What I would like to do in this section is to respond to the settler's statements individually.

Settler: There 'are some Jews that you adore'.... I've heard that put differently as 'some of my best friends are Jews'... a favorite quote from anti Semites in general...

My response:

(a) Yes, me too, I have heard 'some of my best friends are blacks'. I guess we are even.

(b) one has to be a semitic for another to be anti-semitic against the semitic. Since European Ashkenazi Jews constitute 90% of world Jewry, it is the wrong terminology. I would prefer 'anti-Jew'. It makes the point.

(c) The number of Jews who are truly for peace and justice with no hidden agendas are extremely few, but their greatness cannot be taken away from them just because the overwhelming members of their Ashkenazi tribe seem to have no problem making an innocent people, the Arabs, pay the price for whatever took place between the European Jews and the rest of the European people. Therefore my statement that 'There are some Jews that I adore' was meant to convey the message that I could care less which way you are facing as you pray, all that I care about is that you cease being predators, as you obviously are, seeking entitlement for your sustenance from Arab soil based on your 'Jewishness'.

Settler: But to get to your question, the answer lies in the fact that you obviously know little or nothing about Jews or Palestinians.

My Response: Yes, you the know-it-all decides who is an 'outsider' and who is an 'insider', and I guess the preferred title of 'insider' is already claimed by you, therefore I am the outsider. I have heard various versions of this statement from others, such as Dershowitz claiming that those who have not visited the malignant tumor cannot authoritatively speak about it since -unlike him- they have not been there. Another one of the settlers who is known for his 'progressiveness' wrote that unlike Dershowitz that he - the settler predator - does live within the malignant tumor. I guess those who have not been to the moon should not claim to have knowledge about the moon. It is a conceited attitude and I resent it coming from a settler who has no business being on Arab soil - sucking in Arab resources - the entitlement for residence deriving from 'Jewishness'

Settler: We share a common ancestry, our religions are very closely linked and similar, our languages as well... in effect, we are one people.

My Response: You see, Mr. Settler sooner or later, I knew you were about to make the most absurd claim. How does the European Ashkenazi Jew share ancestry with the Arab people, be it Arab Christian, Arab Muslim or Arab Jew? Yes, indeed, the Palestinian Jews were Arab Jews and yes they can claim to have common ancestry with their Palestinian Christian and Muslim brothers, since they are the same people who practice different religions. But how does the European Ashkenazi Jew come to have the same ancestry? That is why I decided to demonstrate via pictures who 'the Jews' are. Why is it that European Ashkenazi Jews have such a propostrous claim and seem to have no value for their own European ancestry and heritage? A Chinese Muslim never claims to be from the place where his religion originates, nor the Italian catholic nor the Nigerian Muslim. Why is it that Ashkenazi Jews continue to claim the most ridiculous claim and no one is sneering at them? What I find baffling about this issue is that the Ashkenazi Jews - against all logic and reality - seem to cling to something that does not belong to them. In the farthest villages of the globe, poor farmers who don't have much material acquisition would never relinquish their own heritage and customs, the only exception are the European Ashkenazi Jews, and I could not find the answers as to what makes these people resort to mass-hysteria if anyone points the truth to them.

Settler: I must say however, that I looked closer at your site than I did before. I like the posts that you link to, but to be honest with you found the smiley section quite offensive and full of misinformation.

My response: Oh shucks! If you go, where shall I go? What shall I do? That was a direct quote from Scarlet O'Hara begging Rhett Butler in 'Gone with the wind'. But you see Settler, it is like a recipe, there are certain folks that are favored by the predators of Palestine, and those are that do not point out to you all your pretences, that in the midst of the struggle to free Palestine from the clutches of International Jewry are those who have placed themselves conveniently to do damage control on behalf of their tribe. I have no illusions that many of your kind would link to my site. Next time Settler, look carefully and make sure that those who have genuine concerns for the Palestinian people remain out of view. Btw: I don't link to other sites - a site design consideration, and the only one that I link to are the 'Al-Ahram' folks because they say it as it is, and a great activist who happens to be, I guess, 'Jewish'?

The Settler also mentioned the 'smiley' section of my blog, devoted to those great people who did in fact struggle for peace in the world: Edwin M Wright, Livia Rokach, Jeff Blankfort, Hassan Nasrallah, Kurt Nimmo, Edward Said, George Galloway, Israel Shahak. I wonder what could be so 'offensive' about posting articles by these great individuals? There is hardly any of my own commentaries within those links ... so I must wonder why the Settler used the word 'offensive'? I also wonder if the Settler noticed that out of the nine people with a 'smiley' next to their name on my blog (meaning that I liked what they wrote and that I had trust in them), four are Jews. Food for thought.

Settler: Would you prefer I leave here and no longer confront the Israeli authorities face to face on a daily basis as I have been doing for twenty five years? The criteria that qualifies me to be here is to demand that this land be given back to its rightful owners. Do you have a problem with that or would you rather only zionazi settlers live here instead?

My Response: I have looked at your site and specially at the time you launched it where you seem to be ecstatic describing what it was like to be in the Holy land during the holidays. I guess so. You left no room for doubt that you are so similar to Herzl and other emotional Jews who consider the Holy land of three religions their exclusive domain. Again, you statements are full of holes, holes of deception. You don't have to be sucking in Arab resources to fight for the Palestinian freedom. Are you engaged in physical confrontation, the only reason where you physical presence would be required? You are blogging, right, and you can blog from any place on the planet. And your statement about you being on Arab soil 'to demand that this land be given back to its rightful owners' is in direct contradiction to your statement "I am so confident that one day we will live in peace together. I know it can be done!" You see settler, if you are always telling the truth, then there won't be such contradictory statements coming out of you.

In conclusion, let me state what I once heard a Palestinian activist woman say. She was asking her audience why there seemed to be Jews everywhere attempting to speak on behalf of the Palestinians in disproportionate numbers to their percentages. She wondered where were the great Arab people speaking on their own behalf. She expressed concern that most of the Jews with divided loyalties are not the best people to rely upon to seek justice for Palestine. But she also explained that those great Arab speakers rarely get the podium to speak from, specially the kind of podium where they can manage to reach the ears of millions of people. Those are off-limits to Arabic and Islamic types of people unless of course they happen to be those that are willing to betray their people for fame and fortune, and there are many of them.