Netanyahu does not have a diplomatic plan to show Livni, which would predicate an invitation to join his government. He also has no positions to offer her as long as Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and his ministers are part of the government.

Livni continues to maintain her strategic decision of remaining in the opposition, from which she believes she will be able to capture the premiership. Recent internal Kadima polls reportedly support her decision.

However, Livni's number two, MK Shaul Mofaz, is working openly to create conditions to join the cabinet. Netanyahu believes that when the time is ripe, Mofaz will be able to lead a rebellion in Kadima and demand that the party join the coalition.

Mofaz, seemingly recovered from the shock of finding himself in the opposition, has gone back to attacking Livni mercilessly, apparently hoping to bring her down from within the party.

Mofaz is also touting a diplomatic plan calling for a "Palestinian state within temporary borders, around which he claims he can unite the party."

Mofaz denies any intention of bolting Kadima, but senior Likud ministers who are in close contact with him say that if Netanyahu calls again for Kadima to join the government, Mofaz will work as hard as he can to make it happen, even if it means splitting the party.

The move would have the added benefit of acting as revenge for what he sees as Livni's stealing the party leadership from him.

Meanwhile, Netanyahu is preparing for the day Lieberman is indicted. Theoretically only Lieberman would have to resign; his ministers could remain in the cabinet. However, the prime minister knows that this is an unhealthy situation in terms of his government's stability and has therefore pushed for the so-called Mofaz bill by which seven MKs can form their own party. He believes Kadima support is the only way to bolster his coalition.

At the moment Mofaz has no camp behind him. Still, like Netanyahu, he believes a concrete offer and a diplomatic plan will draw plenty of support.

Mofaz was the subject of well-aimed barbs yesterday by outgoing MK Haim Ramon (Kadima). "Those who don't know how to be in the opposition don't come into power," Ramon warned, using Netanyahu as an example.

Ramon also told a press briefing he was a "great believer" in Kadima, which he said was solid and "in two or three years would be the largest party and return to power. Tzipi Livni will be prime minister."

Last update - 10:41 30/06/2009

Israel ministers divided on settlement halt

By Barak Ravid

Tags: Settlements

Defense Minister Ehud Barak will meet in New York today with U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell in an effort to agree on a compromise formula on settlement construction. The meeting takes place in light of a recent disagreement among the "forum of six" ministers over this issue.

A political source in Jerusalem said Monday that a "temporary freeze" of construction in the settlements was met with objections by three of the six senior ministers in the forum.

Monday morning the forum, which includes Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and ministers Dan Meridor, Benny Begin and Moshe Ya'alon, met to agree on a position that Barak would then present to Mitchell.

Barak supported a formula according to which Israel would freeze settlement construction completely, except for projects that have already started, and would require U.S. guarantees on the future of the peace process.

A political source in Jerusalem said that Barak's position was countered by Lieberman, Begin and Ya'alon, who opposed his proposal. The three argued that "a temporary freeze" of settlement construction will create a precedent and may become permanent. "If we start it will be difficult to go back," the three said.

It is unclear what the positions of Netanyahu and Meridor were.

According to the three ministers opposing Barak, Israel must not propose a "temporary freeze" without a commitment for similar and equal concessions by Arab states and the Palestinian Authority, and as part of a broader package deal. Another argument put forth was that Israel must request guarantees from the U.S., so that it is not surprised by American initiatives without earlier consultation.

"We must explain to the Americans that we, too, have red lines," Deputy Prime Minister Ya'alon said during the meeting.

Nonetheless, Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon said Monday that "Israel and the U.S. will not enter a confrontation over the settlements. The shared interests are too strong and the joint aim is to work together and avoid a dead end."

During the meeting with Mitchell, Barak intends to present a more watered-down proposal, which will include a declared wish to resolve the settlements issue during negotiations with the Palestinian Authority over a final settlement agreement. Moreover, the proposal will be to limit new construction to the addition of stories to existing structures in the settlements, except for projects that have already begun.

Netanyahu has dispatched his special adviser, Isaac Molho, to the meeting between Barak and Mitchell. Molho met Mitchell last week but the formula he presented to the U.S. envoy was rejected. The failure of that meeting resulted in the cancelation of a planned meeting between the prime minister and Mitchell in Paris last week.

Prior to his departure Monday, Barak said that "the intimate and direct dialogue with the U.S. continues, and its purpose is to advance regional order. Within this framework it is possible to have effective and practical negotiations with the Palestinians, and within this framework it is also possible to find an appropriate solution to the issue of settlement construction."

Last update - 23:28 29/06/2009

U.S. won't rule out compromise on settlement growth

By Natasha Mozgovaya, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Middle East peace

The State Department hinted Monday that while the United States is committed to its demand that Israel freeze all construction in West Bank settlements, it will not rule out a future compromise on the matter as peace talks progress.

Both the Palestinians and the Israelis must adhere to obligations made within the road map plan, State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said, but time and negotiations would set the tone for future resolutions.

"We look forward to sitting down and talking about what can we do to move this process forward. In order to create this environment that will be conducive to resumptions of the negotiations, both sides need to comply with road map commitments," said Kelly.

"Freeze on all activity relating to settlements including natural growth is laid out very clearly," he added. "Working out the way to our resolution, I'm not going to say we're not going to compromise; we'll see what happens."

Meanwhile, Israel's UN ambassador said on Monday that the Obama administration has assured Israel it will continue defending Israel at the United Nations despite the allies' dispute over settlements.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has balked at U.S. President Barack Obama's call to freeze settlements in the West Bank, stirring speculation

that Washington could eventually apply diplomatic pressure.

One scenario sees the Americans, who have regularly vetoed UN Security Council resolutions that would have censured Israel, refraining from such active support at the world forum or scaling back Israel's access to U.S. decision-making.

Asked on Channel Ten television whether the veto could be at risk, Shalev said: "We were told explicity [by the Americans] that there are no consultations and no discussions at all within the administration in this direction."

"There is ongoing dialogue between the delegations, between the ambassadors. Today there is also a very good dialogue between myself and [U.S.] Ambassador [Susan] Rice, who is a confidante of President Obama."

Defense Minister Ehud Barak is due to meet Obama's Middle East envoy, George Mitchell, in New York on Tuesday in a bid to bridge the rifts over settlements.

Last update - 22:25 29/06/2009

Palestinian reconciliation talks begin amid mutual accusations

By Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Israel news, Hamas

Palestinian reconciliation talks began in Cairo on Monday amid mutual recriminations by senior Hamas and Fatah members.

Tayeb Abed al-Rahim, a senior Palestinian Authority official, on Monday said Palestinian security forces arrested dozens of Hamas activists in the West Bank because they had been planning attacks against PA institutions.

PA sources said the suspects admitted under interrogation that they had planned to assassinate several senior Palestinian leaders on July 1, in order to foil the reconciliation talks in Cairo.

Abdullah Abu Samadane, a Fatah leader in Gaza, accused Hamas of arresting dozens of the group's members there over the past two weeks, including prominent Fatah man Ahmed Nasser.

However, Hamas refuted Fatah's arrest claims, and accused the Palestinian Authority and Fatah of continuing to arrest its members in the West Bank in order to foil the Cairo talks.

Izat al-Risk, one of the Hamas representatives in Cairo, said the talks have produced no results so far.

However, Mahmoud al-Romahi, a Hamas member on the Palestinian Legislative Council, told Haaretz that all differences between the rival factions have been resolved, except the arrests.

Al-Romahi claimed both groups accepted the Egyptian proposal to set up a joint administration to manage and rebuild Gaza.

Last update - 02:40 01/07/2009

Netanyahu reaffirms support for Lieberman after Sarkozy remarks

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service

Tags: Nicolas Sarkozy, Israel news

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday he has complete confidence in Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, a day after Channel 2 reported that French President Nicolas Sarkozy had told him to "get rid" of Lieberman.

"[He] is fully committed to peace and security," said Netanyahu. "Lieberman constitutes an important part of the elected government of the democratic State of Israel."

The premier made the comments before a group of over 20 European ambassadors at Jerusalem's King David hotel. Netanyahu noted that he had consulted with Lieberman prior to a major foreign policy speech he delivered two weeks ago, in which he declared support for a demilitarized Palestinian state.

"Foreign Minister Lieberman will play an important role in implementing the policy presented in the speech," he said.

During the premier's visit to Paris last week, Sarkozy urged Netanyahu to "get rid" of hard-line Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, Channel Two reported on Monday.

Earlier Tuesday, Sarkozy's unusually blunt request sparked a political backlash among Lieberman's allies in Jerusalem.

The second-in-command of Lieberman's Yisrael Beteinu party said Netanyahu should have "banged on the table" in response to Sarkozy's attack on Lieberman.

"It is hard to believe that the leader of a friendly country would express himself in such a way," Infrastructure Minister Uzi Landau told Army Radio.

"If I was the prime minister, and those statements were made in my presence, I would have banged on the table and protested," Landau told Army Radio. "That is how a prime minister who preserves his country's dignity should behave."

Foreign Ministry blasts Sarkozy's 'intolerable intervention'

The Foreign Ministry responded to the report by lambasting the French leader for his "intolerable intervention in internal Israeli affairs."

Sarkozy spent a good portion of his meeting with Netanyahu last Wednesday discussing the composition of the Israeli official, according to the report. The presence of three other Israeli officials at the meeting did not deter the French leader from expressing his true opinion of the foreign minister, said Channel Two.

The French president reportedly told Netanyahu that while he usually scheduled talks with Israel's top foreign envoys on visit to Paris he could not bring himself to meet with Lieberman. According to Channel Two, this statement was accompanied by disparaging hand gestures.

Sarkozy then advised Netanyahu to fire Lieberman and bring former foreign minister Tzipi Livni back into the coalition, according to the report. Netanyahu reportedly told Sarkozy that Lieberman came across differently in private than his public appearances would suggest.

French far-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen also comes across as a nice person in private, Sarkozy reportedly responded, to which Netanyahu replied that Lieberman was not Le Pen and that there was no basis for comparison. Sarkozy then responded that he did not intend to compare.

The prime minister's bureau did not respond to Sarkozy's remarks nor deny them, but the office of Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman did respond with a strong condemnation.

"If the words attributed to the president of France are correct, the interference of a president of a respected democratic state in the matters of another democratic state is a grave and intolerable thing. We expect that that regardless of political stance, every political body in Israel will condemn this callous attack by a foreign state in our domestic affairs."

Meanwhile MK Ahmed Tibi welcomed Sarkozy's comments, saying that he hopes "the international community has started to absorb the danger of the fascism" being taught by Lieberman.

Ruth Halimi, at the funeral of her son Ilan.

(AP)

Mother of slain French Jew Ilan Halimi calls for public trial

By Haaretz Service

Tags: anti-Semitism, Israel News

The mother of slain Parisian Jew Ilan Halimi has called for a public trial so that her son's death "will not have been in vain", French newspaper Le Figaro reported Tuesday.

The trial, which will open in Paris on April 29, is scheduled to be held behind closed doors at a juvenile court, because two of the 30 gang members allegedly behind Halimi's murder were minors at the time of the act.

French law allows for a public trial to be held in certain cases where juveniles are involved.

Halimi, 23, was found naked, tortured and covered in burns near Paris on February 13, 2006, after being held captive by a gang calling itself "The Barbarians" for three weeks in a crime that shocked France and raised fears of surging anti-Semitism among French Muslims. He died of his injuries soon afterward.

He was reburied at the Givat Shaul cemetery in Jerusalem in February 2007.

Halimi's mother, Ruth, made the decision to reinter his body in Israel after speaking with Jewish Agency Chairman Ze'ev Bielsky.

Last update - 00:00 05/03/2008

Jewish teen tortured in French town where Ilan Halimi was killed

By Daniel Ben Simon, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: anti-Semitism, Israel, France

The incident of brutal abuse began at 10 A.M. on February 22. Mathieu Roumi, 19, whose father is Jewish, was strolling through his neighborhood in the Paris suburb of Bagneux, which has been the site of violent riots by immigrants in the past two years. The suburb became notorious as the scene of Ilan Halimi's 2006 murder, which horrified France.

Roumi ran into two youths he knew. They discussed a sum of money that he supposedly owed them. An argument ensued, after which they beat him and, with the help of a third friend, dragged him to a dark basement. The three assailants were joined by three other youths, all neighborhood residents and neighbors of Roumi.

For two hours the attackers tortured the young man. One shoved cigarette butts into his mouth, another took issue with Roumi's Jewish origin, grabbed correction fluid and scrawled "dirty Jew" on his forehead. The six men proceeded to scream at him and threaten that he would die the way Halimi did.

They identified themselves as members of the "Barbarians," the same gang that kidnapped Halimi from his store, demanded ransom for his release, and when that was not forthcoming, tortured the 23-year-old over the course of three weeks. Moments after he was dumped on the street, Halimi died.

Roumi told police investigators that throughout his ordeal, his assailants employed measures with sexual and sadistic connotations. When the issue of his sexual orientation arose, one of them placed a condom on the tip of a stick and shoved it in Roumi's mouth.

"We admire Youssouf Fofana!" they shouted at him, referring to the leader of the gang that murdered Halimi. Fofana and 29 other suspects are on trial for abduction, torture and murder. If convicted, they can expect a life sentence.

Roumi's life was spared because one of the assailants, who owned the basement space, had to leave and take the key with him. Roumi was set free and returned home, battered and broken. When he got to his parent's home, they sent him immediately for a medical examination.

The next day Roumi went to the police. In a matter of hours, the six assailants were arrested. Most are in their 20s, two come from Muslim homes, two are "fully" French, and another two are African and Portuguese immigrants. They told interrogators that they had not meant to hurt Roumi.

Sami Gozlan, a former police investigator appointed by the Jewish community to monitor anti-Semitic incidents, visited the Roumi family the day after the incident.

"The family was in a terrible state," he told Haaretz Wednesday. "The father was weeping like a baby and couldn't believe that such a thing could happen to his son in France. The mother was also deeply upset. They told me that their younger children were forced to stay with relatives outside the neighborhood. Mathieu himself is still in shock."

"Sadly the lesson of Halimi's murder has not been learned," Gozlan added. "The fact that angry immigrant youth can kidnap a Jew in broad daylight and abuse him proves that the lesson has yet to be learned."

Jewish organizations condemned the attack and urged the authorities to increase police vigilance in mixed immigrant neighborhoods, where fear of attacks against Jews runs especially high.

21 charged with kidnap, murder of Jewish man

By Haaretz Correspondent and Reuters , By Daniel Ben-Simon

Tags: jews, ilan halimi

Twenty-one people will be tried in France for the 2006 kidnapping and murder of Ilan Halimi, a French Jew, in a trial expected to generate a great deal of interest in the country's Jewish and African communities.

Another seven suspects face trial for failing to report a crime, while one will be tried in a court for children because she was under 16 at the time of the attack on Halimi.

Halimi, 23, was found naked, tortured and covered in burns near Paris on February 13, 2006, after being held captive for three weeks in a crime that shocked France and raised fears of surging anti-Semitism among French Muslims. He died of his injuries soon afterward.

The African community, which gave rise to the self-styled "gang of barbarians" accused of killing Halimi, says the suspects were motivated by money rather than anti-Semitism. The suspects include Muslim immigrants from North Africa, and immigrants from Congo and the Ivory Coast.

The self-proclaimed "brain of the Barbarians," Youssouf Fofana, was eventually arrested in the Ivory Coast. Fofana told police that he led the gang and organized Halimi's kidnapping, but has denied killing him. If he is convicted, he is expected to receive a life sentence.

Fofana and 18 other suspects are in jail pending the trial, which will be heard before a juvenile court because some were youths at the time of the attack. The other suspects have blamed Fofana for the abduction and murder, telling police he recruited them to the gang and that they joined because they didn't have anything better to do.

"We were bored," one of the suspects said.

No trial date was set, and a judicial source said it might not be held until 2009.

Police say the gang attempted to kidnap several Jewish youths before capturing Halimi. They then sent a series of ransom demands to his parents, asking for as much as 450,000 euros, but lengthy negotiations failed to secure his release.

The kidnappers used a pretty young woman - a blonde of Iranian descent - to entice Halimi into a trap, dragging the telephone salesman to a cellar where they proceeded to beat and torment him. Police investigators said the kidnappers acted with indescribable cruelty.

Last update - 02:40 01/07/2009

Netanyahu reaffirms support for Lieberman after Sarkozy remarks

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service

Tags: Nicolas Sarkozy, Israel news

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday he has complete confidence in Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, a day after Channel 2 reported that French President Nicolas Sarkozy had told him to "get rid" of Lieberman.

"[He] is fully committed to peace and security," said Netanyahu. "Lieberman constitutes an important part of the elected government of the democratic State of Israel."

The premier made the comments before a group of over 20 European ambassadors at Jerusalem's King David hotel. Netanyahu noted that he had consulted with Lieberman prior to a major foreign policy speech he delivered two weeks ago, in which he declared support for a demilitarized Palestinian state.

"Foreign Minister Lieberman will play an important role in implementing the policy presented in the speech," he said.

During the premier's visit to Paris last week, Sarkozy urged Netanyahu to "get rid" of hard-line Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, Channel Two reported on Monday.

Earlier Tuesday, Sarkozy's unusually blunt request sparked a political backlash among Lieberman's allies in Jerusalem.

The second-in-command of Lieberman's Yisrael Beteinu party said Netanyahu should have "banged on the table" in response to Sarkozy's attack on Lieberman.

"It is hard to believe that the leader of a friendly country would express himself in such a way," Infrastructure Minister Uzi Landau told Army Radio.

"If I was the prime minister, and those statements were made in my presence, I would have banged on the table and protested," Landau told Army Radio. "That is how a prime minister who preserves his country's dignity should behave."

Foreign Ministry blasts Sarkozy's 'intolerable intervention'

The Foreign Ministry responded to the report by lambasting the French leader for his "intolerable intervention in internal Israeli affairs."

Sarkozy spent a good portion of his meeting with Netanyahu last Wednesday discussing the composition of the Israeli official, according to the report. The presence of three other Israeli officials at the meeting did not deter the French leader from expressing his true opinion of the foreign minister, said Channel Two.

The French president reportedly told Netanyahu that while he usually scheduled talks with Israel's top foreign envoys on visit to Paris he could not bring himself to meet with Lieberman. According to Channel Two, this statement was accompanied by disparaging hand gestures.

Sarkozy then advised Netanyahu to fire Lieberman and bring former foreign minister Tzipi Livni back into the coalition, according to the report. Netanyahu reportedly told Sarkozy that Lieberman came across differently in private than his public appearances would suggest.

French far-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen also comes across as a nice person in private, Sarkozy reportedly responded, to which Netanyahu replied that Lieberman was not Le Pen and that there was no basis for comparison. Sarkozy then responded that he did not intend to compare.

The prime minister's bureau did not respond to Sarkozy's remarks nor deny them, but the office of Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman did respond with a strong condemnation.

"If the words attributed to the president of France are correct, the interference of a president of a respected democratic state in the matters of another democratic state is a grave and intolerable thing. We expect that that regardless of political stance, every political body in Israel will condemn this callous attack by a foreign state in our domestic affairs."

Meanwhile MK Ahmed Tibi welcomed Sarkozy's comments, saying that he hopes "the international community has started to absorb the danger of the fascism" being taught by Lieberman.

Last update - 21:17 29/06/2009

Ruth Madoff says `devastated` for victims of husband`s fraud

By Reuters

Tags: Israel News, Ponzi Scheme

Ruth Madoff, the wife of disgraced financier Bernard Madoff, issued the following statement on Monday after her husband was sentenced to 150 years in prison for perpetrating Wall Street's biggest and most brazen investment fraud.

"I am breaking my silence now, because my reluctance to speak has been interpreted as indifference or lack of sympathy for the victims of my husband Bernie's crime, which is exactly the opposite of the truth.

"From the moment I learned from my husband that he had committed an enormous fraud, I have had two thoughts - first, that so many people who trusted him would be ruined financially and emotionally, and second, that my life with the man I have known for over 50 years was over. Many of my husband's investors were my close friends and family. And in the days since December, I have read, with immense pain, the wrenching stories of people whose life savings have evaporated because of

h

is crime.

"My husband was the one we (and I include myself) respected and trusted with our lives and our livelihoods, often for many, many years, and who was respected in the securities industry as well. Then there is the other man who stunned us all with his confession and is responsible for this terrible situation in which so many now find themselves.

"Lives have been upended and futures have been taken away. All those touched by this fraud feel betrayed; disbelieving the nightmare they woke to. I am embarrassed and ashamed. Like everyone else, I feel betrayed and confused. The man who committed this horrible fraud is not the man whom I have known for all these years.

"In the end, to say that I feel devastated for the many whom my husband has destroyed is truly inadequate. Nothing I can say seems sufficient regarding the daily suffering that all those innocent people are enduring because of my husband. But if it matters to them at all, please know that not a day goes by when I don't ache over the stories that I have heard and read."

Prague summit urges return of Nazi-looted property

By Reuters

Tags: Israel News, Czech Republic

Forty six countries have backed the foundation of an institute aiming to track the return of Jewish art and property stolen by the Nazis, the Czech European Union presidency said on Monday.

A former Nazi concentration camp in the northern Czech town of Terezin, or Theresienstadt in German, will host the European Shoah Legacy Institute, a body that will monitor restitution claims by survivors of the Holocaust.

The Nazis confiscated hundreds of thousands of pieces of art and religious objects from Jews and other victims.

"There remain substantial issues to be addressed, because only a part of the confiscated property has been recovered or compensated," a declaration establishing the institute said.

The declaration follows up on principles from the 1998 Washington Conference organized to create a platform for retrieving Nazi-seized property.

Under the Washington Principles, countries agreed to identify stolen art, open up archives, publicize suspicious cases and "achieve a just and fair solution" for the Nazi-persecuted pre-war owners or their heirs.

Those behind the declaration believe publishing achievements and positive examples could push countries to do more.

"It is the first... declaration ever in which there is an institutional follow-up mechanism," Stuart Eizenstat, head of the U.S. delegation, told a news conference in Prague.

"(It is) an institute in which there is a centralized repository database where all developments related to the Holocaust ... (and) new recovery developments can be placed."

The European Union pledged its support in a joint statement by the Czech EU presidency and the European Commission.

It is hard to estimate the value of artworks and real estate seized by the Nazis. One reason is that it is hard to legally define the property itself.

Jews were sometimes forced to sell their assets to Nazis to fund day-to-day living and some say in cases where original owners received money it was a legally valid transaction.

It is also hard to trace the provenance of pieces of art and prove ownership.

Eizenstat said he estimated the value of all European Jewish assets in 1939 among 6 million people was around $15 billion at that time "which would probably be 10 times that much today."

He said the percentage of recovery has been "very tiny" compared to what was taken, and much of the recovered property was "symbolic".

Terezin was a transit point for Nazi victims who were then moved on to death camps in Auschwitz and Treblinka in Poland, and others.

Last update - 20:17 29/06/2009

Iran confirms Ahmadinejad victory after official recount

By News Agencies

Tags: Israel news

Iran's top legislative body on Monday confirmed President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's victory in the contested June 12 presidential recount.

The Guardian Council's official recount of the votes found that no irregularities in the election which brought about the largest protest on Iranian streets since the 1979 revolution. Protesters have claimed that the vote was imbued with massive fraud, but the legislative body has insisted that it was legitimate.

"The secretary of the Guardian Council in a letter to the interior minister announced the final decision of the Council ... and declares the approval of the accuracy of the results of ... the presidential election," according to the IRIB.

Massive police deployments were observed in Tehran on Monday evening ahead of the recount, which began earlier in the day in a move spurned by defeated reformist candidate Mirhossein Mousavi.

Mousavi had previously rejected the Council's offer of a partial recount,

saying the vote was rigged in Ahmadinejad's favour and that the whole election should be annulled.

Witnesses said an atmosphere of quasi-martial law had descended on northern Tehran, as police officers, riot police and large numbers of

security forces took up positions.

In addition mobile phone networks were blocked again as of midday. Text-messaging systems have been blocked in the country for more than 18 days, since the crisis over the disputed presidential election began on June 13.

Riot police clashed with up to 3,000 protesters near a mosque in north Tehran on Sunday, using tear gas and truncheons to break up Iran's first post-election demonstration in five days, witnesses said.

Sunday's clashes broke out at a rally that had been planned to coincide with a memorial held each year for Ayatollah Mohammad Beheshti, who came to be considered a martyr in the Islamic Republic after he was killed in a 1981 anti-regime bombing.

It was Iran's first election-related unrest since last Wednesday, when a small group of rock-throwing protesters who had gathered near parliament was quickly overwhelmed by police forces using tear gas and clubs.

Government tallies have shown that at least 627 people have been arrested in Tehran since the elections. Some state media have reported 17 protesters killed by security forces. Other state reports give the number as 27, said Hadi Ghaemi, director of the New York-based International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran.

Last update - 19:47 29/06/2009

Israeli Arabs flood Palestinian cities to boost ailing economy

By Reuters

Tags: West Bank, Israel News

Israeli Arabs long banned from the West Bank have converged on its cities in recent weeks to buy anything from groceries to makeup, taking advantage of lower prices and boosting the Palestinian economy.

Under U.S. pressure to ease Palestinian hardship, Israel has recently removed several key West Bank checkpoints, including one at the entrance to the city of Jericho.

Since May, Israel has also allowed its Arab population to visit the West Bank city of Nablus, though it restricts their entry by private car to Saturdays, when an average 3,000 shoppers arrive, according to the local Businessmen's Forum.

Hundreds of Israeli checkpoints remain in place, limiting Palestinian travel and trade, but the easing in restrictions is proving to be a boon for the Palestinian economy.

"No doubt the return of Arabs has contributed to... commercial activity in Jenin," said Nasser Atyani, who heads the chamber of commerce in the northern West Bank city of Jenin.

"Many sectors in the city are benefiting. The restaurants are full of them."

On a recent Saturday, about 500 Israeli Arab shoppers took buses from around Israel to spend the day in Jenin's markets, stuffing their trolleys with everything from toys to fruit and vegetables, attracted by lower prices across the Green Line.

Established by a 1949 ceasefire, the Green Line divides Israel from the West Bank. Arabs who stayed in Israel after the ceasefire received Israeli citizenship, with living standards higher than those in the West Bank, where taxes and prices are lower.

"I brought 500 shekels ($126) with me and I spent all of it," said Rasha Oweida.

"Prices here are cheaper."

Before the first Palestinian Intifada, or uprising, of the late 1980s, Israeli Arabs comprised 80 percent of Jenin's customers, Atyani said. But shops that grew fat on Israeli Arab clients lost out when travel restrictions stopped them coming.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he is committed to policies that will boost the Palestinian economy in the West Bank, which is ruled by the Palestinian Fatah faction.

Israel and many Western countries have sought to bolster Fatah against rival Islamist group Hamas since it took control of the Gaza Strip in mid-2007.

While an Israeli blockade against Gaza restricts imports to that territory, relaxed Israeli security measures at the Huwara checkpoint south of Nablus since mid-June have reduced waiting times, encouraging Arab visitors, said Tayel al-Huwari, who is

on the board of the local Businessmen's Forum.

"On Saturday specifically, more than 50 percent of the merchants' income in Nablus comes from Israeli Arabs. Trade is noticeably greater on Saturdays," Huwari said.

Israeli authorities are considering allowing Israeli Arabs entry to the city by private car all week long, he added, arguing that prosperity could also promote peace.

"This would improve the economy in Nablus and create political calm. When there's a revitalized economy everyone will be preoccupied with the economy," Huwari said.

Local news website Ekhbaryat Network said on Saturday that about 100 shops and businesses had reopened since Israel began easing restrictions.

But Israeli Arabs attracted by cheaper prices in the West Bank are largely ignoring the Arab shops of East Jerusalem.

Israel captured East Jerusalem in the Six-Day War in 1967 and considers the whole city its capital, a claim not recognized internationally. Arabs make up some 34 percent of Jerusalem's 750,000 residents and do not recognize Israeli rule over East Jerusalem.

Israeli authorities tax Jewish and Arab businesses alike but Arab businesses say the taxes are more than their businesses can support, leaving them unable to compete with West Bank prices.

Some believe Israel's aim is to turn business away from East Jerusalem to the West Bank, so Palestinians leave the city.

An Old City shopkeeper, speaking on condition of anonymity, said he owes nearly 100,000 shekels ($25,300) in property taxes.

Many small businesses in the Old City face the same problem.

"Business is so bad that you have a situation where people are prepared to sell their property on a very large scale to those who are willing to pay," said a senior official working for an international economic organization.

"There's huge demand from the Jewish side to actually purchase land in the Arab Old City."

Palestinians caught selling property to Israelis are seen as traitors and face death threats. But Jewish buyers get around this risk by offering secret buyouts to Old City shop owners, and promises to delay the actual takeover for years.

Last update - 19:01 29/06/2009

Victims of Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi scheme speak out

By The Forward

Tags: Bernard Madoff, Israel News

Veterans, widowers, parents, the elderly and the sick. They are hardworking people who believed in living within their means, saving for a rainy day and putting money aside for their grandchildren's college tuition. From across the country, victims of Bernard Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi scheme wrote in painful detail of their hardship and losses as they implored U.S. District Judge Denny Chin to give Madoff the maximum prison time allowed by law, 150 years, at his June 29 sentencing.

In their own voices, some of the victims wrote of losing their homes, having to go on food stamps or needing to go back to work, despite being in their late 60s, to make ends meet. Many of his victims said they were shocked by the news that they were broke. Then as the slow realization set in, they found themselves questioning their faith in humanity and coping with the emotional and physical pain that the financial upheaval has wrought.

Despite the pervasive assumption that those who invested with Madoff were celebrities, the wealthy and well connected, the messages released by the court illustrate that many of Madoff's clients had been ordinary Americans. They had trusted him or their financial advisers with their life savings, and they asked why the Securities and Exchange Commission had not saved them from the massive fraud.

Madoff surrendered to authorities last December and pleaded guilty in March to 11 criminal charges in connection with the scheme. What follows are excerpts from some of the 113 statements written by Madoff's victims. -Alison Cies

Our parents didn't, and don't, deserve to lose everything they saved for over the decades, and they don't deserve to have to say goodbye to their safe, unflashy home. They never harmed anybody... Bernard Madoff lied to, and thus stole from, my parents ON A WEEKLY BASIS, with every weekly packet of confirmation slips that he sent out. That means that he lied to them, and stole from them, 52 separate times in a single year. And, because they invested with him approximately two decades ago, that means that Bernard Madoff lied to them, and stole from them, 1,040 separate times. He deserves to stay in prison for at least that many years.

Abby Frucht

Wisconsin

I am an 80-year-old man in poor health whose remaining years have been totally devastated by Bernie Madoff. My wife and I have lost every dollar of our life savings in Madoff's fraud scheme with no hope of recovery. We have had to sell every asset that we own in order to survive, and we don't know how long the proceeds will last. I cannot begin to describe to you the toll that Madoff's actions have taken on us financially, physically and emotionally... Mr. Madoff is a ruthless and unscrupulous man with no conscience or remorse.

Leonard Forrest

Port Saint Lucie, Fla.

I have personally been in contact with several victims, most of whom have lost their entire life savings. None of these people had millions of dollars invested. They were, for the most part, humble, hardworking individuals who invested prudently and diligently to provide for their retirement. I am one of those people... I had never heard of Bernard Madoff prior to his highly publicized arrest on December 11, 2008. And I realized only after receiving Michael Sullivan's letter on December 20 that my entire life savings had probably been lost. I am 52 years old and once had hopes of retiring with modest means. That possibility has disappeared... Due to his egregious deeds, Mr. Madoff deserves no better than to live under a bridge in a cardboard box, scavenging for his food and clothing, living the existence which he has undoubtedly relegated some unfortunate victims to.

Robert G. Mick

I recently read a report that Mr. Madoff has hired a jailhouse consultant who is supposed to teach him how to put his best face forward during the sentencing phase. Please be aware that he (or his wife) is using our money, that belonging to the victims, to pay that consultant. This is just one more slap in the face and once again demonstrates total disdain for the victims of his massive fraud.

Michael De Vita

Chalfont, Pa.

We have a 16-year-old daughter. We took her to New York three years ago to meet Bernie Madoff. He had the gall to shake her hand as we thanked him for taking such good care of our money - her college money - and all of our extended family's money. He robbed us not only of our money, but of our faith in humanity, and in the systems in place that were supposed to protect us. Please remember his victims. Sentence this monster Madoff to the most severe punishment within your abilities. Madoff is a serial criminal.

Randy Baird

We trusted the SEC to protect us, and they failed us. At this point, we really feel like we cannot trust anyone... I am hoping that the judicial system does not fail us, as well.

Sheila Ennis

Manhattan Beach, Calif.

Twenty-one years ago my husband invested our life savings with Bernard Madoff. He died from a heart attack two weeks later. Shortly after I buried my husband, I met with Bernard Madoff. He appeared to be a genuine, kind man. He put his arm around my shoulder and assured me that my money was safe and I should not worry. I have to admit that I was not sophisticated in investing or finance and I trusted this kindly man... Look at the faces of the people in the courtroom; they are a small representation of the thousands that he has destroyed. Please keep all of us in your mind when you decide the fate of this heartless human being.

Norma Hill

Armonk, N.Y.

I am opening up my family's financial status to anyone who wants to see it, which is incredibly humbling and humiliating after years of hard work and major philanthropy. My family's name can be seen on buildings for the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, the Hebrew Home for the Aged and the Hebrew University in Jerusalem... Mr. Madoff seems to have done all he could to protect his family, while now I have lost almost everything I have to protect mine... I had to pretend to smile when my 10-year-old daughter was around, and try not to reveal the fear that I was living with... What gave him the right to do this to us?! He knows everything. He knows where the money is and who else is involved and is not talking, thus he shows no remorse for what he has done. For this alone, he deserves the maximum sentence. Combine that with how much suffering he has caused his investors, and it's a slam dunk.

Caren Low

Harrison, N.Y.

Bernard Madoff did not come forward because he felt regret for his actions. He came forward because he knew he could not continue his fraud. He came forward in his own calculating way to keep the damage at a minimum for himself and his family. While he was sitting in his penthouse apartment, waiting for a hearing with his upscale lawyer and his legal team to minimize the prison time, my husband and I had to put our house up for sale, scramble to pay our bills and try not to go bankrupt... We cannot afford a lawyer to help us.

Florence and Richard Roth

Jupiter, Fla.

Not wealthy, I am not the typical media portrayal of a Bernard Madoff victim. I live in a modest two-bedroom house, and I own one car. I was a small business owner and I worked six days a week for most of my life and funded my own IRA in order to retire comfortably. Now I am considered under the poverty level, and I do not think I can last another six months in my home... The impact of this crime is far-reaching, and Bernard Madoff must be severely punished for a crime of this magnitude. Please take into account that Mr. Madoff stole not only money, but lives, dreams, futures and security.

Angelo Viola

Staten Island, N.Y.

Mr. Madoff has not cooperated with any law enforcement entities to unravel his decades-old crimes. He has not cooperated in identifying other accomplices, and essentially he took the easy way out by pleading guilty, thus avoiding any cross-examination and the thorough investigation of the facts which a trial would have necessitated... I feel I have been economically raped. Mr. Madoff has not only stolen my money; he has stolen my lifestyle and my family's lifestyle. I recognize I will never be able to earn what Madoff stole from me, my wife and our children, and we, as a result, are sentenced to living a life devoid of our life savings and the security and comfort that provided to us... While the popular perception has been that the victims were primarily very wealthy Jews, the reality is that most of the victims were your neighbor next door, hardworking, middle-class, tax-paying citizens. Madoff didn't discriminate, as long as the money was green; he took it for his own benefit.

Richard Shapiro

Hidden Hills, Calif.

I am 76 years old. I have served my country in the Korean War and have been a good tax-paying citizen. I was recommended to Madoff in 1997. I had two other investment counselors, but Madoff outperformed them every year (or so I thought), and I moved all of my money (it was in an IRA) to Madoff. I am now destitute. We had to sell our home in upstate New York at a very reduced price to avoid foreclosure. We are now living in one room in my daughter's house in California. I cannot pay my long-term health insurance. I had to give up my car, and we are applying for food stamps. Our lives are a nightmare.

Allan Goldstein

Woodland Hills, Calif.

My husband is 92 and I am 87 years of age, and the distress and misery

and anguish his vile acts have caused deserve a severe sentence. If I could, I would charge him with heartbreak, sadness and tears.

Shirley Stone

I am a widow of 81 years old. My husband and I invested our money for 20 years so we would have a worry-free retirement... My husband passed away on April 8 after a long battle with cancer. In December, I found out that Madoff stole all of my money - I am broke - robbed by "The Madoff Gang." Now I find that I was also robbed by my government. My husband and I paid taxes for years, and it is unlikely that I will ever get that back. Not only did Madoff steal money, but he caused the government to steal also... Madoff victims have been portrayed in the media as wealthy and privileged individuals. Nothing could be further from the truth. Many Madoff victims are elderly individuals or retirees who were saving for the future and had the misfortune to believe in a powerful Wall Street insider who was repeatedly investigated and given a clean bill of health by a government watchdog agency named the SEC.

Emma De Vita

Chalfont, Pa.

Share |

Last update - 18:59 29/06/2009

Iran recalls Azerbaijan envoy for talks following Peres visit

By Reuters

Tags: Iran, Azerbaijan, Israel News

Iran has recalled its ambassador to Azerbaijan for consultations after a visit by President Shimon Peres to the Islamic Republic's northwestern

neighbor, an Iranian news agency reported on Monday.

Quoting an informed source, ISNA said the envoy was recalled to Tehran after Peres' visit to Azerbaijan on June 28 and "threats" which it said the Israeli ambassador in Baku had voiced against Iran, without elaborating.

The semi-official Fars News Agency carried a similar report.

Iran does not recognize Israel, which it refers to as the "Zionist regime". Israel has not ruled out military action if diplomatic efforts fail to resolve Tehran's nuclear row with the West. Tehran says its nuclear work is peaceful.

On June 21, Peres, commenting on post-election unrest in Iran, said he hoped the current Iranian government would disappear.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who officially won the disputed June 12 election, has sparked outrage in the West by questioning the Holocaust and predicting the imminent demise of Israel.

Last update - 16:24 29/06/2009

Poll: Hamas popularity falls in both West Bank and Gaza

By Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz Correspondent, and Reuters

Tags: Israel News, Hamas

Discontent with Hamas over slow-moving Palestinian unity talks and Israel's ban on Gaza reconstruction aid have led to a sharp decline in the Islamist group's popularity, an opinion poll showed on Monday.

The survey by the Jerusalem Media and Communications Centre (JMCC) put public support for Hamas in the West Bank and Gaza Strip at 18.8 percent, compared with 27.7 percent in its previous poll in January.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah faction is now more popular than Hamas with a 34.9 percent rating, up from 26 percent in January, according to the poll of 1,199 people.

Khader Khader, head of the media unit at the East Jerusalem-based JMCC, said Hamas' popularity was hit by discontent in the Gaza Strip, where the group rules, over a lack of movement in Egyptian-sponsored unity talks with Fatah and in reopening the territory's borders.

According to the poll, 26.5 percent of those surveyed blamed Israel for the deadlock in the Hamas-Fatah dialogue while 23.5 percent pointed a finger at Hamas and 15.5 percent said Fatah was responsible.

"It's a sort of protest by the people [of Gaza] because there is no progress on these two major issues," Khader said.

Israel has barred reconstruction material from entering the Gaza Strip since the Israel Defense Forces' 22-day offensive there in January, because it says the material could be used by Hamas to make weapons.

The poll also found that most Palestinians do not have high expectations of U.S. President Barack Obama, and think that he will not have an impact on negotiations with Israel.

More than 49 percent of the respondents said that Obama's policies would not impact the peace process, compared with 35.4 percent who believe that Obama's policies will improve the chances for peace.

Fatah accuses Hamas of arresting its activists in the Gaza Strip

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah group accused rival Hamas of arresting dozens of Fatah activists in the Gaza Strip on Monday.

The recriminations threaten to derail the Egyptian-mediated efforts to reconcile the two Palestinian groups.

A Hamas spokesman said there had been no arrests and accused Fatah of distortion aimed at undermining the talks.

Senior Fatah lawmaker Ashraf Gomaa told Reuters by telephone from Gaza that at least 90 of those arrested on Monday had been identified, but that the Hamas sweeps were continuing.

"We urge the Egyptian leadership to take a stronger position towards these actions by Hamas, which create doubt among our people over the importance of, and the need for, these continued talks in Cairo," Gomaa said.

"These Fatah positions have only one aim, which is Fatah's desire to foil the dialogue," Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri told Reuters by phone from the Gaza Strip.

Gomaa's remarks came hours before a spokesman for Fatah's security forces in the West Bank, where Fatah holds sway, announced that 100 Hamas members "who do not pose a threat to general security and the rule of law" would be released on Monday and Tuesday.

Sources close to the reconciliation talks in Cairo said the latest round on Sunday had stalled due to disagreements over a mechanism to end factional arrests. Both groups deny the arrests are politically motivated.

Hamas and Fatah delegations were scheduled on Monday to hold talks with Egyptian intelligence chief Omar Suleiman, who has spearheaded Egypt's efforts to heal the rift between Hamas and Fatah for nearly a year.

Last update - 15:16 29/06/2009

French-Jewish comedian cancels Lebanon gig after rumors of IDF service

By Haaretz Service

Tags: Israel News, Lebanon

French-Jewish stand-up comedian Gad Elmaleh has cancelled his performances in a Lebanon festival, after media in Lebanon reported he had served in the Israel Defense Forces.

The organizing committee of the Beiteddine festival, which is scheduled to take place south-east of Beirut next month, wholly denied the claims.

But in a statement, Elmaleh's agent said he decided to cancel his participation "out of concern for his personal security and that of the festival," after the organizers were swamped with e-mails and phone calls calling for a boycott of his three shows, which are sold out.

?Following the various manifestations of hostility and calls for a boycott against the coming of Gad Elmaleh, it is with regret that we are forced to cancel the participation of the artist at Beiteddine festival in July, whereas they may endanger the safety of the artist and hinder the smooth running of shows,? the agent said.

Al Manar's Web site said that "Elmaleh has long expressed willingness to defend his country Israel whenever needed," and referred to another Web site that allegedly posted pictures of Elmaleh in IDF uniform.

"Gad Elmaleh has never been part of the Israeli army. It is clear that this is not Gad Elmaleh in this picture, anyone who knows a minimum the artist can see without difficulty?, his agent added.

Slapping Obama, or Please God, keep Israel from making peace

By Bradley Burston

Tags: Israel News, Barack Obama

Click here for more articles by Bradley Burston

The following is the second installment of the Outpost Watch, a project aimed at helping monitor outposts and clarify the potential difficulty in countering them for the sake of peace. Data are based in large part on extensive research conducted over years by the Peace Now organization, augmented with and cross-referenced by information from settlers and Haaretz correspondents.

_______________

Everyone who lives here is a hostage. We know it, even if we are often surprised anew by the specific people who are currently holding us hostage, which is to say, staving off progress toward a future peace, and, in the process, taking a direct slap at Barack Obama.

Some we know all too well, of course. There are those among our captors who are so consistent and tireless in the work against peace that they have become part of the wallpaper, along with the scratches we make, year after year, decade after decade, marking opportunities intentionally wasted and lives needlessly lost.

Oddly enough, for fundamentalists on both sides, the prayer is oddly the same. It amounts to Please God, Keep Israel from Making Peace.

There are those among supporters of the Palestinians who, deep down, would rather see Israel punished than to see a Palestinian state be established. These include the diaspora schemers of Hamas, headed by Khaled Meshal,

who said last week "The enemy's leaders call for a so-called Jewish state is a racist demand that is no different from calls by Italian Fascists and Hitler's Nazism."

And there are those among us, Jews obsessed with the West Bank, who would rather see Israel punished than have the settlements harmed in any way.

After all these years, praying against peace is easy to understand. For both sides, peace will entail repugnant compromises, ugly admissions, internal war. And for fundamentalist Islam and fundamentalist Judaism both, it's either peace on our maximalist terms, or no peace at all.

When it comes to fundamentalists, we know what we are up against: The people who let us know that a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians is the last thing God wants.

But there are others who hold us - and peace - hostage, who are more difficult to comprehend. Take Ehud Barak. The nominal leader of Israel's peace camp. The head of the party which first concluded a peace agreement with the Palestinians. And the Israeli leader who presided over the defense ministry decision last month to, in effect, reward the squatters in Migron, the most heavily populated and highest profile of all illegal outposts, with new housing in an established settlement. A sophisticated but no less direct slap at the American presidedent. A time-bomb of a decision which, inconveniently enough, went off in the High Court Monday just as Barak was leaving for Washington and talks over, what else, a freeze on settlement.

Never mind that the proposed new housing would be in Adam, north of Jerusalem, which is outside the settlement blocs which Washington has foreseen as annexed to Israel in a land-swap as a part of an overall future peace settlement.

Never mind that the plan also appears to be part of a much larger strategy aimed at eventually extending Adam to link to the northern Jerusalem neighborhood of Neve Yaakov, a proposal Palestinians strongly oppose as a direct block to a viable independent Palestine.

Never mind that it acts as a reward for squatting, illegality, and defiance of Israeli government authority.

The worst problem is that neither the Defense Ministry nor its minister, seem to see any of these as a problem at all.

Last update - 18:21 29/06/2009

Ahead of sentencing, Madoff hopes to die a free man

By The Associated Press

Tags: Bernard Madoff, Israel News

It was a crime of epic proportions: a multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme that wiped out fortunes, drained retirement nest eggs, ruined charities and foundations, and even pushed some investors to commit suicide.

Six months after the scandal came to light, the battle lines over Bernard Madoff's punishment have been drawn. His lawyer insists 12 years in prison is enough. Prosecutors demand a 150-year sentence that would guarantee the 71-year-old spends his final days behind bars.

Victims of the disgraced Financier called for harsh punishment at Madoff's sentencing Monday in federal court in Manhattan. Ten have told U.S. District Judge Denny Chin they wish to speak out in court.

Madoff also will speak to the shame he has felt and to the pain he has caused, his attorney, Ira Sorkin, said in court papers.

"We seek neither mercy nor sympathy," Sorkin wrote. But the lawyer urged Chin to set aside the emotion and hysteria attendant to this case as he determines the sentence.

There was no shortage of emotion in recent e-mails and letters to the judge by victims.

Carla and Stanley Hirschhorn wrote that they lost their life savings - "a living nightmare that we can't wake up from."

Miriam Siegman expressed outrage at the spectacle of a man playing with his victims - thousands of them - who he knew were facing a kind of death, playing with them as a cat would with a mouse.

Prosecutors argued in court papers Friday that federal sentencing guidelines allow the 150-year sentence. Any lesser term, they said, should at least be the equivalent of a life sentence.

"The sheer scale of the fraud calls for severe punishment," the prosecutors wrote.

The jailed Madoff already has taken a severe financial hit: Last week, a judge issued a preliminary $171 billion forfeiture order stripping Madoff of all his personal property, including real estate, investments, and $80 million in assets his wife Ruth had claimed were hers. The order left her with $2.5 million.

The terms require the Madoffs to sell a $7 million Manhattan apartment where Ruth Madoff still lives. An $11 million estate in Palm Beach, Florida, a $4 million home in Montauk and a $2.2 million boat will be put on the market as well.

Before Madoff became a symbol of Wall Street greed, the former Nasdaq chairman had earned a reputation as a trusted money manager with a Midas touch. Even as the market fluctuated, clients of his secretive investment advisory business - from Florida retirees to celebrities such as Steven Spielberg, actor Kevin Bacon and Hall of Fame pitcher Sandy Koufax - for decades enjoyed steady double-digit returns.

But late last year, Madoff made a dramatic confession: Authorities say he pulled his sons aside and told them it was all just one big lie.

Madoff pleaded guilty in March to securities fraud and other charges, saying he was deeply sorry and ashamed. He insisted that he acted alone, describing a separate wholesale stock-trading firm run by his sons and brother as honest and legitimate.

Aside from an accountant accused of cooking Madoff's books, no one else has been criminally charged. But the family, including his wife, and brokerage firms who recruited investors have come under intense scrutiny by the FBI, regulators and a court-appointed trustee overseeing the liquidation of Madoff's assets.

The trustee and prosecutors have sought to go after assets to compensate thousands of burned victims who have filed claims against Madoff. How much is available to pay them remains unknown, though it's expected to be only a fraction of the astronomical losses associated with the fraud.

The $171 billion forfeiture figure used by prosecutors merely mirrors the amount they estimate that, over decades, flowed into the principal account to perpetrate the Ponzi scheme. The statements sent to investors showing their accounts were worth as much as $65 billion were fiction.

The investigation has found that in reality, Madoff never made any investments, instead using the money from new investors to pay returns to

existing clients - and to finance a lavish lifestyle for his family.

In bankruptcy filings, Trustee Irving Picard say family members used customers accounts as though they were their own, putting Madoff's maid, boat captain and house-sitter in Florida on the company payroll and paying nearly $1 million in fees at high-end golf clubs on Long Island and in Florida.

Picard has sought to reclaim ill-gotten gains by freezing Madoff's business bank accounts and selling legitimate portions of his firm. (Its season tickets for the Mets went for $38,100.) He's also sued big money managers and investors for billions of dollars, claiming they were Madoff cronies who also cashed in on the fraud.

The defendants include leading philanthropists Stanley Chais and Jeffry Picower - from whom Picard is seeking at least $5.1 billion alleged to have come out of victims' pockets - and hedge fund manager J. Ezra Merkin. All have denied any wrongdoing.

Last update - 20:23 29/06/2009

Obama officials say Iran talks still possible, despite G-8 push for sanctions

By News Agencies

Tags: Iran elections, Iran

Despite questions about the legitimacy of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's re-election and his belligerent anti-American rhetoric, the White House remains open to discussions with Iran over its nuclear ambitions.

"It's in the United States' national interest to make sure that we have employed all elements at our disposal, including diplomacy, to prevent Iran from achieving that nuclear capacity," Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said Sunday.

Meanwhile, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi said on Monday that the Group of Eight wealthy powers would discuss the situation in Iran and are likely to agree to adopt sanctions when they meet in Italy next week.

Speaking at a news conference to present the July 8-10 summit of G8 leaders, Berlusconi said the situation in Iran would be at the top of the international issues on the table.

Asked if the G8 would adopt sanctions against Iran, Berlusconi said he did not want to announce decisions in advance but, having spoken to his G8 partners on the telephone, "I believe things will go in the direction you have said."

As protesters filled the streets of Iranian cities after the disputed vote, Ahmadinejad accused the West of stoking the unrest, singling out Britain and the United States for allegations of meddling. Iran expelled two British diplomats last week and Britain responded in kind. Iran detained nine British Embassy employees Saturday and released at least four.

The U.S. has not had diplomatic relations with Tehran since the aftermath of the Iranian revolution in 1979. Ahmadinejad has said he would make the U.S. regret its criticism of the postelection crackdown and said the mask has been removed from President Barack Obama's efforts to improve relations.

Rice said Sunday that Ahmadinejad was falling back on his government's usual strategy of blaming the West and the United States in particular for its internal problems.

"This is a profound moment of change. And what Ahmadinejad says to try to change the subject is, frankly, not going to work in the current context, because the people understand that the United States has not been meddling in their internal affairs," she said.

"The legitimacy of the government, while questioned by the people of Iran, is not the critical issue for the U.S. goal of preventing Iran from developing a nuclear capability," Rice said.

Both Rice and David Axelrod, Obama's top adviser, said Ahmadinejad doesn't appear to have the final say over Iran's foreign policy. Axelrod, dismissing Ahmadinejad's harsh language as bloviations, said being open to talks with Iran is not an effort to reward the country.

"We are looking to... sit down and talk to the Iranians and offer them two paths. And one brings them back into the community of nations, and the other has some very stark consequences," Axelrod said.

White House officials pointed to Obama's remarks last week, urging engagement. "My expectation would be ... that you're going to continue to see some multilateral discussions with Iran," Obama said Friday.

Officials in Washington said they want Iranian officials at the negotiating table - which, they say, was not destroyed during the postelection demonstrations in Iran.

"We are also mindful of the fact that the nuclear weapons in Iran and the nuclearization of that whole region is a threat to that country, all countries in the region, and the world. And we have to address that. We can't let that lie," Axelrod said.

Iran frees detained U.K. embassy staff

Meanwhile on Monday, Iran said five out of the nine detained local staff at the British embassy in Tehran had been released, while the other four were being held for questioning, state television reported.

Iranian media said on Sunday several local British embassy staff had been held on accusations of involvement in the street protests that rocked Iran after a disputed June 12 presidential election.

"Out of nine people, five of them have been released and the rest are being interrogated," Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi told a news conference in comments translated by Iran's English-language Press TV.

A senior officials said Iran has videotape proof that local employees of the British Embassy in Tehran detained for allegedly stirring up post-election unrest were distinctly present at the scene of clashes.

Intelligence Minister Gholam Hossein Mohseini Ejehi said in an interview with state television broadcast late Sunday that the detainees - all Iranian nationals - mingled with demonstrators to encourage unrest.

Ejehi said Iran's judiciary, which is tightly controlled by supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, will decide what happens next.

"Some of them who were distinctly present at the scene of clashes and were even videotaped have been cracked down on, and we should wait and see what will happen to them later with the cooperation of the judiciary," he said.

On Sunday, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband demanded the release of all the staff held and said his European Union colleagues had agreed to a "strong, collective response" to any such "harassment and intimidation" against EU missions.

Qashqavi said Miliband and Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki had spoken on the phone on Sunday evening when Miliband stressed Britain's intention was not to interfere in Iran's internal affairs.

"Mottaki said that if they really prove this in practice... this can be considered as a positive step," Qashqavi said.

Iran has stepped up accusations of Western powers - Britain and the United States in particular - interfering in its internal affairs and fomenting post-election unrest. London and Washington have denied the allegations.

In London, a Foreign Office spokesman said around nine embassy staff were detained and that "several have been released", without giving specific numbers.

Britain and Iran have already expelled two of each other's diplomats since the election, which stirred Iran's most striking display of internal dissent since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

Mottaki was last week quoted as saying Iran was reviewing whether to downgrade ties with Britain. But Qashqavi said closing down any foreign embassy or reducing diplomatic ties was not on Iran's agenda.

Qashqavi also said Iran expected Sweden to pay damages after about 200 protesters, some wearing masks and hurling stones, demonstrated outside the Iranian embassy in Stockholm on Friday.

He blamed an exiled Iranian opposition group as well as communists and monarchists for the incident, in which he said three of "our colleagues" were injured. Stockholm was known for being an "unsafe city for diplomats," Qashqavi added.

On Sunday, several thousand protesters - some chanting Where is my vote? - clashed with riot police near the Ghoba Mosque in north Tehran. It was Iran's first major clash in four days.

Witnesses told The Associated Press that police used tear gas and clubs to break up the crowd, and said some demonstrators suffered broken bones. They alleged that security forces beat an elderly woman, prompting a screaming match with young demonstrators who then fought back.

The reports could not be independently verified because of tight restrictions imposed on journalists in Iran.

North Tehran is a base of support for opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi, who has alleged massive fraud in Iran's disputed June 12 presidential election and insists he - not President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - is the rightful winner.

Witnesses who spoke with the AP said they did not spot Mousavi at the rally. But one of his close assistants addressed the crowd through a loudspeaker and other opposition figures also appeared, including reformist presidential candidate Mahdi Karroubi.

Sunday's clashes erupted at a rally that had been planned to coincide with a memorial held each year for Ayatollah Mohammad Beheshti, who came to be considered a martyr in the Islamic Republic after he was killed in a major anti-regime bombing in 1981.

Iranian authorities say 17 protesters and eight members of the volunteer Basij militia have been killed in two weeks of unrest, and that hundreds of people have been arrested.

"The Paris-based International Federation of Human Rights said its information suggests at least 2,000 arrests have been made - not just (people) arrested and later released, but who are locked up in prison," the group's vice president, Abdol Karim Lahidji, told the AP.

He said his information came from members of human rights groups in Iran and other contacts inside the country.

Last update - 22:40 28/06/2009

Iran minister: U.S., Zionists trying to destabilize Iran

By Reuters

Tags: Iran election, Israel news

Iran's intelligence minister said on Sunday that no organized vote rigging took place which could affect the outcome of the country's disputed June 12 presidential election.

Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei also said on state television that the United States had aimed to destabilize the Islamic Republic with vote rigging allegations.

"I am announcing that no organized rigging which could affect the result of the election took place," he said.

"Americans and the Zionists wanted to destabilize Iran ...even months before the election they started to talk about the possibility of vote rigging in Iran and they continue this path after the election," the minister said.

The United States and its Western allies reject accusations by Tehran of interference in this month's vote, which official results showed was won by hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

His main challenger, moderate former Prime Minister Mirhossein Mousavi, says the vote was rigged and that the election should be annulled.

Last update - 14:34 29/06/2009

Barak heads to U.S. in bid to end settlements row

By Akiva Eldar, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service

Tags: Barak, Obama, Settlements

Defense Minister Ehud Barak was set to head to the United States Monday in a bid to end a quarrel with U.S. President Barack Obama's administration over Israel's refusal to completely halt West Bank settlement construction.

Barak is expected to propose two potential compromises on the matter: Either a temporary complete settlement freeze, or the limiting of building in settlement blocs to high-rise construction only.

The defense minister, who is also the chairman of the center-left Labor party, will tell Obama's special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, that Israel cannot completely halt settlement construction.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, for his part, reiterated Monday that negotiations wouldn't resume while settlement expansion continues.

Despite Israel's official stance, the Israel Defense Forces has banned the settlement of Modi'in Ilit from building hundreds of new homes.

The decision by the GOC Central Command, Major General Gadi Shamni, which was approved by Barak, pertains to two new neighborhoods in the ultra-Orthodox settlement.

Shamni issued the ban last month, in the wake of a High Court ruling that ordered the relocation of the separation fence around the Palestinian village of Bil'in, near Modi'in Ilit.

The construction freeze is necessary for "maintaining security and public order in the area and moving ahead with the separation fence," Shamni wrote.

As a direct result, the construction of some 40 high-rise buildings will be halted, although they are though in advanced stages. Tenders for hundreds of housing units that have already been approved will not be carried out, even though some units have already been sold.

According to a precedent set by the Rabin government in 1992, which imposed a complete construction freeze in the settlements, the state will compensate the contractors for the losses they will incur.

Settler leader condemns Barak plan to offer temporary halt

The Yesha Council of settlements blasted on Monday reports that Barak was going to offer the U.S. a complete halt to construction for three months.

"These tactical tricks will in the end lead us to a strategic defeat," Yesha Council Chairman Danny Dayan told Army Radio.

"The time has come for the government to tell the truth - that it was elected because it believes that a Palestinian state is an existential threat to the State of Israel, that Jews have a right to settle any place in the Land of Israel and to build, not only for natural growth."

The High Court has backed the government's right to halt settlement construction, citing the its prerogative to set priorities for budget allocations.

"The national priority, including diplomatic and economic decisions, is subject, naturally, to the policy stipulated by the elected government," the court said.

Peace Now Secretary General Yariv Oppenheimer, meanwhile, urged Barak on Monday to impose a total construction freeze in the settlements, at any cost.

"It is very unfortunate that of all people, the chairman of the Labor party is advocating Yesha Council and urges the United States to allow settlement expansion," Oppenheimer told Army Radio.

"I would expect him to follow the road paved by Yitzhak Rabin and his [Labor] government and impose a complete ban, even on projects whose construction is currently underway."

Dutch backer of Israel boycotts rebuked over 'misleading' flier

By Cnaan Liphshiz

Tags: jewish world, holland

A major Dutch promoter of boycotts against Israel was last week rebuked for misleading consumers by spreading messages which run "contrary to the truth," according to a precedent ruling by Holland's national advertising board.

The Advertising Code Committee recommended on Tuesday that the Amsterdam-based organization Peace - which describes itself as a consumer group - cease its current campaign against the sale of Israeli products.

Peace's activities came under the committee's scrutiny following a complaint by the Israel Products Center, a Netherlands-based online store specializing in Israeli goods. In February the center's managers complained that a flier which Peace has been circulating has damaged them by targeting their livelihood and brand.

The flyer was circulated inside national and local newspapers. It called for a boycott of Israeli products from the West Bank, but also told readers about "wholesale fraud using false papers and labels" concerning the origin of Israeli products.

Critics of Peace's campaign said that in so doing, Peace was in fact calling for a boycott of all Israeli products. The advertising committee found the campaign created the false impression that the Israel Products Center was engaged in illegal activity. Furthermore, the committee said Peace misled readers by suggesting that the sale of products from the West Bank was illegal.

Acknowledging Peace's freedom of expression, the committee said that "when presenting facts, these facts must be in agreement with the truth."

Elise Friedmann, head of anti-Semitism research at the Center Information and Documentation on Israel (CIDI), Holland's largest Zionist group, described the Committee's finding as a "landmark event" in the discussion about the boundaries of freedom of expression.

"The Committee reminds boycott promoters that while they are free to propagate their views, they can't do so by deceiving the public," she said. "It echoes hateful stereotypes about Jews. I hope the distinction will be picked up in other European countries. We need less deceit and hatred, and more rational dialogue."

Peace chairman Joost Hardeman, who is Jewish and says he supports Israel but opposes its occupation of Palestinian land, told Haaretz earlier this year that he rejected the center's allegations.

"We do not propose a comprehensive ban on Israeli goods, and we are opposed to this," he said. "We only demand that consumers be made aware, through labeling, of the origins of the goods they are purchasing."

Last update - 06:18 14/01/2009

Holland supermarkets boycotted on rumors of Israel donations

By Cnaan Liphshiz

Tags: Hamas, Israel boycott

The fighting in Gaza resulted in unexpected collateral damage this week for two discount supermarket chains in Holland, after their Muslim shoppers began boycotting following rumors that the supermarkets are donating to Israel.

In a statement released Tuesday, the two German-based international food giants Aldi and Lidl said the rumors - which circulated in e-mails and even mobile text messages - were false.

The retailers will not say if turnover was affected, but Dutch media quoted self-described regulars who said they went to the competition.

In reporting on the issue, one influential site promoting a boycott of Israel wrote: "Lidl and Aldi may not be sending their revenue to Israel ... but they stock fruit and vegetables stolen from the Palestinian occupied territories."

Last update - 13:25 17/04/2009

Pro-Israel boycott group: Dutch Jewish leadership 'abusing' our postal system

By Cnaan Liphshiz, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Israel News, Netherlands

A Dutch consumer rights group promoting a ban on Israeli goods is planning to take legal action against one of the Netherland's largest Jewish institutions for alleged "abuse" of the postal system. The Jewish group denies foul play.

Peace, which is advocating a boycott of Israeli goods from the West Bank, says the umbrella group for the Jewish Orthodox communities in the Netherlands, NIK, deliberately caused it losses of thousands of euros.

Peace argues that NIK did this by using its Web site to encourage people to send thousands of Peace's prepaid envelopes through a mailing service that allows anyone to send mail to certain organizations at no charge, since the organizations pay the postal fees after delivery.

"For two weeks now we have been receiving empty envelopes which we put out for people to support our campaign," said Peace chairman Joost Hardeman. "We of course had to pay for this traffic. This illegal manipulation by NIK of the Royal Mail service has forced us to cancel our mail arrangement, and we are preparing a lawsuit against them to cover our costs."

The Amsterdam-based group is also planning to take legal action against two operators of pro-Israel Web sites, including a blog, that advertised Peace's prepaid mailbox.

Ruben Vis, secretary general of NIK, confirmed that the address of Peace's prepaid mailbox was posted on his organization's site, but said that was part of a report about Peace's claims that the Israeli Embassy was pressuring a publisher to drop a pro-boycott ad campaign. The embassy has denied this.

"Certain individuals may have decided to mail back to Peace their own prepaid envelopes, but NIK is certainly not involved," Vis said.

Hardeman, who is Jewish and says he supports Israel but opposes its occupation of Palestinian land, said Peace will nonetheless attempt to show NIK is to blame for "the abuse of the mail system."

The Israel Products Center, a Netherlands-based online store specializing in Israeli goods, recently complained to the Dutch advertising ombudsman organization that Peace's campaign against Israeli products has caused it financial damages because it directly targets their livelihood and brand.

Hardeman rejects the allegation. "We do not propose a comprehensive ban on Israeli goods, and we are opposed to this," he said. "We only demand that consumers be made aware, through labeling, of the origins of the goods they are purchasing. That way they can decide whether they want to buy a product which comes from Palestinian land that is illegally occupied by Israel."

Last update - 09:42 29/06/2009

Obama should play on Israel's fears, not its hopes for peace

By Akiva Eldar

Tags: settlements, palestinians

It is both interesting and strange that the very same people who complain about what they believe to be U.S. President Barack Obama's excessive support for the Palestinian struggle for liberation from the yoke of Israeli rule also attack him for what they perceive as his soft stance on the internal Iranian struggle against the incumbent regime. What was Benjamin Netanyahu trying to gain in leaking to Maariv that Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi told him that even Hillary Clinton is opposed to the president's weak stance on the Iranian regime? Was he trying to make Obama understand, once and for all, that the only language understood in the Middle East is one of force and fear?

To be honest, when it comes to the Israeli government, Washington has received the message, loud and clear. The Americans understand that Israel did not voluntarily compromise on "natural growth" in the settlements. And what has changed in the West Bank, allowing for the sudden removal of dozens of roadblocks and the evacuation of more Palestinian cities?

White House officials know what became of the promises previous Israeli governments gave to former president George W. Bush and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on plans to alleviate the hardships of Palestinian civilians. They were able to locate the transcripts, while they were (desperately and unsuccessfully) looking for documents to prove earlier "understandings" on natural growth.

A new study by Prof. Daniel Bar-Tal of Tel Aviv University and Dr. Eran Halperin of the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya shows that fear is one of the obstacles preventing the spread of alternative beliefs on resolving conflicts by peaceful means. Such obstacles develop through a selective and distorted processing of information aimed at preserving conflict-beliefs. Take, for example, the belief that "time is on our side." By contrast, the two researchers found that only a small minority of Israelis evaluate the conflict through the ethical lenses of justice and morality.

The researchers therefore assumed that the only way to open Israelis to compromise was to present them with the heavy price they are now paying - and will pay in the future - as a result of their refusal to compromise. This conclusion parallels the findings of Nobel Prize laureate Prof. Daniel Kahneman and the late Prof. Amos Tversky, who assert that people are primarily influenced by fear of losing their assets, rather than the hope for a future profit.

In their research, Bar-Tal and Halperin found that people who were exposed to a scenario emphasizing the price Israel might have to pay for allowing the conflict to continue were more willing to accept new information and compromise, in comparison to those exposed to a scenario based on the fruits of peace. While positive prognoses on the future of Israel and the Middle East did not result in a change of attitude, information on the losses Israel can expect unless a peace agreement is signed soon intensified the wish of those surveyed to consider alternative solutions to the conflict.

Detailed explanations on the economic ramifications of a failure to resolve the conflict, or demonstrations on a possible Arab shift toward supporting a binational state led many people to realize that "time is not on our side" and that the cost of a future peace may exceed that of peace today.

Since the outbreak of the Al-Aqsa Intifada, the fear of "terror now" has silenced the public discourse on "peace now." In the absence of an effective left, there is no agent in Israel able to convince the public of the urgent need for change, and to outline the heavy cost of perpetuating the conflict. Israel's right has entered this enormous void and filled it with alternative fears: It points to Hamastan at Jerusalem's gates and expresses fear in the face of the right of return and horror at Barack Hussein Obama. (Incidentally, how many Israeli politicians knew the middle names of Bill Clinton or George H.W. Bush and his son?).

Leaders of the international community and the Arab world are the only ones capable of convincing the average Israeli that only a "sucker" would miss out on the great opportunity for a Jewish state within the improved 1967 borders, on resolving the bulk of the Palestinian refugee problem, ensuring normalization with the Arab world and receiving security guarantees from the West. Obama appealed directly to the Muslim umma, bypassing the radical Islamists; the time has come for him to directly address the Israelis, bypassing their leadership. In doing so, it would be best to first present them with the cost of refusal, before Netanyahu manages to convince them that Obama is not a partner.

Last update - 09:24 29/06/2009

Sarkozy: No Shalit deal unless Israel frees jailed Palestinians

By Avi Issacharoff and Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondents

Tags: nicolas sarkozy, hamas

During their meeting in Paris last week, French President Nicolas Sarkozy asked Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he should seek the assistance of Syria and Qatar to speed up the talks for releasing abducted soldier Gilad Shalit.

Sarkozy said France could ask the leaders of the two Arab countries to seek Hamas' consent for either a sign of life from Shalit or permission for a visit by the Red Cross.

Sarkozy also told Netanyahu that during the Olmert administration he had contributed to exchanges on the Shalit affair through his ties with Syrian President Bashar Assad and the Emir of Qatar, Hamad bin Khalifa. Both leaders have regular contact with Hamas politburo chief Khaled Meshal, who is based in Damascus.

Sarkozy also told Netanyahu that the release of Shalit, who has been held in Gaza for three years now, is "key to a change in the situation in the area." But Sarkozy also stressed that "you will have to release prisoners, otherwise there will be no deal."

Meanwhile, at the cabinet meeting Sunday, Defense Minister Ehud Barak refuted reports of a breakthrough in the negotiations to bring Shalit home.

"Not a day goes by that we do not think of Gilad Shalit," he said. "Not a day goes by that the best minds in the country are not working on the issue.

"The reports are not correct and they may even be damaging, and in this matter the less we talk and the more we focus on doing, the better."

Hamas also issued an official statement denying any progress on Shalit. The Hamas official assigned to the Shalit case, Osama al-Muzaini, said there had been no progress on the matter since Netanyahu assumed office.

Muzaini said no new Israeli offer on Shalit had been received, though the soldier was alive and had received the letter sent to him by his family through former U.S. president Jimmy Carter.

Regarding the negotiations, Muzaini said the latest Israeli offer had been for the release of 325 prisoners out of a list of 450 demanded by Hamas. However, he said Israel demanded that 125 of the 325 prisoners would be exiled from the West Bank.

Muzaini said that many of the prisoners had been imprisoned for life, and that Israel had offered to release 550 others who had been jailed for five to seven years. Their terms would be completed soon.

Contract negotiator

Unlike his predecessors, the newly appointed Israeli negotiator to win Shalit's release, Hagai Hadas, is employed as an external consultant and is being paid by the Prime Minister's Office, Channel 10 reported yesterday.

The contract for his employment is for a year, starting this month. The total remuneration stands at NIS 22,684 per year.

Last update - 22:49 28/06/2009

Livni: Deals with Hamas will gravely harm Israel

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Hamas, Israel news, Gaza

Opposition leader and former foreign minister Tzipi Livni announced on Sunday that "agreements with Hamas clearly, and gravely, harm the interests of the state of Israel," in response to reports in Haaretz Sunday morning that Israel and Egypt were negotiating terms of a new Gaza cease-fire.

Livni added that her remark did not include any deals made with Hamas to secure the release of abducted Israel Defense Forces soldier Gilad Shalit.

The negotiations between Israel and Egypt revolve around an Egyptian proposal within a broader effort to reconcile the two main Palestinian factions, Fatah and Hamas.

Another plank in the broader agreement being discussed is the reopening of the crossings to the Gaza Strip, on the border with Sinai and Israel.
Speaking at a conference in Tel Aviv, Livni criticized Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's involvement in the deal, saying that "just as halting the negotiations with the moderates in the Palestinian Authority harms Israel, so does formulating direct or indirect deals with Hamas, which could legitimize the organization in exchange for a mere few days of quiet. It is a strategic mistake that will harm Israel."
The opposition leader added that "this will undermine the interests of all the moderate elements in the area. Just as we should strive to achieve deals with the moderates, we should strive to confront Hamas and deny it any legitimacy."
MK Nachman Shai, of Livni's Kadima, also criticized the prime minister's policy in light of the reports of Israel-Egypt contacts, saying that "Netanyahu is giving Hamas a stamp of approval. In direct contradiction with his campaign promises, he is currently invested in legitimizing a terror organization which has made the destruction of Israel it primary goal."
Shai added that in taking part in the deal, which is being formulated behind the public's back, Israel is aligning itself with an Egyptian initiative to reconcile Hamas and the Palestinian Authority, which will end up legitimizing Hamas' Gaza government.
]]]
Last update - 05:17 29/06/2009
Israelis in Honduras warned to exercise caution amid unrest
By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent and News Agencies
Tags: Honduras, Barack Obama
The Foreign Ministry on Sunday warned Israelis traveling in Honduras to exercise caution and avoid areas where crowds gather, in the wake of unrest gripping the Central American country.
The ministry has also advised Israelis traveling in Honduras to contact the Israeli embassy in Guatemala in order to update them on their status.
The Foreign Ministry estimates there are currently between twenty and thirty Israelis in Honduras, in addition to a local Jewish community that numbers around 200.
Advertisement
Israel has no embassy in Honduras, the closest foreign mission being in Guatemala.
Gunshots were heard near the presidential palace in Honduras late on Sunday as protests erupted after the country's army ousted and exiled leftist President Manuel Zelaya in Central America's first military
coup since the Cold War.
Hundreds of pro-Zelaya protesters, some of them masked and wielding sticks, set up barricades in the center of the capital, Tegucigalpa, and sealed off road access to the presidential palace.
Zelaya earlier on Sunday said soldiers rousted him out of bed, beat his body guards and arrested him in his pajamas in what he called a coup and a kidnapping.
Zelaya said he would not recognize any attempt to name a replacement for him following his detention earlier Sunday.
Zelaya said he will be meeting with diplomats and stressed he wanted to serve out his term, which ends in early 2010. He called for talks.
Zelaya was detained by army troops early Sunday, shortly before he was to have held a controversial referendum on constitutional reform opposed by most of the rest of the Honduran government.
The Honduras Supreme Court said Sunday it told the Army to oust Zelaya due to his attempt to hold 'illegal' re-election vote.
Following the reports of the upheaval, Venezuela President Hugo Chavez said he put his nation's armed forces on alert and will "bring down" any government sworn in as a result of the unrest.
Ecuador's leadership later echoed the call not to recognize the new government.
Honduran deputies will vote on Sunday on naming Congress head Roberto Micheletti as acting president, a senior opposition deputy said.
Congress will likely choose Micheletti to run the country until scheduled presidential and parliamentary elections in November, said senior opposition deputy Rigoberto Chang.
]]]
Last update - 21:18 28/06/2009
Obama aide: Ahmadinejad not in charge of Iran foreign policy
By The Associated Press
Tags: David Axelrod, Israel News
The White House contended on Sunday that Iran's president wasn't in charge of his country's foreign policy and said his criticism of Washington was little more than bloviations.
President Barack Obama's top adviser, David Axelrod, said the U.S. remains open to meeting, alongside its European allies, with Iran in Paris in an effort to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions.
"We are not looking to reward Iran. We are looking to ... sit down and talk to the Iranians and offer them two paths. And one brings them back into the community of nations, and the other has some very stark consequences," Axelrod said.
Advertisement
But he was careful to signal that the White House doesn't think Ahmadinejad has the final say over Iran's interaction with the West.
"We are also mindful of the fact that the nuclear weapons in Iran and the
nuclearization of that whole region is a threat to that country, all countries in the region, and the world. And we have to address that. We can't let that lie," Axelrod said.
Iran has accused the West of stoking unrest, singling out Britain and the
United States for alleged meddling. Last week, Iran expelled two British
diplomats, and Britain responded in kind. Iran has also said it's considering downgrading diplomatic ties with Britain; the U.S. does not have diplomatic relations with the country.
Axelrod said Tehran faces a choice between engaging the West or facing further isolation in the wake of a presidential election that sent protesters to the streets and amid questions of its validity.
"Let's be clear that we didn't meddle in the election in Iran," Axelrod said. "The dispute in Iran is between the leadership in Iran and their own people, and plainly, Mr. Ahmadinejad thinks that by fingering the United States, that he can create a political diversion. So I'm not going to entertain his bloviations that are politically motivated."
He said Ahmadinejad's accusations are meant for domestic consumption and to quell unrest after his re-election that his opponents call a fraud.
]]]
Last update - 14:33 28/06/2009
Israel: Lebanon still responsible for any Hezbollah attacks
By Haaretz Service and Reuters
Tags: Israel News, Lebanon
Israel on Sunday warned the incoming Lebanese government that Beirut would be held to account in the event Hezbollah launches attacks against the north.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted to the formation of a new government in Lebanon, a coalition that is likely to include seven ministers from Hezbollah.
In light of Hezbollah's entry into the government, Netanyahu said that Israel would view the Lebanese government responsible for any offensive action taken against it from its neighbor to the north.
Advertisement
During the cabinet meeting, Welfare Minister Yitzhak Herzog asked Netanyahu if the political developments in Lebanon were a topic of conversation in talks with French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
Netanyahu replied that the topic was indeed discussed. He stated that any government with significant Hezbollah representation cannot disclaim responsibility for attacks against Israel.
Lebanon's newly appointed Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri said on Saturday he would seek forming a national unity government but warned his task would be difficult.
"In line with our commitment during the election campaign in favour of a national unity government in which the main parliamentary blocs are represented ... we will begin consultations with all parliamentary blocs ...," Hariri said after meeting President Michel Suleiman.
Suleiman earlier appointed Hariri as prime minister-designate on Saturday, charging him with the task of forming a new government that would turn the page on four years of turmoil.
Suleiman issued a presidential decree designating Sunni Muslim Hariri after 86 parliamentarians in the 128-seat assembly nominated him for the post.
Hariri, who is backed by the United States and Saudi Arabia, led a political coalition to victory against Iranian-backed Hezbollah and its allies in this month's election. He is the son of statesman Rafik al-Hariri whose assassination in 2005 plunged Lebanon into the worst crisis since the 1975-1990 civil war.
Lebanon's sectarian power-sharing system reserves the premiership for a Sunni.
In a sign of the difficulties the 39-year-old leader faces in forming a cabinet acceptable to all sides, Hezbollah and its Christian allies refrained from nominating him.
Only 15 out of the minority alliance's 57 deputies backed him in two days of consultations with Suleiman, adding to support from Hariri's 71 deputies.
The main stumbling block facing Hariri is likely to be demands by militant group Hezbollah and its allies that they hold veto power in a new unity government. Hariri rejects such a veto but will seek to get the minority to participate in the government.
Hariri has been keen on securing the backing of his powerful Shi'ite rivals, who are close allies of neighboring Syria, to ensure a smooth launch for his administration.
Immediately after the June 7 election, he called for the contentious issue of disarming Hezbollah to be shelved. The group, labeled a terrorist organization by the United States, has battled Israeli forces since the early 1980s.
Hariri, who led a U.S.-backed coalition to victory over Iranian-backed Hezbollah and its allies in this month's election, met Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah overnight Thursday.
A joint statement said the men, who had only met once before in three years, had held talks and discussed the outcome of the election and the possible shape of the new government.
"They also agreed on continuing discussions in the current positive calm atmosphere and stressed the logic of dialogue, cooperation and openness," it said.
]]]
Last update - 19:21 28/06/2009
EU threatens 'strong response' to Iranian harassment of EU staff
By News Agencies
Tags: Israel News, Iran election
European Union foreign ministers agreed on Sunday the bloc would
meet any Iranian intimidation of European diplomatic staff in Tehran with a "strong and collective response", Britain said.
British Foreign Secretary David Miliband said the ministers at a meeting on the Greek island of Corfu unanimously called for the immediate release of British embassy local staff detained by Iranian authorities.
Advertisement
"There was also a commitment that harassment and intimidation of (Tehran) diplomatic staff of European countries will be met with a strong and collective response, " he told reporters.
Earlier on Sunday, Miliband called the detentions "harassment and intimidation of a kind which is quite unacceptable".
"These are hardworking diplomatic staff. The idea that the British Embassy is somehow behind the demonstrations and protests that have been taking place in Tehran. ... is wholly without foundation."
Iranian media reported Sunday that authorities had detained eight local employees of the British Embassy in Tehran for an alleged role in postelection protests, signaling a hardening of Iran's stance toward the West.
Miliband said some of the employees had been released following their detention, but that others continued to be held. He said "about nine" workers had initially been detention. It was not clear how many of those had been released.
"At the moment our top priority is the position of our locally engaged staff, who we want to see released, unharmed and back at work," Miliband said.
Iran has accused Western powers - Britain and the United States in particular - of interfering in its internal affairs after the vote, which sparked days of huge demonstrations in which at least 20 people were killed.
Britain and the United States have rejected the accusations.
"Eight local employees at the British embassy who had a considerable role in recent unrest were taken into custody," the semi-official Fars News Agency said, without giving a source. "This group played an active role in provoking recent unrest."

Iran's English-language state Press TV carried a similar report, citing Iranian sources.

In London, a foreign ministry spokesman said, "We have in the last few days received a number of sometimes confused reports that British nationals or others with British connections have been detained. We continue to raise them with the Iranian authorities."

A senior diplomat from another Western country said the reported detentions were a "worrying development".

Official results showing hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won re-election by a landslide were met with disbelief by many Iranians who agreed with complaints by the runner-up, Mirhossein Mousavi, that the vote was rigged.

The authorities accuse Mousavi of responsibility for the bloodshed that occurred when riot police and religious basij militia crushed the protests. Mousavi blames the government.

Iranian officials have over the last week stepped up accusations of foreign interference.

Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said Tehran was considering downgrading ties with Britain, and Intelligence Minister Gholamhossein Mosheni-Ejei said some people with British passports were involved in this month's unrest.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced on June 23 that Britain was expelling two Iranian diplomats after Iran forced two British diplomats to leave.

Britain has a long history of involvement in Iran and many Iranians remain suspicious of its motives.

The two countries have frequently clashed over Iran's nuclear program, which the West suspects is aimed at developing nuclear weapons. Iran denies this, saying it only wants nuclear power for generating electricity.

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on June 19 attacked foreign powers for alleged interference, singling out Britain as the "most treacherous" of Iran's enemies.

Brown has condemned violence and media censorship in Iran.

Britain suspended its diplomatic ties with Iran after the Islamic revolution in 1979, only reopening an embassy in 1988, following the Iran-Iraq war. Ties were downgraded again in the early 1990s, with full normalization only taking place in 1998.

In 2007, 15 British sailors and marines were seized by Iran in the Gulf and released after a tense 13-day standoff.

Last update - 11:51 28/06/2009

Netanyahu: EU receptive to Israel stance on Palestinian statehood

By Haaretz Service

Tags: U.S., Israel News, Ehud Barak

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday that the European heads of state with whom he met last week were receptive to Israel's new position on Palestinian statehood.

"I found a receptive ear in Europe to the principles that we presented for the diplomatic process with the Palestinians," said Netanyahu at the start of Sunday's weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem.

He listed the principles as, "The recognition of a Jewish state, demilitarizing a Palestinian state, and recognition that any agreement signed will be the end of the conflict and an end to demands [of Israel]."

Netanyahu said that these principles garner widespread public support. "I call on the opposition to declare its support for these ideas," he said.

On Wednesday, the prime minister said his proposal for a demilitarized Palestinian state was gaining international ground and was the only solution for Middle East peace.

"The idea of a demilitarized state will in course become accepted," Netanyahu said after meeting the leaders of France and Italy.

"If it is not accepted, there will not be an agreement," he told following his meeting in Paris with French President Nicolas Sarkozy. "It cannot be that there is a Palestinian state and the struggle will continue within it."

Sarkozy, meanwhile, said that Israel must take immediate confidence-building measures for Middle East peace, including a complete freeze of construction in West Bank settlements.

The French leader told reporters after his meeting with Netanyahu that Israel must also work to improve freedom of movement for Palestinians in the West Bank.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak told the cabinet on Sunday that Israel places "great importance" on reaching an understanding with the Obama administration on the issue of construction in West Bank settlements.

Commenting on the possibility of a temporary freeze in settlement construction, Barak said the matter has yet to be fully formulated.

"The subject of settlements is just part of a wide range of topics of conversation with the Americans," Barak said on Sunday.

Barak will travel to the United States on Monday for a meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama's special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell.

In an effort to placate the Obama administration on the issue of settlements, Barak is mulling a proposal whereby the Israeli government would pledge to a temporary, three-month halt to construction in all West Bank settlements, Army Radio reported on Sunday.

Mitchell was scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Paris last week, although the meeting was put off reportedly due to the remaining gaps that separate Jerusalem and Washington on the subject of "natural growth."

Israel seeks American approval to continued construction within the existing municipal boundaries of West Bank settlements in order to accommodate the growing population within the communities, a stance that Washington rejects.

The reported proposal would make an exception for some 200 structures which are current in advanced stages of construction, according to Army Radio.

The offer of a temporary freeze is intended to gauge the Palestinian response and to determine whether the Americans are willing to consider the proposal.

The cabinet will discuss Barak's upcoming trip to Washington during its weekly meeting in Jerusalem on Sunday.

Last update - 16:54 28/06/2009

Despite Iran pressure, Peres to visit Azerbijan and Kazakhstan

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz COrrespondent

Tags: Shimon Peres, Israel News

President Shimon Peres will visit Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan on Sunday, despite heavy pressure from nearby Iran for the trip to be canceled.

The trip will be the first by an Israeli president to either of the Muslim countries.

Peres will be joined by Industry, Trade and Labor Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer and National Infrastructure Minister Uzi Landau. Also on hand will be the director-general of the Defense Ministry, top executives of Israel Military Industries and 60 Israeli businessmen.

Peres' visit to Azerbaijan is also going ahead despite Hezbollah's attempted bombing of the Israeli embassy in the capital last year.

Azerbaijan and Iran are both Shi'ite Muslim countries, and the cultures of the two countries are closely intertwined. Azeris are also the largest minority in Iran, making up nearly a quarter of the population.

In Kazakhstan, Peres will meet with his counterpart, Nursultan Nazarbayev. He is expected to sign an agreement allowing Israel to use a local military base to launch satellites. Peres is also set to participate in an interreligious conference alongside the Emir of Qatar.

Last update - 05:04 28/06/2009

Where has ex-Iran president Rafsanjani vanished to?

By Zvi Bar'el , Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Ayatollah Khamenei

If anyone can serve as the ultimate barometer of the political mood in Iran, and knows what to say without looking like someone who has stepped out of line, it is Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, says Kenneth Pollack, a former CIA intelligence analyst and Iran researcher at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institute in his book "The Persian Puzzle: The Conflict between Iran and America" (Random House, 2004).

During the past month Rafsanjani has stepped strikingly "out of line." Three days before the elections he made public a letter he sent to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that included a sharp complaint against him. "The supreme leader has seen fit to remain silent in the face of [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad's accusations against me," wrote Rafsanjani. He was referring to Ahmadinejad's remarks during a televised debate with rival presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi, in which Ahmadinejad accused Rafsanjani of having made millionaires of members of his family since the Islamic revolution in 1979, and accused Mousavi of being supported by "corrupt politicians like Rafsanjani."

A week later, in his Friday sermon, Khamenei attacked Ahmadinejad for his remarks against Rafsanjani and, very angrily, "suggested" that anyone who has complaints about Rafsanjani should submit them to a court and not make false accusations in public. However, he immediately added that even though he has known Rafsanjani for over 50 years, Ahmadinejad is closer to his heart.

A few days later, when the demonstrations in the streets of Tehran were at their height, Rafsanjani's daughter Faezeh and a number of other family members were arrested, but they were released within two days. During this time, Rafsanjani's voice was not heard. However, Rafsanjani's silence is more thunderous in Iran than anyone else's voice, and if anyone can attack Khamenei directly, it is him. The rumors were that he had gone to the holy city of Qom in order to organize a revolt of senior clerics, not only against the election but also against Khamenei himself.

If there is a channel ripe for a revolution in Iran, it is not in the demonstrating masses, who are mustering tremendous courage in face of the violent suppression by the police and volunteer vigilantes who operate under instructions from the Revolutionary Guard. The revolution will have to come via the same ayatollahs who brought about the 1979 revolution, through the system itself.

This is giving Khamenei cause to worry. Within the ranks of the clerical-political elite that rules Iran, Rafsanjani, as that sensitive "political barometer," is registering the scent of the wounded animal that can now be brought down. If the assessments coming out of Iran can be relied upon, Rafsanjani will not be content only with ridding the political arena of Ahmadinejad, but also aims to become the country's spiritual leader himself and to depose Khamenei, whose appointment he aided 20 years ago.

Rafsanjani, who has twice served as president of Iran and was the speaker of parliament, was also one of the people closest to Ayotollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the father of the Islamic revolution in Iran. In the 1980s, when Iran was at war with Iraq and Mousavi, the candidate who lost in the recent elections, was prime minister under Khamenei's presidency, Rafsanjani had far easier access to Khomeini than the two other men combined.

His closeness to Khomeini afforded him tremendous influence on the decision-making process in Iran, and even more importantly he was considered to speak for Khomeini even after the latter's death in 1989. When the time came to appoint Khomeini's successor, Rafsanjani acted tirelessly to have Khamenei appointed.

Contrary to the position of important clerics in Qom, Rafsanjani, who had already demonstrated his skill in the twists and turns of Iranian politics, made certain that Khamenei was given the title ayatollah, enabling him to become the supreme leader. If there is anyone to whom Khamenei owes his position, it is Rafsanjani, who is now also the man who can depose him.

Is there a chance this will happen? Rafsanjani serves as chairman of the two strongest political bodies in the country. One is the Expediency Discernment Council, which has the role of finding compromises between parliamentary legislation and the position of the Council of Guardians, which represents Khamenei's positions absolutely. The other is the Assembly of Experts, which appoints or dismisses the supreme leader. The chairman can control the agenda for deliberations and direct the decisions, but Rafsanjani's real power lies in his ability to set political traps that will ultimately allow him to control the decision-making processes in these councils.

However, Rafsanjani has also had some resounding failures, the most important being the previous election, when Ahmadinejad defeated him. In the years prior to that election Rafsanjani had skipped back and forth between reformism and conservatism, and did not manage to brand himself in a way that would enable either conservatives or reformists to vote for him.

The affluent pistachio merchant, whose personal wealth has been estimated at more than a $1 billion, has always been considered the West's hope, because in his public statements he supports relations between Iran and the United States, has acted to release American hostages from Lebanon and was one of the key figures behind the Irangate affair in the 1980s. However, Iranian intellectuals have not forgotten that in his day about 100 journalists and intellectuals opposed to the regime were murdered.

Until it becomes clear where the chips in the political game have fallen, Iran is continuing to live from one week to the next. The second stage of checking the ballot boxes is slated to be completed on Sunday. From the first inspection it emerged that in some ballot boxes there was a 100 percent discrepancy between the number of registered voters and the number of people who actually voted. While the Council of Guardians is continuing to check the ballot boxes, the efforts to find a political compromise will also continue.

The streets of Iran have calmed down in recent days, partly because of the brutal response and partly because Mousavi has instructed his supporters not to enter into confrontation with the security forces. The result for now is that the demonstrations have changed from a catalyst that awakened the political process into a reined-in threat that could renew its activity at any moment.

Khamenei, who is now at the most fragile point in his 20 years as supreme leader, will have to pay some sort of price. Suddenly it appears that the lowest price from Khamenei's perspective would be to ask Ahmadinejad to resign and to ask the Council of Guardians to decide who will become president or declare new elections.

However, what seems logical to rivals or to assessors from outside is not necessarily the conclusion that Khamenei will reach. He is not one to tremble in fear of Rafsanjani, and he, too, is capable of twisting arms and putting both the security forces and "his" clerics to work on his behalf - the ones who are liable to lose their influence if there is the reform - never mind revolution - towards which Rafsanjani is moving. Rafsanjani is perhaps the ultimate barometer for understanding the political pressures in Iran, but not every strong movement on the seismograph means an earthquake will wreak destruction.

Last update - 11:56 28/06/2009

Mousavi would shun nuclear weapons, says Iran scholar

By Amira Hass, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Mir Hossein Mousavi, Iran

Even if the Iranian authorities succeed in suppressing the large demonstrations, the opposition might adopt other forms of protest - such as manifestos, strikes and mass resignations by university professors. That is the assessment of Ervand Abrahamian, a professor of history at the City University of New York and author of several books about Iran, most recently "A History of Modern Iran" (Cambridge University Press, 2008). "There is talk about the opposition trying to encourage its supporters to go out into the market places and prevent commercial activity," he told Haaretz last Wednesday in a phone conversation from New York. "That's the question: How will the bazaars behave, will the strike reach commerce."

One of the repressive steps taken this week, he said, was "having young people appear on television to 'confess' that the BBC et al had incited them to choose the wrong way, which was the reason why they had demonstrated." Abrahamian believes they were tortured. This was the method used during the "ideological period" of the 1980s - torture of leftists considered opponents of the system, who were then told "to confess their crimes" on television broadcasts. Abrahamian, who in fact wrote a book on this subject ("Tortured Confessions: Prisons and Public Recantations in Modern Iran," University of California Press, 1999), is fearful that "we'll begin to see senior activists in [Mir Hossein] Mousavi's office or journalists who support the opposition 'confessing' in public."

Abrahamian, who was born in Iran to an Armenian family and educated in England, has not returned to his country of birth for 30 years. "I was involved in left-wing student activity during the time of the Shah and for that reason I was on the Sawak [intelligence services] blacklist. The list was transferred in its entirety to the new regime," he explained. He maintains regular contact with a group of people in Iran via an online chat room - a method that has proven safer than phone conversations.

Were you surprised by the scale of the demonstrations?

"Yes, but actually I shouldn't have been, because it's an Iranian tradition. The important events in Iranian history took place after mass public turnouts: The constitutional revolution in 1905, thwarting Great Britain's plans to include Iran in its empire in 1911, the nationalization of the oil industry and [prime minister Mohammed] Mossadegh's rise to power in 1951."

Were you surprised by the scope and swiftness of the suppression?

"No. The authorities have the ability and the experience to suppress. They trained the Revolutionary Guards for that purpose for 20 years. But at the same time, they know that ruling by force will not help their legitimacy. They may be able to stop the protests, but they won't restore their credibility.

"The demonstrations that took place during the election campaign already threatened the authorities, which is why they hastened to interfere in the results. They felt that they were losing control over the street, and therefore the only solution was to declare an unequivocal victory. They were afraid of a second round, in which the level of politicization and public recruitment would increase.

Unexpected campaign

There are some who say the division between opponents and supporters of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reflects a dichotomy between classes.

"The core of the support for Mousavi is in fact university graduates and educated people, who can be described as middle class, and who are a clear product of the welfare state and the policy of expanding social services in force since the establishment of the [Islamic] Republic. Ahmadinejad's support base is whom I call 'evangelical' rather than 'fundamentalist.' These are not the poor, but the religious poor - between 20 and 25 percent. It's similar to the support base for former president George W. Bush in the U.S. That doesn't mean that the Iranian working class supported Ahmadinejad. The general impression that most Iranians are religious is not correct.

"This division changed during the elections," Abrahamian continued. "In Iran, the activity of political parties is not very important. Therefore the election campaign is very fluid, unexpected. Ahmadinejad based his election propaganda on nostalgia for the past, among other things, and Mousavi has an important part in that past. Mousavi was able to reach the classes who supported Ahmadinejad for populist reasons. During the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, the gap between rich and poor in Iran actually narrowed, because Mousavi - who was prime minister at the time - initiated price control and was responsible for nationalization. It's no coincidence that many on the left supported him. The trade unions support him too. He cannot be called leftist or socialist, as several articles have described him, but rather 'statist.'

"In 2005 Ahmadinejad won for several reasons: The reformists boycotted the elections and his rival [Akbar Hashemi] Rafsanjani was identified with the most corrupt elements in the regime. That is why Ahmadinejad tried this time to claim that Mousavi in effect represents Rafsanjani, but people don't believe him. In 2005 Ahmadinejad was actually running against George W. Bush, whereas this time the U.S. is headed by President Barack Obama. It's therefore reasonable to assume that support for Ahmadinejad declined this time."

Which means you do not doubt the claims that the elections were rigged?

"There's no doubt. Mousavi's chances of winning in the cities were known. That isn't the case in the villages. But people who are involved in what's happening in the villages said that the rate of support for Ahmadinejad there was about 20 percent. The rest supported [Mehdi] Karroubi and Mousavi. In the past, opening the ballot boxes and counting the votes was done in the villages themselves. This time the Interior Ministry took the closed ballot boxes. When they announced Ahmadinejad's victory, people in the villages were as angry as those in the cities."

You explained in one of your articles that the welfare state established after the revolution is the main reason for the republic's stability. Does it still exist?

"More or less. That's why people support the Islamic Republic, but not Ahmadinejad. They aren't talking about bringing down the regime - and that may be why the demonstrators mistakenly believed that they would not be suppressed. It's irresponsible on the part of Westerners to claim that this is a revolution against Islam. That plays into the hands of Ahmadinejad and [supreme religious leader Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei. The welfare state was established before Ahmadinejad, much of it during Mousavi's tenure as prime minister and in [former president Mohammad] Khatami's time. Khatami tried to reduce the resources channeled to religious institutions and the inflated Revolutionary Guards. Ahmadinejad restored the previous situation, and resumed the transfer of some of the oil profits to these institutions and their members. For every villager who received money from oil profits, there are 10 who didn't - another reason for the accumulation of anger."

Is the economic recession in Iran related to the global crisis?

"No. Khatami put the oil profits in reserves and intended to use it for development. Ahmadinejad decided to spend the money by raising salaries and giving pensions, and by investing in Revolutionary Guards projects. This channeling of money led to a flooding of the market with cash, and to inflation - but did not create jobs. Unemployment increased, mainly among university graduates. The value of the raise in salaries and pensions was eroded. One of the strong images of the most recent demonstrations is that old man carrying a sign on Freedom Square. The sign says: 'I'm not a speck of dust, [referring to Ahmadinejad's claim that the demonstrators are only a speck of dust] I'm a retired teacher.'"

'The return of the messiah'

Why do Ahmadinejad's followers support him?

"The basis was and remains evangelical. And that's why Ahmadinejad speaks a great deal about the return of the messiah. Some think that it is crazy, but it speaks to some people. There is the conservative base in the Revolutionary Guards and a group of clerics who are inflexible in their thinking. Ahmadinejad appointed his former friends from the Revolutionary Guards, who think like him, as governors. They won't want any improvement in relations with the U.S. and are convinced that the U.S. is determined to destroy the republic. That's why they secretly support the development of a nuclear bomb. They don't say it openly, but that's the direction.

"Mousavi is realistic. He knows that developing a nuclear bomb would be catastrophic for Iran. It would alienate the neighbors and lead to additional sanctions that would harm the economy. If they want an improvement in the economy they have to improve relations with the U.S. That's why there's such a major battle. It's connected to foreign policy. That's why Rafsanjani supports Mousavi. That doesn't mean that they support the West, but they understand that confrontation with the West is not worthwhile.

"Ahmadinejad thinks that the U.S. won't dare to impose sanctions," Abrahamian added. "He speaks of the U.S. as having lost its power. But the U.S. still has the power to destroy the Iranian economy, to destroy Iranian cities. I assume that Mousavi's supporters are thinking about this possibility. The Iranians are very savvy in politics, even the residents of the villages are aware of these questions, not only the middle class and people with education. The development of nuclear technology stemmed from an exaggerated assessment of Iran's power. Although it's an important force in the Persian Gulf, to consider it a world power is megalomania of the kind the Shah suffered from. I think most Iranians understand that. The only reason Iran has influence in Afghanistan and Pakistan is the stupidity of American intervention there."

Are the claims there has been Western and Israeli involvement in the demonstrations totally without foundation?

"Yes. Obama and the U.S. are not involved in the demonstrations. And as far as Israel is concerned, it certainly did not stir up the demonstrations, but there are people who are making strange declarations to foreign correspondents to the effect that Iran wants to be a friend of Israel and is not interested in financing Hezbollah and Hamas. I assume that these are emissaries of the Mossad. They don't reflect the views of the opposition. Mousavi's followers are interested in an improvement of relations with the West, but not in normalization. They aren't interested in intensifying the Israeli-Arab conflict, but they won't go so far as to rid themselves of Hamas and Hezbollah. They apparently accept the official position of the Khatami era - that if the Palestinians support the two-state solution, Iran will not oppose it."

Why is Ahmadinejad so insistent on denying the Holocaust?

"He may have spoken to the hearts of the 25 percent of evangelical supporters. With the exception of this group, his words surprised the Iranians. They say 'What does this viewpoint have to do with us?' Karroubi and Mousavi, for example, said that this talk presents Iran in a ridiculous light. It's possible that he thought that this is the way to reach the Arab world. It's possible that 20 or 30 years ago such claims, about the Holocaust having been invented, were common in the Arab world. It's possible that today this claim still speaks to extremist religious groups.

"And I should add a footnote: One of Ahmadinejad's close advisers is a redhead named Mohammad Ramin, who speaks fluent German. This mystery man grew up in Germany, maybe he's partly German. He's the one behind Ahmadinejad's statements about the Holocaust."

Egypt proposes pan-Arab force for Gaza Strip

By Avi Issacharoff and Zvi Bar'el, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Egypt, Fatah, Hamas

Another round of talks between Fatah and Hamas representatives will begin in Cairo on Sunday, where Egyptian mediators are trying to convince the two sides to enter a reconciliation agreement that will lead to a Palestinian unity government. The talks are scheduled to last a week.

Egypt has been pushing for the agreement to be ready for signing by July 7, but have warned that if these fail it does not intend to press on with its mediation efforts. The Egyptian efforts are being coordinated by General Omar Suleiman and his deputy, Muhammad Ibrahim. Fatah is represented by Ahmed Qureia (Abu Alaa), and Hamas by the deputy of the group's politburo, Musa Abu Marzouk.

According to the Egyptian proposal, Palestinian elections would be held in January 2010, with 75 percent of the members of parliament being elected on a party basis, and the rest by constituency. This is a formula that tends to favor Fatah. One possible result of reconciliation is Hamas agreeing to relinquish some of its control over the Gaza Strip and pave the way for a broader ceasefire agreement with Egypt, a lifting of the siege, and the establishment of a committee under Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas that would administer the territory.

A recent development has been that Egypt put forth a detailed proposal for the involvement of military and security experts from Egypt and other Arab countries in the security force that would control the Gaza Strip. Egyptian and Palestinian sources have said that a total of 180 Arab security experts would oversee the joint Palestinian security force comprising Fatah and Hamas troops. The proposal is part of an overall plan being put before the Palestinians, but also presented to Israel, which seeks to both resolve the internal, domestic Palestinian rift and deal with the thorny issue of a besieged Gaza Strip.

The proposal also calls for the immediate opening of the Rafah crossing, linking Sinai with the Strip, and the crossings with Israel, in return for the establishment of a long-term ceasefire, a tahadiyeh. The Rafah crossing would be operated according to agreements signed between Israel and the PA under the aegis of the Quartet in 2005, and European monitors would oversee the proper functioning of the crossing.

The Egyptian reconciliation plan calls for the establishment of a Gaza Administration Committee, which would represent all Palestinian factions. The committee would comprise 27 members: 12 from Hamas, 10 from Fatah and the rest from other factions. The Islamic Jihad organization has already rejected this proposal.

Such a committee would answer to Abbas and not to PA Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, and its tenure would end with the January 2010 elections.

In addition to the continuing recriminations between Hamas and Fatah over arrests of members of the Islamic group in the West Bank by Palestinian Authority security forces, it is also unclear whether Syria favors the reconciliation talks. Palestinian sources have said that the recent American announcement of restoring full diplomatic ties with Syria and returning its ambassador to Damascus is likely to convince the Syrians to pressure Hamas to agree to the Egyptian proposal.

ANALYSIS / Shalit has become the key to Mideast peace

By Akiva Eldar, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Gaza, Gilad Shalit

Never before have so many senior officials dealt so long with the fate of a single captive soldier, a soldier that became the key to so many important moves.

Three years after the capture of Gilad Shalit, the international community has decided to turn the key in the lock of the Gaza siege. This is supposed to unlock the reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas, perhaps with the additional profit of a split between the more moderate Gaza Hamas with the more radical Damascus section. The idea to unilaterally disengage Shalit from Gaza and relocate him to Egypt is meant to inject new energy into the prisoner-exchange negotiations. A gesture by Hamas in allowing Shalit to meet with his parents in an Egyptian guest house is expected to put pressure on Israel - at home and abroad - to reciprocate by releasing prisoners and a more generous opening of the Gaza border crossings.

And that's just the begining. The Shalit deal is but a first move in an extensive and complex political process, and but one ingredient of the PR campaign that will accompany it. President Obama's strategy of politics-and-PR was backed by the rest of the Quartet last week, as Russia, the EU and the UN gave him their blessing to revive the spirit of the 1991 Madrid conference. Just like 18 years ago, the U.S. wishes to move the Middle East peace process on two parallel tracks. The first is bilateral negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, as well as between Israel, Syrian and Lebanon. The other is multilateral talks between Israel and the members of the Arab League.

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak hinted in the Wall Street Journal last week that the Arab states are prepared to begin normalizing relations with Israel without waiting for a withdrawal from the occupied territories - as stipulated in the Arab peace initiative. But it is Israel that needs to make the first crucial step - an unequivocal commitment to freeze all construction in the settlements.

The Arabs have learned that since the Madrid conference, Israel has tripled the number of settlers in the West Bank. The conditioning of normalization on construction freeze is the explanation for Obama's insistence about national growth.

Last update - 13:49 28/06/2009

Hamas: No truth in media storm over Shalit deal

By Akiva Eldar, Barak Ravid and Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz Correspondents

Tags: Gilad Shalit, Egypt, Gaza

The Hamas official in charge of negotiations over abducted Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit said Sunday that there was no truth in the recent flurry of reports over a breakthrough in the talks.

Osama Muzeini said there are no serious talks on the matter, and that the last Israeli proposal for a deal to secure the soldier's release was made at the end of former prime minister Ehud Olmert's tenure.

European officials and Arab sources have been recently quoted as saying that Shalit will be moved to Egypt within a few days as part of a deal with Hamas, the Islamist militant group holding him.

Speaking to a Hamas-linked Web site, Muzeini added that under Olmert, Israel agreed to release 325 Palestinians out of a list of 450 requested by Hamas in return for Shalit. Israel demanded that 125 of those it agreed to free be resettled outside of the West Bank, he said.

According to Muzeini, those Israel refused to release were "heavies," Palestinians who had been given life sentences. He said Israel had agreed to free a further 550 prisoners two months after the initial swap; those Palestinians would be serving lesser sentences between five and seven years.

"The organization has clarified to European diplomats that Israel can only veto ten names on the list of 450, and no more than this," he said.

Muzeini noted that the Hamas committee running the talks, which is made up of the Islamist group's military wing, determines the makeup of the list. The Hamas official added that Israel has no means of freeing the abducted soldier other than through negotiations.

He revealed that on the eve of the last round of talks, the head of Hamas' military wing, Ahmed Jabri, was told by Egyptian mediators that Israel agreed to all of the group's demands. But when Jabri arrived in Cairo to close the deal, Muzeini said, he discovered this was not the case.

Barak blasts 'damaging' reports on Shalit deal

Defense Minster Ehud Barak, meanwhile, on Sunday criticized the reports of a breakthrough in the talks as "damaging."

"The reports on the release of Shalit are incorrect and even damaging," said Barak at the weekly cabinet meeting.

Following Barak's comments, an Egyptian source involved in the negotiations told Haaretz Sunday that while the efforts to secure Shalit's release are continuing, it is too soon to speak of Shalit's imminent release.

"You need to listen to your Defense Minister," he said.

Senior Israeli political sources made similar denials over the weekend. "There is no substantive progress on the matter," one of the sources said.

However, a senior Israeli official acknowledged Saturday that, "Egypt has presented us with a plan and we are now discussing it."

Israel Defense Forces corporal Shalit was kidnapped on June 25, 2006, in a cross-border raid from the Gaza Strip that left two of his comrades dead.

The issue of the soldier's release is one of the parts of an Egyptian proposal for a cease-fire in the Gaza Strip being mediated, but it is not central to the deal.

A senior political source reiterated that there has been no progress at this stage on the Shalit case, but expressed the hope that a new cease-fire formula may further a deal.

"There is linkage between the issues," the sources said. "The chances for his release in the near future are not high but in view of the new cease-fire plan, the chances are better than they used to be."

Last update - 12:11 28/06/2009

Israel, Egypt negotiate terms of new Gaza truce

By Barak Ravid and Akiva Eldar, Haaretz Correspondents

Tags: Israel News, Hamas, Gaza

Israel is holding talks with Egypt on a new cease-fire agreement in Gaza - the negotiations revolve around an Egyptian proposal within a broader effort to reconcile the two main Palestinian factions, Fatah and Hamas.

Another plank in the broader agreement being discussed is the reopening of the crossings to the Gaza Strip, on the border with Sinai and Israel.

On the Israeli side, the talks are being led by Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who is coordinating his moves with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Israel opposes Egypt's proposal of a Palestinian unity government because it allows Hamas to be part of the Palestinian leadership.

Meanwhile, on attempts to reach a deal on abducted soldier Gilad Shalit, senior Israeli political sources said during the weekend that there has been "no substantive progress."

The source said the Gaza cease-fire was raised in talks held in Cairo by Amos Gilad, the head of the political-security bureau at the Defense Ministry, and National Security Adviser Uzi Arad, with Egyptian intelligence chief Omar Suleiman. The issue was also discussed during Barak's visit to the Egyptian capital several days ago.

During his recent trip to Europe, Netanyahu was asked many times about talks for a new cease-fire arrangement, but did not confirm or deny any developments.

Sources at the Prime Minister's Bureau said Saturday they would not add to the statements by Netanyahu.

Following Sunday's report in Haaretz on the negotiations, MK Nahman Shai (Kadima) criticized Netanyahu for reneging on promises he made during his election campaign.

"Netanyahu is koshering Hamas, and in opposition to his promise on the eve of the election, he is engaged in bestowing legitimacy upon a terror organization that has set itself the goal of Israel's destruction," said Shai.

On a number of occasions before the Knesset elections in February, Netanyahu declared that his government's policy would be to seek the demise of Hamas rule in the Gaza Strip. This policy is part of coalition agreements that include the parties Shas and Yisrael Beiteinu.

Israel's motivation for resuming talks with Egypt on a new cease-fire agreement is the feeling among many defense officials that despite the relative calm in Gaza, fighting might resume in the near future.

"This calm is fragile, so it is necessary to examine whether it is possible to reach an agreement," a senior political source in Jerusalem told Haaretz.

The Israelis say the ability to carry out another offensive like Operation Cast Lead last winter is minimal because of the stiff opposition of the international community, especially the Obama administration.

However, in Israel the chance that a more permanent cease-fire deal will be reached is considered slim because of the many variables not dependent on Israel.

"These are the first talks, and at this stage we are not yet discussing a draft agreement," the senior political source said.

The issue of Shalit's release is part of the package proposal being mediated by Egypt, but it is not a central element. A senior political source reiterated that there has been no progress at this stage on the Shalit case, but he expressed hope that a new cease-fire formula might further a deal.

U.S., EU seek to include Hamas in peace process

The American government and the European Union are making efforts to include Hamas in a broader diplomatic effort that would include a long-term cease-fire with Israel, reconciliation among Palestinian factions and support for renewed negotiations with Israel on the basis of the Arab peace initiative.

According to the Saudi Arabian newspaper Al-Hayat reporting from Damascus, a U.S. official visiting Syria two weeks ago said that "the Hamas leadership has recently made important and interesting statements." The official added that the U.S. is following the Hamas stance and hopes that the group will alter its views and adopt a two-state solution.

Last update - 12:11 28/06/2009

Israel, Egypt negotiate terms of new Gaza truce

By Barak Ravid and Akiva Eldar, Haaretz Correspondents

Tags: Israel News, Hamas, Gaza

Israel is holding talks with Egypt on a new cease-fire agreement in Gaza - the negotiations revolve around an Egyptian proposal within a broader effort to reconcile the two main Palestinian factions, Fatah and Hamas.

Another plank in the broader agreement being discussed is the reopening of the crossings to the Gaza Strip, on the border with Sinai and Israel.

On the Israeli side, the talks are being led by Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who is coordinating his moves with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Israel opposes Egypt's proposal of a Palestinian unity government because it allows Hamas to be part of the Palestinian leadership.

Meanwhile, on attempts to reach a deal on abducted soldier Gilad Shalit, senior Israeli political sources said during the weekend that there has been "no substantive progress."

The source said the Gaza cease-fire was raised in talks held in Cairo by Amos Gilad, the head of the political-security bureau at the Defense Ministry, and National Security Adviser Uzi Arad, with Egyptian intelligence chief Omar Suleiman. The issue was also discussed during Barak's visit to the Egyptian capital several days ago.

During his recent trip to Europe, Netanyahu was asked many times about talks for a new cease-fire arrangement, but did not confirm or deny any developments.

Sources at the Prime Minister's Bureau said Saturday they would not add to the statements by Netanyahu.

Following Sunday's report in Haaretz on the negotiations, MK Nahman Shai (Kadima) criticized Netanyahu for reneging on promises he made during his election campaign.

"Netanyahu is koshering Hamas, and in opposition to his promise on the eve of the election, he is engaged in bestowing legitimacy upon a terror organization that has set itself the goal of Israel's destruction," said Shai.

On a number of occasions before the Knesset elections in February, Netanyahu declared that his government's policy would be to seek the demise of Hamas rule in the Gaza Strip. This policy is part of coalition agreements that include the parties Shas and Yisrael Beiteinu.

Israel's motivation for resuming talks with Egypt on a new cease-fire agreement is the feeling among many defense officials that despite the relative calm in Gaza, fighting might resume in the near future.

"This calm is fragile, so it is necessary to examine whether it is possible to reach an agreement," a senior political source in Jerusalem told Haaretz.

The Israelis say the ability to carry out another offensive like Operation Cast Lead last winter is minimal because of the stiff opposition of the international community, especially the Obama administration.

However, in Israel the chance that a more permanent cease-fire deal will be reached is considered slim because of the many variables not dependent on Israel.

"These are the first talks, and at this stage we are not yet discussing a draft agreement," the senior political source said.

The issue of Shalit's release is part of the package proposal being mediated by Egypt, but it is not a central element. A senior political source reiterated that there has been no progress at this stage on the Shalit case, but he expressed hope that a new cease-fire formula might further a deal.

U.S., EU seek to include Hamas in peace process

The American government and the European Union are making efforts to include Hamas in a broader diplomatic effort that would include a long-term cease-fire with Israel, reconciliation among Palestinian factions and support for renewed negotiations with Israel on the basis of the Arab peace initiative.

According to the Saudi Arabian newspaper Al-Hayat reporting from Damascus, a U.S. official visiting Syria two weeks ago said that "the Hamas leadership has recently made important and interesting statements." The official added that the U.S. is following the Hamas stance and hopes that the group will alter its views and adopt a two-state solution.

Share |

Last update - 22:57 27/06/2009

Mourners across Arab world pay tribute to Michael Jackson

By The Associated Press

Tags: israel news, michael jackson

A Bahraini royal mourned him publicly, young Lebanese held a candlelight tribute, Egyptians hailed him as an inspiration.

Beyond his global reach, Michael Jackson held a special place in the Muslim world, as one of the first major Western entertainers to break through cultural barriers in the 1980s.

Some made a connection with the pop icon because of rumors, never substantiated, that he had converted to Islam. Others embraced him as one of their own after he sought refuge in the Gulf emirate of Bahrain in 2005, following a bruising trial on child molestation charges in the U.S.

"God have mercy on him. He was a Bahraini. He lived with us," said Jassim Ali, 35, shopping for Jackson CDs on Saturday in a music store in the capital, Manama.

Jackson only spent a year in the emirate, as a guest of Sheik Abdulla bin

Hamad Isa Al Khalifa, a son of Bahrain's king and an aspiring songwriter who had befriended the entertainer. Jackson kept a low profile there, largely staying close to his host.

After Jackson's departure, the sheik sued Jackson for $7 million, saying he had failed to fulfill a joint music venture, but the two settled in November, with terms not disclosed.

The sheik said Saturday, in a statement in the Gulf Daily News, that the world has lost a giant in the music industry.

"We are all very saddened by that," Al Khalifa said in comments confirmed by his spokesman.

Across the Arab world, the tributes to Jackson, who died Thursday, mirrored those elsewhere around the globe, though some argued the singer had a special appeal in the region.

"Religion is a big part of identity in this part of the world, and the idea he became Muslim boosted his popularity," said Egyptian cultural critic Tarek el-Shinnawi.

The conversion rumors were fueled, in parts, by comments by Jackson's brother, Jermaine, a convert to Islam, who has said his brother showed interest in the faith. In November, a British tabloid claimed Michael Jackson converted at a friend's home in Los Angeles.

The Jackson brothers were raised as Jehovah's Witnesses.

Others simply loved Michael Jackson for his music. At his peak, in the 1980s, a time without Internet and satellite TV, the Arab world was more shielded from Western pop culture. Jackson was one of the few successful crossover artists.

In Egypt, keyboarder and music distributor Fady Badr traveled to Alexandria to take a few days off work to come to terms with the pop star's death.

"He's the reason I got into this business," said 28-year old Badr. "Everything he did was new, he had such a power of voice and style; this industry would wait for his new ideas to get us inspired."

A manager of the Cairo Jazz Club, Shady Hamza, said that he was flooded by calls from local bands and musicians to help arrange a tribute night to the singer.

"I feel like I lost a brother, said Hamza, 30. He turned so many of us into the whole music thing - for a lot of musicians, Michael Jackson was their first encounter."

In Lebanon, about 100 young fans lit candles and sang along to his songs in a downtown street lined with bars and restaurants. A few tried to moon walk while others cheered.

Qays al Zu'bi, a Bahraini lawyer who said he helped Jackson with his finances when he lived in the emirate, said the singer had qualities about him that endeared him to people in the region, including his close relationship with his children and his vision.

"He had an aura about him," said the lawyer. "Despite the scandal in the United States, I saw mothers at the lobby of his hotel who brought their children to introduce them to Michael Jackson."

Last update - 21:49 27/06/2009

Ally: Mousavi rejects Iran vote recount proposal

By News Agencies

Tags: Israel News, Mousavi

Iranian opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi has rejected a government proposal to recount 10 percent of all ballot boxes from the disputed presidential election, an ally told Reuters on Saturday.

"This kind of recount will not remove ambiguities...There is no other way but annulment of the vote...Some members of this committee are not impartial," the ally quoted a Mousavi statement that was due to be published soon on his Web site, as saying.

Another beaten candidate, pro-reform cleric Mehdi Karoubi, also rejected the partial recount offer in a statement on his Web site.

Mousavi says there was massive fraud in the June 12 election, which was won by incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in a landslide.

Since the election, opposition protesters repeatedly have clashed with security forces who beat them with batons, fired tear gas and water cannons and arrested hundreds of people. At least 17 people have been killed, in addition to eight members of the pro-government Basij militia, officials have said.

The crackdown has pushed protesters off the streets, ending days of unprecedented demonstrations that saw hundreds of thousands of people demanding the election be canceled and held again.

Many supporters of Mousavi have been shouting "God is great!" from the roofs of their homes - a practice dating to the 1979 Islamic Revolution - to register discontent with the regime.

Members of the Basij have been raiding homes and beating residents in an attempt to stop the chanting, Human Rights Watch said Saturday. The group also said that authorities were seizing satellite dishes to prevent citizens from seeing news broadcast from overseas. Iranian officials have blamed the BBC, Voice of America and other news channels for fomenting unrest on behalf of Western governments.

"While most of the world's attention is focused on the beatings in the streets of Iran during the day, the Basijis are carrying out brutal raids on people's apartments during the night," said Sarah Leah Whitson, the group's Middle East director.

"Witnesses are telling us that the Basijis are trashing entire streets and even neighborhoods as well as individual homes trying to stop the

nightly rooftop protest chants."

Also Saturday, the official news agency IRNA reported that Ahmadinejad vowed on Saturday to toughen Iran's stance toward the West during his new term in office.

Last update - 03:29 28/06/2009

Ahmadinejad vows to toughen stance toward West

By News Agencies

Tags: Israel News, Obama

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad vowed on Saturday to toughen Iran's stance toward the West during his new term in office, the official news agency IRNA reported.

"Without any doubt, in the new [presidential] term the government will have a more decisive and powerful approach toward the West," said Ahmadinejad, escalating his war of words with U.S. President Barack Obama and western nations.

Ahmadinejad made the comments at a meeting of judiciary officials in Tehran, speaking one day after Obama rejected the Iranian president's demand that he apologize for meddling in internal Iranian affairs.

Ahmadinejad, whose disputed June 12 election victory prompted widespread protests followed by a brutal state-led crackdown, again decried Obama and leaders of European countries Saturday for having "insulted" the Iranian nation with what he called interference in internal matters, IRNA reported.

Obama and European states have urged the Iranian government to solve the post-election turmoil peacefully and avoid violence in suppressing protests against alleged election fraud.

"From now on we will push you to a court of justice in every international meeting," Ahmadinejad said, without elaborating.

"This time the reply by the Iranian nation will be decisive and harsh and make you [the West] regret and be ashamed, he said in an apparent reference to Western criticism of the election.

The Iranian president added that, "The destiny of [former U.S. president George W.] Bush is still fresh," insisting that world powers should stop interfering in other states and not damage their prestige with imperialistic and arrogant rhetoric.

Obama scoffs at Ahmadinejad's demand for apology

Obama's criticism of Iran on Friday turned into an unusually personal war of words. To Ahmadinejad's demand he apologize for meddling, Obama shot back that the regime should "think carefully" about answers owed to protestors it has arrested, bludgeoned and killed.

"The violence perpetrated against them is outrageous," Obama said. "We see it and we condemn it."

The president spoke at an East Room news conference capping his third set of meetings with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, one of several European leaders who spoke out more forcefully, more quickly than Obama on the unrest in Iran that followed the disputed June 12 elections.

"We will not forget," Merkel said.

Ahmadinejad told Obama Thursday to "show your repentance" for criticizing Tehran's response.

"I don't take Mr. Ahmadinejad's statements seriously about apologies, particularly given the fact that the United States has gone out of its way not to interfere with the election process in Iran," Obama responded sternly.

"I would suggest that Mr. Ahmadinejad think carefully about the obligations he owes to his own people," he added. "And he might want to consider looking at the families of those who've been beaten or shot or detained. And, you know, that's where I think Mr. Ahmadinejad and others need to answer their questions."

It was Obama's first direct criticism of any of Iran's leaders. Even more, it was coupled with his first specific boost for Mousavi. "Mousavi has shown to have captured the imagination or the spirit of forces within Iran that were interested in opening up," Obama said.

The remark sought to clarify what many view as Obama's biggest misstep - saying last week in a television interview that there may not be much difference between Ahmadinejad and Mousavi. But it appeared to swing over to an outright endorsement of Mousavi, though White House press secretary Robert Gibbs denied it was meant that way.

Obama also said for the first time that his offer to loosen the decades-old U.S. diplomatic freeze with Iran through direct talks is now in question.

"There is no doubt that any direct dialogue or diplomacy with Iran is going to be affected by the events of the last several weeks," Obama said, without elaborating.

Gibbs said Obama was "more stating the obvious" that no talks are possible while developments are still unfolding. And Obama said that an existing system of multilateral talks with Iran over its suspected goal of building a nuclear bomb, involving nations including the U.S., Europe, China and Russia, must continue.

"The clock is ticking. Iran is developing a nuclear capacity at a fairly rapid clip," he said.

Merkel agreed there must be no letup among nations trying to stop Iran's nuclear development, which Tehran insists is aimed at providing only electric power, not weapons. She said "we have to bring Russia and China alongside," referring to the two nations most historically unwilling to get tough with Iran over the nuclear standoff.

Berlusconi denies saying Obama 'weak' on Iran

Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi denied on Saturday an Israeli newspaper report that he had described U.S. President Barack Obama as being "weak" on Iran during a meeting with Israel's prime minister in Rome.

Maariv reported in an opinion piece that when Berlusconi met Benjamin Netanyahu last Tuesday, Netanyahu said Obama would "find it difficult to hold dialogue" with Iran after protest erupted over Iran's disputed election result.

The paper said Berlusconi replied: "Obama is weak. He is in a difficult situation. I talk to people in America and they tell me there has been criticism of his weak response."

Maariv's online edition quoted Berlusconi saying Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini had talked to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton "and she has a firmer stance on Iran"

Italy's cabinet office had already denied the Maariv story, saying it "in no way reflected the spirit of the conversation".

But Berlusconi, who hosts Obama at a G8 summit next month, elaborated, saying: "I simply said the American administration was thinking about how to respond to Iran and someone in the Democratic Party insisted on Obama taking a stronger stance."

]]]]

Last update - 11:17 26/06/2009

Ahmadinejad: Obama like Bush, must apologize for Iran comments

By Reuters

Tags: Israel News, Iran Election

Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday accused U.S. President Barack Obama of behaving like his predecessor toward Iran, and said there was not much point in talking to Washington unless the U.S. president apologized.

Obama said Tuesday he was "appalled and outraged" by the post-election crackdown in Iran, and Washington withdrew invitations to Iranian diplomats to attend Independence Day celebrations on July 4 - stalling efforts to improve ties with Tehran.

"Mr Obama made a mistake to say those things... our question is why he fell into this trap and said things that previously [former president George W.] Bush used to say," the semi-official Fars News Agency quoted Ahmadinejad as saying.

"Do you want to speak with this tone? If that is your stance then what is left to talk about ... I hope you avoid interfering in Iran's affairs and express your regret in a way that the Iranian nation is informed of it," he said.

Iran's tough security crackdown after its disputed June 12 presidential election, which Ahmadinejad won by a landslide according to official results, has led Obama to ramp up his previously muted criticism of Tehran.

The turmoil in Iran has dimmed prospects for Obama's engagement with Tehran over its nuclear program, with Ahmadinejad's government blaming Britain and the United States for fomenting violence.

Obama toughened his criticism of Iran on Tuesday for its crackdown on protesters demonstrating against the official election results, declaring scenes of death in Tehran "heartbreaking."

"In 2009, no iron fist is strong enough to shut off the world from bearing witness to the peaceful pursuit of justice," Obama said in Washington.

But the U.S. president declined to spell out any potential consequences for Tehran of the crackdown, and said there was still "a path available" to Iran in which it could operate within the international community.

Ahmadinejad said, according to Fars: "What way of talking is this to the Iranian nation ... I tell them that all those people who voted and all the Iranian nation will stand against them."

He was speaking in the port town of Assaluyeh, where he was inaugurating a petrochemical plant.

The Iranian leader added: "A country which talks of change and cooperation, why did it fall into this trap. The Iranian nation sees and hears this talk and will make its decision... I hope you avoid interfering in Iran's affairs and express your regret in a way that the Iranian nation is informed of it."

Meanwhile, Soccer's world governing body FIFA has asked Iran's soccer federation to respond to media reports that players who wore green wrist bands in a show of solidarity with the protests have been punished.

Last update - 11:12 25/06/2009

Blackberry president vs. Twitter

By Ari Shavit

Tags: Iran Election, Obama

Barack Obama is the king of the world. The mega-celebrity of the 21st century enjoys unprecedented affection all over the universe and solid political support in the United States. His party controls both houses of Congress, and he himself has the American media swooning. With the exception of one pariah vice president (Dick Cheney) and one pariah television network (Fox), nobody dares to criticize him.

Obama conquered the world this spring, and the world is still conquered. Since World War II there has not been a president like Obama in the White House who can do whatever he desires in Washington.

And yet, this past week has cracked the U.S. president. The paralysis that seized the king of the world in the face of Iranian evil has exposed a scratch in his Teflon coating for the first time.

The warrior of Chicago's acceptance of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's religious fascism is hard to digest. It is hard to understand and excuse the exaggerated caution exercised by the leader of the free world with the despots of Tehran. It is even harder to forgive the way he turned his back on the demonstrators for freedom who risked their lives - and sometimes even sacrificed them - for the values he is supposed to represent. The Blackberry president did not heed the distress of the Twitter rebels. In his first test Obama stumbled morally.

The reason Obama behaved as he did is simple: George W. Bush. Obama the statesman has been guided by his determination to be the opposite of his predecessor.

Bush entered Iraq, so Obama will leave Iraq. Bush established Guantanamo, so Obama will close Guantanamo. Bush approved torture, so Obama forbids torture. Bush was hostile to Hugo Chavez, so Obama is chummy with the Venezuelan president. Bush threatened the Saudi king, so Obama bowed down before the Saudi king. Bush demanded that the Arab-Muslim world change, so Obama accepts it as is. Bush believed that the fate of despotic Islamic regimes should be the same as that of despotic Soviet regimes, so Obama believes that despotic Islamic regimes are no less legitimate than patronizing white democracies.

It is entirely clear what would have happened this week had Bush still been president. He would have sided determinedly with the friends of Neda Agha-Soltan and condemned Khamenei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. He would have made it clear that the United States will have nothing to do with an evil regime that is trying to obtain nuclear weapons while oppressing its citizens. He would have exploited the historic opportunity to isolate the ayatollahs and undermine their rule.

But just because Bush would have behaved that way, Obama did the opposite. He stammered and hesitated and apologized, and did nothing. When history came to stare him in the face, Obama lowered his eyes.

The problem is not only a personal one. The fashionable left has a weakness for third-world tyrants. Just as the Israeli left is forgiving toward the tyranny of Hamas, the American left is forgiving toward the tyranny of the Revolutionary Guard. Just as Israeli liberals turn a blind eye to the persecution of women, homosexuals and other minorities in Arab countries, American liberals turn a blind eye to any oppression that is not Western.

Due to a profound sense of guilt for the white man's sins, the politically correct left is incapable of properly confronting the sins of a non-white person. The result is patently immoral: It is the very people who consider themselves obligated to the third world who are turning their backs on the victims of oppression there. It is the champions of human rights who are abandoning the Middle East's residents to the mercies of despots.

The same Jimmy Carter whose diplomatic blindness enabled Khomeini to take control of Iran, thus condemning it to 30 years of oppression, is not going to Tehran this week to wash away his sins. Instead he dares to report to Hamastan in order to strengthen the discrimination by Hamas.

Obama is not Carter. He is an ethical, realistic and intelligent person. The hope that he has aroused in the world is not without foundation. But this hope will not be realized if he fails in Iran. In order to succeed there, Obama must stretch out a hand not to the oppressors in Iran but to the oppressed.

He must stand not alongside the religious dictatorship but alongside the courageous rebellion. If he does not do so, the fate of the incumbent Democratic president will be similar to that of the Democratic president of the 1970s. He will quickly lose his moral authority and even bear responsibility for a historic missed opportunity.

Last update - 21:15 27/06/2009

Italy to expel Palestinian hijacker of Achille Lauro cruise ship

By The Associated Press

Tags: Syria, italy, achille lauro

A lawyer on Saturday said Italian authorities are set to expel to Syria one of the Palestinians who hijacked the Achille Lauro cruise ship and killed an American passenger in 1985.

Attorney Gianfranco Pagano said Youssef Magied al-Molqui was about to be flown from Palermo, Sicily, to Rome and then on to Damascus on Saturday.

In April, Al-Molqui was transferred to a holding center for immigrants in Sicily after spending 23 years in prison.

Al-Molqui was a member of the four-man team that hijacked the Achille Lauro off the Egyptian coast. He was convicted of shooting Leon Klinghoffer, an elderly Jewish wheelchair-bound man from New York, and ordering him to be dumped in the sea.

Al-Molqui was released from a Palermo prison in April. A judge then ordered him expelled from Italy.

Al-Molqui, who is married to an Italian woman, served 23 years of a 30-year sentence handed down by an Italian court after the hijacking. He was released early for good behavior.

Share |

Last update - 21:28 27/06/2009

Lebanon: Shun calls for info on Ron Arad, other Israeli MIAs

By The Associated Press

Tags: IDF, israel news, lebanon

The Lebanese army on Saturday warned people not to respond to recorded phone messages asking for information about missing Israeli air man Ron Arad and other Israel Defense Forces troops missing in action.

Lebanese have been receiving phone messages periodically for more than a year asking people to view a Web site or call if they have information on missing Israeli soldiers, including Arad, whose plane was shot down over Lebanon in 1986.

The Web site, www.10million.org, belongs to a foundation set up by the Israeli government and offers a U.S. $10 million reward.

An army statement said Saturday that the messages were a violation of Lebanese sovereignty. It said any response would be considered clear collaboration with Israel.

Israel has in the past refused to say if it was behind the calls

Focus on stolen art as Holocaust conference opens in Prague

By DPA

Tags: Czech Republic, Jewish World

The question of how to restore art stolen by Nazis during World War II took centre stage as experts and world leaders met in Prague Saturday for a conference on the Holocaust.

The conference, set to run through Tuesday, was attended by hundreds of Holocaust experts and representatives of 49 nations' governments.

Other items on the agenda include discussions on the proper way to teach the Holocaust, both in schools and universities, and the creation of a European Holocaust Institute in Theresienstadt, the site of one of the Nazis' most well-known concentration camps.

Stefan Fuele, the Czech minister for European affairs, called the meeting one of the most important events of the Czech Republic's time at the helm of the European Union.

Focusing on the question of restoration of stolen art, he said the goal was to craft a Theresienstadt Agreement, to build on a similar agreement in Washington in 1998.

Experts agreed that the question of restoring the property more than 60 years after the end of the war would be a challenge.

"We can't even seriously estimate how many cases are involved," said Georg Heuberger, a representative of the Jewish Claims Conference.

Holocaust survivor and Nobel Peace Prize recipient Elie Wiesel said "the simplest thing would have been to return all the houses, money and property to the victims directly after the Second World War."

Last update - 21:42 27/06/2009

Egypt opens Gaza Strip border crossing for 72 hours

By News Agencies

Tags: Israel News, Egypt, Rafah

Egypt opened its border crossing with the Gaza Strip Saturday for a period of 72 hours, giving permission to medical patients and Gazans with foreign residency to leave.

Some 5,000 Palestinians have signed up to leave the Gaza Strip via the Rafah border terminal over the next three days.

Egypt and Israel sealed Gaza's borders two years ago, after the Islamic militant group Hamas seized control of the territory.

Egypt opens the crossing periodically, like on Saturday. Israel has allowed in food and humanitarian aid, but banned supplies, such as concrete, that it fears could be used to make weapons.

On Friday, the international community called for lifting the Gaza blockade.

Israel and Egypt had agreed that the Rafah border crossing would not be opened until captured Israel Defense Forces soldier Gilad Shalit is released and Hamas and Fatah reach a deal to form a national unity government.

The opening of the border crossing Saturday comes amid reports of Shalit's imminent release in an Egyptian-brokered prisoner exchange deal.

Last update - 21:12 27/06/2009

Report: Arab sources also say Shalit to be handed over to Egypt soon

By Haaretz Service

Tags: Egypt, Israel News

The Arabic language newspaper Asharq al-Awsat on Saturday quoted Arab officials as saying that abducted Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit will be moved to Egypt soon as part of a deal with Hamas to secure his release.

The report came two days after European officials claimed a breakthrough in negotiations to secure Shalit's release.

Israel Defense Forces corporal Shalit was kidnapped on June 25, 2006, in a cross-border raid from the Gaza Strip that left two of his comrades dead.

On Thursday, Haaretz quoted European diplomatic officials as saying that Shalit would be transferred to Egypt in the coming days as part of an Egyptian-brokered prisoner exchange deal reached two days earlier.

According to Saturday's report in Asharq al-Awsat, Arab and European officials say Shalit will be transferred soon to Egyptian intelligence in exchange for the release of 400 Palestinian prisoners by Israel, most of whom women and children, as well as some Hamas members of parliament.

Despite the multiple reports about Shalit's imminent release, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh on Saturday denied that progress has been made in negotiations to free the abducted soldier, Army Radio reported.

"What has been reported in the media does not reflect reality," Haniyeh was quoted as saying.

Shalit's transfer to Egypt would be the first stage of an Egyptian-brokered agreement backed by the United States.

The report said that the Palestinians would be released by Israel only after Shalit has been transferred into the hands of the Egyptian officials. Shalit's parents Noam and Aviva would then be allowed to meet their son in Egypt, followed by the release of the remaining Palestinian prisoners being freed by Israel, and the return of Shalit to Israel.

Israel is expected to release a total of 1,100 Palestinian prisoners under the deal, according to the sources.

Israeli security sources refused to comment on the report and said they were not aware of any progress on the matter. Palestinian sources also expressed doubts about the report.

Last update - 12:40 27/06/2009

The day I sang a Yom Kippur melody for Michael Jackson

By Jewishjournal.com

Tags: David Suissa, Israel News

"Sing me your favorite melody, David," Michael Jackson said to me.

I was sitting alone with Michael in one of the many living rooms at his Neverland ranch in the summer of 2000, and we were talking about melodies.

une 25, 2009 | 5:28 pm

The Day I Sang for Michael Jackson

Posted by David Suissa

Photo

“Sing me your favorite melody, David”, Michael Jackson said to me.

I was sitting alone with Michael in one of the many living rooms at his Neverland ranch in the summer of 2000, and we were talking about melodies.

I had come up to see him because we were planning to discuss him writing an article for our “Parents” issue of OLAM magazine. I spent a lot of time that summer hanging out with Rabbi Shmuley Boteach (going with him to the Sydney Olympics, among other things) who everyone knew was close to Michael.

Shmuley, the great schmoozer that he is, told me that Michael “really loved” OLAM magazine, and that he might be interested in writing an original piece for the “Parents” issue.

So off we went to Neverland, with, of course, my two young daughters, Tova and Shanni.

On the way up, I played some old Michael videos (“Thriller”) to give my daughters a little education on someone who a decade earlier had been the most famous person on the planet. When we got to the ranch, we had to sign special papers at the main gate, and agree to take no pictures.

That’s too bad, because I could have taken some great shots at the moment Michael met my daughters. Shanni’s first question for him—before even how are you? or nice to meet you—was: “Is it true that you have rollercoasters?”

One of Michael’s handlers took my daughters to see the rides and the elephants, while the grown-ups sat down to talk. Shimon Peres’s granddaughter, Mika Walden, who would soon be working at my ad agency, came along for support. We talked about OLAM magazine and the special issue on “Parents”, as well as other projects that Rabbi Shmuley was working on with Michael.

The issue for me was, how candid would Michael be if he wrote an OLAM article about his childhood? The last thing I wanted (OK, not the last thing) was a puff piece with just a famous name attached.

Thanks in large part to Shmuley’s help, Michael came through with an honest piece. He fessed up to the lack of love he felt growing up, especially from his hard-driving father. But in the sweet, enchanted tone that he was known for, he also wrote lovingly of the little moments—his father putting him up on a little pony or getting him his favorite glazed donuts—that marked him growing up.

The day the issue broke, we started getting calls from People magazine and TV news shows who wanted to know how we got Michael to write for OLAM. We had our fifteen minutes of fame, but we didn’t divulge anything that was not in the magazine. That was our deal with Michael.

Beyond the article he wrote, what I will remember most is the moment we spent alone in his living room. By then Shmuley had gone to another part of the house for a meeting with Michael’s manager, and there I was, completely alone with the King of Pop.

I decided that I wouldn’t waste this moment with mindless chatter. So I thought of something he might be interested in that I felt passionate about, and I dove right in.

“I have always been madly in love with melodies”, I told him. “The whole idea of a beautiful melody blows me away. How can a certain arrangement of notes have so much power over me?”

“There are certain melodies that I cannot imagine living without”, I continued.

“They’re like a part of me. I surrender to them.”

By now I was kvelling and I couldn’t control myself—but I meant every word. At that moment, Michael, in his sweet, hummingbird voice, looked at me and said, “Sing me your favorite melody, David.”

And I did. It was an ancient Sephardic melody that Moroccan Jews sing only on Yom Kippur. It is my all-time favorite melody. Growing up, I would often cry when I would hear it. It’s the melody that has done the most to keep my emotional connection to my faith and my people. Today, I “cheat” and sing it before doing the Hamotzeh on Shabbat.

He had caught me off-guard. It was the only thing I could thing of singing. In the song, the lyrics describe Abraham’s apparent sacrifice of his son Isaac. At one point, the son asks innocently where his father is taking him, oblivious to the biblical drama that is about to unfold.

I sang for no more than a minute.

I don’t remember what Michael said after I finished. All I remember is that while I was singing, his eyes were closed and he was smiling.

Hollywood Jew

June 26, 2009

MICHAEL JACKSON: Memories of my Childhood

by Michael Jackson

This column originally appeared in OLAM Magazine, a journal of Jewish spirituality. Reprinted here with permission of the editor, David Suissa. To read David Suissa’s reflection on meeting Jackson, click here.

When I look back on my childhood, it is not an idyllic landscape of memories. My relationship with my father was strained, and my childhood was an emotionally difficult time for me. I began performing when I was five years old, and my father - a tough man - pushed my brothers and me hard, from the earliest age, to be the best performers we could be.

Although we all worked hard to perform, he never really complimented me. If I did a great show, he would tell me it was a good show. And if I did an OK show, he didn’t say anything at all. He seemed intent, above all else, on making us a commercial success. And at that he was more than adept. My father was a managerial genius, and my brothers and I owe our professional success, in no small measure, to the forceful way he pushed us. He trained me as a showman, and under his guidance I couldn’t miss a step.

Those of you who are familiar with the Jackson Five know that since I began performing at that tender age I haven’t stopped dancing or singing. But while performing and making music undoubtedly remain among my greatest joys, when I was young I wanted more than anything else to be a typical little boy. I wanted to build tree houses, have water balloon fights and play hide-n-seek with my friends. But fate had it otherwise, and all I could do was envy the laughter and playtime that seemed to be going on all around me.

There was no respite from my professional life. But on Sundays I would go “Pioneering”, the term used for the missionary work that Jehovah’s Witnesses do. It was then that I was able to see the magic of other people’s childhood.

Since I was already a celebrity, I had to don a disguise of fat suit, wig, beard and glasses, and we would spend the day in the suburbs of Southern California, going door-to-door or making the rounds of shopping malls, distributing our Watchtower magazine. I loved to set foot in all those regular suburban houses and catch sight of the shag rugs and La-Z-Boy armchairs, kids playing Monopoly and grandmas babysitting and all those wonderful, ordinary and starry scenes of everyday life. Many, I know, would argue that these things are no big deal. But to me they were mesmerizing - because they symbolized, to me, a home life that I seemed to be missing.

My father was not openly affectionate with us, but he would show his love in different ways. I remember once when I was about four years old, we were at a little carnival and he picked me up and put me on a pony. It was a tiny gesture, probably something he forgot five minutes later. But because of that one moment, I have this special place in my heart for him. Because that’s how kids are, the little things mean so much to them and for me, that one moment meant everything. It was a gesture that showed his caring, and his love. I only experienced it that one time, but it made me feel really good, about him and the world.

And I have other memories too, of other gestures, however imperfect, that showed his love for us. When I was a kid, I had a real sweet tooth - we all did. I loved eating glazed doughnuts, and my father knew that. So every few weeks I would come downstairs in the morning and there on the kitchen counter was a bag of glazed doughnuts - no note, no explanation, just the doughnuts. It was like a fairy godmother had visited our kitchen. It was like Santa Claus. Sometimes, I would think about staying up late so I could see him leave them there, but as with Santa Claus, I didn’t want to ruin the magic, for fear that he would never do it again.

I think now that my father had to leave the doughnuts secretly at night so that no one would catch him with his guard down. He was scared of human emotion, he didn’t understand it, or know how to deal with it. But, he did know doughnuts.

And when I allow the floodgates to open up, there are other memories that come rushing back, memories of other tiny gestures, however imperfect, that showed that he did what he could.

With hindsight and maturity, I have come to see that even my father’s harshness was a kind of love. An imperfect love, sure, but love nonetheless. He pushed me because he loved me. He pushed me because he wanted me to have more than he EVER had, and he wanted my life to be better than his EVER was.

It has taken me a long time to realize this, but now I feel the resentments of my childhood are finally being put to rest. My bitterness has been replaced by blessing, and in place of my anger, I have found absolution. And with this knowledge, that my father loved his children, I have found peace.

Last update - 00:46 01/01/2008

Report: Pop star Michael Jackson converts to Islam

By Haaretz Service

Tags: Israel News, Los Angeles

The American singer Michael Jackson has converted to Islam, the Sun newspaper reported over the weekend.

The 50-year-old pop star, who changed his name to Mikaeel, pledged allegiance to the Koran at a friend's house in Los Angeles. An Imam was summoned from a nearby mosque to hold the shahada, the declaration of belief in Allah and Mohammed's prophecy.

An associate said that Jackson chose his new name, which is the name of one of Allah's angels, after rejecting another Muslim name, Mustafa, which means "the chosen one."

Last week, he sold his multimillion California estate, Neverland Ranch, to cover his debts. He is also facing a lawsuit by a Bahrain prince, Sheikh Abdulla Bin Hamad Bin Isa Al-Khalifa, who alleges he gave Jackson $2.2 million after he was acquitted of child molestation in 2007

Last update - 01:24 25/11/2005

ADL: Michael Jackson has an anti-Semitic streak

By The Associated Press

LOS ANGELES - The Anti-Defamation League yesterday demanded an apology from Michael Jackson after ABC aired what was said to be a telephone answering-machine message in which the pop star referred to Jews as "leeches."

The message was supposedly recorded two years ago and has surfaced in connection with a lawsuit against the pop star.

"Michael Jackson has an anti-Semitic streak and hasn't learned from his past mistakes," ADL director Abraham H. Foxman said in a statement. "It seems every time he has a problem in his life, he blames it on Jews."

Jackson infuriated Jewish groups in 1995 when his song "They Don't Care About Us" included the lyrics "Jew me, sue me, everybody do me, kick me, kike me." Jackson apologized, saying the lyrics were meant to demonstrate the hatefulness of racism, anti-Semitism and stereotyping. He then changed the lyrics.

On Tuesday, ABC's "Good Morning America" aired portions of a 2003 voice message that Jackson was alleged to have left for a former adviser, Dieter Wiesner.

The message was among about a dozen released by attorney Howard King, who represents Wiesner and another former adviser who are locked in business disputes with the pop star and are suing him for millions. King said he released the tapes to keep Jackson from appearing sympathetic in court.

A transcript provided by King's office quotes Jackson as saying: "They suck them like leeches. ... They start out the most popular person in the world, make a lot of money, big house, cars and everything and end up penniless. It's a conspiracy. The Jews do it on purpose."

Jackson spokeswoman Raymone K. Bain said yesterday the singer had no comment. A call to Jackson's attorney Thomas Mesereau was not immediately returned.

Jackson, now living in the Persian Gulf kingdom Bahrain, was acquitted in June of molesting a boy at his Neverland ranch

Last update - 06:28 27/06/2009

Disgraced financier Madoff ordered to forfeit over $170b

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News, Madoff

Disgraced financier Bernard Madoff has been ordered to forfeit over $170 billion for orchestrating perhaps the largest financial swindle in history, prosecutors said Friday.

U.S. District Judge Denny Chin entered a preliminary order of forfeiture Friday, according to Acting U.S. Attorney Lev Dassin. The order forces Madoff to give up his interests in all property, including real estate, investments, cars and boats.

According to earlier court documents, prosecutors reserved the right to pursue more than $170 billion in criminal forfeiture. That represents the total amount of money that could be connected to the fraud, not the amount stolen or lost.

The government also settled claims against Madoff's wife, according to Friday's order. Under the arrangement, the government obtained Ruth Madoff's interest in all property, including more than $80 million of property to which she had claimed was hers, prosecutors said.

The order makes it clear, though, that nothing precludes other departments or entities from seeking to recover additional funds

The agreements strip the Madoffs of all their interest in properties belonging to them, including a homes in Manhattan, Montauk, and Palm Beach, Fla., worth a total of nearly $22 million.

New York prosecutors seek 150-year sentence for Madoff

Meanwhile, federal prosecutors said in court papers Friday that Madoff should receive a 150-year sentence.

"The sheer scale of the fraud calls for severe punishment," the prosecutors wrote in response to a defense motion seeking lighter punishment.

Madoff, 71, is due to be sentenced Monday after pleading guilty in March to charges that his exclusive investment advisory business was actually a massive pyramid scheme.

Federal sentencing guidelines allow for the 150-year term, prosecutors said. Any lesser sentence, they added, should still be long enough to send a forceful message and assure that Madoff will remain in prison for life.

The government's papers quoted from letters to U.S. District Judge Denny Chin written by victims of the scheme who are suffering severe hardships.

"Madoff ruined lives," one letter said. "He deserves no mercy."

At the time of Madoff's arrest, fictitious account statements showed thousands of clients had $65 billion. But investigators say he never traded securities, and instead used money from new investors to pay returns to existing clients.

Prosecutors said Friday that the total losses, which span decades, haven't been calculated. But 1,341 accounts opened since December 1995 alone suffered loses of $13.2 billion, they said.

Madoff attorney Ira Sorkin argued in court papers last week for a 12-year

term. He said his client deserved credit for his voluntary surrender, full

acceptance of responsibility and meaningful cooperation efforts.

"We seek neither mercy nor sympathy," Sorkin wrote. But he urged the judge to set aside the emotion and hysteria attendant to this case as he determines the sentence.

Holocaust assets conference opens in Prague

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News, Holocuast

Holocaust survivors, Jewish groups and experts gathered in Prague on Friday to assess efforts to return property and possessions stolen by the Nazis to their rightful owners or heirs.

The five-day conference, which brings together delegates from 49 countries, is a follow-up to a 1998 meeting in Washington that led to agreements on recovering art looted by the Nazis.

Stuart Eizenstat, head of the U.S. delegation, called it the most ambitious international meeting ever on the recovery of such stolen possessions or compensation for their loss.

One goal is to produce international guidelines on this, but they would not be compulsory for the governments involved.

"There's no political will to have a binding treaty," Eizenstat acknowledged.

But he said the voluntary principles that were approved in Washington are having an impact. "We have hundreds of pieces of art that have been returned," he said.

During the Holocaust, Adolf Hitler and his followers killed 6 million Jews and seized billions of dollars of gold, art and private and communal property across Europe. But while countries such as Austria have stepped up restitution in recent years, critics claim some Central and Eastern European states still have a long way to go.

"Many governments in Central and Eastern Europe have not found a way to implement a process to resolve outstanding real property issues that is both consistent with national law and incorporates basic principles such s nondiscriminatory treatment of non-citizens and a simple, expeditious claims and restitution process," said conference delegate Christian Kennedy, the U.S. Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues.

Kennedy said the U.S. wants the meeting to provide an impetus for an expansion in social welfare benefits to survivors and lay the framework for further real property compensation.

The Czech Republic, host of this week's meeting, and other countries, have come under fire for legal hurdles and a lack of political will that critics claim make property restitution in some cases practically impossible.

For example, attempts by Maria Altmann of California to reclaim a castle north of Prague that once belonged to her uncle, Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer, proved futile since she is not a Czech citizen.

"As far as I know, there is no legal method for obtaining any recovery there at this time," Altmann's lawyer, Randol Schoenberg, said in an e-mail. Altmann had waged - and won - a seven-year legal battle in neighboring Austria for the return of five paintings by Gustav Klimt.

Efforts by the daughter of wealthy Jewish banker Jiri Popper to recover a building he once owned in Prague also have stalled.

Czechoslovak President Edvard Benes gave the building, which currently houses the Russian Embassy, to the Soviet Union in 1945. Last year, Popper's daughter filed lawsuits against both the Czech Republic and Russia demanding restitution, but no trial date has been set because Czech authorities said they have failed so far to formally inform Moscow about it, said Irena Benesova, the family's lawyer.

While the Justice Ministry declined to comment on the matter, Russian Embassy spokesman Alexandr Pismenny said Moscow was the honest owner.

Both Schoenberg and Benesova wanted to make their case at the conference but were turned away by organizers who said they did not want discussion of individual cases. The Holocaust Survivors' Foundation claims that others also have not been allowed to have their say in setting the agenda for the conference.

In a letter to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dated June 19, the group expressed concern about the lack of survivor involvement on the planning, priority setting and policy making roles in the conference.

Still, the Czech Republic does appear to be taking some steps in the right direction.

A government fund created nine years ago with 300 million koruna ($15.9 million) has paid out 100 million koruna ($5.3 million) to 516 out of 1,256 requests from 27 countries. The requests came from people whose restitution claims did not meet the criteria set by law.

The country also has set up the Documentation Center of Property Transfers of Cultural Assets of WWII Victims, an institution that identifies artwork and other items in Czech collections and museums that were seized from Jews during the Nazi occupation.

According to Director Helena Krejcova, some 7,000 paintings and other works of art that originally belonged to Czech Jews have been found, and another more than 1,000 stolen pieces are believed to be abroad.

"There's still a lot of work ahead of us," Krejcova said, adding that sometimes efforts to restitute items are stymied by a lack of cooperation from other states and a change to that is nowhere in sight.

Case in point: Czech authorities have been waiting five years for a reply from Russia after Krejcova's team traced a valuable collection of 500 porcelain pieces once owned by Holocaust victim Hans Meyer to St. Petersburg.

Last update - 09:14 23/06/2009

Jewish heirs race to find Nazi-looted art before time runs out

By Reuters

Tags: Holocaust, Nazi-looted art

Eighty-one-year old Thomas Selldorff, who fled Austria with his family before it was annexed by Nazi Germany in 1938, hopes an upcoming international conference will bolster efforts to return Nazi-looted art.

The Nazis seized over 200 artworks owned by his grandfather, an avid art collector, as part of a policy of seizing Jewish property. So far, Selldorff has been able to retrieve only two of the lost paintings.

"I want to be able to pass these things on to my family ... I want them to have the link and an appreciation for some of the things my grandfather was involved with," said Selldorff, who lives in the United States and wants to exhibit the altar pieces by Austrian baroque artist Kremser Schmidt in a museum.

Some 65 years after World War Two, experts say thousands of artworks confiscated by the Nazis, including masterpieces by art nouveau master Gustav Klimt and expressionist Egon Schiele, still need to be restituted to their rightful owners.

Government officials from around 49 countries, dozens of non-governmental groups and Jewish representatives will meet in Prague this week to review current practices. They are likely to sign a new agreement to step up restitution efforts.

Some participants hope the conference will lead to the creation of a central body responsible for publishing updates on countries' progress, which could prompt them to do more.

The task of restituting Nazi-looted works is an epic one. The Nazis formed a bureaucracy devoted to looting and they plundered a total of 650,000 art and religious objects from Jews and other victims, the Jewish Claims Conference estimates.

Artworks were auctioned off, handed over to national museums or top Nazi officials, or stashed away for a Fuehrer museum Adolf Hitler was planning to build in the Austrian town of Linz, where he spent a part of his youth.

"This is one way that Jews were made to pay for their own elimination," said art restitution expert Sophie Lillie.

At the end of World War Two, some works were returned but many continued to circulate on the international art market or stayed put in museums, and it was only in the 1990s that there was a new burst of Holocaust restitution.

PATCHY RECORD

Austria is considered among the leaders of art restitution efforts, putting its larger neighbor Germany to shame. The Alpine Republic in 1998 passed a law governing art restitution and has since returned over 10,000 artworks.

"There are a handful of countries that have achieved a lot," said Anne Webber, co-chair of the Commission for Looted Art in Europe, citing Austria, Holland and Britain.

Austria's Belvedere Gallery has had to restitute 10 paintings by Gustav Klimt, including two portraits of Adele Bloch-Bauer, which are among the artist's most famous works.

"Most countries have not even undertaken the work which was endorsed in Washington in 1998," said Webber, referring to the non-binding Washington Principles agreed by 44 countries in 1998 as the framework for returning looted art.

Under the Washington Principles, countries agreed to identify stolen art, open up archives, publicize suspicious cases and "achieve a just and fair solution" for the Nazi-persecuted pre-war owners or their heirs.

Lawyers and experts say many countries have not enforced the principles and hope they will agree at the Prague conference on a transparent way to report on progress.

One of the main obstacles to art restitution is the difficulty in tracing the provenance and proving the ownership.

Gunnar Schnabel, a German lawyer and author of 'Nazi Looted Art' said museums often "hold back any information they might have" about the murky war-time past of some of their works.

The unique nature of the Nazi regime also makes it difficult to legally define which art was looted or not.

"The Nazis were very inventive, and thought up lots of ways to expropriate someone of their belongings," said Christoph Bazil, head of the Austria's art restitution committee.

For example, Jews sometimes were coerced to sell their art to Nazis and their sympathizers, or they had to sell paintings to fund day-to-day living because they were forced out of work or because they had to pay discriminatory taxes.

Some people argue that in cases where the original owners of the artworks received money for them, it was a legally valid transaction, while others say the discriminatory Nazi policies imposed on Jews mitigates that validity.

Even when claimants are successful at proving their ownership of an artwork, they have often been unable to retrieve the work of art due to rigid export bans on cultural patrimony.

A Jewish American heiress won a court battle with Hungary in 2000 for the return of art looted by Nazis, including works by Cranach, Van Dyck and El Greco. But the outcome was a Pyrrhic victory, as the works were not allowed to leave the country.

BACKLASH

As art restitution speeds up and returned works of art fetch record sums at auctions and private sales, there is a beginning of a backlash against the claimants who some say are tracking down their inheritance to sell for profit.

One of the five Klimt artworks returned to the Bloch-Bauer family a few years ago was sold for $135 million, believed to be the highest price ever paid for a painting.

Yet art restitution experts say most looted artworks are worth more sentimentally than financially and they are in some cases the only remaining possessions of murdered relatives.

"The few examples of restituted paintings then sold at auction are of course the ones that everyone talk about, but there are many that stay in the families," said Monika Tatzkow, 54, historian and provenance researcher.

Some say it is time to close the chapter on looted art.

Norman Rosenthal, a former curator at London's Royal Academy of Arts whose own family fled Nazism, has suggested that the issue of Nazi-looted art must now be confined to history, just as with other cases of looted art, during the Bolshevik Revolution for example, or the Napoleonic Wars.

Supporters of art restitution, however, say Nazi-looted art is unique because it was part of the process of genocide, starting with the elimination of peoples' professional existence and their possessions, and ending with their murder.

Expert Lillie argues museums that benefited from Jewish expropriation and then dragged their feet on art restitution for decades have a moral responsibility to address the issue.

"This is their last chance to try to atone for past wrongs.

Claim: Israeli rep at reparations summit will leave survivors 'voiceless'

By Cnaan Liphshiz, Haarez Correspondent

Tags: Claims Conference

Prominent figures involved with restitution warn that heirs of Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust will be "without representation" next month in Prague, at what could be the last international conference on Holocaust era assets.

These people, including former Knesset member Michael Kleiner, complain that the nomination of Reuven Merhav from the Claims Conference to represent Israel at the Prague meeting constitutes a "conflict of interest" and will mean heirs will remain "voiceless."

"As a representative of the Claims Conference, there has to be a conflict of interest in Merhav's nomination to represent Israel in Prague," said Martin Stern, who initiated the compensation process for holocaust era insurances in 1996. A representative of holocaust survivors from Holland, Eldad Kisch, voiced similar concerns.

Merhav told Haaretz his nomination is strictly professional and that he is committed to helping heirs reclaim property.

Kleiner - founder of the Generali Fund for restitution - bases his concerns on the fact that Merhav, a former senior official at the Foreign Ministry and Mossad, is also Chairman of the Executive Committee for the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany.

The Claims Conference is an organization representing world Jewry in compensation talks with Germany, and the world's richest restitution body. "This organization is withholding inheritance money from heirs of people who had been murdered in the Holocaust, spending money on other Jewish causes instead," Kleiner told Haaretz.

"Because the state will be represented by a man who belongs to the Claims Conference, heirs will be made voiceless at what could be their last chance to demand restitution," said Kleiner, a long-time critic of the Claims Conference who chaired a Knesset committee on insurance.

Merhav rejects this assertion. "What belongs to heirs needs to go to heirs. The remaining money needs to go to people in need and to Jewish causes," he said. Merhav also said he is working to increase the representation at the conference of the International Organization for the Return of Jewish Property (ILAR).

Uriel Palti, the ministry's coordinator for the Prague Holocaust Era Assets Conference said the ministry's legal department has concluded Merhav's nomination does not constitute a conflict of interests. Merhav's position with the Claims Conference is voluntary and he does not receive a salary. His role in Prague is also voluntary.

The Prague Conference will include some 50 countries and will take place on June 26, and will assess the progress made since the 1998 Washington Conference on Holocaust Era Assets in recovering looted art and objects of cultural, historical and religious value.

Last month, the Movement for Quality Government in Israel complained to the Foreign Ministry that Merhav's nomination constituted a conflict of interests and demanded Merhav ? who was appointed by former foreign minister Tzipi Livni - be replaced.

"The Claims Conference has been rebuked for its handling of money intended for Holocaust survivors and it seems that its positions on restitution of Jewish property do not necessarily match Israel's approach," said the letter of complaint, noting that the Claims Conference is currently being reviewed by a parliamentary committee of inquiry.

Colette Avital, a former ambassador and Knesset member who headed a committee of inquiry on restitution, said Merhav's appointment "is not necessarily a case of conflict of interest." She added, however, that "it could be problematic," depending on what Merhav says in Prague.

"If he says all property needs to be returned to the claims conference and not to heirs, then there's a conflict of interest," said Avital

Last update - 05:43 14/06/2009

Israel to replace representative at Holocaust claims summit

By Cnaan Liphshiz, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Jewish World, Israel News

Following complaints about conflicts of interest, the Foreign Ministry is considering sending a minister to represent Israel at the Prague conference on Holocaust assets, instead of a Claims Conference representative.

Reuven Merhav had been expected to serve as Israel's top delegate to the forum.

The June 26 Prague event will bring together delegates from 50 countries to assess progress in recovering looted property. This is a follow-up to a 1998 Washington summit.

Currently, East European countries like Poland and Ukraine are refusing to divulge compensation statistics for heirless Jewish property, which is estimated to be worth tens of billions of dollars.

"Israel's position in Prague is unlike that of other countries," Deputy Foreign Ministry Danny Ayalon told the Knesset plenum on Wednesday. "I certainly am considering the option of appointing a minister to represent Israel."

Merhav himself proposed that a minister lead Israel's 12-man team, Ayalon said.

Ayalon was replying to a query by MK Zevulun Orlev, who said that while Merhav was "a worthy man beyond reproach," his nomination was "a conflict of interest."

Merhav currently holds a senior, non-salaried position with the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, the world's richest restitution body, which represents world Jewry in compensation talks with Germany.

The Claims Conference is currently under review by a parliamentary committee of inquiry, over accusations that it has withheld funds from survivors and heirs.

Politicians, prominent restitution figures and the Movement for Quality of Government complained that Merhav's nomination could render heirs of Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust "voiceless" at what may be the last international conference on restitution, citing the Claims Conference's "problematic record" in transferring funds to heirs.

The Claims Conference denies withholding funds from eligible heirs.

Ayalon noted that Merhav - a former Mossad and Foreign Ministry official - was responsible for putting the issue of heirless property in Europe on the agenda of the Prague Conference.

"The interests of the State of Israel and the Claims Conference are not identical," Orlev said. "For example, the Claims Conference may be concerned with commemoration, while Israel is focused on welfare," he told Haaretz.

Ayalon said that the Ministry's legal department has found there was no conflict of interest in Merhav's nomination.

"In my heart, I too have grievances with the Claims Conference," Ayalon said. He also noted that "working together is a major interest for the Claims Conference and Israel," and that the Prague Conference "could turn over a new leaf in Israel's relationship" with the Claims Conference.

Share |

Last update - 00:16 27/06/2009

Israel envoy blasts UN report on Palestinians as 'biased'

By Shlomo Shamir, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Ban Ki-moon, Israel News

The Israeli ambassador to the United Nations on Thursday blasted a report on Israel's conduct vis-a-vis the Palestinians, put together by the UN Humanitarian Affairs chief John Holmes.

In a strident letter addressed to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Gabriela Shalev accused the UN of political bias, ahead of a special Security Council session devoted to "the protection of civilians in armed conflicts."

"I sincerely hope that future reports in the name of the secretary general will avoid politically-charged semantics, accusations and omissions," she wrote.

Holmes' report is likely to be discussed in great detail during the Security Council session. The report implicitly accused Israel of human rights violations, and blasted the impact of Israel's policy on the Palestinian civilian population.

"I write to express my deep concern regarding the report on the protection of civilians in armed conflicts," Shalev also wrote. "The portion of the report regarding the situation in southern Israel and the Gaza Strip is deeply disturbing. They not only embrace flawed terminology but reflect a distorted reality that wholly fails to address the situation on the ground in an accurate manner."

"The report completely ignores the context in which Israel's defensive actions were taken, while it made no mention of Israel's extraordinary efforts to avoid civilian casualties. Equally alarming is the failure to mention the thousands of missile fired by Hamas terrorists in the Gaza Strip into Israel," Shalev concluded.

Last update - 14:36 26/06/2009

Holocaust assets conference gets underway in Prague

By The Associated Press

Tags:

Holocaust survivors, Jewish groups and experts gathered in Prague Friday to assess efforts to return property and possessions stolen by the Nazis to their rightful owners or heirs.

The five-day conference, which brings together delegates from 49 countries, is the first follow-up to a 1998 meeting in Washington that led to agreements on recovering art looted by the Nazis.

During the Holocaust, Adolf Hitler and his followers killed millions and seized billions of dollars of gold, art and private and communal property across Europe.

But while countries such as Austria have stepped up restitution in recent years, critics claim some Central and Eastern European states still have a long way to go.

"Many governments in Central and Eastern Europe have not found a way to implement a process to resolve outstanding real property issues that is both consistent with national law and incorporates basic principles such as nondiscriminatory treatment of non-citizens and a simple, expeditious claims and restitution process," said conference delegate Christian Kennedy, the U.S. Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues.

Kennedy said the U.S. wants the meeting to provide an impetus for an expansion in social welfare benefits to survivors and lay the framework for further real property compensation.

The Czech Republic, host of this week's meeting, and other countries, have come under fire for legal hurdles and a lack of political will that critics claim make property restitution in some cases practically impossible.

For example, attempts by Maria Altmann of California to reclaim a castle north of Prague that once belonged to her uncle, Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer, proved futile since she is not a Czech citizen.

"As far as I know, there is no legal method for obtaining any recovery there at this time," Altmann's lawyer, Randol Schoenberg, said in an e-mail.

Altmann had waged - and won - a seven-year legal battle in neighboring Austria for the return of five paintings by Gustav Klimt.

Efforts by the daughter of wealthy Jewish banker Jiri Popper to recover a building he once owned in Prague have also stalled.

"Czechoslovak President Edvard Benes gave the building, which currently houses the Russian Embassy, to the Soviet Union in 1945. Last year, Popper's daughter filed lawsuits against both the Czech Republic and Russia demanding restitution but no trial date has been set because Czech authorities said they have failed so far to formally inform Moscow about it," said Irena Benesova, the family's lawyer.

While the Justice Ministry declined to comment on the matter, Russian Embassy spokesman Alexandr Pismenny said Moscow was the honest owner.

Both Schoenberg and Benesova wanted to make their case at the conference but were turned away by organizers who said they did not want discussion of individual cases. The Holocaust Survivors' Foundation claims that others have also not been allowed to have their say in setting the agenda for the conference.

In a letter to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dated June 19, the group expressed concern about the lack of survivor involvement on the planning, priority setting and policy making roles in the conference.

Still, the Czech Republic does appear to be taking some steps in the right direction.

A government fund created nine years ago with 300 million koruna (U.S. $15.9 million) has paid out 100 million koruna (U.S. $5.3 million) to 516 out of 1,256 requests from 27 countries. The requests came from people whose restitution claims did not meet the criteria set by law.

The country has also set up the Documentation Center of Property Transfers of Cultural Assets of WWII Victims, an institution that is tasked with determining artwork and other items in Czech collections and museums seized from Jews during the Nazi occupation.

According to director Helena Krejcova, some 7,000 paintings and other works of art that originally belonged to Czech Jews have been found and another more than 1,000 stolen pieces are believed to be abroad.

"There's still a lot of work ahead of us," Krejcova said, adding that sometimes efforts to restitute items are stymied by a lack of cooperation from other states and a change to that is nowhere in sight.

Case in point: Czech authorities have been waiting five years for a reply from Russia after Krejcova's team traced a valuable collection of 500 porcelain pieces once owned by Holocaust victim Hans Meyer to St. Petersburg.

Last update - 12:06 27/06/2009

Blair: Peace within reach if Israel compromises

By Haaretz Service and Reuters

Tags: Iran, G8, Italy, Israel News

Former British prime minister Tony Blair said Friday that a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict could be within reach if Israel compromises on issues such as halting settlement expansion.

"There is a virtual consensus across the international community not just as to what needs to happen, but how...which was not the case a couple of years ago," Blair, who represents the Quartet of Middle East mediators, told Reuters.

"If Israel were to join that, we could get an agreement and an agreement in my view that protects completely the state of Israel."

Blair added that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's election could prove a blessing, since his right-leaning government could have the domestic support to make concessions.

"I hope and believe Prime Minister Netanyahu is sincere about wanting a Palestine state and wanting to help create one. If he is, he could be in a strong position to deliver it," Blair said.

Netanyahu's assumption of power in March sparked concerns that the Middle East peace process would stall in light of his reluctance to back Palestinian statehood.

But world leaders have recently voiced optimism over the chances of peace following a speech the premier delivered two weeks ago, in which he declared support for a demilitarized Palestinian state.

A statement issued Friday by the Quartet, which includes the United Nations, the United States, Russia and the European Union, called for Israel to halt all settlement activities and for Palestinians to combat violent extremism.

The group met on the sidelines of a G8 foreign ministers' meeting in northern Italy.

Direct talks between Israel and the Palestinians could resume soon, Blair said, but the process was at a delicate stage as foreign powers stepped up calls on Jerusalem to ensure a Palestinian state would not be undermined by settlements.

Netanyahu, who heads a right-leaning coalition that could be fractured if he agreed to a settlement halt, has reiterated his intention to continue building within existing settlements in the West Bank to accommodate the "natural growth" of families.

Blair added: "The advent of the Obama administration has given a new sense of energy and commitment and to a certain extent hope... However, the challenges are still there."

G8 urges Israel to halt settlement building

Earlier Friday, the world's richest nations earlier called on Israel to halt construction in West Bank settlements, including that which Jerusalem seeks to pursue to accommodate natural growth.

U.S. envoy George Mitchell told a news conference after the Quartet meeting in Italy that the United States hoped Israelis and Palestinians would soon begin "meaningful and productive" peace negotiations.

"We believe we are making progress in these efforts and we hope very much to conclude this phase of the discussions and to be able to move into meaningful and productive negotiations in the near future," he said.

"We are now trying very hard to seize the very favorably created political atmosphere, of Obama's election to push the peace process forward," UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the conference.

The Group of Eight powers also deplored violence in Iran after its disputed election on Friday and urged Tehran to settle the crisis soon through democratic dialogue, according to the final draft statement seen

by Reuters.

"We deplore post-electoral violence which led to the loss of lives of Iranian civilians and urge Iran to respect fundamental human rights including freedom of expression...," G8 foreign ministers said in the statement.

The G8 called on all parties to "re-enter direct negotiations on all standing issues consistent with the roadmap" and it called for a freeze in settlement construction in the West Bank.

"We also call on both parties to fulfill their obligations under the road map, including a freeze in settlement activity (as well as their 'natural growth') and an unequivocal end to violence and terrorism," the statement read.

"We call on all parties to re-enter direct negotiations on all standing issues consistent with the road map, the relevant UNSC resolutions and the Madrid principles."

Netanyahu's European 'grand tour' offers respite from settlement woes

By Barak Ravid

Tags: berlusconi, netanyahu

PARIS - Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, who met this week in Italy, have both come in for media criticism recently. In Berlusconi's case it was over his personal conduct at parties with young women. For Netanyahu's case, it was over Israel's settlement policy.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Netayahu, who also met this week, also have a few things in common. They share a rightward-leaning political spectrum, both were finance ministers, and both tried to "break" a rival party. At their meeting at the Elysee Palace, Sarkozy told of the "defection" of seven members of the French socialist party and their inclusion in the cabinet. The most senior of these, Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, who was present at the meeting, smiled in embarrassment. Sarkozy has bolstered his command of the French cabinet, but Netanyahu is still trying to pave the way for MK Shaul Mofaz (Kadima) to rejoin Likud.

One of the surprise guests at Sarkozy's meeting with Netanyahu was MK Daniel Ben Simon (Labor). The fact of his co-optation was proven later, at a press briefing, when the Labor whip found it difficult to curb his enthusiasm over the strong friendship between Sarkozy and Netanyahu.

A key figure in all of Netanyahu's trips to Paris in recent years has been Meir Haviv, whose official title is vice president of the CRIF, the umbrella organization of the French Jewish community. He is Netanyahu's unofficial representative in France. When Netanyahu traveled to France as head of the opposition it was Haviv who arranged everything, from lugging suitcases to scheduling meetings with Sarkozy.

On election day in Israel Haviv was at Netanyahu's side, and during the coalition talks it was Haviv who stitched together the compromise that resulted in Silvan Shalom being appointed vice premier and minister of regional development. And when Netanyahu arrived in Paris, Haviv was at his side. Foreign Ministry officials in Jerusalem joked that it would save money to have Haviv appointed ambassador from both countries.

The physical toll of his first months as prime minister were clearly noticeable in the course of Netanyahu's European tour. At the news conference with Berlusconi both mean appeared tired, each for his own reasons. A few hours before taking off for Rome on Monday Netanyahu was still dealing with efforts to defuse the tussle between Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz and Bank of Israel Governor Stanley Fischer over who is responsible for supervising the wages of senior officials at the central bank. Time management is a critical issue for Netanyahu.

Netanyahu went to Europe with two goals in mind: To put his failed trip to Washington behind him through warm hugs from two of his closest friends in Europe, and to market the message of his Bar-Ilan speech to the European political leadership and to European public opinion.

Relatively speaking, he was successful. Berlusconi and Sarkozy accepted the principle of a Jewish state and did not fall off their chairs over the demand that a future Palestinian state be demilitarized. The French call Netanyahu "the American Bibi" and they were actually surprised that he would end up at loggerheads with President Barack Obama.

Netanyahu is frustrated by the crisis with the United States over the settlements. He must have been encouraged, however, by a new article by former U.S. deputy national security advisor Elliott Abrams under George W. Bush in which Abrams again wrote of understandings that Sharon and Olmert came to with Bush on construction within the existing West Bank settlement blocs. Netanyahu still hopes that the Americans will reembrace these understandings, but knows the chances for that are small. Possible solutions are being suggested to him daily, from a temporary freeze to permitting high-rise construction. At the moment, however, no solution appears on the horizon.

DF agrees to expanded activity by PA forces in W. Bank towns

By Avi Isssacharoff and Anshel Pfeffer

Tags: Israel news, west bank, hamas

Israel agreed on Wednesday to expanded activity by Palestinian Authority security forces in four West Bank towns, for a trial period of one week followed by an assessment.

The move follows increased action by Palestinian security forces against Hamas and Islamic Jihad infrastructure in all West Bank towns, including arrests and the shutting down of Hamas-affiliated charitable organizations.

Brig. Gen. Noam Tibon, commander of the Judea and Samaria Brigade and Brig. Gen. Yoav Mordechai, head of the Civil Administration,told representatives of the Palestinian security forces on Wednesday that they would be allowed to operate freely within the city limits of Bethlehem, Ramallah, Jericho and Qalqilyah from midnight to 5 A.M. Israel had previously allowed the Palestinian forces to operate only in Jenin during the night.

Israel is also expected to consider lifting more roadblocks in the West Bank, following the removal of central roadblocks earlier this week that resulted in greatly increased ease of movement by Palestinians in the West Bank.

Some of the new forces to be deployed in the Palestinian localities have been trained in Jordan under American supervision (headed by American security coordinator Gen. Keith Dayton). Three battalions of the national security force and one battalion of the presidential guard are to be deployed, a total of approximately 2,100 Palestinian soldiers.

The U.S. Congress recently approved additional funding for the training in Jordan of three more battalions of the Palestinian national security force, and by the end of the year the Palestinian Authority will have a total of seven battalions at its disposal whose training was supervised by the Americans.

Cooperation has greatly improved over the past year between the Israel Defense Forces, the Shin Bet security service and the Palestinian forces regarding exchanges of intelligence on Hamas and thwarting the formation of terror cells. The IDF has also informed the Palestinians before forces entered Jenin to make arrests.

Meanwhile, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs announced Thursday that Israel had taken a number of steps over the past month to ease movement of Palestinians to and from the West Bank cities of Jericho, Ramallah, Nablus and Qalqilyah.

DF agrees to expanded activity by PA forces in W. Bank towns

By Avi Isssacharoff and Anshel Pfeffer

Tags: Israel news, west bank, hamas

Israel agreed on Wednesday to expanded activity by Palestinian Authority security forces in four West Bank towns, for a trial period of one week followed by an assessment.

The move follows increased action by Palestinian security forces against Hamas and Islamic Jihad infrastructure in all West Bank towns, including arrests and the shutting down of Hamas-affiliated charitable organizations.

Brig. Gen. Noam Tibon, commander of the Judea and Samaria Brigade and Brig. Gen. Yoav Mordechai, head of the Civil Administration,told representatives of the Palestinian security forces on Wednesday that they would be allowed to operate freely within the city limits of Bethlehem, Ramallah, Jericho and Qalqilyah from midnight to 5 A.M. Israel had previously allowed the Palestinian forces to operate only in Jenin during the night.

Israel is also expected to consider lifting more roadblocks in the West Bank, following the removal of central roadblocks earlier this week that resulted in greatly increased ease of movement by Palestinians in the West Bank.

Some of the new forces to be deployed in the Palestinian localities have been trained in Jordan under American supervision (headed by American security coordinator Gen. Keith Dayton). Three battalions of the national security force and one battalion of the presidential guard are to be deployed, a total of approximately 2,100 Palestinian soldiers.

The U.S. Congress recently approved additional funding for the training in Jordan of three more battalions of the Palestinian national security force, and by the end of the year the Palestinian Authority will have a total of seven battalions at its disposal whose training was supervised by the Americans.

Cooperation has greatly improved over the past year between the Israel Defense Forces, the Shin Bet security service and the Palestinian forces regarding exchanges of intelligence on Hamas and thwarting the formation of terror cells. The IDF has also informed the Palestinians before forces entered Jenin to make arrests.

Meanwhile, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs announced Thursday that Israel had taken a number of steps over the past month to ease movement of Palestinians to and from the West Bank cities of Jericho, Ramallah, Nablus and Qalqilyah.

Share |

Last update - 04:31 26/06/2009

U.S. praises Israel for easing West Bank restrictions

By Natasha Mozgavaya, Haaretz U.S. Correspondent, and Reuters

Tags: Israel News, U.S.

In an apparent effort to ease tensions that have been aired publicly through the press, the U.S. State Department on Thursday praised Israel's lifting of restrictions on Palestinian movement in the West Bank.

State Department spokesperson Ian Kelly said the U.S. was appreciative of Israel's "positive steps" in easing Palestinian freedom of movement in the territories.

Relations between Israel and the United States have been strained in recent weeks over Washington's demand that the Netanyahu government declare a total freeze on all settlement construction in the West Bank.

A Paris meeting between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Barack Obama's envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, was canceled earlier this week after it became clear that the two sides would not be able to bridge the gaps on the settlement issue.

Netanyahu announced earlier this week that he would dispatch his defense minister, Ehud Barak, to Washington in an effort to reach a compromise with American officials on the settlements issue.

Israel plans to limit military operations in four Palestinian cities to try to boost a Palestinian security campaign supported by Washington, Israeli and Western security sources said on Thursday.

The move coincided with attempts by Netanyahu to persuade Obama to soften his demand for a total freeze in settlement building in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

Israeli and Western sources said the Israel Defense Forces would refrain from entering Bethlehem, Ramallah, Jericho and Qalqilya, except in cases where the army believed Palestinian militants were poised to attack Israelis. The move stops short of a full withdrawal from these towns.

The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) announced yesterday that the Israeli authorities had somewhat eased travel restrictions for Palestinians to and from four cities in the West Bank: Jericho, Ramallah, Nablus and Qalqilyah.

However OCHA also said that the Israel Defense Forces claim that there are only 16 manned roadblocks in the West Bank is incorrect. According to OCHA there are 69 manned roadblocks.

Last update - 17:06 17/06/2009

Demilitarized Palestine? Just sign this non-aggression pact first

By Aliyana Traison

Tags: Bibi speech, palestinian

It will go down in history, along with the Oslo Accord and the Camp David treaty, another historic speech of vague validations and vows to break. Cowering to U.S. pressure, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said just about nothing in his much awaited foreign policy speech at Bar Ilan University on Sunday evening, when he called for immediate peace talks without preconditions and a Palestinian state stripped of military capabilities.

No preconditions from the Palestinians, Netanyahu meant to say. Israel, on the other hand, is free to scold its neighbor for starting this conflict and delaying a viable final settlement by refusing to recognize it as a Jewish state. No preconditions, but the Palestinian Authority must first topple Hamas or at least cut off all contact. No preconditions, except these conditions.

It is impossible to hold peace negotiations without preconditions. Such diplomacy is subversive procrastination. Both sides of this conflict have demands, but rather than open up negotiations with these conditions in mind, they deny their respective red lines and allow the peace process to roll in infinite still motion.

Israel and the Palestinian Authority both have preconditions; they need to lay them down and abide by them to get the peace process started again.

The Palestinian Authority must concede to recognize Israel as a Jewish state, and in return, Israel needs a concrete plan of withdrawal from parts of the West Bank. It wouldn't hurt to include the Golan Heights on a side draft either, to keep that track busy.

Israel should leave Fatah to engage with Hamas in reconciliation talks, but the Palestinian Authority must agree to hold off elections for a unity government until a final settlement is reached on the West Bank. These negotiations need to be worked out between Israel and a Palestinian Authority free from Hamas influence.

The Old City of Jerusalem (and then later with Syria, parts of the Golan Heights) must be divided appropriately, with free access to the citizens of both countries involved. West Jerusalem and the Jewish Quarter would remain under Israeli control, as its capital, and East Jerusalem and the Muslim Quarter would be Palestinian, as their capital. The rest would be annexed to international supervision, with United Nations troops standing guard.

Following these steps comes the creation of a Palestinian state. Netanyahu declared that he would endorse such an entity if the international community could guarantee its demilitarization. There are a handful of countries out there without an offensive army, Japan and Costa Rica, for instance; Palestine would not be the first.

Should a demilitarized Palestine be established, then Israel would have to compromise for denying a sovereign democracy the right of defense. Israel and Palestine must therefore sign and adhere to a pact of non-aggression as a concession for a demilitarized state.

The Palestinian Authority has thrown the ball into Barack Obama's court, lambasting Netanyahu for sabotaging the peace process. Well, the game has not even started yet because neither team is ready to play. Both Israel and the Palestinians need to get out there, spell the rules of the game, and let the referee blow the whistle.

Last update - 21:14 25/06/2009

FIFA asks Iran for response on punishment of soccer players who protested

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News, Iran, FIFA

Soccer's world governing body FIFA has asked Iran's soccer federation to respond to media reports that players who wore green wrist bands in a show of solidarity with the political opposition have been punished.

FIFA has written to the Iranian federation asking for information, and seeking clarification, regarding current media reports related to Iranian national team players, FIFA said in a statement Thursday.

Several team members wore the wrist bands in an apparent show of support for the defeated presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi's opposition movement during the first half of a World Cup qualifying match against South Korea in Seoul on June 17.

According to Iran's semi-official ISNA news agency, two players, Mehdi Mahdavikia and Ali Karimi, have since resigned from the team for personal reasons.

But Britain's Guardian newspaper and others have reported that as many as four players were permanently banned from the team by government authorities.

The reports could not be immediately verified.

Last update - 21:14 25/06/2009

Ex-U.S. official: Bush agreed to Israel settlement construction

By Haaretz Service

Tags: Israel News, Elliott Abrams

A key Bush administration official is disputing the Obama administration's contention that there were no understandings between President George W. Bush and then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on the issue of continued West Bank settlement construction.

In an op-ed piece which appeared in Thursday's editions of The Wall Street Journal, Elliott Abrams, who served under Bush in the National Security Council and who held a series of discussions with the Israeli leadership, said that Bush and Sharon did strike a deal which constituted U.S. acquiescence to continued construction in Israeli settlement blocs that Jerusalem intended to keep under any final status accord.

Abrams said the Bush administration agreed to Israel's request to allow for natural growth construction in exchange for Sharon's explicit support for Palestinian statehood as well as his pledge not to establish new settlements or to expropriate additional land in the West Bank toward that end.

"On settlements we also agreed on principles that would permit some continuing growth," Abrams wrote in The Wall Street Journal. "Mr. Sharon stated these clearly in a major policy speech in December 2003."

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dismissed reports that the Bush administration had an understanding under which Israel could keep expanding settlements on the West Bank.

Dov Weisglass, Sharon's former chief of staff, wrote in an op-ed piece published earlier this month in the Yedioth Ahronoth daily that the Bush administration had secretly agreed to expanding Jewish settlements on the West Bank within their existing boundaries.

Speaking to reporters in Washington, Clinton sought to undercut Weisglass' argument, saying there was no acknowledgment of any such agreement in the official negotiating record between Israel and the Bush administration.

"For reasons that remain unclear, the Obama administration has decided to abandon the understandings about settlements reached by the previous administration with the Israeli government," Abrams wrote.

"It is true that there was no U.S.-Israel 'memorandum of understanding,' which is presumably what Mrs. Clinton means when she suggests that the 'official record of the administration' contains none," Abrams wrote. "But she would do well to consult documents like the Weissglas letter, or the notes of the Aqaba meeting [in which Sharon expressed support for Palestinian statehood], before suggesting that there was no meeting of the minds.

Last update - 20:53 25/06/2009

Lieberman slams U.S. on Iran, settlements

By Haaretz Service

Tags: settlements, Israel News

The West's failure to forcefully back the reformist protesters in Iran and its willingness to hold a dialogue with the Islamic regime sends a "bad message," Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman told TIME magazine.

In a not-so-veiled reference to the Obama administration's willingness to hold negotiations with Tehran over its nuclear ambitions, the Israeli foreign minister said the recent election upheaval was a missed opportunity for the West.

"This really fanatic extremist regime is still in power, and the young people who are ready to fight and die for change are not getting any real support from the West," Lieberman told TIME. "The fact that this regime continues to be an acceptable partner for dialogue is really a bad message. It shows the bad guys are winners."

Lieberman said the Obama administration is wrong to press its demand that Israel cease all settlement construction in the West Bank and that it was unrealistic for Washington to expect the government to "suffocate our own people."

"We are trying to formulate some understanding with the U.S.," Lieberman told TIME. "We don't speak [with the Americans] of building new settlements. We don't speak of expansion. We try to build only within existing construction lines."

"We cannot suffocate our own people. You know, babies are born. People get married. We cannot stop life. People want to build a synagogue or a kindergarten."

The hawkish foreign minister added that he did not accept the linkage made by many in the West between confronting Islamic radicalism and solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"With 9/11 and terrorist acts in London, Madrid, Bali, in Russia, I can't see any linkage with the Israeli-Palestinian problem," Lieberman told TIME, adding that the conflict in the region was a "clash of values between civilizations."

Lieberman repeated his willingness to meet with Arab leaders to discuss establishing peaceful relations with Israel. In the interview with TIME, the Yisrael Beiteinu sounded a more moderate tone in discussing the future of Israeli Arabs.

Lieberman, who has called for revoking citizenship from those who refuse to swear an oath of loyalty to the state, told TIME that a "transfer of populations" between Israel and the Palestinian Authority is neither "acceptable nor possible."

"Maybe some Arabs would prefer to go to a Palestinian state, but if some want to be Israeli citizens, that's their right," he told TIME.

Last update - 17:11 25/06/2009

Nixon administration pressured Israel on nuclear program, papers reveal

By The Associated Press

Tags: Richard Nixon, Israel News

Inside the Nixon administration four decades ago, American officials weighed options to pressure Israel to declare that it had a nuclear weapons program.

U.S. officials concluded Israel was actively working to improve its capability to produce nuclear weapons on short notice.

In an unsigned National Security Council memo, prepared sometime between April 1969 and March 1970, officials worried that the program might make elusive peace with the Arabs even harder to attain.

The memorandum, part of a collection of memos and tape recordings released Tuesday by the Nixon Presidential Library, shows efforts to get Israel to sign the 1968 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. This would have required Israel to open itself to international inspection and dismantle any nuclear weapons program it had.

Israel resisted, which the memorandum anticipated, because Israel views its nuclear option on the NPT as an integral part of its national security. Israel would not be easily influenced, the unsigned memorandum predicted.

The treaty requires all but five states - the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France - not to develop nuclear weapons. A total of 189 countries are parties to the treaty. The four exceptions are Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea.

Next month, President Barack Obama will meet with his Russian counterpart, President Dmitry Medvedev, in Moscow and again at a summit of world leaders in Italy. Obama will carry with him a determination to reduce the spread of nuclear weapons. He has said it is absolutely imperative that the United States take the lead.

Back in the Nixon era, with little sign of progress toward a peace agreement on the horizon, Israel's leaders have probably decided Israel cannot afford to surrender the nuclear option, the NSC memo concluded.

In fact, the document added, Israel preferred to keep the Arabs guessing as to its power to deter attack, while the program provided bargaining power in negotiating a settlement.

But the longer Israel would hold out against signing the treaty, it also would reduce prospects for settling the Arab-Israeli dispute, the memorandum said.

"We must be prepared whether to make this a crunch issue with Israel and to make it clear that if Israel elects to go the nuclear route it would cause a fundamental change in the U.S.-Israeli relationship."

"And that," the memo says, "includes our long-standing concern for Israel's security."

Last update - 13:56 25/06/2009

Exclusive: Leonard Cohen to perform in West Bank as well as Israel

By Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: West Bank, Israel News

International music legend Leonard Cohen will perform in the West Bank city of Ramallah two days after his upcoming performance in Israel, Haaretz has learned.

The concert in Ramallah is set to be held on September 26, in the Palestinian city's Cultural Palace; about 1,000 fans are expected to attend.

Cohen's decision came after pro-Palestinian activists attempted to dissuade the singer from performing in Israel.

The activists had urged supporters to "apply pressure during his tour by local groups along his path," in an appeal circulated on various pro-Palestinian mailing lists.

The sponsor of Cohen's concert in Israel, Discount Bank, confirmed the event on Wednesday; it is scheduled to take place at Ramat Gan Stadium on September 24.

The announcement put an end to the persistent rumors circulating in the past few months that the Canadian singer-songwriter's visit would be cancelled.

Last update - 11:17 26/06/2009

Ahmadinejad: Obama like Bush, must apologize for Iran comments

By Reuters

Tags: Israel News, Iran Election

Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday accused U.S. President Barack Obama of behaving like his predecessor toward Iran, and said there was not much point in talking to Washington unless the U.S. president apologized.

Obama said Tuesday he was "appalled and outraged" by the post-election crackdown in Iran, and Washington withdrew invitations to Iranian diplomats to attend Independence Day celebrations on July 4 - stalling efforts to improve ties with Tehran.

"Mr Obama made a mistake to say those things... our question is why he fell into this trap and said things that previously [former president George W.] Bush used to say," the semi-official Fars News Agency quoted Ahmadinejad as saying.

"Do you want to speak with this tone? If that is your stance then what is left to talk about ... I hope you avoid interfering in Iran's affairs and express your regret in a way that the Iranian nation is informed of it," he said.

Iran's tough security crackdown after its disputed June 12 presidential election, which Ahmadinejad won by a landslide according to official results, has led Obama to ramp up his previously muted criticism of Tehran.

The turmoil in Iran has dimmed prospects for Obama's engagement with Tehran over its nuclear program, with Ahmadinejad's government blaming Britain and the United States for fomenting violence.

Obama toughened his criticism of Iran on Tuesday for its crackdown on protesters demonstrating against the official election results, declaring scenes of death in Tehran "heartbreaking."

"In 2009, no iron fist is strong enough to shut off the world from bearing witness to the peaceful pursuit of justice," Obama said in Washington.

But the U.S. president declined to spell out any potential consequences for Tehran of the crackdown, and said there was still "a path available" to Iran in which it could operate within the international community.

Ahmadinejad said, according to Fars: "What way of talking is this to the Iranian nation ... I tell them that all those people who voted and all the Iranian nation will stand against them."

He was speaking in the port town of Assaluyeh, where he was inaugurating a petrochemical plant.

The Iranian leader added: "A country which talks of change and cooperation, why did it fall into this trap. The Iranian nation sees and hears this talk and will make its decision... I hope you avoid interfering in Iran's affairs and express your regret in a way that the Iranian nation is informed of it."

Meanwhile, Soccer's world governing body FIFA has asked Iran's soccer federation to respond to media reports that players who wore green wrist bands in a show of solidarity with the protests have been punished.

Share |

Last update - 22:25 24/06/2009

Obama rescinds July 4 invites to Iranian diplomats

By Natasha Mozgovaya, Haaretz Correspondent and Reuters

Tags: Iran elections, Barack Obama

The Obama administration has rescinded invitations to Iranian diplomats to attend U.S. independence day celebrations on July 4, the White House said on Wednesday.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Iranian diplomats had in any case not replied to invitations already sent out. Initially, the administration had said that the invitation still stood, but by Wednesday afternoon announced otherwise.

"As far as I know not a single Iranian accepted the invitation to 4 of July celebration? said State Department Spokesman Ian Kelly said earlier Wednesday. "They are celebration of our basic values of independence and freedom, which are exactly what Iranians demand on the streets."

U.S. officials and analysts believe that the political turmoil in Iran surrounding its contested June 12 presidential election has dimmed immediate prospects for U.S. dialogue with Tehran, but say U.S. President Barack Obama's hopes for engagement have by no means been snuffed out.

Officials acknowledge that the Iranian authorities bloody crackdown on street protests sparked by the election have made it less likely that Tehran will wish to engage and harder for the Obama administration to do so.

However, Obama has deliberately not withdrawn his open-hand policy toward Iran even as the authorities displayed an iron fist to intimidate demonstrators in the biggest anti-government protests since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

"The president's policy of engagement is obviously delayed, but we are going to have to deal with the government of Iran," Senator John Kerry, chairman of the influential Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told Reuters.

"The dust will have to settle but ultimately we are going to deal with a government of Iran because we have to, because the nuclear issue is so compelling, urgent, dangerous and important to us," he added.

Since taking office, Obama has made a series of overtures to Iran - including inviting its diplomats to July 4th parties at U.S. embassies around the world - as a way of trying to rebuild ties severed after the 1979 Islamic revolution.

The U.S. hope is to coax Iran into a negotiation over its nuclear program - which Washington suspects is designed to produce atomic bombs but which Tehran says is to generate electricity - as well as other issues.

Jim Dobbins, a senior fellow at the Rand Corporation nonprofit research group and a former top U.S. diplomat who has dealt extensively with Iranians, said an assumption that the engagement policy was now dead took too short-term a view.

"Engagement with Iran is off for the foreseeable future, but the foreseeable future extends about a week," he said.

"If the regime succeeds in tamping down resistance, establishing effective control, and then proves willing to engage the United States in meaningful talks, my guess is that the administration will ultimately agree, although it will be more difficult as a result of these events," he added.

Security forces have clamped down on Tehran to prevent protest rallies. Reformists say the election was rigged to return President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to power and to keep out moderate former prime minister Mirhossein Mousavi.

The furor over the election has exposed deep rifts within Iran's political elite, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei solidly backing Ahmadinejad against Mousavi and declaring the disputed election result would stand.

U.S. conservatives argued that the Iranian crackdown had vindicated their view that Iran's ruling authorities are not willing to negotiate with the West over their nuclear program.

"I think his underlying policy is fundamentally wrong because negotiation is doomed to failure in the future, just as it has been doomed to failure in the past, when it comes to their nuclear program," said John Bolton, a U.S. ambassador to the United Nations under former President George W. Bush.

"I think the policy he should be pursuing is overthrowing the Islamic revolution of 1979," he said, calling for the United States to funnel more resources -- covert and overt -- to strengthen opponents of the Islamic republic inside and outside Iran.

Obama has taken some political heat for his careful response to the election, with Republicans arguing that he should supported the protesters earlier and and criticized the government's crackdown against them more sharply.

Kerry, however, suggested that Obama could not afford to write off the possibility of negotiating with Ahmadinejad.

"We don't' have the luxury of choosing our negotiating partners in certain situations," he said.

Asked how long any engagement might be delayed, Kerry replied: "I can't tell you how long that is, it could be a matter of weeks.

"Personally, I don't believe it will be a long period of time, but that will ultimately depend on how they will resolve this crisis, internally in Iran. If they choose to do things that are so extreme that they confront everybody's conscience ... they could make it very [difficult] in the short term."

Last update - 23:39 24/06/2009

'George Costanza' offers humor as solution for Mideast peace

By The Associated Press

Tags: Jason Alexander, Israel News

Jason Alexander, who spent nine years playing George Costanza on Seinfeld, told a crowd in Jerusalem on Wednesday that the search for an Israeli-Palestinian solution and the show about nothing that launched him to fame have one thing in common - neither seemed destined to succeed.

But just as the show managed to bounce back with comedy, said the balding actor, a solution might be found for Mideast troubles if people write and laugh with one another.

"We were canceled, we were gone, we were a distant memory and somehow we came back and eventually everybody caught on and started paying attention," he said. "Other than that, we shed no wisdom."

Alexander, 49, is a creator of Imagine: 2018, a project that asked Israeli and Palestinian high school students to write stories about what the world might look like 10 years down the road if an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement was signed in 2008.

The group collected 50 stories from each side into a book and has made two of the stories into short films.

The project is sponsored by One Voice, a nonprofit organization that works to forge connections between Israeli and Palestinian moderates.

Alexander was calm and jovial in an appearance with some of the high school writers and One Voice officials Wednesday - a far cry from the alternately nebbish and erupting George Costanza he played for nine seasons on Seinfeld.

He praised the young writers for bridging the gap between their cultures with comedy, such as a scene from one of the films in which an Israeli soldier and a Palestinian boy point guns at each other with murderous expressions only to laugh and squirt water from the guns a moment later and then to use them as mock cell phones.

"God knows if you can make people laugh, it's the best way to heal wounds," he said.

But he also cautioned: humor is a language that doesn't always translate.

"Jewish humor is self-deprecating humor," said Alexander, who is Jewish. "Nothing makes a Jew laugh more than jokes about Jewishness. It's purely speculation, but my guess is that's probably not as true for the Arab world."

Alexander said he came to Israel for the first time in 1990 with arms folded and heels dug in, thinking "I would not have a positive experience." Instead, he said, he discovered a deep, personal connection with the country and has returned many times, often doing work for One Voice.

Alexander was disappointed, though, that his fellow Americans so often know Israelis and Palestinians only through stereotypes about the conflict.

"People here get painted throughout the world with a very wide brush," he said. "To most of the world, to most people I know, Israelis are two things: victims or occupiers. Palestinians are two things: victims or terrorists... But when you sit down and you talk to people on both sides, everyone's humanity and the similarity we all share comes out."

Last update - 00:05 01/01/2009

ANALYSIS / Maybe Netanyahu really does understand Arabs

By Zvi Bar'el

Enough said. Netanyahu really does understand Arabs. Especially Egyptians. Look what happened to Farouk Hosni, the Egyptian culture minister who longed to head UNESCO.

The beginning of the story is well-known. All of Israel's ambassadors and attaches wasted no effort to sabotage the Egyptian minister's appointment to the desirable post. Every anti-Israeli remark, every word he mouthed critical of Israeli books and writers and every pronouncement against normalizing ties with Israel were meticulously gathered in a file of evidence against him. Indeed, how could an Egyptian minister, a painter and intellectual, be awarded this international post when he had announced he would burn Israeli books?

While it is difficult to find an independent Egyptian intellectual, as opposed to those in the establishment, who would put in a good word for Hosni? His declarations had made him a local hero for building a wall, with his own hands, against normalization. That is, until Netanyahu came along to fix things for him in a conversation with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. Haaretz political correspondent Barak Ravid uncovered the fact that Netanyahu agreed to drop Israel's objections to the appointment in exchange for a gesture of normalization on Egypt's part. The gestures followed immediately.

Hosni apologized for his remarks and even announced he had ordered the translation of books by David Grossman and Amos Oz into Arabic. Heaven forbid, not from the original Hebrew, but from English and French versions. Such translations have, by the way, existed for years in Egypt's university libraries, and Egyptian scholars have written numerous research papers on Israeli authors.

But then there was an uproar. The culture minister became the object of derision. "Hosni will not stop short of courting Zionist influence to reach the UNESCO seat," wrote the critic Wael Kandil. MP Abbas Abd al-Aziz, representing the Suez region, called for Hosni to be removed from office and his way to UNESCO blocked, because he was willing to do anything to get the position, even at the expense of the history of the city of Suez. Aziz was angry; Hosni had agreed to invite Israeli representatives to a literary festival in Suez, nicknamed "the city of opposition."

Intellectuals and academics from Suez announced they would campaign against the invitations and even created an Internet site detailing Hosni's crimes and submission to Zionism.

But the Egyptian opposition contains several voices, and one of them is particularly original. The translator and Hebrew scholar Mohammed Aboud wrote his doctoral dissertation at Ain Shams University on Hebrew literature. Israeli poet and writer Almog Bahar turned my attention to an article by Aboud last week in the Almasry Alyoum newspaper in which he explains why he opposes translating Hebrew works into Arabic through the Egyptian Culture Ministry:

"I personally have great appreciation for those who reject translating Hebrew literature into Arabic through the offices of the Culture Ministry, because this is the apparatus that inherited the slogan 'know your enemy,' under whose shadow Hebrew language departments at Egyptian universities developed. These departments participated and still take part in anti-Israeli efforts on the information, ideological and military fronts. They swallow every piece of paper translated from Hebrew so as to be armed with the knowledge to continue the confrontation with the enemy from the east.

"I understand the reason for the Culture Ministry's haste to translate Hebrew literature at this moment in time," Aboud writes. "Rather than taking this important step in the framework of a national undertaking - to become familiar with Israel, and methodically and intensively gather information on the ideological and cultural currents there - it aspires to attain an international office, which may or may not be reached."

Aboud's voice isn't enough to change the official, ideological allegiance to opposing normalizing ties with Israel. Farouk Hosni now understands very well he will pay too high a price in public opinion for what is seen as reconciliation with Israeli literature. The national hero directly fighting the Zionists has turned into a traitor, according to the principles of those intellectuals warring against normalization.

The army's trick against the government

The plan was ready down to the smallest detail. The Turkish army would see to it that explosives and arms would be found in the homes of supporters of Fethullah Gulen's Islamic movement, so they could be accused of terrorist activities. A publicity campaign would decry army officers said to be "reactionary" (i.e. overly religious) so they would have to resign. And a network of agents working for the army would get busy inside the ruling Justice and Development Party of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

These are the principles of last April's plot. Its details were published two weeks ago by the Turkish newspaper Taraf, after documents were seized in the home of attorney Serdar Ozturk. Ozturk is also linked to a different entanglement, the Ergenekon affair: Former Turkish army officers, politicians and intellectuals were arrested last summer on suspicion of having worked for years to overthrow the government.

These revelations led to clashes between the army and the government. Erdogan pledged to investigate the affair, saying the goal of its instigators "was to harm Turkish democracy." The army denies any such plot was hatched or was known to army commanders.

The recent affair seems a direct continuation of the Ergenekon one, which is coming to light in a Turkish court. The army's denials have failed to convince the Turkish media, which sees the affair as proof the army has not given up its ambitions to be a player in Turkish politics and to direct the civilian government. This is in clearly counter to Turkey's promises to the European Union (and the army's stated stance) that the Turkish army would stay within the confines of its bases and exert only a minor influence on Turkish politics.

Last update - 19:20 24/06/2009

Syria: There is no Israeli partner for peace

By Reuters

Tags: Benjamin Netanyahu

Syrian President Bashar Assad said on Wednesday that Damascus could not make peace with Israel because of the latter's refusal to commit to an internationally recognized settlement.

"Achieving peace requires an Israeli partner and commitment to international law, United Nations resolutions and the land for peace principles," Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said after meeting his Greek counterpart Karolos Papoulias.

"This Israeli partner does not currently exist," he added.

Syria has repeatedly said it wants to resume peace talks with Israel while demanding a commitment from for its withdrawal from the whole of the Golan Heights, which were captured by Israel in the 1967 Six-Day War.

Turkey, which mediated indirect talks between the two enemies that were suspended in December 2008, said this month it was still keen to resume mediation.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu offered in May to talk to Syria but indicated he would not make any commitments on land first. His foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, blamed what he termed Syrian manoeuvres for not returning to negotiations.

On Tuesday, Dutch foreign minister Maxime Verhagen said that Assad had informed him during his visit to Damascus this week that Syria is in fact interested in restarting the peace talks with Israel.

President Barack Obama, meanwhile, has decided to return a U.S. ambassador to Syria after a four-year hiatus as talks between the two nations intensify, U.S. media reported on Tuesday.

The State Department informed Syria's ambassador to Washington, Imad Mustafa, of Obama's intention on Tuesday night, a senior administration official told the Washington Post.

Moustapha said that U.S.-Syrian relations were headed in the right direction and away from the freeze during the Bush administration.

"Nevertheless," Mustapha said, "It is still difficult to talk about radical change in the relationship but we can talk about advancing in small, but consecutive and positive steps."

Last update - 15:19 25/06/2009

Restoration work reveals Afghanistan's Jewish past

By Reuters

Tags: Afghanistan Jews, Israel News

Behind a parade of old mud brick shops, through narrow winding alleys, a tiny door opens onto a sun-drenched courtyard, where school children giggle and play alongside the ghosts of Afghanistan's Jewish past.

The Yu Aw is one of four synagogues in the old quarter of Herat city in western Afghanistan, which after decades of abandonment and neglect has been restored to provide desperately-needed space for an infant school.

When Israel was founded in 1948, the estimated 280 Jewish families that lived in Herat began leaving. Today, there are no Jews left in the city and only one left in the entire country, the last remnant of a community that dates back some 2,500 years.

"Before this was a community centre and school it was a synagogue for the Jewish families who lived in the area," said Fatemeh Nezary, a teacher and supervisor of the school.

"The children don't know, they are too young to understand right now," she said, pointing towards her small class of doe-eyed five-year-old girls and boys.

The Herat synagogue, over a century old, is comprised of a modest stone courtyard framed by a series of small rooms including a main prayer room which still has a raised platform where the Torah would have been read.

Parts of the prayer room's high ceilings are decorated in painted Persian-style floral patterns and motifs.

The mikvah, an echoey underground chamber underneath the courtyard, has also been restored. Decades of rubbish was gutted from its cavity to reveal a natural pool of water which is thought to have been used for bathing rituals.

"Wherever possible we try and put back the elements. We can't put back what we don't find, some of the buildings have been stripped," said Jolyon Leslie, a South African architect who leads restoration projects in Herat's old city on behalf of the Agha Khan Trust for Culture.

"What we're trying to do is protect as many old historical monuments as possible. Whether it's a mosque, whether it's an ex-synagogue like this or whether it's a hamam, to try and put them in public use," Leslie said.

"It's important that Heratis understand for future generations that this was a very rich society in the sense of its religious diversity and its pluralism," he added.

Where Jewish prayers once rang out, now Afghan children chant nursery rhymes. The platform where the Torah would have been read is left undisturbed to bask in warm sunshine which floods through wide, arched bay windows.

"There's a huge shortage of classes in this part of the city and some 60,000 people (here) and some 20,000 of those are children... we really wanted to invest both in protecting the historic monument but also in having a new use," Leslie said.

"It's a mixture of conservation and social development."

Three other synagogues in the same neighborhood are being renovated. Two will also be used as schools for children living in the neighborhood. The third is now a mosque for the residents who live in a cluster of simple, centuries-old abodes.

Afghanistan's once thriving community is believed to trace its roots to the Assyrian and Babylonian conquests in 720 B.C.E. and 560 B.C.E., when exiled Jews moved to what is now Iraq, Iran and neighboring countries such as Afghanistan.

By 1992, when the Soviet-backed communist leadership in Kabul collapsed, the community disappeared from Herat. A few have since returned to re-visit the refurbished relics of their past.

"Jewish visitors from abroad, even Herat Jews from abroad, have come back to visit these places and there's a sense of them re-owning these properties and being very proud to see them restored," Leslie said.

He recalled a recent visit by a Herati Jewish family who had traveled from Canada to visit Yu Aw. They sobbed when they saw the restored synagogue.

A few kilometers away from the old quarter, an Afghan boy unlocks a heavy wrought-iron door to an open field where overgrown thorn bushes and weeds breed unchecked around craggy and windswept white marble tombs inscribed with Hebrew.

The family which has taken care of the cemetery for the past 150 years continue to do their best to protect it, but since Herat's Jews left, they are no longer paid for the work.

"When my grandfather worked here, they were still here and they gave him a salary. But then when the security situation got bad the last of them moved to London. And so our salary was stopped," Jalilahmed Abdelaziz said, adding that the cemetery contained about 1,000 graves.

Through three decades of conflict and the rule of the austere Islamist Taliban, Abdelaziz's family guarded the site, which is off a dirt track lined with Muslim cemeteries.

The Taliban, though responsible for harassing the family at times, resisted damaging the graves.

"The Taliban were not the worst of our problems. We had neighbors who would try and desecrate the graves or steal the stones, they were the worst, but we would tell them to stop and tell them what they were doing was un-Islamic," Abdelaziz said.

"We knew all of the families here... If they wanted to visit here they could, but they don't."

Share |

Last update - 22:41 24/06/2009

Netanyahu: No Palestine without demilitarization

By The Associated Press

Tags: settlements, Netanyahu

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Wednesday that his suggestion of a demilitarized Palestinian state was gaining international ground and was the only solution for Middle East peace.

"The idea of a demilitarized state will in course become accepted," Netanyahu said after meeting the leaders of France and Italy.

"If it is not accepted, there will not be an agreement," he told following his meeting in Paris with French President Nicolas Sarkozy. "It cannot be that there is a Palestinian state and the struggle will continue within it."

Sarkozy, meanwhile, said that Israel must take immediate confidence-building measures for Middle East peace, including a complete freeze of construction in West Bank settlements.

The French leader told reporters after his meeting with Netanyahu that Israel must also work to improve freedom of movement for Palestinians in the West Bank.

He also called for the immediate creation of a viable Palestinian state and offered to contribute French troops to an international force, with the United States and Paris's EU partners, to secure peace in the region.

Netanyahu reiterated his stance that Israel had no intention "of expropriating additional land" for settlements, but that it had a right to build within existing settlements.

"All we want is for [the settlers] to have a normal life," he said.

He praised the French president as "an old friend of Israel and a great champion of peace and security for our country and the Middle East."

Netanyahu had planned to meet in Paris with Washington's top Mideast envoy George Mitchell, but postponed the meeting in order to gain time to iron out differences over West Bank settlements.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak will instead meet Mitchell next week in Washington.

Speaking to reporters in Paris, Netanyau downplayed the tensions with the U.S. Differences could occur "among the best of friends," Netanyahu said, adding that Israel was in the process of clarifying its settlement policy to Washington.

"We have an unbreakable bond of friendship with the United States," Netanyahu added.

"I asked for the postponement of the meeting," Netanyahu said about the talks he had planned to hold with Mitchell in the French capital. "Mr. Mitchell agreed immediately. We believed we had to clarify several issues and statistics. The defense minister will do this on Monday in the United States."

"We will continue the contacts, with goodwill and with the intention of reaching understandings that will advance a peace process - a diplomatic process between us and the Palestinians, and I hope between us and the rest of the Arab world."

Mitchell has been conducting low-profile talks with Israel in a bid to reach an agreement on the settlement issue, a government official told Haaretz.

The source said that Israel is considering enacting a temporary freeze on settlement construction, excluding projects already underway, if the United States agrees to continued construction for natural growth once the freeze ends.

Israel and the United States have already agreed that all unauthorized outposts are to be removed "within weeks or months," no new settlements are to be built and no Palestinian land is to be confiscated.

However, they disagree over the duration of the settlement freeze and the future of settlement construction projects already underway.

Israel is offering to halt some settlement construction for up to six months, while the United States is interested in a considerably longer period.

In addition, Israel wants to convince Washington that building projects currently underway should be allowed to continue - including the construction of up to several thousand housing units.

The leader of the Arab League on Wednesday said that negotiating with Israel while settlements were continuing to expand was tantamount to surrendering on "matters over which we cannot surrender".

"Settlements destroy peace and prevent negotiations. If settlement does not stop, there will be a big catastrophe in the peace [process]," Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa told journalists after a meeting of Arab foreign ministers in Cairo.

Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi raised the settlement issue in a meeting with Netanyahu in Rome on Tuesday, telling him that settlement construction may become an obstacle for peace, and must be stopped.

Netanyahu is reported to have replied that "an agreed-upon formula can be found with the U.S. if this is what they're looking for."

Speaking at a press conference after the meeting in Rome, Netanyahu said he had no intention of giving up his vision of a final-status agreement in which a demilitarized Palestinian state acknowledges Israel as a Jewish state.

"This isn't a trick or a maneuver," Netanyahu said. "It will become a stepping stone on the way to true peace."

Last week, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman told U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that Israel could not accept the Obama administration's demand to "completely" halt activity in West Bank settlements.

"We have no intention of changing the demographic balance in Judea and Samaria," Lieberman said during his talks with the secretary of state in Washington.

"Everywhere people are born, people die, and we cannot accept a vision of stopping completely the settlements. We have to keep the natural growth."

Still, he said, Israel "ready for direct negotiations with the Palestinians."

Clinton, for her part, reiterated that the U.S. viewed a total settlement freeze as "important and essential" step toward achieving peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

Last update - 11:06 01/02/2009

Secret Israeli database reveals full extent of illegal settlement

By Uri Blau

Tags: West Bank, Settlements

Just four years ago, the defense establishment decided to carry out a seemingly elementary task: establish a comprehensive database on the settlements. Brigadier General (res.) Baruch Spiegel, aide to then defense minister Shaul Mofaz, was put in charge of the project. For over two years, Spiegel and his staff, who all signed a special confidentiality agreement, went about systematically collecting data, primarily from the Civil Administration.

One of the main reasons for this effort was the need to have credible and accessible information at the ready to contend with legal actions brought by Palestinian residents, human rights organizations and leftist movements challenging the legality of construction in the settlements and the use of private lands to establish or expand them. The painstakingly amassed data was labeled political dynamite.

The defense establishment, led by Defense Minister Ehud Barak, steadfastly refused to publicize the figures, arguing, for one thing, that publication could endanger state security or harm Israel's foreign relations. Someone who is liable to be particularly interested in the data collected by Spiegel is George Mitchell, President Barack Obama's special envoy to the Middle East, who came to Israel this week for his first visit since his appointment. It was Mitchell who authored the 2001 report that led to the formulation of the road map, which established a parallel between halting terror and halting construction in the settlements.

The official database, the most comprehensive one of its kind ever compiled in Israel about the territories, was recently obtained by Haaretz. Here, for the first time, information the state has been hiding for years is revealed. An analysis of the data reveals that, in the vast majority of the settlements - about 75 percent - construction, sometimes on a large scale, has been carried out without the appropriate permits or contrary to the permits that were issued. The database also shows that, in more than 30 settlements, extensive construction of buildings and infrastructure (roads, schools, synagogues, yeshivas and even police

stations) has been carried out on private lands belonging to Palestinian West Bank residents.

Click here to view the secret Defense Ministry database on illegal construction in the territories. It should be noted that the information is given in Hebrew

The data, it should be stressed, do not refer only to the illegal outposts (information about which was included in the well-known report authored by attorney Talia Sasson and published in March 2005), but to the very heart of the settlement enterprise. Among them are veteran ideological settlements like Alon Shvut (established in 1970 and currently home to 3,291 residents, including Rabbi Yoel Bin Nun); Ofra (established in 1975, home to 2,708 residents, including

former Yesha Council spokesman Yehoshua Mor Yosef and media personalities Uri Elitzur and Hagai Segal); and Beit El (established in 1977, population 5,308, including Hagai Ben-Artzi, brother of Sara Netanyahu). Also included are large settlements founded primarily for economic motives, such as the city of Modi'in Illit (established in 1990 and now home to 36,282 people), or Givat Ze'ev outside Jerusalem (founded in 1983, population 11,139), and smaller settlements such as Nokdim near Herodion (established in 1982, population 851, including MK Avigdor Lieberman).

The information contained in the database does not conform to the state's official position, as presented, for instance, on the Foreign Ministry Web site, which states: "Israel's actions relating to the use and allocation of land under its administration are all taken with strict regard to the rules and norms of international law - Israel does not requisition private land for the establishment of settlements." Since in many of the settlements, it was the government itself, primarily through the Ministry of Construction and Housing, that was responsible for construction, and since many of the building violations involve infrastructure, roads, public buildings and so on, the official data also demonstrate government responsibility for the unrestrained planning and lack of enforcement of regulations in the territories. The extent of building violations also attests to the poor functioning of

the Civil Administration, the body in charge of permits and supervision of construction in the territories.

According to the 2008 data from the Central Bureau of Statistics, approximately 290,000 Jews live in the 120 official settlements and dozens of outposts established throughout the West Bank over the past 41 years.

"Nothing was done in hiding," says Pinchas Wallerstein, director-general of the Yesha Council of settlements and a leading figure in the settlement project. "I'm not familiar with any [building] plans that were not the initiative of the Israeli government." He says that if the owners of private land upon which settlements are built were to complain and the court were to accept their complaint, then the structures would have to be moved somewhere else. "This has been the Yesha

Council's position for the past years," he says.

You'd never know it from touring several of the settlements in which massive construction has taken place on private Palestinian lands. Entire neighborhoods built without permits or on private lands are inseparable parts of the settlements. The sense of dissonance only intensifies when you find that municipal offices, police and fire stations were also built upon and currently operate on lands that belong to Palestinians.

On Misheknot Haro'im Street in the Kochav Yaakov settlement, a young mother is carrying her two children home. "I've lived here for six years," she says, sounding surprised when told that her entire neighborhood was built upon private Palestinian land. "I know that there's some small area in the community that is in dispute, but I never heard that this is private land." Would she have built her home on this land had she known this from the start? "No," she answers. "I wouldn't have kicked anyone out of his home."

Not far away, at the settlement's large and unkempt trailer site, which is also built on private land, a young newlywed couple is walking to the bus stop: 21-year-old Aharon and his 19-year-old wife, Elisheva. They speak nearly perfect Hebrew despite having grown up in the United States and having settled permanently in Israel just a few months ago, after Aharon completed his army service in the ultra-Orthodox Nahal unit. Now he is studying computers at Machon Lev in Jerusalem. Asked why they chose to live here of all places, they list three reasons: It's close to Jerusalem, it's cheap and it's in the territories. In that order.

The couple pay their rent, NIS 550 a month, to the settlement secretariat. As new immigrants, they are still exempt from having to pay the arnona municipal tax. Aharon doesn't look upset when he hears that his trailer sits on private land. It doesn't really interest him. "I don't care what the state says, the Torah says that the entire Land of Israel is ours."

A complicated problem

Even today, more than two years after concluding his official role, Baruch Spiegel remains loyal to the establishment. In a conversation, he notes several times that he signed a confidentiality agreement and so is not willing to go into the details of the work for which he was responsible. He was appointed by Shaul Mofaz to handle several issues about which Israel had given a commitment to the United States, including improving conditions for Palestinians whose lives were adversely affected by the separation fence, and supervision of IDF soldiers at the checkpoints.

Two years ago, Haaretz reporter Amos Harel revealed that the main task given Spiegel was to establish and maintain an up-to-date database on the settlement enterprise. This was after it became apparent that the United States, as well as Peace Now's settlement monitoring team, was in possession of much more precise information about settlement construction than was the defense establishment, which up to then had relied mostly on information collected by Civil Administration inspectors. The old database had many gaps in it, which was largely a consequence of the establishment preferring not to know exactly what was going on in this area.

Spiegel's database contains written information backed up by aerial photos and layers of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) data that includes information on the status of the land and the official boundaries of each settlement. "The work took two and a half years," says Spiegel. "It was done in order to check the status of the settlements and the outposts and to achieve the greatest possible accuracy in terms of the database: the land status, the legal status, the sector boundaries, the city building plan, government decisions, lands whose ownership is unclear. It was full-time, professional work done with a professional team of legal experts, planning people, GIS experts. And I hope that this work continues, because it is very vital. One has to know what's going on there and make decisions accordingly."

Who is keeping track of all of this now?

"I suppose it's the Civil Administration."

Why was there no database like this before your appointment?

"I don't know how much of a focus there was on doing it."

Why do you think the state is not publicizing the data?

"It's a sensitive and complex subject and there are all kinds of considerations, political and security-related. There were questions about the public's right to know, the freedom of information law. You should ask the officials in charge."

What are the sensitive matters?

"It's no secret that there are violations, that there are problems having to do with land. It's a complicated problem."

Is there also a problem for the country's image?

"I didn't concern myself with image. I was engaged in Sisyphean work to ensure that, first of all, they'll know what exists and what's legal and what's not legal and what the degree of illegality is, whether it involves the takeover of private Palestinian land or something in the process of obtaining proper building permits. Our job was to do the meticulous work of going over all the settlements and outposts that existed then - We found what we found and passed it on."

Do you think that this information should be published?

"I think they've already decided to publish the simpler part, concerning areas of jurisdiction. There are things that are more sensitive. It's no secret that there are problems, and it's impossible to do something illegal and say that it's legal. I can't elaborate, because I'm still bound to maintain confidentiality."

Dror Etkes, formerly the coordinator of Peace Now's settlement monitoring project and currently director of the Land Advocacy Project for the Yesh Din organization, says, "The government's ongoing refusal to reveal this material on the pretext of security reasons is yet another striking example of the way in which the state exploits its authority to reduce the information at the citizens' disposal, when they wish to formulate intelligent positions based on facts rather than lies and half-truths."

Following the initial exposure of the material, the Movement for Freedom of Information and Peace Now requested that the Defense Ministry publish the database, in accordance with the Freedom of Information law. The Defense Ministry refused. "This is a computerized database that includes detailed information, in different cross-sections, regarding the Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria," the Defense Ministry said in response. "The material was collected by the defense establishment for its purposes and includes sensitive information. The ministry was asked to allow a review of the material in accordance with the Freedom of Information law, and after consideration of the request, decided not to hand over the material. The matter is pending and is the subject of a petition before the Administrative Affairs Court in Tel Aviv."

Ofra, Elon Moreh, Beit El

The database surveys settlement after settlement alphabetically. For each entry, it notes the source of the settlement's name and the form of settlement there (urban community, local council, moshav, kibbutz, etc.); its organizational affiliation (Herut, Amana, Takam, etc.), the number of inhabitants, pertinent government decisions, the official bodies to which the land was given, the status of the land upon which the settlement was built (state land, private Palestinian or Jewish land, etc.), a survey of the illegal outposts built in proximity to the settlement and to what extent the valid building plans have been executed. Beneath each entry, highlighted in red, is information on the extent of construction that has been carried out without permission and its exact location in the settlement.

Among all the revelations in the official data, it's quite fascinating to see what was written about Ofra, a veteran Gush Emunim settlement. According to a recent B'tselem report, most of the settlement's developed area sits on private Palestinian land and therefore falls into the category of an illegal outpost that is supposed to be evacuated. The Yesha Council responded to the B'tselem report, saying that the "facts" in it are "completely baseless and designed to present a false picture. The inhabitants of Ofra are careful to respect the rights of the Arab landowners, with whom they reached an agreement regarding the construction of the neighborhoods as well as an agreement that enables the private landowners to continue to work their lands."

But the information in the database about Ofra leaves no room for doubt: "The settlement does not conform to valid building plans. A majority of the construction in the community is on registered private lands without any legal basis whatsoever and no possibility of [converting the land to non-private use]." The database also gives a detailed description of where construction was carried out in Ofra without permits: "The original part of the settlement: [this includes] more than 200 permanent residential structures, agricultural structures, public structures, lots, roads and orchards in the old section of the settlement (in regard to which Plan 221 was submitted, but not advanced due to a problem of ownership)." After mentioning 75 trailers and temporary shelters in two groups within the old settlement, the database mentions the Ramat Zvi neighborhood, south of the original settlement: "There are about 200 permanent structures as well as lots being developed for additional permanent construction, all trespassing on private lands." Yesha Council chairman Danny Dayan responds: "I am not familiar with that data."

Another place where the data reveals illegal construction is Elon Moreh, one of the most famous settlements in the territories. In June 1979, several residents of the village of Rujib, southeast of Nablus, petitioned the High Court, asking it to annul the appropriation order for 5,000 dunams of land in their possession, that had been designated for the construction of the settlement. In court, the government argued, as it did regularly at the time, that the construction of the settlement was required for military needs, and therefore the appropriation orders were legal. But in a statement on behalf of the petitioners, former chief of staff Haim Bar-Lev asserted that, "In my best professional judgment, Elon Moreh does not contribute to Israel's security."

The High Court, relying on this statement and the statements of the original core group of settlers of Elon Moreh, who also argued that this was not a temporary settlement established for security purposes, but a permanent settlement, instructed the IDF to evacuate the settlement and return the lands to their owners. The immediate consequence of the ruling was to find an alternative site for construction of the settlement, on lands previously defined as "state lands." Following this ruling, Israel stopped officially using military injunctions in the territories for the purpose of establishing new settlements.

The lands that were originally taken for the purpose of building Elon Moreh were returned to their Palestinian owners, but according to the database, also in the new site where the settlement was built, called Har Kabir, "most of the construction was done without approved, detailed plans, and some of the construction involved trespassing on private lands. As for the state lands in the settlement, a detailed plan, no. 107/1, was prepared and published on 16/7/99, but has yet to go into effect."

The Shomron regional council, which includes Elon Moreh, said in response: "All the neighborhoods in the settlement were planned, and some were also built, by the State of Israel through the Housing Ministry. The residents of Elon Moreh did not trespass at all and any allegation of this kind is also false. The State of Israel is tasked with promoting and approving the building plans in the settlement, as everywhere else in the country, and as for the plans that supposedly have yet to receive final validity, just like many other communities throughout Israel, where the processes continue for decades, this does not delay the plans, even if the planning is not complete or being done in tandem."

Beit El, another veteran settlement, was also, according to the database, established "on private lands seized for military purposes (In fact, the settlement was expanded on private lands, by means of trespassing in the northern section of the settlement) and on state lands that were appropriated during the Jordanian period (the Maoz Tzur neighborhood in the south of the settlement)."

According to the official data, construction in Beit El in the absence of approved plans includes the council office buildings and the "northern neighborhood (Beit El Bet) that was built for the most part on private lands. The neighborhood comprises widespread construction, public buildings and new ring roads (about 80 permanent buildings and trailers); the northeastern neighborhood (between Jabal Artis and the old part of the settlement) includes about 20 permanent residential buildings, public buildings (including a school building), 40 trailers and an industrial zone (10 industrial buildings). The entire compound is located on private land and has no plan attached."

Moshe Rosenbaum, head of the Beit El local council, responds: "Unfortunately, you are cooperating with the worst of Israel's enemies and causing tremendous damage to the whole country."

'One giant bluff'

Ron Nahman, mayor of Ariel, was re-elected to a sixth term in the last elections. Nahman is a long-time resident of the territories and runs a fascinating heterogeneous city. Between a visit to the trailer site where evacuees from Netzarim are housed and a stop at a shop that sells pork and other non-kosher products, mostly to the city's large Russian population, Nahman complains about the halting of construction in his city and about his battles with the Civil

Administration over every building permit.

Ariel College, Nahman's pride and joy, is also mentioned in the database: "The area upon which Ariel College was built was not regulated in terms of planning." It further explains that the institution sits on two separate plots and the new plan has not yet been discussed. Nahman confirms this, but says the planning issue was recently resolved.

When told that dozens of settlements include construction on private lands, he is not surprised. "That's possible," he says. The fact that in three-quarters of the settlements, there has been construction that deviates from the approved plans doesn't surprise him either. "All the complaints should be directed at the government, not at us," he says. "As for the small and communal settlements, they were planned by the Housing Ministry's Rural Building Administration. The larger communities are planned by the ministry's district offices. It's all the government. Sometimes the Housing Ministry is responsible for budgetary construction, which is construction out of the state budget. In the Build Your Own Home program, the state pays a share of the development costs and the rest is paid for by the individual. All of these things are one giant bluff. Am I the one who planned the settlements? It was Sharon, Peres, Rabin, Golda, Dayan."

The database provides information attesting to a failure to adhere to planning guidelines in the territories. For example, an attempt to determine the status of the land of the Argaman settlement in the Jordan Rift Valley found that "the community was apparently established on the basis of an appropriation order from 1968 that was not located." About Mevo Horon, the database says: "The settlement was built without a government decision on lands that are mostly private within a closed area in the Latrun enclave (Area Yod). There was an allocation

for the area to the WZO from 1995, which was issued as in a deviation from authority, apparently on the basis of a political directive." In the Tekoa settlement, trailers were leased to the IDF "and installed contrary to the area's designation according to a detailed plan? and some also deviate from the boundaries of the plan."

Most of the territories of the West Bank have not been annexed to Israel, and therefore regulations for the establishment and construction of communities there differ from those that apply within Israel proper. The Sasson report, which dealt with the illegal outposts, was based in part on data collected by Spiegel, and listed the criteria necessary for the establishment of a new settlement in the territories:

1. The Israeli government issued a decision to establish the settlement

2. The settlement has a defined jurisdictional area

3. The settlement has a detailed, approved outline plan

4. The settlement lies on state land or on land that was purchased by Israelis and registered under their name in the Land Registry.

According to the database, the state gave the World Zionist Organization (WZO) and/or the Construction and Housing Ministry authorization to plan and build on most of the territories upon which the settlements were constructed. These bodies allocated the land to those who eventually carried out the actual construction of the settlement: Sometimes it was the Settlement Division of the WZO and other times it was the Construction and Housing Ministry itself, sometimes through the Rural Building Administration. In several cases, settlements were built by Amana, the Gush Emunim settlement arm. Another body cited in the database as having received allocations and being responsible for construction in some of the settlements is Gush Emunim's Settler National Fund.

Talmud Torah

@Text: Regular schools and religious schools (Talmudei Torah) have also been built on Palestinian lands. According to the database, in the southern part of the Ateret settlement, "15 structures were built outside of state lands, which are used for the Kinor David yeshiva. There are also new ring roads and a special security area that is illegal." Kinor David is the name of a "yeshiva high school with a musical framework." The sign at the entrance says the yeshiva was built by the Amana settlement movement, the Mateh Binyamin local council and the

WZO settlement division.

The data regarding Michmash also make it very clear that part of the settlement was built on "private lands via trespassing." For example, "In the center of the settlement (near the main entrance) is a trailer neighborhood that serves as a Talmud Torah and other buildings (30 trailers) on private land."

On a winter's afternoon, a bunch of young children were playing there, one of them wearing a shirt printed with the words "We won't forget and we won't forgive." There were no teachers in sight. A young woman in slacks, taking her baby to the doctor, stopped for a moment to chat. She moved here from Ashkelon because her husband's parents are among the settlement's founders. When her son is old enough for preschool, she won't send him to the Talmud Torah. Not because it sits on private land, but just because that's not the type of education she wants for him. "I don't think there's been construction on private land here," she said. "I don't think there ought to be, either."

In the Psagot settlement, where there has also been a lot of construction on private land, it's easy to discern the terracing style typical of Palestinian agriculture in the region. According to the database, in Psagot there are "agricultural structures (a winery and storehouses) to the east of the settlement, close to the grapevines cultivated by the settlement by trespassing." During a visit here, the winery was abandoned. Its owner, Yaakov Berg, acquired land from the Israel Lands Administration near the Migron outpost and a new winery and regional visitors' center is currently under construction there.

"The vineyards are located in Psagot," says Berg, who is busy with the preparations for the new site. From the unfinished observation deck one can see an enormous quarry in the mountains across the way. "If I built a bathroom here without permission from the Civil Administration, within 15 minutes, a helicopter would be here and I'd be told that it was prohibited," Berg complains. "And right here there's an illegal Palestinian quarry that continues to operate."

The politicians did it

Kobi Bleich, spokesperson for the Ministry of Construction and Housing: "The ministry participates in subsidizing the development costs of settlements in Priority Area A, in accordance with decisions of the Israeli government. Development works are carried out by the regional councils, and only after the ministry has ascertained that the new neighborhood is located within an approved city plan. This applies throughout Israel as well as in the areas over the Green Line. Let me emphasize that the ministry's employees are charged with implementing the policies of the Israeli government. All of the actions in the past were

done solely in keeping with the decisions of the political echelon."

Danny Poleg, spokesperson for the Judea and Samaria district of the Israel Police: "The issue of the construction of police facilities is the responsibility of the Ministry of Internal Security, so any questions should be addressed to them."

The Internal Security Ministry spokesman responds: "And for construction by the police is allocated by the Israel Lands Administration in coordination with the Internal Security Ministry. There is no police station in Modi'in Ilit, but a rapid response post for the local residents on land allocated by the local authority. The land in Givat Ze'ev was allocated by the local council and the police station is located within the municipality. The road to the police headquarters was built by the Housing and Construction ministry and is maintained by the local council."

Avi Roeh, head of the Mateh Binyamin regional council (whose jurisdiction includes the settlements of Ofra, Kochav Yaakov, Ateret, Ma'aleh Michmash and Psagot): "The Mateh Binyamin regional council, like the neighboring councils in Judea and Samaria, is coping with political decisions regarding the manner of the the communities' expansion. However, this does not remove the need for proper planning procedures in order to expand the settlements in an orderly manner and in accordance with the law."

For its response, the WZO sent a thick booklet, a copy of which was previously sent to attorney Talia Sasson in response to her report. "Settlement in Judea and Samaria, as in Israel, has been accompanied by the preparation of regional master plans," says the booklet. "Steering committees from various government ministries, the Civil Administration and the municipal authorities were involved in the preparation of these plans? The (settlement) department worked solely on lands that were given to it by contract from the authorities in the Civil Administration and all the lands that were allocated to it by contract were properly

allocated."

The Civil Administration, which was first asked for a response regarding the database more than a month ago, has yet to reply

ANALYSIS / Even the CIA gets its Iran updates via Twitter

By Amos Harel

Tags: intelligence, barack obama

1. The Israeli perspective. The debate in Israel over what is happening in Iran is shifting between two problematic poles: The media coverage, which suffers from overt dramatization - some events are fateful enough on their own - and the political establishment's observations, which are far too jaded.

The sometimes violent conflict is not about the sons of light against the sons of darkness. To a degree, as Professor David Menashri from Tel Aviv University had already pointed out, it's a kind of family dispute: Factions that were part of the regime inspired by the Islamic Revolution are now challenging its authority.

This is true about "moderate conservatives" like former president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, and even reformists like former prime minister Mir Hossein Mousavi. Even now, and even if the uprising is suppressed, we can conclude that Iran has changed over the past 10 days. But it's unclear if even a successful revolution can detach Iran from the influence of its radical religious establishment.

On the other hand, Israel - which hopefully is refraining from excessive meddling in the events - has something to gain from each of the scenarios. If conservative rule prevails it will be at the price of a brutal suppression of the protests. The international community, which over the years has developed a disturbing apathy toward Iranian threats to annihilate Israel, is much more concerned about the crushing of democracy in Tehran. This trampling of democracy may bring about a much harsher approach by the United States and European Union if the dialogue over the Iranian nuclear program fails and the sanctions are intensified.

At the same time, a victory by the moderates, committed as they may be to the nuclear project, might render Iran more open to the West and allow for understandings that will block the project, even if this is achieved at an uneasy price for the international community. Israel will then be more concerned about the conduct of the U.S. administration. The inaction demonstrated by President Barack Obama in the face of a taunting North Korea, as well as the gap between the passionate speeches and hesitant conduct on the ground is disconcerting.

2. The limits of intelligence. It's not much of a surprise, but what's happening in Iran, from the election results to the enormous protests, is a stark reminder of the limits of intelligence. We might even assume that the CIA is getting more information on the events from CNN (constrained as it is by the Iranian authorities), the blogosphere and Twitter, than from its agents deep in the land of the ayatollahs. Western intelligence has been focusing on the nuclear program a lot more than the Iranian regime's stability.

One of this week's big questions was why intelligence organizations didn't predict what was about to happen. But the events in Iran have taken the world by surprise, and one wonders if even Iranian intelligence had any idea what was about to unfold. Unlike counting tanks and centrifuges, less "physical" processes like leaders' intentions, election results and nations' willingness to rebel against oppressive regimes are much more difficult to predict.

Even a single database can lead to completely opposite conclusions, such as the ones provided by Military Intelligence and the Mossad on the benefits of negotiating with Syria. GOC Northern Command Gadi Eisenkot often says his service as military secretary to then-prime minister Ehud Barak taught him a valuable lesson. "I would be sitting in the same room with him and I would often have no idea what he was thinking and planning," Eisenkot has said. "How do we expect our intelligence to know what is on Assad's mind?"

Brig. Gen. (res.) Shalom Harari, who helped oversee the Israel Defense Forces' activities in the territories, says he experienced the limitations of intelligence at close range when the first intifada broke out in 1987. "Anyone can say that the existing situation is unbearable and will lead to an explosion, but virtually no one can predict at which point during a decade this will happen," he says. New York Times columnist David Brooks wrote last weekend: "The real action is out on the streets. The future course of events is maximally uncertain.

"The fate of nations is determined by glances and chance encounters: by the looks policemen give one another as a protesting crowd approaches down a boulevard ... by a captain who either decides to kill his countrymen or not; by a shy woman who emerges from a throng to throw herself on the thugs who are pummeling a kid prone on the sidewalk."

Brooks also relays a quote from Michael McFaul, a democracy expert who serves on the National Security Council: "In retrospect, all revolutions seem inevitable. Beforehand, all revolutions seem impossible." Former defense minister Moshe Arens used to say that intelligence people possess "perfect backward vision."

Intelligence and media both missed the eruption in Iran, much like the financial media and analysts didn't see the economic crisis coming. The lesson here is that intelligence is a limited instrument intended to provide information for leaders, but it cannot replace the actual decision-makers. The trouble starts when you mix the two and intelligence officials are pretentious enough to dictate policy.

Share |

Last update - 12:34 12/06/2009

Poll: 56% of Israelis back settlement construction

By The Associated Press

Tags: settlements, Israel news

Nearly six of every 10 Israelis think Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should resist U.S. demands to completely freeze construction in Jewish West Bank settlements, according to a new poll released Friday.

The poll by the Maagar Mohot Polling Institute comes just ahead of Netanyahu's major policy speech on Sunday that is expected to address a growing divide with Washington.

U.S. President Barack Obama has said he wants to aggressively pursue Mideast peacemaking, and the halt of all building on land the Palestinians claim for their future state has been a key U.S. demand.

Fifty-six percent of those surveyed said Netanyahu should not consent to the American demand to halt all settlement construction, as opposed to 37 percent who said he should. Fifty percent said failure to comply would not provoke a crisis with the U.S., while 32 percent said they thought the settlement freeze was a make or break issue for Washington.

Maagar Mohot also found in a separate poll that two-thirds of Israelis have little appetite for dismantling West Bank settlements. Thirty-six percent oppose any evacuation as part of a final peace deal and 30 percent said only a small number should be dismantled.

Both surveys polled 503 people and had a margin of error of 4.5 percentage points.

Nearly 300,000 Israelis live in 121 West Bank settlements and more than 100 wildcat settler enclaves.

The Palestinians want the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza Strip for a future state, and see settlement building as a major obstacle to that aspiration. The U.S. has opposed settlement construction for decades, but Obama has been especially forceful in the early months of his presidency in demanding a settlement freeze.

He also has been pressing Netanyahu to endorse the creation of a Palestinian state, something the Israeli leader has refused to do.

Netanyahu is expected to try to placate Washington in his policy address on Sunday. He will have to execute a delicate balancing act because he doesn't want any overtures to the U.S. to splinter his hawkish coalition.

Last update - 17:35 24/06/2009

U.S. to send ambassador to Syria after four-year hiatus

By Reuters

Tags: Basher Assad, Israel News

President Barack Obama has decided to return a U.S. ambassador to Syria after a four-year hiatus as talks between the two nations intensify, U.S. media reported on Tuesday.

The State Department informed Syria's ambassador to Washington, Imad Mustafa, of Obama's intention on Tuesday night, a senior administration official told the Washington Post.

Moustapha said that U.S.-Syrian relations were headed in the right direction and away from the freeze during the Bush administration.

"Nevertheless," Mustapha said, "It is still difficult to talk about radical change in the relationship but we can talk about advancing in small, but consecutive and positive steps."

By returning a senior U.S. envoy to Damascus, Obama is seeking to carve out a far larger role for the United States in the region as he works to rehabilitate U.S. relations with the Islamic world and the Arab Middle East, the newspaper said.

"It's in our interests to have an ambassador in Syria," a senior administration official told CNN.

Ambassador Mustafa welcomed the decision to name a U.S. envoy to increase dialogue among stakeholders in the Middle East, CNN said. The announcement of a new ambassador is expected to be made later this week but no individual has been chosen to fill the post, the report states.

A State Department spokesperson was not immediately available late on Tuesday.

Washington withdrew its ambassador from Syria in 2005 to protest the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri was assassinated.

The United Nations has cleared the way for a tribunal to investigate the circumstances of that killing. A preliminary report from the UN implicated several Syrian and Lebanese officials in the assassination.

Relations between Syria and the United States improved after Obama took office in January and U.S. officials said he was committed to seeking a peace deal between Syria and Israel as part of an overall Middle East peace deal.

The Syrian government, however, remains under U.S. sanctions, partly because of what the United States describes as a Syrian role in helping insurgents infiltrate Iraq.

The decision to appoint a U.S. ambassador follows a series of recent visits to Damascus by high-level U.S. military and diplomatic delegations, including a trip there this month by Obama's Middle East envoy, George J. Mitchell.

"We've been having more and more discussions, and we need to have someone there to engage," the administration official told CNN.

Recent post-election unrest in Iran was not directly responsible for the decision to increase direct ties to Syria, the source told CNN.

Last update - 08:27 24/06/2009

Leave the settlers there

By Yair Sheleg

Tags: palestinians, israel news

When diplomatic negotiations with the Palestinians resume, the question of the settlers' place in any agreement will once again come up. In recent years, the Israeli left has repeatedly compared them to Hamas, based on the following logic: The Israeli majority is the equivalent of the Palestine Liberation Organization, which recognized Israel and is willing to make peace with it, while the settlers are equivalent to Hamas in their refusal.

Clearly, this false symmetry is extremely problematic, and not only because the settlers, for all the serious violence they have engaged in over the last few years, are still far from Hamas' "achievements" in this realm. The comparison of the moderates is also flawed, because even the most moderate Palestinians have yet to voice consent to the ideas that most moderate Israelis have been promoting for many years - see, for instance, their demand for the refugees' "return" to Israel.

But even granting for the moment there is room for such a comparison on the diplomatic front, it is still fatally flawed. After all, most of those who equate the settlers with Hamas also generally argue that Hamas must be treated as a significant player in the negotiations. But the settlers, they say, should be ignored. And it seems this is the main reason for the rise in the level of settler terror, because it is absolutely clear that what made Hamas into "a player that must be taken into account" is not the West's sympathy for its religious vision, but the terror it perpetrates. So now the settlers also want to become a significant player via terror.

Lest there be any doubt, I do not intend this as a justification of settler terror. But if we stick to this comparison, we need to remember the wise statement often made about Palestinian terror: It is not enough to fight terror; it is also necessary to dry up the swamp in which it breeds.

So what role can the settlers be given in diplomatic negotiations that will fall short of the right to veto any agreement? The answer is they should be given the right to remain in their settlements, with Israeli citizenship, even after Israel has vacated these areas to make way for Palestinian sovereignty.

This proposal has several advantages. First, it is morally preferable. For the moral problem with the settlement enterprise is not its existence per se, but that it has perpetuated a situation in which millions of people are not citizens of any state. Had it been possible to annex the territories and grant Israeli citizenship to all their inhabitants without endangering Israel's Jewish identity, there would have been no moral problem with this solution - or at least, no more than when Israel forced its sovereignty and citizenship on those Arabs who lived within the Green Line. In any case, if it is possible to enable Palestinian sovereignty without uprooting 200,000 Jews from their homes, this would be the most just and moral solution of all.

There is also a practical advantage: If the settlers do not accept the offer, the justice of evacuating them will increase. Even Charles de Gaulle, who very much wanted to get out of Algeria, refused to sign an agreement until the Algerians agreed to allow the French settlers to remain, because he understood that he could not violate the principle of natural justice, which holds that a person should not be forced out of his home unless it is absolutely necessary.

This is not "giving a prize to criminals." After all, no one would suggest evacuating residents of the United States just because their forebears conquered the land via horrendous massacres. And the Jews even have an advantage over America's founding fathers. Our case is that of a people that returned to its historic homeland, in which it dwelled long before Arab colonists established settlements in it 1,400 years ago.

Dutch FM sees 'unpredictable' chance for Mideast peace

By Cnaan Liphshiz

Tags: Obama, Dutch FM, Israel news

The fact that Israel and the Palestinians are exploring a two-state solution mere months after the Gaza crisis is an "unpredictable" occurrence, according to Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen. "The speeches by Barack Obama, Benjamin Netanyahu and Salam Fayyad have created a momentum for peace," the minister told Haaretz Tuesday.

Recalling March's Sharm el-Sheikh international conference on reconstruction efforts in Gaza following Israel's invasion into the Strip, Verhagen said, "Had someone told me there that by June I'd be in Tel Aviv to discuss a two-state solution, I would've told him he couldn't predict that. Yet it's happening."

The Dutch minister, known for his pro-Israel stance, is completing a three-day visit to Israel, the Palestinian Authority and Syria Wednesday.

Upgrading the ties between Israel and European Union would help the Europeans "play a more constructive role in the peace talks," he added. But last week the EU conditioned such an upgrade on "the resolution of the Israel-Palestinian conflict through the implementation of the two-state solution."

Sitting on the terrace of the Sheraton hotel in Tel Aviv, Verhagen said that "it's important for the European Union to play a role not only with regard to support for the Palestinians, but also that it hold roundtable discussions with Israel."

In parallel to upgrading ties, the EU should set up "a full human rights committee where we can discuss the human rights violation and the need for respect for human rights by Israel," added Verhagen - a member of Holland's ruling Christian-Democrat party.

Asked whether Israel's invasion into Gaza in December helped create "the current momentum for peace," Verhagen replied that, "Saying that would be pleading for further military actions, which I am not doing - but no country can allow its citizens to be attacked on a day-to-day basis, as what happened in Sderot."

Although Arab and Palestinian leaders criticized Netanyahu's speech at Bar-Ilan University last week in which the premier conditioned the formation of a Palestinian state on demilitarization, Verhagen says that following the speech he also heard "very positive appreciation for the possibility of reaching an agreement."

The "very positive thing," according to Verhagen, about the recent speeches by U.S. President Barack Obama, Netanyahu and Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad about the two-state solution is that "although we have to work on reconstructing Gaza and open its border for humanitarian aid, it's not limiting the negotiations."

Turning to the internal unrest following the Iranian elections and its possible regional implications, Verhagen said this served to delegitimize the Iranian leadership, because "a government that shoots its own people cannot presume to represent them very well."

Share |

Last update - 03:45 22/06/2009

ANALYSIS / Expect things to get worse in Iran - at least for now

By Zvi Bar'el

Tags: mir hossein mousavi

The lenses of cell-phone cameras have become the West's only tool for assessing the scope of the demonstrations now taking place in Iran's streets, since conflicting blog posts and government pronouncements offer a distorted picture of reality. As a result, the number of people thronging a few Tehran streets has become the sole means by which to measure the "revolution." This is an important - but it is insufficient.

For instance, who are the demonstrators? Are they all followers of Mir Hossein Mousavi, or is he losing ground to other rivals? What is happening in the villages, which comprise almost a third of Iran's population and the bulk of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's support? Are the middle classes - from merchants to low-level clerics - also participating in the demonstrations? And, most importantly, how long can the demonstrators maintain their momentum?

Judging by the messages Mousavi has posted on the Internet, he himself is torn. On one hand, he has asked his supporters to continue the demonstrations, though quietly - without confronting the security forces, sometimes even without shouting slogans. On the other hand, he insists that his goal is not to change Iran's system of government, but only to implement a few reforms, augment freedom of expression a bit and, above all, prevent Ahmadinejad from serving another term.

Mousavi and his associates know that the longer the demonstrations go on, the more the regime, and especially Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, will entrench themselves in their current positions. That is liable to lead to a violent showdown between the Revolutionary Guards, who have not yet exerted their full force, and the demonstrators. And at that point, a political compromise will become impossible.

Therefore, the opposition on Sunday proposed establishing a neutral commission of inquiry that would thoroughly investigate the entire election, instead of the recount of a random 10 percent of ballot boxes that Khamenei has instructed the Guardian Council to perform. This new proposal reflects an utter lack of faith in the Guardian Council, which Khamenei appointed, and if accepted, it will constitute a major achievement for the opposition.

Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani, who is affiliated with Ahmadinejad's hard-line camp, has come out in favor of this proposal, saying the Guardian Council cannot be a neutral arbiter because some of its members expressed support for Ahmadinejad before the election. The opposition is also trying to recruit important clerics who have thus far declined to enter the political fray. Should they join Mousavi's camp, this would put heavy pressure on Khamenei.

Since neither side can be certain of victory, a mutually acceptable political compromise is still a likely outcome. But even if this does eventually happen, both sides will want to display maximum power on the streets until then. Thus, in the coming days, additional escalation is likely, in both the scope of the demonstrations and the amount of force the government uses to suppress them.

Last update - 09:22 22/06/2009

U.S. road adopted by neo-Nazis could be renamed after rabbi

By The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News

A litter prevention program got an unusual ally last year: A neo-Nazi group adopted a section of highway in Springfield and picked up the trash.

The state said it had no way to reject the group's application, saying membership in the Adopt-A-Highway program can't be denied because of a group's political beliefs.

Lawmakers responded with an amendment to a large transportation bill that would rename that section of road after Abraham Joshua Heschel, a rabbi who narrowly escaped the Nazis in World War II and later marched with the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

But the move is being criticized by Heschel's daughter, who objects to naming the neo-Nazi's half-mile (800-meter) patch of highway after her father and calls the plan highly inappropriate and vulgar.

"I don't want Nazis stomping on a highway named for my father. What are they going to do then if they don't pick up the litter? The whole thing is disgusting," said Susannah Heschel, professor of Jewish history at Dartmouth College.

"It may be an attempt to teach the neo-Nazis a lesson, she said. But I think it's an affront to my father's dignity to attach his name to a neo-Nazi highway."

The Springfield unit of the National Socialist Movement committed last year to clean up trash along the section of Highway 160 near the city limits in west Springfield. Two signs noting the group's membership in the Adopt-A-Highway program went up last October.

A 2005 U.S. Supreme Court ruling arising from a similar effort by the Ku Klux Klan says membership in the Adopt-A-Highway program can't be denied because of a group's political beliefs.

In general, the state can deny an organization's application only if it has members who have been convicted of violent criminal activity within the past 10 years.

After the state dropped the Klan from cleaning up a section of Interstate 55 near St. Louis in 2001 for failing to pick up trash, that stretch of highway was renamed the Rosa Parks Highway in honor of the black woman arrested in 1955 when she refused to give up her seat to a white man on a bus in Montgomery, Alabama.

In May, State Rep. Sara Lampe introduced legislation renaming the Springfield stretch of highway after Heschel after consulting with the Jewish Community Relations Board of Kansas City. The measure was added as an amendment to the large transportation bill.

For the National Socialist movement to be in the Adopt-a-Highway program is well within their rights, said Rabbi Alan L. Cohen of the Jewish Community Relations Board of Kansas City.

But obviously there were people raising the concern that this is the wrong message for people to see driving down a Missouri highway, that there are National Socialists out here, Cohen said Sunday.

Susannah Heschel said she contacted Lampe's office last month and told them about her objections over naming just the neo-Nazi's stretch of highway after her father.

Lampe did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

"I understand the good intentions," Susannah Heschel said. "Everybody wants to get rid of racism.... But I don't think it should be done this way."

Representatives of the National Socialist movement in Missouri did not immediately return calls seeking comment about the legislation Sunday. But a statement on the movement's Web site calls the renaming a lame attempt to insult National Socialist pro-environment/green policies.

The Web site has images of the Confederate flag, swastikas and members in military garb, and says the group fights for the rights of all White American citizens of European descent.

"We welcome this spineless legislation, as it will no doubt spur a backlash from the local people whom will wonder why anyone, especially outside Jewish agitators would attempt to disrespect local citizens that volunteer their time to clean local roads," the statement said.

The governor has until mid-July to sign or veto the transportation bill. Nixon spokesman Scott Holste said Sunday that while the governor is reviewing the entire bill, he is in favor of the amendment to rename the stretch of highway.

Heschel was deported from Germany and then escaped from Poland weeks before the Germans invaded in World War II, said Michael Abrams, chairman of the Jewish Community Relations Board. He taught at the Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati during World War II and later at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America in New York.

He was revered for his piety and for his activism on civil rights and other issues.

"He's a great example of the Nazi failure to annihilate the Jews and of Jewish participation in the civil rights movement," Abrams said. He said a famous photograph shows Heschel and King walking side by side at Selma in 1965.

But Susannah Heschel said her father would have been appalled at having his name used for the highway. He would not feel honored by this.

Last update - 18:44 21/06/2009

Yemeni Jews arrive in Israel on covert Jewish Agency mission

By The Associated Press

Tags: Moshe Yaish Nahari

Sixteen Yemenite Jews arrived in Israel on Sunday afternoon in a secret immigration operation orchestrated by the Jewish Agency.

Jewish Agency representatives were seen of late in Yemen as part of their efforts to organize this mission, Arab media reported.

The Agency carried out a similar operation in March, when it rescued a family of 10 whose lived were apparently threatened by Al-Qaida agents in their native Yemen.

Yemenite Jews have the special protection of the President of Yemen Ali Abdallah Salah. In recent years, however, anti-Semitic attacks against Jews have spiralled out of control.

An appeals court on Sunday sentenced to death a Muslim convicted of killing a Yemeni Jew, overturning a previous verdict ordering the man to pay the victim's family a fine instead of facing capital punishment.

The family had criticized the previous verdict, which was issued in March when the judge found Abdel Aziz Yehia Hamoud al-Abdi, a retired Yemeni air force pilot, mentally unstable.

During the earlier trial, Al-Abdi admitted gunning down a Jewish teacher, Moshe Yaish Nahari, in December in Omran town north of the capital, San'a. He said he warned other Jews they must convert to Islam or be killed.

After Ahmed al-Budani read the verdict Sunday, al-Abdi told the judge this sentence is an honor to me. The ruling could be appealed to the supreme court.

The original ruling was unusual because Islamic law normally stipulates a man convicted of murder can only be spared the death penalty if the victim's family agrees to compensation, known as diyah in Arabic. The family refused to accept the fine, which the judge set at about $27,500 (5.5 million riyals), and vowed to pursue the death penalty.

Nahari was one of the roughly 400 Jews still living in Yemen - mostly in Raydah, a small town north of the capital. Yemen was once home to about 50,000 Jews in the early 1950s, but most emigrated to Israel.

[img jews7]

Yemeni Rabbi Yahya Youssef Moussa celebrates Passover with children relocated to the capital, San'a, from a northern province.

(AP)

Last update - 22:39 26/04/2009

Yemen's ancient Jewish community fights for survival

By The Associated Press

Tags: Isreal News, Jewish World

In the village of Kharif in northern Yemen, where a kosher butcher slaughters chickens and the school bus carries young boys in side curls along a dirt track to their Hebrew studies, one of the oldest Jewish communities in the Arab world is fighting for its survival.

Yemen's Jews, here and elsewhere in the country, are thought to have roots dating back nearly 3,000 years to King Solomon. The community used to number 60,000 but shrank dramatically when most left for the newborn state of Israel.

Those remaining, variously estimated to number 250 to 400, are feeling new and sometimes violent pressure from Yemeni Muslims, lately inflamed by Israel's fierce offensive against Hamas militants in Gaza that cost over 1,000 Palestinian lives.

They face a Yemeni government that is ambivalent - publicly supportive but also lax in keeping its promises - in an Arab world where Islamic extremism and hostility to minorities are generally on the rise.

"There is hardly a mosque sermon that's free of bigotry. The government's own political rhetoric marginalizes the Jews, and civil society is too weak to protect them," says Mansour Hayel, a Muslim Yemeni and human rights activist who is an expert on Yemen's Jewry.

"The government's policies are to blame for the suffering of the Jews," he says.

The pressures have long existed. But an Associated Press reporter who traveled recently to the rarely visited north and interviewed Jews, Muslim tribal sheiks, rights activists and lawyers in Yemen's capital of San'a, heard complaints that the frequency of harassment - including a murder and the pelting of homes with rocks ? has markedly increased.

The testimony was particularly striking because Jews in Arab lands often refrain from airing grievances, lest they antagonize the government and provoke Muslim militants.

Yemen's government says it is trying to stop the harassment. President Ali Abdullah Saleh has proposed that the 45 Jewish families in the farming communities of Kharif and the nearby town of Raydah in Omran province be moved 50 miles southeast to San'a, where they can be better protected. He has offered them free plots of land to build homes.

But the government has taken no concrete steps since presidential aides first spoke of the offer late last year.

For 18 Jewish families who moved to San'a in 2007 from Saada, another northern province, things have not gone well. They fled fighting between troops and rebels, during which some Jewish homes were ransacked and ancient books destroyed. Now they live in cramped apartments under tight guard, entirely dependent on small government handouts.

The families in Kharif and Raydah say they too would like to leave, but only if compensated for property they leave behind.

Migrating to Israel or the U.S. is a possibility, and the government says it will not stop anyone from leaving. But Jews here don't discuss that option publicly, because in Yemen, Israel is anathema and America is deeply distrusted.

At least one outside group has tried to bring the Yemeni Jews out, said an Israeli official in Jerusalem, speaking on condition of anonymity because the subject is highly sensitive. But many are loath to become refugees and lose all they have, the official said.

"It is in the interest of the government for the Jews to stay," said Sheik Mohammed Nagi al-Shayef, a wealthy tribal leader and the Yemeni president's point man on Jewish affairs. "It will be a disgrace for the government if they leave."

But that view appears far from universal.

In Kharif, Yahya Yaish Al-Qedeimi has a long list of complaints about how he and his fellow Jews are treated: harassment in the market, stones thrown at the school bus, insults from villagers walking past his house.

When Saddam Hussein was executed, "they pelted our house with rocks," he said.

Al-Qedeimi is a rabbi's son in a village that no longer has a rabbi. He is uncertain about the future but fears that if the community moves to the capital it will be grouped in one place and become a tempting target for militants.

He says younger members of the community are pressuring the elders to leave Yemen altogether.

Tensions rise each time Israel conducts military operations in Gaza or the West Bank, he says.

"We complain to the police about the more serious incidents, but they never investigate," Al-Qedeimi said. "Our fears have grown after Moshe's killing. The lenient sentence against his killer will encourage others to do the same."

By "Moshe" he means Moshe Yaish Youssef Nahari, who was gunned down on a December day near his home in Raydah. Compounding the Jews' shock and dread, the self-confessed killer was spared the death penalty, though it's usually mandatory in such cases.

Nahari, a father of nine in his early 30s, taught Hebrew to the children, and was also in charge of slaughtering sheep and poultry according to kosher laws.

He had Jewish and Muslim friends and occasionally invited them to his home to chew qat, the mildly narcotic leaf that is a Yemeni staple and symbol of social togetherness. He also was an active campaigner for Yemen's president.

The killer was Abdul-Aziz Yehia Hamoud al-Abdi, a former air force pilot. He was convicted of murder in the first degree, but the judge ruled him mentally unfit, sent him to a mental institution and ordered his clan to pay the victim's family 5.5 million riyals ($27,500).

Nahari's family has refused to accept the money and is appealing the March 2 sentence.

It was al-Abdi's second murder. The 38-year-old Muslim had killed his wife five years earlier but the case never reached a court because tribal leaders protected him, saying he suffered from depression.

According to witnesses cited by Khaled al-Anasi, the Nahari family's Muslim lawyer, al-Abdi confronted Nahari shouting, "You, Jew, convert to Islam so your life is safe." Nahari said something to the effect of "mind your own business" and al-Abdi pumped 11 bullets from a Kalashnikov assault rifle into the victim, killing him, the witness statements said.

Al-Anasi said the judge, having convicted al-Abdi of first-degree murder, was obliged to sentence him to life imprisonment or death. He also complained that the trial was held in Omran province, with hundreds of al-Abdi's fellow tribesmen frequently disrupting the proceedings and intimidating the judge and Nahari's family.

"I used to like living in Raydah, now I just want to leave," said 12-year-old Sasson, the oldest of the murdered man's four boys.

Sasson was taught Hebrew and religion by his late father. He says his education has been disrupted by his father's death and that he may travel abroad to study. Four of his aunts are married and settled in Israel, the family says.

"I will be back when I finish my studies," said Sasson, a soft-spoken boy who wore a dark suit, it being the day before Passover, the holiday that celebrates the Jews' exodus from slavery in ancient Egypt.

The history of Jews in the Arab world is a narrative of discrimination and persecution, but also some prosperity. The hundreds of thousands who arrived after their expulsion from 15th century Spain mostly lived in ghettos with limited rights, although some professionals prospered.

Most migrated to Israel in the 1950s. The small numbers who stayed behind lived at the mercy of nationalist governments in places like Iraq and Egypt.

For Jews, Yemen has more symbolic significance than almost any place in the Arab world. Historians believe the first Jews arrived here in around 900 B.C. as part of King Solomon's trading network. Evidence of a Jewish presence in Yemen can be traced back to the 3rd century A.D.

The Jews of today's Yemen zealously guard their customs. Men wear skull caps, women black robes and veils. Children must learn Hebrew and Torah. Holy days are celebrated in bare makeshift synagogues attached to the homes of community elders. On a recent day, two men bumped along a dirt track on a motorcycle near Kharif, side curls blowing horizontal in the wind.

In the dusty courtyard of al-Qedeimi's mud-brick home, Jewish men stood chatting, while a man murmured prayers as he slaughtered a chicken.

Al-Qedeimi is a car repairman and traditional healer who says he made lifelong Muslim friends at the government school he attended.

Because of the harassment, young Jews no longer can go to that school and make such friends, he said.

Receiving visitors in a room with Hebrew writings on the wall, he comes back to his friend Nahari's murder.

"If the sentence had been appropriately strong, the Jews would have stayed quiet and dropped any plans to leave for San'a. Most of us want to stay, but we are worried about our lives," he said.

In the capital, the 18 families evacuated by the government from Saada in 2007 celebrated Passover. In the apartment block assigned to them by the government, the boys were wearing suits so new they still showed the designer labels on the sleeves. Girls with dark hair and eyes wore new white dresses.

The government, eager to show benevolence toward the uprooted Jews, let Yemeni reporters and TV crews record the celebrations. Plainclothes security men listened to every word spoken by Yahya Youssef Moussa, the families' rabbi.

Moussa, while the cameras are on, lavishly praised the president as a "loving father" and a leader. "We are ready to sacrifice our lives for him," he said.

Compared with the fighting they fled, "This is a place where we feel completely safe," said Moussa. "We can never return."

When the cameras were off, however, Moussa had grievances to air: The government wasn't giving the community money to rent stores and buy craftsmen's tools; the evacuees hadn't been compensated for property they left behind in Saada; they were crammed into six small apartments, sometimes 18 to an apartment.

Many want their young men to travel to the U.S. or Europe for study, but insist they should return after graduation.

Physical safety is their overriding concern.

"If we are ever to move from here," the rabbi said, "we want homes with high walls and armed guards."

Last update - 13:54 19/03/2009

U.S. to aid in rescue of persecuted Yemen Jews

By Shlomo Shamir, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Jewish World, Yemen

The United States government is taking part in efforts to extricate Jews in Yemen who have been the subject of physical harassment from their Muslim neighbors.

The rescue efforts focus on 300 Jews from the Yemenite town of Rada, north of the capital Sanaa.

The State Department has maintained a weeks-long dialog with Yemenite authorities over the fate of the country's Jewish community. The issue took on more urgency following the murder this past December of a prominent activist in the Jewish community, Moshe Yaish Nahari.

It is unclear if the U.S. involvement in helping facilitate the Jews' exit from Yemen is the result of an initiative by Washington or an appeal from Israel. The operation is the brainchild of the umbrella group United Jewish Communities, which is being aided by other organizations specializing in absorbing and resettling refugees.

The Satmar Hassidic sect in New York is extending special assistance to help the new immigrants put down roots in the United States. Originally, the government intended to provide housing for the immigrants in North Dakota.

Yet, functionaries intervened on behalf of the Satmar movement and convinced the authorities to permit their resettlement in Monsey, New York, a town north of New York City that is known for its large Hassidic population.

Last update - 21:38 21/06/2009

British Jewish soldier killed while on patrol in Afghanistan

By Haaretz Service

Tags: Britain, Israel News

A British Jewish soldier was killed earlier this month in Afghanistan when a roadside bomb exploded near him while leading his platoon on foot patrol.

Lieutenant Paul Mervis, 27, was the first British Jewish combatant to fall during the operation in Afghanistan. He was buried Tuesday at the military cemetery in Aldershot, Hants.

"

He was passionately committed to his men, far beyond mere duty," his family was quoted as saying in the London Times. "He had read widely about Afghanistan and went with a genuine desire to help bring enough stability there to enable reconstruction to follow."

Only a few hundred Jewish soldiers serve in the British army, a significantly lower number than those serving in the U.S. military.

Two Jewish U.S. intelligence officers, Shawn Pine and Lieutenant Roslyn Schultte, were also killed recently in Kabul.

Schulte, 25, was the first female graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy to be killed in action in Afghanistan or Iraq.

FUNNY

]]]

Last update - 14:37 21/06/2009

Barak: Regional talks better than bilateral negotiations with PA

By Haaretz Service

Tags: Israel news, Labor

Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on Sunday that multilateral regional talks would be better for Israel than bilateral negotiations with the Palestinians toward a peace accord.

Barak told reporters in Cairo after meeting Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak that in negotiations with the Palestinians, Israel is the "only

one that can give, the Palestinians are the underdog and the talks are

a

symmetrical."

But in regional talks, Barak said, it becomes clear that Israel is the isolated party. He said topics could include the struggle against radical Islamic terrorism and economic projects.

"The Arab side has much to give in the form of confidence building measures and steps toward normalization," he said.

Barak also said that a recent policy speech by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, dismissed by Egypt as flawed, was a major step forward.

In his first official policy address last week, Netanyahu endorsed - with

tough conditions - the establishment of a demilitarized Palestinian state. Cairo, however, has said the proposal falls short of the Palestinian state Arabs seek.

"[Netanyahu] made it clear that the end result, the goal of the whole

process is to have a situation where the two peoples, Palestinian and Israeli, are living side by side in two states in good neighborliness, peace and security," Barak told reporters.

"It is a really unique opportunity for the peace process because the common interest is so apparent regarding the struggle against hegemonic Iran, against radical terrorism, against proliferation of nuclear weapons," he said.

Barak described Netanyahu's comments on a Palestinian state as a "major step forward" by Israel in helping advance peace.

Netanyahu, speaking on June 14, said Palestinians must recognize Israel as a Jewish state and forego the right of return for refugees but did not promise a halt to settlement expansion in the West Bank.

Mubarak has said Israel's call to recognize Israel as a state for the Jewish people undermined efforts to achieve peace and has said he told Netanyahu, who visited Egypt last month, that peace talks should resume where they left off.

Palestinian leaders have refused to recognize Israel as a Jewish state because they believe it weakens the position of the 20 percent of Israel's citizens who are Arabs.

They also say it undermines a key demand for a right for Palestinians to return to areas in Israel from which they fled or were forced out in the 1948 Independence Day War ahead of Israel's creation.

An Israeli official said Barak's visit aimed to look at ways to move ahead in peace talks after Netanyahu's speech and an address by U.S. President Barack Obama from Cairo on June 4 that covered Middle East peace and other topics.

Obama, who has promised a deep U.S. role in Middle East peace efforts, has called for a full Israeli settlement freeze but said he saw "positive movement" in Netanyahu's speech.

"The fact that it [Netanyahu's speech] was well accepted by the White House ... means that the Americans are reading it the same way," Barak said. "It is still clear that there are certain differences in how to implement certain practical aspects of it but I think that in the coming weeks we will try to iron it out and pave the way for moving forward."

Like Egypt, Palestinian officials have voiced opposition to many aspects of Netanyahu's proposal.

Arab foreign ministers will meet in Cairo on Wednesday to discuss Obama's address and Netanyahu's proposal, Palestinian state news agency MENA reported.

Labor and Likud MKs clash over Palestinian statehood

Meanwhile, an argument broke out during a cabinet meeting Sunday between Labor parliamentarians and a number of Likud ministers, after Netanyahu outlined his diplomatic forays planned for the coming months.

Several Labor MKs called on Netanyahu to advance the peace process with greater urgency, with Transportation Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer calling for the prime minister to head to Egypt to advance peace talks by way of Mubarak.

Minority Affairs Minister Avishai Braverman added that "We must advance the diplomatic process so there will not be one state for two peoples here".

The remarks by Labor MKs were met with disapproval by Likud ministers, indcluding Benny Begin, who said "it is our right to be a Jewish state and to continue living in Judea and Samaria".

Begin also echoed Netanyahu's statement from his Bar-Ilan speech, in which he said a future Palestinian state must be demilitarized, saying "there is no such thing as a state without missiles, the missile will come after there is a country."

Minister of Strategic Affairs Moshe Ya'alon, a former IDF chief of staff, said "there is no partner on the Palestinian side, we just give, and we get nothing."

Bayit Chairman MK Daniel Hershkovitz, said "the Palestinians need to accept Israel as a Jewish state and show if they want peace or continued conflict".

Shas Chairman Eli Yishai called on the Palestinians to show they are serious about a two-state solution with Israel, saying "if by two-states they mean a state for Fatah and a state for Hamas, this is something we can't agree to."

The meeting was delayed shortly because Netanyahu had to be taken to see a doctor after a foreign object became lodged in his eye.

]]]]

Last update - 22:50 16/06/2009

Rightist MK warns: Demand for Palestinian demilitarization will fade

By Cnaan Liphshiz

Tags: Israel news, Palestinians

By next year, nothing will remain of the demilitarization stipulation that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has set for the formation of a Palestinian state, Infrastructure Minister Uzi Landau warned on Tuesday at an event sponsored by Yisrael Beiteinu in Jerusalem.

"My fear is that in a few months from now, no one will remember what Netanyahu said about demilitarization," Landau said. "They will only register the fact that the head of the National Camp in Israel supports the formation of a Palestinian state."

The national infrastructure minister nonetheless praised Netanyahu for articulating the precondition and for beginning his recent foreign policy speech at Bar Ilan University on Sunday with the assertion that Jews were entitled to live in an independent, Jewish state in the Land of Israel because of their biblical heritage.

Click here for the full text of Netanyahu's foreign policy speech.

"I was proud to hear Netanyahu's speech because he said we deserve this land according to the Bible," said Landau, a former Likud member who switched over to Avigdor Lieberman's party, Yisrael Beiteinu - now Likud senior-most coalition partner.

Landau's statements may be seen as a reaction to U.S. President Barack Obama?s recent speech in Cairo, in which he linked the right of Jews to a Jewish state to the murder of six million Jews in the Holocaust.

Landau was speaking in English before a predominantly American-Israeli crowd of 100 people at Cafe Joe in the center of the capital. He devoted part of his speech to defending Yisrael Beiteinu's contested initiative to require all citizens to pledge their allegiance to the state.

"The Israeli Arabs have every right in the country, and none on it," he said. "We are proposing to apply the loyalty oath to everyone. Many countries, including the U.S., require new immigrants, for example, to swear their allegiance."

Introducing more nationalistic values into the school system with a greater emphasis on flag and anthem, Landau said, would make Israel "a stronger country." In this context, Landau mentioned that as things stand now, "Arab figures but also Jews stand up against us at times of trial."

"The attempt of the highly respected U.S. President Barack Obama to introduce symmetry into his attitude to the region is erroneous," Landau said. "There is no symmetry between those who observe human and civil rights, and those who hand out candies when Israelis and Americans die in horrible suicide attacks, as we have seen in September 2001."

Last update - 07:07 21/06/2009

Row grows over Norway honor for pro-Nazi Nobel laureate

By Cnaan Liphshiz, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Jewish World, Norway

By honoring novelist and Nazi-sympathizer Knut Hamsun, Norway has damaged the international Holocaust education drive that it has recently been appointed to head, campaigners against anti-Semitism told Haaretz. Yet, the leader of Norway's Jewish community disagrees.

In March, Norway assumed chairmanship of the 26-nation Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education in the midst of celebrating the 150th anniversary of the birth of Knut Hamsun, the country's once celebrated author who was shunned for supporting Norway's Nazi occupation regime during World War II.

The government has honored the novelist with celebrations, a commemorative coin and is allocating millions of dollars toward building a cultural center in the Nobel Prize laureate's hometown, which is to open in August.

Hamsun, who died impoverished at the age of 92 in 1952 (the government stripped him of his property) once gave his Nobel Prize medal in literature as a gift to Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels. He also met Adolf Hitler in Bavaria. The author of masterpieces like "Hunger," Hamsun is cherished by readers in Norway and around the world.

"No government should honor Nazis, their collaborators or their sympathizers," said Carole Nuriel, an analyst for the Anti-Defamation League. The ADL drafted a statement on Norway in consultation with the country's Jewish community, noting that in the framework of commemoration, the Norwegian government was "highlighting Hamsun's moral failure, not downplaying it."

A spokesperson for the Norwegian embassy in Tel Aviv declined to comment, but Bjorn Svenungsen of the foreign ministry in Oslo told Haaretz that honoring Hamsun is "a commemoration of one of Norway's most important authors." He said all parties involved have criticized Hamsun's Nazi past. The celebration is "a tribute to Hamsun's role in European literature, not an acceptance of his political views," Svenungsen added. "The event is also used to remember the massive criticism of Hamsun after the 1945 liberation."

Per Antonsen, a former veteran consultant on foreign policy to the Norwegian government, told Haaretz that Hamsun's commemoration was "a clear result of the government's deep-rooted ignorance and lack of political and moral consciousness."

The head of the Simon Wiesenthal Center's Israel office, Ephraim Zuroff, said Hamsun's commemoration "casts a shadow on the task force's work, turning it into something less effective" and "more symbolic than practical."

Anne Sender, chairwoman of Norway's Jewish community, said she would rather the government didn't honor Hamsun, but she nonetheless lauded it for "using the events to highlight the man's Nazi past alongside his genius." She said she did not see the commemoration as conflicting with Norway's task force chairmanship. "The commemoration can be used in a healthy manner, to teach people who are less knowledgeable about Hamsun's Nazi sympathies."

Michael Melchior, Norway's Danish-born former chief rabbi, said the legitimacy of commemorating Hamsun depended on the prominence given to his Nazi past. "If Hamsun's ignominy is displayed in all its acrimoniousness, it wouldn't conflict with Norway's chairmanship of the task force," he said. "If they turn him into a hero, it would merit condemnation regardless of the task force."

Erez Uriely, director of the Oslo-based Center Against Anti-Semitism, concurs. "We should remember the genius Knut Hamsun, both as one of the most important authors of his time and as a Nazi supporter," he said.

But Manfred Gerstenfeld, a scholar on anti-Semitism and chairman of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, said the problem goes deeper than just the Hamsun issue. "The outrageous state-sponsored honoring of Hamsun is only the tip of the iceberg of why Norway should never have been chosen to chair the task force," he said

Last update - 10:19 21/06/2009

Luxury Palestinian mall signals transformation of 'terror capital'

By Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: palestinian authority

The skies lit up over Jenin last month, and it wasn't tracer bullets or flash bombs but celebratory fireworks, set off to mark the occasion of the opening of Hirbawi Home Center, a new luxury establishment on the city's outskirts.

The five-story building near the Jalame checkpoint cost $5 million to build, says its owner, and it is filled with deluxe, foreign-made products seen mostly in the pages of newspaper supplements.

This shopping opportunity is intended to interest the upper crust of Jenin, and while some might think the proposition suggests financial suicide, the profit forecasts for the project have been so favorable the owner plans to open four more shops in the West Bank and one in Jordan.

The next city to enjoy a Hirbawi Home Center is Ramallah, where one is already in partial operation; then Hebron, Tul Karem and Nablus.

"It may sound mad to outsiders," says the chain's CEO, Ziad Turabi, "but to us it makes perfect sense. We believe we can make a very handsome profit. Many people in the occupied territories have money but they have nowhere to spend it if they're after quality. We offer them the best quality there is."

This may not sound like the familiar description of the occupied territories - the impoverished Palestinian village or the overcrowded refugee camp, a population sustaining itself on international aid. But it turns out that quite a few Palestinians consider a plasma screen, a surround sound stereo and comfortable chairs to be fairly essential items.

Here, on the fifth floor of the Jenin operation, overlooking the fields separating Israel from Jenin, are the in-demand electric gadgets: enormous TV screens, vacuum cleaners, espresso machines, and the list goes on and on. Turabi points out that some products are only available in Home Center shops. "This is an espresso machine that grinds the coffee beans," he says. "People want more and more of these products. They ask for the finest quality." Most of the products on sale are imported through the port of Ashdod. "We have exclusive deals with quite a few brands," says Turabi. "They'll only market their products at Home Center."

The idea turns out to be approximately five years old. Mwafaq Hirbawi, a prominent businessman in the carpet trade, was looking for a new avenue in which to branch out. He put up a few buildings across the occupied territories without determining their final purpose.

Turabi, who hails from the furniture business, has worked with the Hirbawi family for 14 years, and he was the man they turned to to run the enterprise. "We were making our evaluations for a few months and decided to go for the luxury brands, like LG for electrics and Meselmani for kitchens. After linking up the furniture I was dealing with the carpet business [and] we realized we can grow further. We got several offers to give it up, to rent out the buildings, but Mwafaq didn't want to, he was looking for something different and new," Turabi says.

"But how will you profit? Who'll go to Jenin to buy luxury wares?"

"We've been working for a few months now and every day had been like opening day. We are very pleased, and the profits have been very satisfying so far. Don't worry, we're not going to lose, and we truly believe that. It's true that Jenin is like a big village and wealthy people here are few. Everyone told us to start off with Ramallah. But I came here a few months ago and ran some profit estimates."

"And what if there's a closure on Jenin tomorrow?"

"Let's just say we don't pin much hopes on shoppers from other areas. If something really major happens in the West Bank, well, there's not much we can do. But let's also say that if I was a pessimist forever thinking about all the things that could go wrong, we never would have opened. But we think we can make a very handsome profit here."

The prices are not much cheaper than in Israel, perhaps except on the furniture, arguably the true gem of the place. A decorated glass table is sold on the second floor for NIS 2,800; Turabi suggest it would have cost 40 percent more in Israel. One can also find china plates, crystal, classical furniture and more. The company is preparing to begin building the Hebron branch, which will accommodate a retail area of about 12,000 square meters. Curious would-be shoppers can see the display rooms of the business live-cast on the Web.

"Abu Tarek," the Jenin area commander, seemed pleased. He and his predecessor, "Abu Hadid," have turned "terrorism capital" into the quietest, safest city in the West Bank. Jenin, the flagship project of the American administration and the U.S. security coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority, Lieutenant-General Keith Dayton, has become the success story of the new PA. "What brings Hirbawi and others is the security situation", Abu Tarek says. "We solved quite a few issues and, Inshallah (God willing, we will see many more investments. Even the refugee camp is quiet now. There are no militants and we react very quickly to any incident. The residents believed in the security apparatus. They trust us and assist us."

"And you can see it on the street. Shops are open until late, women can go around fearlessly."

"What about attacks on Israel?"

"It's been over two years since the last attack from Jenin against Israel. We went to great length to prevent terror attacks, and your people know that."

A third factor which makes the change in the West Bank possible is the Israel Defense Forces. Abu Tarek says the Israeli army was still carrying out operations in the West Bank but became "a lot less violent." And one of the Palestinians present, who witnessed his brothers' arrest recently, chuckles: "They're very gentle nowadays. They come quietly, knock on the door and say politely: Army, please open up."

Last update - 04:32 21/06/2009

ANALYSIS / Assad no longer stands in his father's shadow

By Yoav Stern, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Hafez Assad, Syria

There are large billboards on the road leading to Damascus from the Jordanian border. Once they featured portraits of former Syrian president Hafez Assad. Even after his death, he continued to exist on the billboards, alongside his two sons, Basil (who died before him) and Bashar, who was appointed president in his place. Today Bashar alone is on the billboards. The new "lion of Damascus" no longer stands in anyone's shadow.

This month marks the ninth anniversary of Hafez Assad's death. Next month will mark nine years of Bashar's tenure. A different Syria and a different Assad. The young man (34 years old at the time) who lacked confidence and experience has become an experienced president with tested ability to overcome crises and even to be strengthened by them. The Ibn Khaldun Center for Development Studies in Cairo recently awarded him the title of "the most popular leader" in the Middle East.

Prof. David Lesch, a Middle Eastern scholar at Trinity University in San Antonio, Texas and the author of "The New Lion of Damascus: Bashar al-Assad and Modern Syria," visited here last week. At the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies at Tel Aviv University he related an incident he witnessed at the Damascus Opera House (which is named after Bashar's father). At the end of the performance Bashar and his wife Asma held a reception. They stood in the large square outside, and the audience leaving the hall found itself facing the presidential couple. To help the audience overcome their embarrassment, the ushers took action and simply pushed those present toward the couple. A handshake, a smile, a glance, a short conversation. It's important for their image.

Lesch sees this incident as an example of the way in which Bashar Assad establishes his rule in Damascus. No longer is there the distance his father favored, no more residence in the military ivory tower. The president and his wife are said to go out, by private car, to eat in a restaurant or a cafe. That did, in fact, happen once or twice, far less often than the Syrians tend to talk about.

In an interview with Haaretz Lesch said Assad had "clearly evolved as a leader. When I first met with him in 2004, he was still a bit unsure. He was not totally in control domestically."

At the time, said Lesch, Assad had limited knowledge of the Arab-Israeli conflict and lacked basic information about U.S. foreign policy. Meetings with him were held in the presence of advisers and interpreters, who made sure he would not blurt out anything stupid. Now during meetings with interviewers, Assad sits by himself, relaxed.

The turning point that Lesch saw was the election of 2007, when he was "re-elected' in a referendum. The word "elected" does not quite fit the procedure in which the citizens of Syria can say "yes" or "no" to the continued tenure of the president. To ensure the outcome, the answer is written in sight of everyone in the room where the ballot box is located.

In those days Assad was recovering from two major crises: the murder of Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri and the Second Lebanon War. Hariri's murder forced the Syrians to withdraw its forces from Lebanon. A Syrian friend of Lesch told him: "We lost Beirut at the time, but we gained Damascus," because as a result of the crisis, Assad strengthened his hold in the corridors of power and ousted those who did not accept his policy. A year later, in 2006, Syria turned out to be one of the big winners of the Second Lebanon War. Assad was euphoric. His tough policy, his opposition to the American occupation in Iraq and the price he had paid for that in international isolation - all increased his popularity. In Damascus, people took to the city squares and cheered their president.

The 2007 elections were accompanied by demonstrations of support organized by the regime, and yet, said Lesch, they contained a degree of authenticity. Assad went out on the balcony of the modest house that serves as the presidential residence, pointed to families who were standing in the street and cheering him and hosted them for a few minutes on his balcony.

"I met with him just after he was elected," said Lesch, "and for the first time I really saw in him this level of self-satisfaction that I hadn't seen before. He has always been very modest and humble, self-deprecating even. This time he was ... in a cathartic expression of gratification that the people really liked him."

The meetings with Assad also provided Lesch with a rare glimpse into the manner in which the regime is run. "It is very interesting to see him work around the system," said Lesch. Assad once said to him, for example: "You know, I've signed 1,000 decrees, only four were implemented. Many times I have to work around the system to get anything done."

Assad is aware of the corruption and the opposition to change," and according to Lesch "it's very frustrating for him over the years to get any kind of serious reform." He knows that changes that go too far are liable to lose him the support of those who benefit from the corruption and from the existing situation. Lesch said that once, in a conversation about a project in which he is involved in Syria, "Bashar leaned over to me and said, 'How can we do this? We need to implement this. How do we get around these groups?'"

Assad is leading a policy of rapprochement with Israel, and Lesch said that "since it was the first time [he was] doing this, he cannot afford to fail. He has made his decision and he has an array of people around him who agree with him in terms of the idea of the negotiations with Israel. This is still a strategic choice. But there are elements who do not agree with this. This indicates to me that Bashar feels he has one shot at this, and he'd better get it right or he'll be forced to retrench from this foreign policy path he'd like to follow."

That's why, said Lesch, the president will agree to direct talks with Israel only if there is a good chance they will succeed.

Lesch described the atmosphere in Damascus as "sour." U.S. President Barack Obama did not mention Syria in his policy speech in Cairo. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked only to visit Damascus. In the wake of the speech, the Syrian press agency issued an official statement to the effect that Syria saw it as proof of "an absence of genuine Israeli desire to make peace in the region."

The West is still suspicious of the Syrian regime. The transfer of weapons to Hezbollah continues, and Hamas receives refuge in Damascus. Iran is a strategic ally. Is Bashar secretly promoting a nuclear program? Bashar denies it, Lesch doesn't know.

He quotes Assad as saying "that would be monumentally stupid for the Syrians to do, to develop a nuclear capability ... history is full of regimes who made monumentally stupid decisions."

When it comes to internal Syrian affairs Assad projects greater confidence. He is not paying a price for imprisoning human rights activists, there is no real threat to his regime and the opposition in exile is of no real importance. In the area of foreign relations he has not succeeded in totally breaking out of the isolation imposed on him years ago. He just went with his wife to the Republic of Georgia and earlier visited Qatar and France. His schedule is fuller than in the past, and he entertains many diplomats and foreign ministers who come to Damascus. But that is not enough. Assad is disturbed mainly by the continued coldness of the U.S. administration.

Last update - 04:44 21/06/2009

Assad spurns Netanyahu offer to resume peace talks

By Barak Ravid, Haaretz COrrespondent

Tags: Benjamin Netanyahu

Syrian President Bashar Assad rejected the offer of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for a resumption of peace talks between the two countries from "point zero." Assad commented on Netanyahu's proposal during a meeting with U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell they held in Damascus a week ago.

In talks with Mitchell, who had relayed Netanyahu's proposal, Assad requested that a direct line of communication be established between himself and President Barack Obama.

Mitchell had met with Netanyahu in Jerusalem about 10 days ago, and even though most of their meeting dealt with the Palestinian track, they also discussed the Syrian peace talks. Netanyahu told Mitchell he is interested in resuming the negotiations with Syria "without preconditions" and emphasized that "I am unwilling to commit in advance to a full withdrawal from the Golan Heights."

A source familiar with the details of Mitchell's meetings in Jerusalem and Damascus told Haaretz the U.S. envoy relayed the message to Assad in their meeting a few days later.

The Syrian president rejected the Israeli proposal and stressed that Israel is well aware that the basis for talks is full withdrawal from the Golan Heights. Assad said the negotiations should resume from the point at which they stopped under former prime minister Ehud Olmert, in other words, from the point at which the two sides had planned to formulate mutual commitments that would enable the talks to move to a direct negotiations stage. The indirect negotiations stopped some six months ago, following Operation Cast Lead, and the announcement of early elections in Israel.

Assad told Mitchell he would like to resume the indirect negotiations through Turkish mediation, but the same source said Netanyahu had informed the American envoy that Israel is opposed to Ankara's role in mediations. Netanyahu explained Israel's opposition as a development of Turkey's stance during the offensive in the Gaza Strip in January.

Friday, the daily Yedioth Aharonoth reported that Netanyahu had relayed messages to Syria on his wish to resume negotiations, but also said he was opposed to a complete withdrawal from the Golan Heights. According to the report Netanyahu and his aides are considering a proposal to France to undertake mediation efforts.

Haaretz has learned that during his talks in Israel Mitchell was informed that Israel is willing to negotiate with Syria on a regional basis in talks that would also involve Jordan and Lebanon and would involve an exchange of territory that would enable Israel to continue to hold several points on the Golan Heights. According to a source, when Mitchell raised the Israeli proposal, "they fell back laughing."

Share |

Last update - 12:46 21/06/2009

Which Iran would Israel bomb?

By Zvi Bar'el, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Iran, Iran election

Suddenly, there appears to be an Iranian people. Not just nuclear technology, extremist ayatollahs, the Holocaust-denying Ahmadinejad, and an axis of evil. All of a sudden, the ears need to be conditioned to hear other names: "'Mousawi' or 'Mousavi,' how is it pronounced exactly?"; Mehdi Karroubi; Khamenei ("It's not 'Khomeini'?"). Reports from Iranian bloggers fill the pages of the Hebrew press. Iranian commentators - in contrast to Iranian-affairs commentators - are now the leading pundits. The hot Internet connection with Radio Ran (the Persian-language radio station in Israel) is the latest gimmick. And most interesting and important is that the commentary on what is taking place in Iran is not being brought to the public by senior intelligence officers, but via images transmitted by television.

Israel is now gaining a more intimate, accurate familiarity with the Iranian public. The demonstrations have made quite clear that there is not one Iran or even two, but rather a number of Irans. There is the Iran that belongs to those who screamed, "Death to America and to Israel," and there is the Iran that screams, "Down with the dictator."

The entire world intently listened to Iran's supreme leader with the same anticipation and focus with which it received Barack Obama's speech in Cairo, perhaps even more so. The political sermon delivered by spiritual leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, which included couched threats against his opponents, proved that not everything is done on the command of the supreme leader. He too needs to heed public opinion, he too needs to compromise, he too is operating within a system that includes religious and political adversaries. In short, it was not the son of God who spoke on Friday, but a politician who needs to preserve his system of rule as well as his own legitimacy. Advertisement Khamenei, like his rivals, knows that even if the world believes that the elections were as pure as snow, there are still, by a conservative estimate, at least 15 million grown men and women - who make up over one-third of Iranian citizens who have the right to vote - who stand in opposition to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. These are Iranians with families and businesses. Some of them oppose his economic policies, others his nuclear policy; some object to his denial of the Holocaust or his anti-American stance, or perhaps all of these things together. It is still too early to predict how the demonstrators will act and in what fashion the Revolutionary Guards will respond, but this past week's events will leave a historic mark in post-revolutionary Iran. It is a mark that should also be seared into the minds of the West in general, and the United States and Israel in particular. All in all, 30 years have passed since the Khomeini revolution, and the Iranian public is now rebelling against the system. True, this constituency has twice elected a reformist president who disappointed, and this time it does not appear that it is ready to give up, at least not easily. But hundreds of thousands of demonstrators did not pour into the streets due to American intervention or threats from Israel. They want a better Iran for themselves, not for Obama or Benjamin Netanyahu. They will be the ones to determine what qualifies as a better Iran. This is the crux of the confusion that we have stumbled upon. The grand enemy that was neatly packaged into a nuclear, Shi'ite-religious container has come apart at the seams. On the one hand, it threatens, while on the other hand it demonstrates for democracy. On one street, it raises a fist against America, and in another alley, streams of protesters march for human rights. For goodness' sake, who is left to bomb? Until one week ago, the path was well-lit. An Israeli decision to strike depends on American policy, which depends on the outcome of the dialogue that President Obama seeks to begin with Iran. And, as military jargon so succinctly teaches us, the prescribed plan of action can be interrupted by unforeseen events. This is a segment of the Iranian population that is beginning to give rise to new questions. If there is a chance to change the system of rule - perhaps not now, but in the next Iranian election in four years - if there is a chance that Obama will gain greater leverage because the Iranian leader understands that he must compromise with his people, this will be a route that must be tried anew. All the more so when one gets the sneaky suspicion that the military challenge from a nuclear Iran does not pose as menacing a threat as we were warned to believe. If the head of the Mossad pushes the threat back to 2014, and since we place trust in our defense leaders whether they say the threat will be realized in another year or within a few months, and if the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency says it is impossible to prevent a state from acquiring know-how in the field of nuclear technology, there is no alternative but to explore the path that will weaken the motivation to use a nuclear weapon. And that is to speak with Iran through the Iranians. ]]] Last update - 20:15 20/06/2009 Ya'alon: Iran protests will lead to revolution By Haaretz Service Tags: Iran Election, Iran Nuclear Strategic Affairs Minister Moshe Ya'alon said Saturday he believes the ongoing demonstrations in Iran over last week's disputed election result will eventually lead to a revolution, Army Radio reported. "[Opposition leader] Mousavi and his wife have brought a new spirit of openness and freedom," Ya'alon was quoted as saying during a speech in Modi'in. "It is impossible to hide this energy - and therefore there will eventually be a revolution in Iran. Seventy percent of Iranians oppose the regime of the ayatollahs. I said that when I was the head of Military Intelligence, and I am saying it again now." Advertisement Ya'alon has made a similar assessment in the past. While serving as Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff, he said in a 2003 interview with Haaretz that "conditions have ripened for a revolution in Iran."

In the speech Saturday, Ya'alon added that despite the internal conflict in Iran, it is unlikely that the Islamic Republic's nuclear program will be slowed down or brought to a halt.

"What is happening now will not change the nuclear issue, but it is still a very encouraging development for the West," he was quoted as saying.

The minister's comments came after Mossad chief Meir Dagan told the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Tuesday that the unrest would end within a few days.

[img jew9]

Former IDF chief Moshe "Bugey" Ya'alon. (Dudu Bachar)

Last update - 13:50 27/05/2007

Ya'alon: Bring down Iran regime, send ground troops into Gaza

By Yuval Azoulay, Haaretz Correspondent

Attempts to prevent the nuclearization of Iran will fail, according to former Israel Defense Forces chief of staff Moshe Ya'alon, who asserted Saturday that the military option should be examined and the Iranian regime should be brought down.

Speaking on Channel 2's "Meet the Press," Ya'alon also proposed going into Gaza with massive ground forces to "clean" the area without taking it over for a long period. He said he feared that within a year terrorists would be firing Katyushas at Kiryat Gat and Ashdod. "No one will solve the problem in Gaza for us," he said.

"We will have to get at the terrorists and their workshops, which are the infrastructure of terror, and to strike them. We did this in Operation Defensive Shield. Before Defensive Shield we also debated, but in the end we carried it out wisely. You have to be blind not to see the necessity to go into the Strip. There is no choice," Ya'alon added.

The former IDF chief said he believed Mahmoud Abbas is not a relevant partner. He also expressed concern that escalation in the south might cause the northern front with Hezbollah to heat up. In addition, he said that anti-rocket systems the defense establishment has discussed are ineffective and do not provide a real response to the problem of Qassams and Katyushas.

According to Ya'alon, he prepared the IDF for a scenario like last year's Second Lebanon War. "With me as chief of staff, the war would have looked different," he said.

ANALYSIS / No one truly knows how the protests in Iran will end

By Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff

Tags: Intelligence, Israel News

A perusal of newspaper headlines this week may lead the reader to the mistaken conclusion that the revolution has already occured. Indeed, a revolution in Iran is an old Israeli hope. For Israel, the end of the ayatollahs' regime could be seen as belated compensation for the downfall of the friendly regime of the shah exactly 30 years ago. More importantly, Israel harbors the hope - not necessarily well-founded - that the Iranian nuclear program could still be checked without an aerial attack, Israeli or American. In 2003, then-chief of staff Moshe (Bogie) Ya'alon said in an interview with Haaretz that "conditions have ripened for a revolution in Iran."

It's still hard to anticipate how the wave of riots sweeping Iran - due to claims of election fraud after incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's alleged victory - will end. Most Israeli experts, academics and intelligence officials are not rushing to risk a prediction. The only one who has done so is Mossad chief Meir Dagan. On Tuesday, when he appeared before the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, he stated in his typically emphatic manner that the unrest would end within a few days.

D

ifferent circles in the local intelligence community are viewing the events differently. At the moment, it is hard to find an expert willing to bet the clash will end with the regime's downfall. This is not only due to a lack of information; it is doubtful whether the Iranians themselves know how things will end. "Nations do not always behave in a straightforward way," remarks one intelligence source.

Intelligence reports received by the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee indicate the regime is strong enough to survive the current upheaval. The election was fraudulent, but possibly not to the extent described in the Western media. Dagan even claimed, to the surprise of his listeners, that the Iranians had the same percentage of illegal ballots as in liberal democratic elections. Currently, no Western intelligence group has any definite proof of the extent of the fraud.

The regime's agreement to conduct a recount in some of the election districts is seen as a compromise designed to buy time and to calm the atmosphere; it does not constitute a real surrender. The Revolutionary Guards, one of Ahmadinejad's mainstays, has not been completely brought into the fray, but the security forces are suppressing some of the rallies violently.

Maj. Gen. (res.) Aharon Ze'evi Farkash, former head of Military Intelligence, said this week that Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei made a serious mistake in underestimating the scope of the rioting. The government will have to implement "significant changes" to reduce the damage, said Farkash. On the other hand, the ayatollahs and their followers have years of experience in amazingly efficient suppression of unrest, not to mention a built-in advantage: They know exactly how things look from the other side of the barricades. The previous revolution in Iran was, after all, their work.

The MKs heard that the regime is in a very uncomfortable situation, but far from collapse. Ahmadinejad's decision to visit Moscow midweek, in spite of the huge demonstrations by supporters of his moderate opponent, Mir Hossein Mousavi, has been interpreted as an attempt to demonstrate control, almost complacency. But the president had important reasons for meeting the Russians: One was apparently an attempt to convince Moscow to implement a deal, agreed on in principle several years ago, to supply the Iranians with advanced SE-300 anti-aircraft missile batteries.

Aiming for results

Toward the end of the week, Israeli officials were discussing the Iranian protest's momentum. So far, there are no signs it is waning: On the contrary, rioting has spread throughout the country, with demonstrations in most of the major cities. The brave step by the Iranian national soccer team's players, who entered the playing field during the World Cup qualifier against South Korea wearing green armbands (signifying solidarity with the protesters), imbued the struggle a dramatic, graphic image.

Apparently, the moderate conservatives, along with the reformists, are trying to pull strings behind the scenes. Mousavi, and former presidents Mohammad Khatami and Akhbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, are trying to translate the anger into political results. Rafsanjani also has a personal agenda: to return to a position of influence after being ousted by Khamenei and his followers. The members of the more moderate camp, who would be happy to see Ahmadinejad leave the government, are being cautious about a public clash with Khamenei, and are focusing on a demand for new elections. On the other hand, conservative and ultra-conservative forces are organizing behind Ahmadinejad - although they don't support him wholeheartedly.

The quality of Israeli forecasts on Iran is liable to be somewhat overshadowed by the serious tension between the Mossad and the Israel Defense Forces General Staff intelligence division, due to a professional dispute on another issue; Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi and Mossad Chief Dagan met recently to discuss this and ease the tension. As far as is known, they achieved relative success after addressing the problem of communications between Ashkenazi and Dagan, but did not deal with the same problem between the chief of the Mossad and MI head Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin.

Not only was Western intelligence surprised by the intensity of the protests in Iran. Even the regime itself was surprised, although its senior members have been obsessing for some time over fears of a "velvet revolution," such as those in the Czech Republic or Ukraine.

Khamenei met this week with the four presidential candidates and called for national unity. In attempting to calm the atmosphere, he told them they were "all his sons" - i.e., the sons of the revolution. Khameini - Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's heir since 1989, and a cleric whose word is law in Iran - also announced that he had instructed the chairman of the Council of Guardians, Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, to examine the claims of election fraud.

In any case, we can confidently assume that the regime will not announce that Ahmadinejad actually lost. The more pressing question is whether, beyond his involvement the present protest, Mousavi is capable of leading a move to change the regime. It's not only a matter of the balance of power: He is the flesh and blood of the Islamic Republic.

As opposed to the 1979 revolution, the protest camp lacks a "rebel" - a reformist, a charismatic figure like Khomeini, who specifically challenged the shah's government and demanded it be replaced. On Wednesday afternoon Mousavi took an important step when he publicly called for mass demonstrations yesterday, in spite of police opposition. When the violent demonstrations against the shah began, about a year before the revolution, almost nobody believed the result would be an Islamic regime. At first the shah was hesitant to exercise too much force, but when he did, it was too late. This time the government clearly is prepared to take a tough stance, due to its members concern that their future is in danger.

Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, a cleric close to Ahmadinejad, said during the 1999 demonstrations, "Islam is not a forgiving and conciliatory religion," and he issued a call to "uproot the weeds by the sword."

In Iran of 1979 the funerals of those killed in the demonstrations became a focus of unrest, which was followed by more casualties and more violent protests. The current regime apparently learned the lesson and is trying to prevent mass funerals for protesters. The reformists are satisfied with symbolic demonstrations of mourning.

"In the final analysis, the leaders of the demonstrations today are children of the Islamic Revolution," says Prof. David Menashri of Tel Aviv University. "They are seeking another path, but not the downfall of the current regime. These are problems 'in the family.' We must also recall that Khomeini kept himself above factionalism and camps. The present leadership is tainted by these ills. Khamenei is identified with Ahmadinejad, Rafsanjani with Mousavi. The problem of the reformists, many of whom are part of the government institutions, is that the opposition movement is currently stronger than its leader, Mousavi."

Beyond the soccer players, the most prominent aspect of the protest has been the use of technology to bypass the government: The current revolution is not being broadcast on television, but it is disseminating itself on Twitter. The regime can confine local media and forbid foreign correspondents from into the street, but its efforts to stop the transmission of text messages and block blogs and Web sites identified with the reformists have been only partially successful.

The centrifuges spin

Israel is particularly interested in how Iran's crisis will affect its nuclear project. If the regime overcomes the unrest, this may be used as an excuse to postpone dialogue with the United States. Any time that Iran gains as a result will be critical to advancing its nuclear program. On the other hand, the riots are eroding the last vestiges of the regime's international legitimacy. Iran has until now hidden behind a quasi-democratic mask. The strong suspicion of election fraud and the violent suppression of the protests are wearing down American and European patience. In exceptional circumstances, this could lead Tehran to a more moderate approach regarding the nuclear question, but in any scenario - and any regime - it is hard to see the Iranians giving up what they consider a strategic goal.

The second part of the Mossad leader's Knesset address this week also aroused numerous reactions. Dagan spoke about the new target date for the Iranian nuclear project: 2014. In effect, as we wrote here about two months ago, the gaps between the Israeli and American intelligence assessments are smaller than they seem, and stem mainly from a difference in definitions. The U.S. has chosen to emphasize the later date (the capability to install a nuclear warhead on a long-range missile, 2015), while Israel has focused on an earlier one (the capability to detonate a nuclear device, 2010-2011). The change in the Israeli assessment is due to a decision to focus on the more distant goal.

Dagan's words suit the more sober and cautious policy toward Iran that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu conveyed in his speech at Bar-Ilan University on Sunday. The two men's declarations are the result of clear messages from the U.S. administration. Israel's need to maintain silence is becoming only more acute in light of Iran's internal crisis. The last thing Iran's reformist camp needs now is public encouragement from Jerusalem or Washington. Meanwhile, U.S. President Barack Obama is being careful in this respect. This week he mentioned the historical precedent (the overthrow of the Mossadegh government in Iran in 1953, with CIA help), in order to explain the need for American restraint.

If Israel can understand the president's current policy toward Iran, it is having trouble doing so regarding North Korea. This week, at a discussion in the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University, Ze'evi Farkash described the "total impotence" of the Americans in the face of Pyongyang's provocations. There is "tremendous significance to Obama's failure" in the Iranian nuclear context as well, he said.

During that same discussion, Sima Shein, a former senior member of the National Security Council and the Mossad, said that in the past four years, the Iranians have chalked up an amazing success in advancing their nuclear program. "They are showing contempt for everyone, they haven't retreated and they haven't relinquished anything. Tehran is making it clear to Obama: We won't even talk about the nuclear program with you," she said.