Do Ashkenazi Jews have a right to self-determination
Please someone help me! Tell me what it is that unites the above Jews in the picture above? What else could it possibly be besides religion? Do the above people have the same pristine 'Jewish blood' flowing through their golden veins? The notion that 'Jews' are a people like Chinese are a people, like Nigerians are a people it totally bunkrupt! Look at the pictures above! If Ashkenazi Jewry wanted 'Self-determination' why go plundering the lands of people of color? Yes, indeed, not a square inch of land belonging to white people in general (North America, Iceland, Australia, entire Europe) was considered for the stampede of Ashkenazi Euro Jewry. Let's look at the lands that were under serious consideration for European Jewry's 'Self-determination'.
Palestine
Uganda-Kenya
Cyprus
Argentina
Madagascar
What do the above lands have in common? They were and are inhabited by people of color who did not possess white people's kind of arsenal to ward off a stampeding and invading European Jewry.
Why are European Ashkenazi Jews who in our times go by so many hyphenated-names (Israeli-Canadian, Israeli-American (I don't think Ashkenazi Jews like to hyphenate their fake identity of 'Israeli' with a European country))? Here is what Prof. Shlomo Sand, author of a best-selling book: "When and How the Jewish People Was Invented" said when asked: "Why do you think the idea of the Khazar origins is so threatening (to Ashkenazi Jews)?"
"It is clear that the fear is of an undermining of the historic right to the land. The revelation that the Jews are not from Judea would ostensibly knock the legitimacy for our being here out from under us. Since the beginning of the period of decolonization, settlers have no longer been able to say simply: 'We came, we won and now we are here' the way the Americans, the whites in South Africa and the Australians said. There is a very deep fear that doubt will be cast on our right to exist."
May I ask: If European Jewry could stampede to other people's land and establish 'Self-determination' why can't and shouldn't gay people? If you think about it, Jewry's claim to 'Self-determination' is no different than any other group of people with a common thread, a binding aspect to their lives, and who as a group are also discriminated against due to the specific issue that they have in common. Gays would love it if they could do 'Self-determination' on a conquered and vanquished land of people of color. Imagine how much easier they could live their lives, not ever having to explain or apologize for their life style. Imagine how much happier short people could be if some superpower would allocate to them a land of people of color by cleansing the land of its inhabitants for the benefit of short people. Short people could then build auto industry and build cars only for short people, design their homes with short people in mind. Life would be dandy for the gay people and the short people if this fantasy were to be translated into reality! European Jewry's theft of Palestine is no different from the example I gave above. Their case was strictly a white European people up against another white European people -European Ashkenazi Jews who are indeed Khazars. The way they decided to solve their squabbles was to find a solution to the 'Jewish Question' that would be a win-win situation for both warring groups. They decided that some poor and unarmed people of color somewhere on the planet were to pay a heavy price and European Jewry's axe fell on Palestine!
Here is Theodor Herzl:
London, October 23, 1902
Talked yesterday with the famous master-figure of England, Joe Chamberlain. One hour. I explained to him all of my intentions, and he listened carefully. Unfortunately, my voice quivered a little at first, which, as I spoke, more than a little annoyed me. After a few minutes, however, things improved and I talked with quiet vigor, so far as my helter-skelter English permitted.
Addressing myself to Joe Chamberlain's imperturbable musk, I presented the entire Jewish question as I understood it and desired to solve it. My negotiations with Turkey, etc.
"I am in negotiations with the Sultan," I said [Herzl's English verbatim] ... Now I have time to negotiate, but my people has not. They are starving the Pale. I must bring them an immediate help. Etc.
Then I brought up the territory which I desired to obtain from England: Cyprus, El Arish and the Sinai Peninsula.
He begun by saying that he could speak only about Cyprus. The rest was not his concern but that of the Foreign Office. As to Cyprus, this was how matters stood:
The Island was inhabited by Greeks and Moslems, whom he could not evict for the sake of newcomers. Indeed, he was in duty bound to stand by them. Now, if the Greeks-encouraged perhaps by Greece and Russia-were to resist a Jewish immigration, the difficulties would be insuperable. Personally, he had nothing against the Jews. On the contrary, if by chance he were to have a drop of Jewish blood in his veins, he would be proud of it; but Voila, he didn't have a drop.
He was willing, however, to help if he could: He liked the Zionist idea. If I could show him a spot among the British possessions which was not yet inhabited by white settlers, then we could talk.
There you have it! That was a European Ashkenazi Jew making deals not with the owners of the lands but with the white European colonizers of the lands.
Notice how Herzl did not seem to have any problem if the land were inhabited by the indigenous people; those were easily dispensable! His concern was not to touch a land that had white settlers in it! Why? It was a matter of force! He and his European Khazaric tribe could not do it! It was not out of consideration for white Europeans but out of fear of getting whacked by white Europeans who did in fact have the means to inflict severe injury upon white Jewry!
Notice also how Herzl had a very unique and consistent style of dealing with those whom he looked down upon and he considered dispensable: people of color! In the example above, he did not care about 'Moslems' who also inhabited Cyprus; his concern was setters of European origin. Therefore he mentioned how the Greeks might resist Euroopean Jewry's stampede to Cyprus but not how the Moslems might resist European Ashkenazi encroachment of their land. Herzl understood that people of color were in much weaker position militarily and financially than white European settlers.
Notice also how Herzl who did not have a drop of 'Jewish blood' in his veins due to the fact he was a European Khazar and if anyone is going to make references to 'Jewish blood', that blood could only be present in the viens of those Jews who originate from the Arab region and not any Ashkenazi Jewry (European blood), Ethiopian Jewry (African blood) or Ugandan Jewry (Afrian blood).
There is one very important point why Ashkenazi Jews decided to be deceptive and latched on to this very bankrupt idea of 'Self-determination'. 'Self-determination' for Jewry on any piece of land on the globe held by white people of European origin was out of the question. Indeed, the white Europeans desired more than any other political issue the riddance of white European Jewry from their land. Therefore, it would be contrary to logic that white Ashekazi Jewry would have attemtped 'Self-determination' on any European soil. They stole ARAB Palestine and because they did not want to be eternally perceived as the stampeding, colonizing and murdering white European Jews, they decided to come up with 'Self-determination'. Let me know when gays and short people have attained the fantasy of 'self-determination'.